Difference between revisions of "RFC6548"

From RFC-Wiki
imported>Admin
(Created page with " Internet Architecture Board (IAB) N. Brownlee, Ed.Request for Comments: 6548 The University of AucklandObsoletes: 5620 ...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Internet Architecture Board (IAB)                      N. Brownlee, Ed.
 +
Request for Comments: 6548                    The University of Auckland
 +
Obsoletes: 5620                                                      IAB
 +
Category: Informational                                        June 2012
 +
ISSN: 2070-1721
  
 +
              Independent Submission Editor Model
  
 
+
'''Abstract'''
 
 
 
 
 
 
Internet Architecture Board (IAB)                      N. Brownlee, Ed.Request for Comments: 6548                    The University of AucklandObsoletes: 5620                                                      IABCategory: Informational                                        June 2012ISSN: 2070-1721
 
 
 
              Independent Submission Editor Model
 
Abstract
 
  
 
This document describes the function and responsibilities of the RFC
 
This document describes the function and responsibilities of the RFC
Line 20: Line 19:
 
Oversight Committee (IAOC).
 
Oversight Committee (IAOC).
  
Status of This Memo
+
'''Status of This Memo'''
  
 
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
 
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
Line 35: Line 34:
 
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6548.
 
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6548.
  
Copyright Notice
+
'''Copyright Notice'''
  
 
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
Line 46: Line 45:
 
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 
to this document.
 
to this document.
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
== Introduction ==
 
== Introduction ==
  
The RFC Editor Model [RFC6635] defines a set of streams that produce
+
The RFC Editor Model [[RFC6635]] defines a set of streams that produce
 
draft RFCs, which are submitted for publication.  This document
 
draft RFCs, which are submitted for publication.  This document
 
defines the management function for the Independent Submission
 
defines the management function for the Independent Submission
 
stream, specifically the role of Independent Submission Editor (ISE).
 
stream, specifically the role of Independent Submission Editor (ISE).
This document is a derivative of [RFC5620], Section 3.2, and was
+
This document is a derivative of [[RFC5620]], Section 3.2, and was
separated out from [RFC6635].
+
separated out from [[RFC6635]].
  
This document obsoletes [RFC5620] in combination with [RFC6635].
+
This document obsoletes [[RFC5620]] in combination with [[RFC6635]].
  
 
== Independent Submission Editor ==
 
== Independent Submission Editor ==
  
 
The ISE is an individual who is responsible for the Independent
 
The ISE is an individual who is responsible for the Independent
Submission stream of RFCs, as defined by [RFC4844].  The Independent
+
Submission stream of RFCs, as defined by [[RFC4844]].  The Independent
 
Submission stream and the ISE are not under the authority or
 
Submission stream and the ISE are not under the authority or
 
direction of the RSE or the RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC)
 
direction of the RSE or the RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC)
(see [RFC6635]).  As noted below, the ISE is appointed by and is
+
(see [[RFC6635]]).  As noted below, the ISE is appointed by and is
 
responsible directly to the IAB.
 
responsible directly to the IAB.
  
Line 84: Line 78:
  
 
2.  Thorough familiarity with the RFC series.
 
2.  Thorough familiarity with the RFC series.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
3.  An ability to define and constitute advisory and document review
 
3.  An ability to define and constitute advisory and document review
Line 106: Line 94:
 
6.  The ability to work effectively in a multi-actor environment with
 
6.  The ability to work effectively in a multi-actor environment with
 
     divided authority and responsibility similar to that described in
 
     divided authority and responsibility similar to that described in
     [RFC6635].
+
     [[RFC6635]].
  
 
=== Responsibilities ===
 
=== Responsibilities ===
Line 122: Line 110:
  
 
4.  Defining and developing the scope of the Independent Submission
 
4.  Defining and developing the scope of the Independent Submission
     stream as a part of the overall RFC Editor function [RFC6635].
+
     stream as a part of the overall RFC Editor function [[RFC6635]].
  
 
5.  Reviewing and approving RFC errata for Independent Submissions.
 
5.  Reviewing and approving RFC errata for Independent Submissions.
Line 136: Line 124:
 
appropriate.  Such an Advisory Board exists at the pleasure of the
 
appropriate.  Such an Advisory Board exists at the pleasure of the
 
ISE, and its members serve at the pleasure of the ISE.
 
