Difference between revisions of "RFC3529"

From RFC-Wiki
imported>Admin
(Created page with " Network Working Group W. HaroldRequest for Comments: 3529 IBMCategory: Experimental ...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Network Working Group                                          W. Harold
 +
Request for Comments: 3529                                          IBM
 +
Category: Experimental                                        April 2003
  
 +
    Using Extensible Markup Language-Remote Procedure Calling
 +
    (XML-RPC) in Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP)
  
 +
Status of this Memo
  
 +
This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
 +
community.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
 +
Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
 +
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
  
 +
Copyright Notice
  
 +
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003).  All Rights Reserved.
  
Network Working Group                                          W. HaroldRequest for Comments: 3529                                          IBMCategory: Experimental                                        April 2003
 
 
    Using Extensible Markup Language-Remote Procedure Calling    (XML-RPC) in Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP)
 
Status of this Memo
 
This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internetcommunity.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
 
Copyright Notice
 
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003).  All Rights Reserved.
 
 
Abstract
 
Abstract
  
Line 26: Line 31:
 
Protocol (BEEP) to transfer messages encoded in the XML-RPC format
 
Protocol (BEEP) to transfer messages encoded in the XML-RPC format
 
between clients and servers.
 
between clients and servers.
 +
 +
Table of Contents
 +
 +
1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
 +
2.  BEEP Profile Identification  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
 +
    2.1  Profile  Initialization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
 +
3.  XML-RPC Message Packages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
 +
4.  XML-RPC Message Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
 +
5.  URL Schemes  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
 +
    5.1  The xmlrpc.beep URL Scheme. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
 +
        5.1.1 Resolving IP/TCP Address  Information . . . . . .  6
 +
    5.2  The xmlrpc.beeps URL Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
 +
6.  Initial Registrations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
 +
    6.1  Registration: The XML-RPC Profile . . . . . . . . . . .  9
 +
    6.2  Registration: The xmlrpc.beep URL Scheme. . . . . . . .  9
 +
 +
    6.3  Registration: The xmlrpc.beeps URL Scheme . . . . . . . 10
 +
    6.4  Registration: The System (Well-Known) TCP port number
 +
        for XML-RPC over BEEP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
 +
7.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
 +
8.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
 +
Appendix
 +
A. Acknowledgements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
 +
B. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
 +
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
 +
Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
  
 
== Introduction ==
 
== Introduction ==
Line 56: Line 87:
 
The "serverName" attribute is analogous to HTTP's "Host" request-
 
The "serverName" attribute is analogous to HTTP's "Host" request-
 
header field (c.f., Section 14.23 of [3]).
 
header field (c.f., Section 14.23 of [3]).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
There are two states in the BEEP profile for XML-RPC, "boot", the
 
There are two states in the BEEP profile for XML-RPC, "boot", the
Line 89: Line 108:
 
   "RPY" message containing a response.
 
   "RPY" message containing a response.
  
2.1 Profile Initialization
+
=== Profile Initialization ===
  
 
The boot message is used to identify the resource accessed by the
 
The boot message is used to identify the resource accessed by the
Line 114: Line 133:
 
Typically, the boot message and its response are exchanged during
 
Typically, the boot message and its response are exchanged during
 
channel initialization (c.f., Section 2.3.1.2 of [2]).
 
channel initialization (c.f., Section 2.3.1.2 of [2]).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
For example, here the boot message and its response are exchanged
 
For example, here the boot message and its response are exchanged
Line 170: Line 182:
 
   I:        <value><i4>41</i4></value>
 
   I:        <value><i4>41</i4></value>
 
   I:      </param>
 
   I:      </param>
 
 
 
 
  
 
   I:    </params>
 
   I:    </params>
Line 214: Line 222:
 
present, a "generic" URL scheme for XML-RPC is not defined.
 
present, a "generic" URL scheme for XML-RPC is not defined.
  
5.1 The xmlrpc.beep URL Scheme
+
=== The xmlrpc.beep URL Scheme ===
  
 
The "xmlrpc.beep" URL scheme uses the "generic URI" syntax defined in
 
The "xmlrpc.beep" URL scheme uses the "generic URI" syntax defined in
Line 223: Line 231:
 
o  the server-based naming authority defined in Section 3.2.2 of [5]
 
o  the server-based naming authority defined in Section 3.2.2 of [5]
 
   is used for the authority component.
 
   is used for the authority component.
 
