Difference between revisions of "RFC6671"

From RFC-Wiki
imported>Admin
(Created page with " Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. BettsRequest for Comments: 6671 ZTECategory: Informational ...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          M. Betts
 +
Request for Comments: 6671                                          ZTE
 +
Category: Informational                                    November 2012
 +
ISSN: 2070-1721
  
 +
    Allocation of a Generic Associated Channel Type for ITU-T
 +
MPLS Transport Profile Operation, Maintenance, and Administration
 +
                          (MPLS-TP OAM)
  
 
+
'''Abstract'''
 
 
 
 
 
 
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          M. BettsRequest for Comments: 6671                                          ZTECategory: Informational                                    November 2012ISSN: 2070-1721
 
 
 
    Allocation of a Generic Associated Channel Type for ITU-TMPLS Transport Profile Operation, Maintenance, and Administration                          (MPLS-TP OAM)
 
Abstract
 
  
 
This document assigns a Generic Associated Channel (G-ACh) Type for
 
This document assigns a Generic Associated Channel (G-ACh) Type for
Line 15: Line 15:
 
Channel.
 
Channel.
  
Status of This Memo
+
'''Status of This Memo'''
  
 
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
 
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
Line 41: Line 41:
 
should be implemented.
 
should be implemented.
  
 
+
'''Copyright Notice'''
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Copyright Notice
 
  
 
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
Line 68: Line 58:
 
== Introduction ==
 
== Introduction ==
  
The Transport Profile of MPLS (MPLS-TP) defined in [RFC5654] is a
+
The Transport Profile of MPLS (MPLS-TP) defined in [[RFC5654]] is a
 
profile of MPLS technology for use in packet transport networks.  The
 
profile of MPLS technology for use in packet transport networks.  The
 
MPLS-TP profile includes a set of Operations, Administration, and
 
MPLS-TP profile includes a set of Operations, Administration, and
Management (OAM) tools defined by the IETF [RFC6669] that are used to
+
Management (OAM) tools defined by the IETF [[RFC6669]] that are used to
meet the OAM functional requirements defined in [RFC5860].
+
meet the OAM functional requirements defined in [[RFC5860]].
  
 
ITU-T Recommendation [G.8113.1] documents MPLS-TP OAM.  This
 
ITU-T Recommendation [G.8113.1] documents MPLS-TP OAM.  This
Line 90: Line 80:
 
A number of experts in the IETF do not consider that the development
 
A number of experts in the IETF do not consider that the development
 
or deployment of a second protocol solution within the same
 
or deployment of a second protocol solution within the same
architectural problem space is necessary or advisable [RFC6670].
+
architectural problem space is necessary or advisable [[RFC6670]].
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
== Conventions Used in This Document ==
 
== Conventions Used in This Document ==
Line 110: Line 88:
 
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
 
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
+
document are to be interpreted as described in [[RFC2119]].
  
 
== Scope of the G.8113.1 OAM G-ACh Type ==
 
== Scope of the G.8113.1 OAM G-ACh Type ==
Line 118: Line 96:
 
in the G-ACh.  The OAM messages and procedures carried behind this
 
in the G-ACh.  The OAM messages and procedures carried behind this
 
G-ACh Type are restricted to only those that address the OAM
 
G-ACh Type are restricted to only those that address the OAM
functional requirements defined in [RFC5860].  Other message types
+
functional requirements defined in [[RFC5860]].  Other message types
 
MUST NOT be carried behind this G-ACh Type.
 
MUST NOT be carried behind this G-ACh Type.
  
