Difference between revisions of "RFC7192"

From RFC-Wiki
imported>Admin
(Created page with " Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) S. Turner Request for Comments: 7192 IECA Category: Standards Tra...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                        S. Turner
 
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                        S. Turner
 
Request for Comments: 7192                                          IECA
 
Request for Comments: 7192                                          IECA
 
Category: Standards Track                                    April 2014
 
Category: Standards Track                                    April 2014
 
ISSN: 2070-1721
 
ISSN: 2070-1721
 
  
 
         Algorithms for Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
 
         Algorithms for Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
 
           Key Package Receipt and Error Content Types
 
           Key Package Receipt and Error Content Types
  
Abstract
+
'''Abstract'''
  
 
This document describes the conventions for using several
 
This document describes the conventions for using several
Line 22: Line 15:
 
EnvelopedData, EncryptedData, and AuthEnvelopedData.
 
EnvelopedData, EncryptedData, and AuthEnvelopedData.
  
Status of This Memo
+
'''Status of This Memo'''
  
 
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
 
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
Line 36: Line 29:
 
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7192.
 
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7192.
  
Copyright Notice
+
'''Copyright Notice'''
  
 
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
Line 50: Line 43:
 
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
 
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
 
described in the Simplified BSD License.
 
described in the Simplified BSD License.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
== Introduction ==
 
== Introduction ==
Line 62: Line 48:
 
This document describes the conventions for using several
 
This document describes the conventions for using several
 
cryptographic algorithms with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
 
cryptographic algorithms with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
key package receipt and error content types [RFC7191].  Specifically,
+
key package receipt and error content types [[RFC7191]].  Specifically,
it includes conventions necessary to implement SignedData [RFC5652],
+
it includes conventions necessary to implement SignedData [[RFC5652]],
EnvelopedData [RFC5652], EncryptedData [RFC5652], and
+
EnvelopedData [[RFC5652]], EncryptedData [[RFC5652]], and
AuthEnvelopedData [RFC5083].
+
AuthEnvelopedData [[RFC5083]].
  
 
This document does not define any new algorithms; instead, it refers
 
This document does not define any new algorithms; instead, it refers
 
to previously defined algorithms.  In fact, the algorithm
 
to previously defined algorithms.  In fact, the algorithm
requirements in this document are the same as those in [RFC5959],
+
requirements in this document are the same as those in [[RFC5959]],
[RFC6033], [RFC6160], [RFC6161], and [RFC6162] with the following
+
[[RFC6033]], [[RFC6160]], [[RFC6161]], and [[RFC6162]] with the following
 
exceptions: the content-encryption algorithm is AES in Cipher Block
 
exceptions: the content-encryption algorithm is AES in Cipher Block
 
Chaining (CBC) mode as opposed to AES Key Wrap with Message Length
 
Chaining (CBC) mode as opposed to AES Key Wrap with Message Length
Line 81: Line 67:
 
key-wrap algorithm the same as the content encryption algorithm.
 
key-wrap algorithm the same as the content encryption algorithm.
  
NOTE: [RFC7191] only requires that the key package receipt be signed.
+
NOTE: [[RFC7191]] only requires that the key package receipt be signed.
  
 
=== Terminology ===
 
=== Terminology ===
Line 88: Line 74:
 
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
 
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
 
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
 
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
[RFC2119].
+
[[RFC2119]].
  
 
== SignedData ==
 
== SignedData ==
  
 
If an implementation supports SignedData, then it MUST support the
 
If an implementation supports SignedData, then it MUST support the
signature scheme RSA [RFC3370] and SHOULD support the signature
+
signature scheme RSA [[RFC3370]] and SHOULD support the signature
schemes RSA Probabilistic Signature Scheme (RSASSA-PSS) [RFC4056] and
+
schemes RSA Probabilistic Signature Scheme (RSASSA-PSS) [[RFC4056]] and
Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) [RFC3370].  Additionally,
+
Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) [[RFC3370]].  Additionally,
implementations MUST support the hash function SHA-256 [RFC5754] in
+
implementations MUST support the hash function SHA-256 [[RFC5754]] in
 
concert with these signature schemes, and they SHOULD support the
 
concert with these signature schemes, and they SHOULD support the
hash function SHA-1 [RFC3370].  Implementations can also choose the
+
hash function SHA-1 [[RFC3370]].  Implementations can also choose the
 
to support Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA)
 
to support Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA)
[RFC5753] and [RFC6090].
+
[[RFC5753]] and [[RFC6090]].
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
== EnvelopedData ==
 