 
 
 
  
 
o  the path component maps to the "resource" component of the boot
 
o  the path component maps to the "resource" component of the boot
Line 241: Line 245:
 
might result in the example shown in Section 2.1.
 
might result in the example shown in Section 2.1.
  
5.1.1 Resolving IP/TCP Address Information
+
==== Resolving IP/TCP Address Information ====
  
 
The "xmlrpc.beep" URL scheme indicates the use of the BEEP profile
 
The "xmlrpc.beep" URL scheme indicates the use of the BEEP profile
Line 275: Line 279:
 
number used is assigned by the IANA for the registration in Section
 
number used is assigned by the IANA for the registration in Section
 
6.4.
 
6.4.
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
While the use of literal IPv6 addresses in URLs is discouraged, if a
 
While the use of literal IPv6 addresses in URLs is discouraged, if a
Line 285: Line 284:
 
to the syntax specified in [7].
 
to the syntax specified in [7].
  
5.2 The xmlrpc.beeps URL Scheme
+
=== The xmlrpc.beeps URL Scheme ===
  
 
The "xmlrpc.beeps" URL scheme is identical, in all ways, to the
 
The "xmlrpc.beeps" URL scheme is identical, in all ways, to the
Line 329: Line 328:
 
     S:
 
     S:
 
     S: <greeting>
 
     S: <greeting>
 
 
 
 
  
 
     S:  <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/TLS' />
 
     S:  <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/TLS' />
Line 382: Line 377:
 
     C: </start>
 
     C: </start>
 
     C: END
 
     C: END
 
 
 
 
  
 
     S: RPY 0 2 . 341 402
 
     S: RPY 0 2 . 341 402
Line 397: Line 388:
 
== Initial Registrations ==
 
== Initial Registrations ==
  
6.1 Registration: The XML-RPC Profile
+
=== Registration: The XML-RPC Profile ===
  
 
Profile Identification: http://iana.org/beep/transient/xmlrpc
 
Profile Identification: http://iana.org/beep/transient/xmlrpc
Line 417: Line 408:
 
Contact Information: Ward Harold <[email protected]>
 
Contact Information: Ward Harold <[email protected]>
  
6.2 Registration: The xmlrpc.beep URL Scheme
+
=== Registration: The xmlrpc.beep URL Scheme ===
  
 
URL scheme name: xmlrpc.beep
 
URL scheme name: xmlrpc.beep
Line 434: Line 425:
  
 
Security Considerations: c.f., Section 7
 
Security Considerations: c.f., Section 7
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
Relevant Publications: c.f., [1], and [2]
 
Relevant Publications: c.f., [1], and [2]
Line 446: Line 432:
 
Author/Change controller: the IESG
 
Author/Change controller: the IESG
  
6.3 Registration: The xmlrpc.beeps URL Scheme
+
=== Registration: The xmlrpc.beeps URL Scheme ===
  
 
URL scheme name: xmlrpc.beeps
 
URL scheme name: xmlrpc.beeps
Line 471: Line 457:
 
Author/Change controller: the IESG
 
Author/Change controller: the IESG
  
6.4 Registration: The System (Well-Known) TCP port number for XML-RPC
+
=== Registration: The System (Well-Known) TCP port number for XML-RPC ===
 
  over BEEP
 
  over BEEP
  
Line 487: Line 473:
  
 
Contact Information: Ward Harold <[email protected]>
 
Contact Information: Ward Harold <[email protected]>
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
== Security Considerations ==
 
== Security Considerations ==
Line 516: Line 497:
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
  
[1]  Winer, D., "XML-RPC Specification", January 1999,     http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec
+
[1]  Winer, D., "XML-RPC Specification", January 1999,
[2]  Rose, M., "The Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol Core", RFC    3080, March 2001.
+
    http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec
[3]  Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L.,    Leach, P. and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol --    HTTP/1.1", [[RFC2616|RFC 2616]], June 1999.
 