Line 125: Line 103:
 
[G.8113.1], the G-ACh Type assigned by this document MUST NOT be used
 
[G.8113.1], the G-ACh Type assigned by this document MUST NOT be used
 
for any functions not identified as OAM functional requirements in
 
for any functions not identified as OAM functional requirements in
[RFC5860].  An update of [G.8113.1] may use the G-ACh Type assigned
+
[[RFC5860]].  An update of [G.8113.1] may use the G-ACh Type assigned
 
by this document to support the OAM functions identified in
 
by this document to support the OAM functions identified in
[RFC5860].  When an amendment or complete revision of G.8113.1 is
+
[[RFC5860]].  When an amendment or complete revision of G.8113.1 is
 
approved, the reference to [G.8113.1], provided in this document,
 
approved, the reference to [G.8113.1], provided in this document,
 
should be updated to show the approval date of the new version.
 
should be updated to show the approval date of the new version.
Line 137: Line 115:
 
== Security Considerations ==
 
== Security Considerations ==
  
As noted in [RFC5586], when new G-ACh Types are defined, the
+
As noted in [[RFC5586]], when new G-ACh Types are defined, the
 
"security considerations MUST be described in the relevant associated
 
"security considerations MUST be described in the relevant associated
 
channel type specification".  The IETF takes this opportunity to
 
channel type specification".  The IETF takes this opportunity to
 
remind the ITU-T of the need to describe security considerations in
 
remind the ITU-T of the need to describe security considerations in
 
[G.8113.1].
 
[G.8113.1].
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
== IANA Considerations ==
 
== IANA Considerations ==
Line 166: Line 130:
 
   Value        Description              TLV Follows  Reference
 
   Value        Description              TLV Follows  Reference
 
   -----------  -----------------------  -----------  ---------
 
   -----------  -----------------------  -----------  ---------
   0x8902      G.8113.1 OAM            No          [RFC6671]
+
   0x8902      G.8113.1 OAM            No          [[RFC6671]]
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
Line 172: Line 136:
 
=== Normative References ===
 
=== Normative References ===
  
[RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate           Requirement Levels", [[BCP14|BCP 14]], [[RFC2119|RFC 2119]], March 1997.
+
[[RFC2119]]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
[RFC5586]  Bocci, M., Ed., Vigoureux, M., Ed., and S. Bryant, Ed.,          "MPLS Generic Associated Channel", [[RFC5586|RFC 5586]], June 2009.
+
          Requirement Levels", [[BCP14|BCP 14]], [[RFC2119|RFC 2119]], March 1997.
[RFC5654]  Niven-Jenkins, B., Ed., Brungard, D., Ed., Betts, M., Ed.,          Sprecher, N., and S. Ueno, "Requirements of an MPLS          Transport Profile", [[RFC5654|RFC 5654]], September 2009.
 
[RFC5860]  Vigoureux, M., Ed., Ward, D., Ed., and M. Betts, Ed.,          "Requirements for Operations, Administration, and          Maintenance (OAM) in MPLS Transport Networks", [[RFC5860|RFC 5860]],          May 2010.
 
[G.8113.1] ITU-T Recommendation G.8113.1/Y.1372.1, "Operations,          Administration and Maintenance mechanism for MPLS-TP in          Packet Transport Network (PTN)", 11/2012,          http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.8113.1/en.
 
[Y.1731]  ITU-T Recommendation G.8013/Y.1731, "OAM functions and          mechanisms for Ethernet based networks" 07/2011 as updated          by Corrigendum 1, 10/2011, and Amendment 1, 05/2012,          http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.8013/en.
 
=== Informative References ===
 
 
 
[LS370]    "Liaison Statement: LS370 - Current status of          Recommendation ITU-T G.8113.1/Y.1372.1, Operations,          Administration and Maintenance mechanism for MPLS-TP in          Packet Transport Network (PTN)", January 2012,          https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1125/.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[RFC6669]  Sprecher, N. and L. Fang, "An Overview of the Operations,          Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Tool Set for MPLS-          Based Transport Networks", [[RFC6669|RFC 6669]], July 2012.
 
[RFC6670]  Sprecher, N. and KY. Hong, "The Reasons for Selecting a          Single Solution for MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP)          Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)", RFC          6670, July 2012.
 
Author's Address
 
Malcolm BettsZTE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 +
[[RFC5586]]  Bocci, M., Ed., Vigoureux, M., Ed., and S. Bryant, Ed.,
 +
          "MPLS Generic Associated Channel", [[RFC5586|RFC 5586]], June 2009.
  