== EnvelopedData ==
Line 116: Line 93:
 
key transport and it MAY implement key agreement.
 
key transport and it MAY implement key agreement.
  
When key transport is used, RSA encryption [RFC3370] MUST be
+
When key transport is used, RSA encryption [[RFC3370]] MUST be
 
supported, and RSA Encryption Scheme - Optimal Asymmetric Encryption
 
supported, and RSA Encryption Scheme - Optimal Asymmetric Encryption
Padding (RSAES-OAEP) [RFC3560] SHOULD be supported.
+
Padding (RSAES-OAEP) [[RFC3560]] SHOULD be supported.
  
 
When key agreement is used, Diffie-Hellman (DH) ephemeral-static
 
When key agreement is used, Diffie-Hellman (DH) ephemeral-static
[RFC3370] MUST be supported.  When key agreement is used, Elliptic
+
[[RFC3370]] MUST be supported.  When key agreement is used, Elliptic
Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) [RFC5753] [RFC6090] MAY be supported.
+
Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) [[RFC5753]] [[RFC6090]] MAY be supported.
  
 
Regardless of the key management technique choice, implementations
 
Regardless of the key management technique choice, implementations
Line 132: Line 109:
 
algorithm MUST be used.  If the content-encryption algorithm is
 
algorithm MUST be used.  If the content-encryption algorithm is
 
AES-128 in CBC mode, then the key-wrap algorithm MUST be AES-128 Key
 
AES-128 in CBC mode, then the key-wrap algorithm MUST be AES-128 Key
Wrap [RFC3394].  If the content-encryption algorithm is AES-256 in
+
Wrap [[RFC3394]].  If the content-encryption algorithm is AES-256 in
 
CBC mode, then the key-wrap algorithm MUST be AES-256 Key Wrap
 
CBC mode, then the key-wrap algorithm MUST be AES-256 Key Wrap
[RFC3394].
+
[[RFC3394]].
  
 
== EncryptedData ==
 
== EncryptedData ==
Line 150: Line 127:
 
If an implementation supports AuthEnvelopedData, then it MUST
 
If an implementation supports AuthEnvelopedData, then it MUST
 
implement the EnvelopedData recommendations except for the content-
 
implement the EnvelopedData recommendations except for the content-
encryption algorithm, which, in this case, MUST be AES-GCM [RFC5084];
+
encryption algorithm, which, in this case, MUST be AES-GCM [[RFC5084]];
 
the 128-bit version MUST be implemented, and the 256-bit version
 
the 128-bit version MUST be implemented, and the 256-bit version
 
SHOULD be implemented.  Implementations MAY also support AES-CCM
 
SHOULD be implemented.  Implementations MAY also support AES-CCM
[RFC5084].
+
[[RFC5084]].
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
== Public Key Sizes ==
 
== Public Key Sizes ==
  
 
The easiest way to implement SignedData, EnvelopedData, and
 
The easiest way to implement SignedData, EnvelopedData, and
AuthEnvelopedData is with public key certificates [RFC5280].  If an
+
AuthEnvelopedData is with public key certificates [[RFC5280]].  If an
 
implementation supports RSA, RSASSA-PSS, DSA, RSAES-OAEP, or Diffie-
 
implementation supports RSA, RSASSA-PSS, DSA, RSAES-OAEP, or Diffie-
 
Hellman, then it MUST support key lengths from 1024-bit to 2048-bit,
 
Hellman, then it MUST support key lengths from 1024-bit to 2048-bit,
 
inclusive.  If an implementation supports ECDSA or ECDH, then it MUST
 
inclusive.  If an implementation supports ECDSA or ECDH, then it MUST
support keys on the P-256 curve [RFC6090].
+
support keys on the P-256 curve [[RFC6090]].
  