[4]  Murata, M., St. Laurent, S. and D. Kohn, "XML Media Types", RFC    3023, January 2001.
 
[5]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource    Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", [[RFC2396|RFC 2396]], August 1998.
 
[6]  Gulbrandsen, A., Vixie, P. and L. Esibov, "A DNS RR for    specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)", [[RFC2782|RFC 2782]],    February 2000.
 
[7]  Hinden, R., Carpenter, B. and L. Masinter, "Format for Literal    IPv6 Addresses in URL's", [[RFC2732|RFC 2732]], December 1999.
 
[8]  Elkins, M., Del Torto, D., Levien, R. and T. Roessler, "MIME    Security with OpenPGP", [[RFC3156|RFC 3156]], August 2001.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[9]  Newman, C., "Using TLS with IMAP, POP3 and ACAP", [[RFC2595|RFC 2595]], June    1999.
 
[10] Ramsdell, B., "S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification", RFC    2633, June 1999.
 
[11] O'Tuathail, E. and M. Rose, "Using the Simple Object Access    Protocol (SOAP) in Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP)",    [[RFC3288|RFC 3288]], June 2002.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 +
[2]  Rose, M., "The Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol Core", RFC
 +
    3080, March 2001.
  
 +
[3]  Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L.,
 +
    Leach, P. and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol --
 +
    HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.
  
 +
[4]  Murata, M., St. Laurent, S. and D. Kohn, "XML Media Types", RFC
 +
    3023, January 2001.
  
 +
[5]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource
 +
    Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396, August 1998.
  
 +
[6]  Gulbrandsen, A., Vixie, P. and L. Esibov, "A DNS RR for
 +
    specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)", RFC 2782,
 +
    February 2000.
  
 +
[7]  Hinden, R., Carpenter, B. and L. Masinter, "Format for Literal
 +
    IPv6 Addresses in URL's", RFC 2732, December 1999.
  
 +
[8]  Elkins, M., Del Torto, D., Levien, R. and T. Roessler, "MIME
 +
    Security with OpenPGP", RFC 3156, August 2001.
  
 +
[9]  Newman, C., "Using TLS with IMAP, POP3 and ACAP", RFC 2595, June
 +
    1999.
  
 +
[10] Ramsdell, B., "S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification", RFC
 +
    2633, June 1999.
  
 +
[11] O'Tuathail, E. and M. Rose, "Using the Simple Object Access
 +
    Protocol (SOAP) in Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP)",
 +
    RFC 3288, June 2002.
  
 +
Appendix A. Acknowledgements
  
 +
This document is based, in part, on Using SOAP in BEEP [11] and the
 +
author gratefully acknowledges the contributions of Marshall Rose
  
 +
Appendix B. IANA Considerations
  
 +
The IANA has registered the profile specified in Section 6.1, and has
 +
selected an IANA-specific URI, e.g.,
  
 
Appendix A. Acknowledgements
 
This document is based, in part, on Using SOAP in BEEP [11] and theauthor gratefully acknowledges the contributions of Marshall Rose
 
Appendix B. IANA Considerations
 
The IANA has registered the profile specified in Section 6.1, and hasselected an IANA-specific URI, e.g.,
 
 
   http://iana.org/beep/xmlrpc
 
   http://iana.org/beep/xmlrpc
The IANA has registered "xmlrpc.beep" and "xmlrpc.beeps" as URLschemes, as specified in Section 6.2 and Section 6.3, respectively.(See: http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes)
 
The IANA has registered "XML-RPC over BEEP" as a TCP port number(602), as specified in Section 6.4.  (See:http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 +
The IANA has registered "xmlrpc.beep" and "xmlrpc.beeps" as URL
 +
schemes, as specified in Section 6.2 and Section 6.3, respectively.
 +
(See: http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes)
  
 +
The IANA has registered "XML-RPC over BEEP" as a TCP port number
 +
(602), as specified in Section 6.4.  (See:
 +
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers)
  
 
Author's Address
 
Author's Address
Ward K HaroldIBM11400 Burnet RoadAustin,  Texas 78759US
 
Phone: +1 512 838 3622EMail: [email protected]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 +
Ward K Harold
 +
IBM
 +
11400 Burnet Road
 +
Austin,  Texas 78759
 +
US
  
 +
Phone: +1 512 838 3622
 +
  
 
Full Copyright Statement
 
Full Copyright Statement
Line 691: Line 596:
 
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
 
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
 
Internet Society.
 