 +
[[RFC5654]]  Niven-Jenkins, B., Ed., Brungard, D., Ed., Betts, M., Ed.,
 +
          Sprecher, N., and S. Ueno, "Requirements of an MPLS
 +
          Transport Profile", [[RFC5654|RFC 5654]], September 2009.
  
 +
[[RFC5860]]  Vigoureux, M., Ed., Ward, D., Ed., and M. Betts, Ed.,
 +
          "Requirements for Operations, Administration, and
 +
          Maintenance (OAM) in MPLS Transport Networks", [[RFC5860|RFC 5860]],
 +
          May 2010.
  
 +
[G.8113.1] ITU-T Recommendation G.8113.1/Y.1372.1, "Operations,
 +
          Administration and Maintenance mechanism for MPLS-TP in
 +
          Packet Transport Network (PTN)", 11/2012,
 +
          http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.8113.1/en.
  
 +
[Y.1731]  ITU-T Recommendation G.8013/Y.1731, "OAM functions and
 +
          mechanisms for Ethernet based networks" 07/2011 as updated
 +
          by Corrigendum 1, 10/2011, and Amendment 1, 05/2012,
 +
          http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.8013/en.
  
 +
=== Informative References ===
  
 +
[LS370]    "Liaison Statement: LS370 - Current status of
 +
          Recommendation ITU-T G.8113.1/Y.1372.1, Operations,
 +
          Administration and Maintenance mechanism for MPLS-TP in
 +
          Packet Transport Network (PTN)", January 2012,
 +
          https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1125/.
  
 +
[[RFC6669]]  Sprecher, N. and L. Fang, "An Overview of the Operations,
 +
          Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Tool Set for MPLS-
 +
          Based Transport Networks", [[RFC6669|RFC 6669]], July 2012.
  
 +
[[RFC6670]]  Sprecher, N. and KY. Hong, "The Reasons for Selecting a
 +
          Single Solution for MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP)
 +
          Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)", RFC
 +
          6670, July 2012.
  
 +
Author's Address
  
 +
Malcolm Betts
 +
ZTE
  
 +
  
 
[[Category:Informational]]
 
[[Category:Informational]]

Latest revision as of 16:27, 1 October 2020

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Betts Request for Comments: 6671 ZTE Category: Informational November 2012 ISSN: 2070-1721

   Allocation of a Generic Associated Channel Type for ITU-T

MPLS Transport Profile Operation, Maintenance, and Administration

                         (MPLS-TP OAM)

Abstract

This document assigns a Generic Associated Channel (G-ACh) Type for carrying ITU-T MPLS Transport Profile Operations, Administration, and Management (MPLS-TP OAM) messages in the MPLS Generic Associated Channel.

Status of This Memo

This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.

Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6671.

IESG Note

The IESG notes that the IETF has developed a set of OAM tools for MPLS-TP that have been published as Standards Track RFCs. A list of the relevant RFCs can be found in RFC 6669. The approval of this document and the assignment of an ACh Type does not constitute endorsement by the IETF of the alternate MPLS-TP OAM documented in G.8113.1. The IESG recommends instead that the RFCs noted above should be implemented.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

Introduction

The Transport Profile of MPLS (MPLS-TP) defined in RFC5654 is a profile of MPLS technology for use in packet transport networks. The MPLS-TP profile includes a set of Operations, Administration, and Management (OAM) tools defined by the IETF RFC6669 that are used to meet the OAM functional requirements defined in RFC5860.

ITU-T Recommendation [G.8113.1] documents MPLS-TP OAM. This Recommendation builds upon Ethernet OAM as documented in [Y.1731]. The messages in [G.8113.1] are defined to be carried in a new Generic Associated Channel (G-ACh) Type in the MPLS Generic Associated Channel. In order to carry these messages in an interoperable fashion, a Generic Associated Channel Type from the IANA maintained registry "Pseudowire Associated Channel Types" is to be used.