 
== Security Considerations ==
 
== Security Considerations ==
  
The security considerations from [RFC3370], [RFC3394], [RFC3560],
+
The security considerations from [[RFC3370]], [[RFC3394]], [[RFC3560]],
[RFC4056], [RFC5084], [RFC5652], [RFC5753], and [RFC5754] apply.
+
[[RFC4056]], [[RFC5084]], [[RFC5652]], [[RFC5753]], and [[RFC5754]] apply.
  
 
[SP800-57] provides comparable bits of security for some algorithms
 
[SP800-57] provides comparable bits of security for some algorithms
Line 192: Line 160:
 
=== Normative References ===
 
=== Normative References ===
  
[AES]      National Institute of Standards and Technology, FIPS Pub           197: Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), 26 November 2001.
+
[AES]      National Institute of Standards and Technology, FIPS Pub
[RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate           Requirement Levels", [[BCP14|BCP 14]], [[RFC2119|RFC 2119]], March 1997.
+
          197: Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), 26 November 2001.
[RFC3370]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)           Algorithms", [[RFC3370|RFC 3370]], August 2002.
+
 
[RFC3394]  Schaad, J. and R. Housley, "Advanced Encryption Standard           (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm", [[RFC3394|RFC 3394]], September 2002.
+
[[RFC2119]]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
[RFC3560]  Housley, R., "Use of the RSAES-OAEP Key Transport           Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC           3560, July 2003.
+
          Requirement Levels", [[BCP14|BCP 14]], [[RFC2119|RFC 2119]], March 1997.
[RFC4056]  Schaad, J., "Use of the RSASSA-PSS Signature Algorithm in          Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", [[RFC4056|RFC 4056]], June 2005.
+
 
 +
[[RFC3370]]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
 +
          Algorithms", [[RFC3370|RFC 3370]], August 2002.
 +
 
 +
[[RFC3394]]  Schaad, J. and R. Housley, "Advanced Encryption Standard
 +
          (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm", [[RFC3394|RFC 3394]], September 2002.
 +
 
 +
[[RFC3560]]  Housley, R., "Use of the RSAES-OAEP Key Transport
 +
          Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC
 +
          3560, July 2003.
  
 +
[[RFC4056]]  Schaad, J., "Use of the RSASSA-PSS Signature Algorithm in
 +
          Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", [[RFC4056|RFC 4056]], June 2005.
  
 +
[[RFC5083]]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
 +
          Authenticated-Enveloped-Data Content Type", [[RFC5083|RFC 5083]],
 +
          November 2007.
  
 +
[[RFC5084]]  Housley, R., "Using AES-CCM and AES-GCM Authenticated
 +
          Encryption in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC
 +
          5084, November 2007.
  
 +
[[RFC5280]]  Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
 +
          Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
 +
          Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
 +
          (CRL) Profile", [[RFC5280|RFC 5280]], May 2008.
  
 +
[[RFC5652]]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", [[STD70|STD 70]],
 +
          [[RFC5652|RFC 5652]], September 2009.
 +
 +
[[RFC5753]]  Turner, S. and D. Brown, "Use of Elliptic Curve
 +
          Cryptography (ECC) Algorithms in Cryptographic Message
 +
          Syntax (CMS)", [[RFC5753|RFC 5753]], January 2010.
 +
 +
[[RFC5754]]  Turner, S., "Using SHA2 Algorithms with Cryptographic
 +
          Message Syntax", [[RFC5754|RFC 5754]], January 2010.
 +
 +
[[RFC6090]]  McGrew, D., Igoe, K., and M. Salter, "Fundamental Elliptic
 +
          Curve Cryptography Algorithms", [[RFC6090|RFC 6090]], February 2011.
 +
 +
[[RFC7191]]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Key
 +
          Package Receipt and Error Content Types", [[RFC7191|RFC 7191]], April
 +
          2014.
  