Internet Society.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[[Category:Experimental]]
 

Revision as of 12:41, 24 September 2020

Network Working Group W. Harold Request for Comments: 3529 IBM Category: Experimental April 2003

   Using Extensible Markup Language-Remote Procedure Calling
    (XML-RPC) in Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP)

Status of this Memo

This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

XML-RPC is an Extensible Markup Language-Remote Procedure Calling protocol that works over the Internet. It defines an XML format for messages that are transfered between clients and servers using HTTP. An XML-RPC message encodes either a procedure to be invoked by the server, along with the parameters to use in the invocation, or the result of an invocation. Procedure parameters and results can be scalars, numbers, strings, dates, etc.; they can also be complex record and list structures.

This document specifies a how to use the Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP) to transfer messages encoded in the XML-RPC format between clients and servers.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. BEEP Profile Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

   2.1  Profile  Initialization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3

3. XML-RPC Message Packages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. XML-RPC Message Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5. URL Schemes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

   5.1  The xmlrpc.beep URL Scheme. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
        5.1.1 Resolving IP/TCP Address  Information . . . . . .  6
   5.2  The xmlrpc.beeps URL Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7

6. Initial Registrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

   6.1  Registration: The XML-RPC Profile . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   6.2  Registration: The xmlrpc.beep URL Scheme. . . . . . . .  9
   6.3  Registration: The xmlrpc.beeps URL Scheme . . . . . . . 10
   6.4  Registration: The System (Well-Known) TCP port number
        for XML-RPC over BEEP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Appendix A. Acknowledgements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 B. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

Introduction

This memo specifies how messages encoded in the XML-RPC [1] format are transmitted using a BEEP profile [2].

Throughout this memo, the terms "request" and "response" refer to the "methodCall" and "methodResponse" elements defined by the XML-RPC specification [1]. Further the terms "peer", "client", "server", and "one-to-one" are used in the context of BEEP. In particular, Sections 2.1 and 2.1.1 of [2] discuss BEEP roles and exchange styles.

BEEP Profile Identification

The BEEP profile for XML-RPC is identified as

  http://iana.org/beep/transient/xmlrpc

in the BEEP "profile" element during channel creation.

In BEEP, when the first channel is successfully created, the "serverName" attribute in the "start" element identifies the "virtual host" associated with the peer acting in the server role, e.g.,

  <start number='1' serverName='stateserver.example.com'>
      <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/transient/xmlrpc' />
  </start>

The "serverName" attribute is analogous to HTTP's "Host" request- header field (c.f., Section 14.23 of [3]).

There are two states in the BEEP profile for XML-RPC, "boot", the profile's initial state, and "ready":

o In the "boot" state, the peer requesting the creation of the

  channel sends a "bootmsg" (either during channel initialization or
  in a "MSG" message).
  *  If the other peer sends a "bootrpy" (either during channel
     initialization or in a "RPY" message), then the "ready" state
     is entered
  *  Otherwise, the other peer sends an "error" (either during
     channel initialization or in a "ERR" message), and no state
     change occurs.

o In the "ready" state, the initiating peer begins an XML-RPC

  message pattern by sending a "MSG" message containing a request.
  The other peer completes the message pattern by sending back a
  "RPY" message containing a response.

Profile Initialization

The boot message is used to identify the resource accessed by the channel bound to the BEEP profile for XML-RPC.

The DTD syntax for the boot message and its response are:

  <!ELEMENT bootmsg     EMPTY>
  <!ATTLIST bootmsg
            resource    CDATA             #REQUIRED>
  <!ELEMENT bootrpy     EMPTY>

The boot message contains a single mandatory attribute: "resource", which is analagous to HTTP's "abs_path" Request-URI parameter (c.f., Section 5.1.2 of [3])

If the peer acting in the server role recognizes the requested resource, it replies with a boot response. Otherwise, if the boot message is improperly formed, or if the requested resource isn't recognized, the peer acting in the server role replies with an error message (c.f., Section 7.1 of [2]).