ISE, and its members serve at the pleasure of the ISE.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
The individual with the listed qualifications is selected by the IAB
 
The individual with the listed qualifications is selected by the IAB
 
after input has been collected from the community.  An approach
 
after input has been collected from the community.  An approach
 
similar to the one used by the IAB to select an IAOC member every
 
similar to the one used by the IAB to select an IAOC member every
other year as described in [RFC4333] should be used.
+
other year as described in [[RFC4333]] should be used.
  
 
While the ISE itself is considered a volunteer function, the IAB
 
While the ISE itself is considered a volunteer function, the IAB
Line 167: Line 148:
  
 
This document has no specific security implications, however the same
 
This document has no specific security implications, however the same
security considerations as those in [RFC4846] and [RFC4844] apply.
+
security considerations as those in [[RFC4846]] and [[RFC4844]] apply.
  
 
== IAB Members at the Time of Approval ==
 
== IAB Members at the Time of Approval ==
Line 178: Line 159:
  
 
Generous thanks to Joel Hapern for all his help with this document,
 
Generous thanks to Joel Hapern for all his help with this document,
and for all his work on [RFC6635]).  Thanks also to the IAB members,
+
and for all his work on [[RFC6635]]).  Thanks also to the IAB members,
 
whose comments and suggestions were both welcome and useful.
 
whose comments and suggestions were both welcome and useful.
  
Line 185: Line 166:
 
=== Normative References ===
 
=== Normative References ===
  
[RFC4846]  Klensin, J. and D. Thaler, "Independent Submissions to the           RFC Editor", [[RFC4846|RFC 4846]], July 2007.
+
[[RFC4846]]  Klensin, J. and D. Thaler, "Independent Submissions to the
[RFC4844]  Daigle, L., Ed. and IAB, "The RFC Series and RFC Editor",          [[RFC4844|RFC 4844]], July 2007.
+
          RFC Editor", [[RFC4846|RFC 4846]], July 2007.
  
 +
[[RFC4844]]  Daigle, L., Ed. and IAB, "The RFC Series and RFC Editor",
 +
          [[RFC4844|RFC 4844]], July 2007.
  
 +
=== Informative References ===
  
 +
[[RFC4333]]  Huston, G. and B. Wijnen, "The IETF Administrative
 +
          Oversight Committee (IAOC) Member Selection Guidelines and
 +
          Process", [[BCP113|BCP 113]], [[RFC4333|RFC 4333]], December 2005.
  
 +
[[RFC5620]]  Kolkman, O. and IAB, "RFC Editor Model (Version 1)",
 +
          [[RFC5620|RFC 5620]], August 2009.
  
 +
[[RFC6635]]  Kolkman, O., Ed., Halpern, J., Ed., and IAB, "RFC Editor
 +
          Model (Version 2)", [[RFC6635|RFC 6635]], June 2012.
  
=== Informative References ===
 
 
[RFC4333]  Huston, G. and B. Wijnen, "The IETF Administrative          Oversight Committee (IAOC) Member Selection Guidelines and          Process", [[BCP113|BCP 113]], [[RFC4333|RFC 4333]], December 2005.
 
[RFC5620]  Kolkman, O. and IAB, "RFC Editor Model (Version 1)",          [[RFC5620|RFC 5620]], August 2009.
 
[RFC6635]  Kolkman, O., Ed., Halpern, J., Ed., and IAB, "RFC Editor          Model (Version 2)", [[RFC6635|RFC 6635]], June 2012.
 
 
Authors' Addresses
 
Authors' Addresses
  
Line 204: Line 190:
  
  
 
  
 
Internet Architecture Board
 
Internet Architecture Board
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
[[Category:Informational]]
 
[[Category:Informational]]

Latest revision as of 14:00, 1 October 2020

Internet Architecture Board (IAB) N. Brownlee, Ed. Request for Comments: 6548 The University of Auckland Obsoletes: 5620 IAB Category: Informational June 2012 ISSN: 2070-1721

              Independent Submission Editor Model

Abstract

This document describes the function and responsibilities of the RFC Independent Submission Editor (ISE). The Independent Submission stream is one of the stream producers that create draft RFCs, with the ISE as its stream approver. The ISE is overall responsible for activities within the Independent Submission stream, working with draft editors and reviewers, and interacts with the RFC Production Center and Publisher, and the RFC Series Editor (RSE). The ISE is appointed by the IAB, and also interacts with the IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC).

Status of This Memo

This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.

This document is a product of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) and represents information that the IAB has deemed valuable to provide for permanent record. Documents approved for publication by the IAB are not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.

Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6548.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.