[RFC5083]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)          Authenticated-Enveloped-Data Content Type", [[RFC5083|RFC 5083]],          November 2007.
 
[RFC5084]  Housley, R., "Using AES-CCM and AES-GCM Authenticated          Encryption in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC          5084, November 2007.
 
[RFC5280]  Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,          Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key          Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List          (CRL) Profile", [[RFC5280|RFC 5280]], May 2008.
 
[RFC5652]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", STD 70,          [[RFC5652|RFC 5652]], September 2009.
 
[RFC5753]  Turner, S. and D. Brown, "Use of Elliptic Curve          Cryptography (ECC) Algorithms in Cryptographic Message          Syntax (CMS)", [[RFC5753|RFC 5753]], January 2010.
 
[RFC5754]  Turner, S., "Using SHA2 Algorithms with Cryptographic          Message Syntax", [[RFC5754|RFC 5754]], January 2010.
 
[RFC6090]  McGrew, D., Igoe, K., and M. Salter, "Fundamental Elliptic          Curve Cryptography Algorithms", [[RFC6090|RFC 6090]], February 2011.
 
[RFC7191]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Key          Package Receipt and Error Content Types", [[RFC7191|RFC 7191]], April          2014.
 
 
== Informative References ==
 
== Informative References ==
  
[RFC5959]  Turner, S., "Algorithms for Asymmetric Key Package Content
+
[[RFC5959]]  Turner, S., "Algorithms for Asymmetric Key Package Content
 
           Type", [[RFC5959|RFC 5959]], August 2010.
 
           Type", [[RFC5959|RFC 5959]], August 2010.
  
[RFC6033]  Turner, S., "Algorithms for Cryptographic Message Syntax
+
[[RFC6033]]  Turner, S., "Algorithms for Cryptographic Message Syntax
 
           (CMS) Encrypted Key Package Content Type", [[RFC6033|RFC 6033]],
 
           (CMS) Encrypted Key Package Content Type", [[RFC6033|RFC 6033]],
 
           December 2010.
 
           December 2010.
  
[RFC6160]  Turner, S., "Algorithms for Cryptographic Message Syntax
+
[[RFC6160]]  Turner, S., "Algorithms for Cryptographic Message Syntax
 
           (CMS) Protection of Symmetric Key Package Content Types",
 
           (CMS) Protection of Symmetric Key Package Content Types",
 
           [[RFC6160|RFC 6160]], April 2011.
 
           [[RFC6160|RFC 6160]], April 2011.
  
[RFC6161]  Turner, S., "Elliptic Curve Algorithms for Cryptographic
+
[[RFC6161]]  Turner, S., "Elliptic Curve Algorithms for Cryptographic
 
           Message Syntax (CMS) Encrypted Key Package Content Type",
 
           Message Syntax (CMS) Encrypted Key Package Content Type",
 
           [[RFC6161|RFC 6161]], April 2011.
 
           [[RFC6161|RFC 6161]], April 2011.
  
 
+
[[RFC6162]]  Turner, S., "Elliptic Curve Algorithms for Cryptographic
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[RFC6162]  Turner, S., "Elliptic Curve Algorithms for Cryptographic
 
 
           Message Syntax (CMS) Asymmetric Key Package Content Type",
 
           Message Syntax (CMS) Asymmetric Key Package Content Type",
 
           [[RFC6162|RFC 6162]], April 2011.
 
           [[RFC6162|RFC 6162]], April 2011.
Line 252: Line 243:
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
[[Category:Standards Track]]
 
[[Category:Standards Track]]

Latest revision as of 02:49, 2 October 2020

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) S. Turner Request for Comments: 7192 IECA Category: Standards Track April 2014 ISSN: 2070-1721

       Algorithms for Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
          Key Package Receipt and Error Content Types

Abstract

This document describes the conventions for using several cryptographic algorithms with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) key package receipt and error content types. Specifically, it includes conventions necessary to implement SignedData, EnvelopedData, EncryptedData, and AuthEnvelopedData.

Status of This Memo

This is an Internet Standards Track document.