Typically, the boot message and its response are exchanged during channel initialization (c.f., Section 2.3.1.2 of [2]).

For example, here the boot message and its response are exchanged during channel initialization:

  C: <start number='1' serverName='stateserver.example.com'>
  C:     <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/transient/xmlrpc'>
  C:         <![CDATA[<bootmsg resource='/NumberToName' />]]>
  C:     </profile>
  C: </start>
  S: <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/transient/xmlrpc'>
  S:     <![CDATA[<bootrpy />]]>
  S: </profile>

The channel bound to the BEEP profile for XML-RPC is now in the "ready" state.

Alternatively, here is an example in which the boot exchange is unsuccessful:

  C: <start number='1' serverName='stateserver.example.com'>
  C:     <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/transient/xmlrpc'>
  C:         <![CDATA[<bootmsg resource='/NameToCapital' />]]>
  C:     </profile>
  C: </start>
  S: <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/transient/xmlrpc'>
  S:     <![CDATA[<error code='550'>resource not
  S:                                supported</error>]]>
  S: </profile>

Although the channel was created successfully, it remains in the "boot" state.

XML-RPC Message Packages

The BEEP profile for XML-RPC transmits requests and responses encoded as UTF-8 using the media type "application/xml" [4], e.g.,

  I: MSG 1 1 . 0 364
  I: Content-Type: application/xml
  I:
  I: <?xml version="1.0"?>
  I:   <methodCall>
  I:     <methodName>examples.getStateName</methodName>
  I:     <params>
  I:       <param>
  I:         <value><i4>41</i4></value>
  I:       </param>
  I:     </params>
  I:   </methodCall>
  I: END

and its associated response

  L: RPY 1 1 . 201 100
  L: Content-Type: application/xml
  L:
  L: <?xml version="1.0"?>
  L:   <methodResponse>
  L:     <params>
  L:       <param>
  L:         <value><string>South Dakota</string></value>
  L:       </param>
  L:     </params>
  L:   </methodRespose>
  L: END

XML-RPC Message Exchange

A request/response exchange involves sending a request, which results in a response being returned.

The BEEP profile for XML-RPC achieves this using a one-to-one exchange, in which the client sends a "MSG" message containing an request, and the server sends back a "RPY" message containing an response.

The BEEP profile for XML-RPC does not use the "ERR" message for XML- RPC faults when performing one-to-one exchanges. Whatever response is generated by the server is always returned in the "RPY" message.

URL Schemes

This memo defines two URL schemes, "xmlrpc.beep" and "xmlrpc.beeps", which identify the use of XML-RPC over BEEP over TCP. Note that, at present, a "generic" URL scheme for XML-RPC is not defined.

The xmlrpc.beep URL Scheme

The "xmlrpc.beep" URL scheme uses the "generic URI" syntax defined in Section 3 of [5], specifically:

o the value "xmlrpc.beep" is used for the scheme component; and,

o the server-based naming authority defined in Section 3.2.2 of [5]

  is used for the authority component.

o the path component maps to the "resource" component of the boot

  message sent during profile initialization (if absent, it defaults
  to "/").

The values of both the scheme and authority components are case- insensitive.

For example, the URL

  xmlrpc.beep://stateserver.example.com/NumberToName

might result in the example shown in Section 2.1.

Resolving IP/TCP Address Information

The "xmlrpc.beep" URL scheme indicates the use of the BEEP profile for XML-RPC running over TCP/IP.

If the authority component contains a domain name and a port number, e.g.,

  xmlrpc.beep://stateserver.example.com:1026

then the DNS is queried for the A RRs corresponding to the domain name, and the port number is used directly.

If the authority component contains a domain name and no port number, e.g.,

  xmlrpc.beep://stateserver.example.com

the SRV algorithm [6] is used with a service parameter of "xmlrpc- beep" and a protocol parameter of "tcp" to determine the IP/TCP addressing information. If no appropriate SRV RRs are found (e.g., for "_xmlrpc-beep._tcp.stateserver.example.com"), then the DNS is queried for the A RRs corresponding to the domain name and the port number used is assigned by the IANA for the registration in Section 6.4.