To fulfill the request from ITU-T SG15 in [LS370] and to allow deployment of the [G.8113.1] OAM solution without using an experimental G-ACh Type, IANA has assigned a G-ACh Type <0x8902> for use by the ITU-T for [G.8113.1]. This G-ACh Type is known as the "G.8113.1 OAM G-ACh Type".

A number of experts in the IETF do not consider that the development or deployment of a second protocol solution within the same architectural problem space is necessary or advisable RFC6670.

Conventions Used in This Document

Requirements Notation

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119.

Scope of the G.8113.1 OAM G-ACh Type

The G-ACh Type assigned by this document MUST only be used for OAM messages, as defined in the ITU-T Recommendation [G.8113.1], carried in the G-ACh. The OAM messages and procedures carried behind this G-ACh Type are restricted to only those that address the OAM functional requirements defined in RFC5860. Other message types MUST NOT be carried behind this G-ACh Type.

All ITU-T Recommendations are subject to updates by errata, corrigenda, amendments, or complete revisions. In any update of [G.8113.1], the G-ACh Type assigned by this document MUST NOT be used for any functions not identified as OAM functional requirements in RFC5860. An update of [G.8113.1] may use the G-ACh Type assigned by this document to support the OAM functions identified in RFC5860. When an amendment or complete revision of G.8113.1 is approved, the reference to [G.8113.1], provided in this document, should be updated to show the approval date of the new version.

The G-ACh Type assigned by this document may be used on any transport construct that uses the G-ACh, e.g., MPLS-TP Sections, MPLS-TP LSPs, or PWs as described in [G.8113.1].

Security Considerations

As noted in RFC5586, when new G-ACh Types are defined, the "security considerations MUST be described in the relevant associated channel type specification". The IETF takes this opportunity to remind the ITU-T of the need to describe security considerations in [G.8113.1].

IANA Considerations

IANA maintains the "Pseudowire Associated Channel Types" sub-registry of the "Pseudowire Name Spaces (PWE3)" registry.

IANA has allocated a new G-ACh Type as follows:

  Value        Description              TLV Follows  Reference
  -----------  -----------------------  -----------  ---------
  0x8902       G.8113.1 OAM             No           RFC6671

References

Normative References

RFC2119 Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate

          Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

RFC5586 Bocci, M., Ed., Vigoureux, M., Ed., and S. Bryant, Ed.,

          "MPLS Generic Associated Channel", RFC 5586, June 2009.

RFC5654 Niven-Jenkins, B., Ed., Brungard, D., Ed., Betts, M., Ed.,

          Sprecher, N., and S. Ueno, "Requirements of an MPLS
          Transport Profile", RFC 5654, September 2009.

RFC5860 Vigoureux, M., Ed., Ward, D., Ed., and M. Betts, Ed.,

          "Requirements for Operations, Administration, and
          Maintenance (OAM) in MPLS Transport Networks", RFC 5860,
          May 2010.

[G.8113.1] ITU-T Recommendation G.8113.1/Y.1372.1, "Operations,

          Administration and Maintenance mechanism for MPLS-TP in
          Packet Transport Network (PTN)", 11/2012,
          http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.8113.1/en.

[Y.1731] ITU-T Recommendation G.8013/Y.1731, "OAM functions and

          mechanisms for Ethernet based networks" 07/2011 as updated
          by Corrigendum 1, 10/2011, and Amendment 1, 05/2012,
          http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.8013/en.

Informative References

[LS370] "Liaison Statement: LS370 - Current status of

          Recommendation ITU-T G.8113.1/Y.1372.1, Operations,
          Administration and Maintenance mechanism for MPLS-TP in
          Packet Transport Network (PTN)", January 2012,
          https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1125/.

RFC6669 Sprecher, N. and L. Fang, "An Overview of the Operations,

          Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Tool Set for MPLS-
          Based Transport Networks", RFC 6669, July 2012.

RFC6670 Sprecher, N. and KY. Hong, "The Reasons for Selecting a

          Single Solution for MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP)
          Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)", RFC
          6670, July 2012.

Author's Address

Malcolm Betts ZTE

EMail: [email protected]