Introduction

The RFC Editor Model RFC6635 defines a set of streams that produce draft RFCs, which are submitted for publication. This document defines the management function for the Independent Submission stream, specifically the role of Independent Submission Editor (ISE). This document is a derivative of RFC5620, Section 3.2, and was separated out from RFC6635.

This document obsoletes RFC5620 in combination with RFC6635.

Independent Submission Editor

The ISE is an individual who is responsible for the Independent Submission stream of RFCs, as defined by RFC4844. The Independent Submission stream and the ISE are not under the authority or direction of the RSE or the RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC) (see RFC6635). As noted below, the ISE is appointed by and is responsible directly to the IAB.

Qualifications

The ISE is a senior position for which the following qualifications are desired:

1. Technical competence, i.e., broad technical experience and

   perspective across a wide range of Internet technologies and
   applications, and also the ability to work effectively with
   portions of that spectrum in which they have no personal
   expertise.

2. Thorough familiarity with the RFC series.

3. An ability to define and constitute advisory and document review

   arrangements.  If those arrangements include an Editorial Board
   similar to the current one or some equivalent arrangement, the
   ability to assess the technical competence of potential Editorial
   Board members (see Section 3).

4. Good standing in the technical community, in and beyond the IETF.

5. Demonstrated editorial skills, good command of the English

   language, and demonstrated history of being able to work
   effectively with technical documents and materials created by
   others.

6. The ability to work effectively in a multi-actor environment with

   divided authority and responsibility similar to that described in
   RFC6635.

Responsibilities

The ISE is an individual who may have assistants and who is responsible for:

1. Maintaining technical quality of the Independent Submission

   stream.

2. Reviewing, approving, and processing Independent Submissions.

3. Forwarding draft RFCs in the Independent Submission stream to the

   RFC Production Center.

4. Defining and developing the scope of the Independent Submission

   stream as a part of the overall RFC Editor function RFC6635.

5. Reviewing and approving RFC errata for Independent Submissions.

6. Coordinating work and conforming to general RFC Series policies

   as specified by the IAB and RSE.

7. Providing statistics and documentation as requested by the RSE

   and/or IAOC.

The ISE may choose to select individuals to participate in an Advisory Board for assistance in special topics as the ISE deems appropriate. Such an Advisory Board exists at the pleasure of the ISE, and its members serve at the pleasure of the ISE.

The individual with the listed qualifications is selected by the IAB after input has been collected from the community. An approach similar to the one used by the IAB to select an IAOC member every other year as described in RFC4333 should be used.

While the ISE itself is considered a volunteer function, the IAB considers maintaining the Independent Submission stream part of the IAB's supported activities. Therefore, the IAOC should include these costs in the IASA budget.

Independent Submission Editorial Board

The ISE is supported by an Editorial Board for the review of Independent Submission stream documents. This board is known as the Independent Submission Editorial Board. This volunteer Editorial Board exists at the pleasure of the ISE, and its members serve at the pleasure of the ISE. The existence of this board is simply noted within this model, and additional discussion of such is considered out of scope of this document.

Security Considerations

This document has no specific security implications, however the same security considerations as those in RFC4846 and RFC4844 apply.

IAB Members at the Time of Approval

Bernard Aboba, Ross Callon, Alissa Cooper, Joel Halpern, Spencer Dawkins, Russ Housley, David Kessens, Olaf Kolkman, Danny McPherson, Jon Peterson, Andrei Robachevsky, Dave Thaler, Hannes Tschofenig.

Acknowledgements

Generous thanks to Joel Hapern for all his help with this document, and for all his work on RFC6635). Thanks also to the IAB members, whose comments and suggestions were both welcome and useful.

References

Normative References

RFC4846 Klensin, J. and D. Thaler, "Independent Submissions to the

          RFC Editor", RFC 4846, July 2007.

RFC4844 Daigle, L., Ed. and IAB, "The RFC Series and RFC Editor",

          RFC 4844, July 2007.

Informative References

RFC4333 Huston, G. and B. Wijnen, "The IETF Administrative

          Oversight Committee (IAOC) Member Selection Guidelines and
          Process", BCP 113, RFC 4333, December 2005.

RFC5620 Kolkman, O. and IAB, "RFC Editor Model (Version 1)",

          RFC 5620, August 2009.

RFC6635 Kolkman, O., Ed., Halpern, J., Ed., and IAB, "RFC Editor

          Model (Version 2)", RFC 6635, June 2012.

Authors' Addresses

Nevil Brownlee (editor) The University of Auckland

EMail: [email protected]

Internet Architecture Board

EMail: [email protected]