If the authority component contains an IP address, e.g.,

  xmlrpc.beep://10.0.0.2:1026

then the DNS is not queried, and the IP address is used directly. If a port number is present, it is used directly; otherwise, the port number used is assigned by the IANA for the registration in Section 6.4.

While the use of literal IPv6 addresses in URLs is discouraged, if a literal IPv6 address is used in a "xmlrpc.beep" URL, it must conform to the syntax specified in [7].

The xmlrpc.beeps URL Scheme

The "xmlrpc.beeps" URL scheme is identical, in all ways, to the "xmlrpc.beep" URL scheme specified in Section 5.1, with the exception that prior to starting the BEEP profile for XML-RPC, the BEEP session must be tuned for privacy. In particular, note that both URL schemes use the identical algorithms and parameters for address resolution as specified in Section 5.1.1 (e.g., the same service name for SRV lookups, the same port number for TCP, and so on).

There are two ways to perform privacy tuning on a BEEP session, either:

o a transport security profile may be successfully started; or,

o a user authentication profile that supports transport security may

  be successfully started.

In either case the client must present the authority component of the URL in the "serverName" attribute of the "start" element it uses to tune the session for privacy.

When TLS is used for privacy the client must verify that the authority component of the URL matches the server's identity as presented in the server's certificate. Section 2.4 of [9] describes the matching process.

For the URL:

  xmlrpc.beeps://stateserver.example.com/NumberToName

the whole process might look like:

   S: <wait for incoming connection @ stateserver.example.com>
   C: <open connection to stateserver.example.com>
   C: RPY 0 0 . 0 52
   C: Content-Type: application/xml
   C:
   C: <greeting />
   C: END
   S: RPY 0 0 . 0 110
   S: Content-Type: application/xml
   S:
   S: <greeting>
   S:   <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/TLS' />
   S:   <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/SASL/DIGEST-MD5' />
   S: </greeting>
   S: END
   C: MSG 0 1 . 52 158
   C: Content-Type: application/xml
   C:
   C: <start number='1' serverName='stateserver.example.com'>
   C:   <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/TLS'>
   C:     <![CDATA[<ready />]]>
   C:   </profile>
   C: </start>
   C: END
   S: RPY 0 1 . 110 121
   S: Content-Type: application/xml
   S:
   S: <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/TLS'>
   S:   <![CDATA[<proceed />]]>
   S: </profile>
   S: END
   ... TLS negotiations ...
   S: RPY 0 0 . 0 88
   S: Content-Type: application/xml
   S:
   S: <greeting>
   S:   <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/transient/xmlrpc'>
   S: </greeting>
   S: END
   C: RPY 0 0 . 0 52
   C: Content-Type: application/xml
   C:
   C: <greeting />
   C: END
   ... use the server's certificate to verify that it is
       in fact stateserver.example.com ...
   C: MSG 0 1 . 112 211
   C: Content-Type: application/xml
   C:
   C: <start number='3' serverName='stateserver.example.com'>
   C:     <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/transient/xmlrpc'>
   C:         <![CDATA[<bootmsg resource='/NumberToName' />]]>
   C:     </profile>
   C: </start>
   C: END
   S: RPY 0 2 . 341 402
   S: Content-Type: application/xml
   S:
   S: <profile uri='http://iana.org/beep/transient/xmlrpc'>
   S:     <![CDATA[<bootrpy />]]>
   S: </profile>
   S: END

Initial Registrations

Registration: The XML-RPC Profile

Profile Identification: http://iana.org/beep/transient/xmlrpc

Messages exchanged during Channel Creation: bootmsg, bootrpy

Messages starting one-to-one exchanges: bootmsg, methodCall

Messages in positive replies: bootrpy, methodResponse

Messages in negative replies: error

Messages in one-to-many exchanges: none

Message Syntax: methodCall, methodResponse as defined in [1]

Message Semantics: c.f., [1]

Contact Information: Ward Harold <[email protected]>

Registration: The xmlrpc.beep URL Scheme

URL scheme name: xmlrpc.beep

URL scheme syntax: c.f., Section 5.1

Character encoding considerations: c.f., the "generic URI" syntax

  defined in Section 3 of [5]

Intended usage: identifies a XML-RPC resource made available using

  the BEEP profile for XML-RPC

Applications using this scheme: c.f., "Intended usage", above

Interoperability considerations: n/a

Security Considerations: c.f., Section 7

Relevant Publications: c.f., [1], and [2]

Contact Information: Ward Harold <[email protected]>

Author/Change controller: the IESG

Registration: The xmlrpc.beeps URL Scheme

URL scheme name: xmlrpc.beeps

URL scheme syntax: c.f., Section 5.2

Character encoding considerations: c.f., the "generic URI" syntax

  defined in Section 3 of [5]

Intended usage: identifies a XML-RPC resource made available using

  the BEEP profile for XML-RPC after the BEEP session has been tuned
  for privacy

Applications using this scheme: c.f., "Intended usage", above

Interoperability considerations: n/a

Security Considerations: c.f., Section 7

Relevant Publications: c.f., [1], and [2]

Contact Information: Ward Harold <[email protected]>

Author/Change controller: the IESG

Registration: The System (Well-Known) TCP port number for XML-RPC

over BEEP

Protocol Number: TCP

Message Formats, Types, Opcodes, and Sequences: c.f., Section 2.1

Functions: c.f., [1]

Use of Broadcast/Multicast: none

Proposed Name: XML-RPC over BEEP

Short name: xmlrpc-beep

Contact Information: Ward Harold <[email protected]>

Security Considerations

Although service provisioning is a policy matter, at a minimum, all implementations must provide the following tuning profiles:

for authentication: http://iana.org/beep/SASL/DIGEST-MD5

for confidentiality: http://iana.org/beep/TLS (using the

  TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA cipher)

for both: http://iana.org/beep/TLS (using the

  TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA cipher supporting client-side
  certificates)

Further, implementations may choose to offer MIME-based security services providing message integrity and confidentiality, such as OpenPGP [8] or S/MIME [10].

Regardless, consult [2]'s Section 9 for a discussion of BEEP-specific security issues.

References

[1] Winer, D., "XML-RPC Specification", January 1999,

    http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec

[2] Rose, M., "The Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol Core", RFC

    3080, March 2001.

[3] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L.,

    Leach, P. and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol --
    HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.

[4] Murata, M., St. Laurent, S. and D. Kohn, "XML Media Types", RFC

    3023, January 2001.

[5] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource

    Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396, August 1998.

[6] Gulbrandsen, A., Vixie, P. and L. Esibov, "A DNS RR for

    specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)", RFC 2782,
    February 2000.

[7] Hinden, R., Carpenter, B. and L. Masinter, "Format for Literal

    IPv6 Addresses in URL's", RFC 2732, December 1999.

[8] Elkins, M., Del Torto, D., Levien, R. and T. Roessler, "MIME

    Security with OpenPGP", RFC 3156, August 2001.

[9] Newman, C., "Using TLS with IMAP, POP3 and ACAP", RFC 2595, June

    1999.

[10] Ramsdell, B., "S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification", RFC

    2633, June 1999.

[11] O'Tuathail, E. and M. Rose, "Using the Simple Object Access

    Protocol (SOAP) in Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP)",
    RFC 3288, June 2002.

Appendix A. Acknowledgements

This document is based, in part, on Using SOAP in BEEP [11] and the author gratefully acknowledges the contributions of Marshall Rose

Appendix B. IANA Considerations

The IANA has registered the profile specified in Section 6.1, and has selected an IANA-specific URI, e.g.,

  http://iana.org/beep/xmlrpc

The IANA has registered "xmlrpc.beep" and "xmlrpc.beeps" as URL schemes, as specified in Section 6.2 and Section 6.3, respectively. (See: http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes)

The IANA has registered "XML-RPC over BEEP" as a TCP port number (602), as specified in Section 6.4. (See: http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers)

Author's Address

Ward K Harold IBM 11400 Burnet Road Austin, Texas 78759 US

Phone: +1 512 838 3622 EMail: [email protected]

Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.