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7192.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

Introduction

This document describes the conventions for using several cryptographic algorithms with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) key package receipt and error content types RFC7191. Specifically, it includes conventions necessary to implement SignedData RFC5652, EnvelopedData RFC5652, EncryptedData RFC5652, and AuthEnvelopedData RFC5083.

This document does not define any new algorithms; instead, it refers to previously defined algorithms. In fact, the algorithm requirements in this document are the same as those in RFC5959, RFC6033, RFC6160, RFC6161, and RFC6162 with the following exceptions: the content-encryption algorithm is AES in Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode as opposed to AES Key Wrap with Message Length Indicator (MLI) and the key-wrap algorithm is AES Key Wrap as opposed to AES Key Wrap with MLI. The rationale for the difference is that the receipt and error content types are not keys; therefore, AES Key Wrap with MLI is not appropriate for the content-encryption algorithm. If an implementation is not using AES Key Wrap with MLI as the content-encryption algorithm, then there's no need to keep the key-wrap algorithm the same as the content encryption algorithm.

NOTE: RFC7191 only requires that the key package receipt be signed.

Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119.

SignedData

If an implementation supports SignedData, then it MUST support the signature scheme RSA RFC3370 and SHOULD support the signature schemes RSA Probabilistic Signature Scheme (RSASSA-PSS) RFC4056 and Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) RFC3370. Additionally, implementations MUST support the hash function SHA-256 RFC5754 in concert with these signature schemes, and they SHOULD support the hash function SHA-1 RFC3370. Implementations can also choose the to support Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) RFC5753 and RFC6090.

EnvelopedData

If an implementation supports EnvelopedData, then it MUST implement key transport and it MAY implement key agreement.

When key transport is used, RSA encryption RFC3370 MUST be supported, and RSA Encryption Scheme - Optimal Asymmetric Encryption Padding (RSAES-OAEP) RFC3560 SHOULD be supported.

When key agreement is used, Diffie-Hellman (DH) ephemeral-static RFC3370 MUST be supported. When key agreement is used, Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) RFC5753 RFC6090 MAY be supported.

Regardless of the key management technique choice, implementations MUST support AES-128 in CBC mode [AES] as the content-encryption algorithm. Implementations SHOULD support AES-256 in CBC mode [AES] as the content-encryption algorithm.

When key agreement is used, the same length for the underlying block algorithm MUST be used. If the content-encryption algorithm is AES-128 in CBC mode, then the key-wrap algorithm MUST be AES-128 Key Wrap RFC3394. If the content-encryption algorithm is AES-256 in CBC mode, then the key-wrap algorithm MUST be AES-256 Key Wrap RFC3394.

EncryptedData

If an implementation supports EncryptedData, then it MUST implement AES-128 in CBC mode [AES] and SHOULD implement AES-256 in CBC mode [AES].

NOTE: EncryptedData requires that keys be managed by other means; therefore, the only algorithm specified is the content-encryption algorithm.

AuthEnvelopedData

If an implementation supports AuthEnvelopedData, then it MUST implement the EnvelopedData recommendations except for the content- encryption algorithm, which, in this case, MUST be AES-GCM RFC5084; the 128-bit version MUST be implemented, and the 256-bit version SHOULD be implemented. Implementations MAY also support AES-CCM RFC5084.

Public Key Sizes

The easiest way to implement SignedData, EnvelopedData, and AuthEnvelopedData is with public key certificates RFC5280. If an implementation supports RSA, RSASSA-PSS, DSA, RSAES-OAEP, or Diffie- Hellman, then it MUST support key lengths from 1024-bit to 2048-bit, inclusive. If an implementation supports ECDSA or ECDH, then it MUST support keys on the P-256 curve RFC6090.

Security Considerations

The security considerations from RFC3370, RFC3394, RFC3560, RFC4056, RFC5084, RFC5652, RFC5753, and RFC5754 apply.

[SP800-57] provides comparable bits of security for some algorithms and key sizes. [SP800-57] also provides time frames during which certain numbers of bits of security are appropriate, and some environments may find these time frames useful.

Acknowledgements

I'd like to thank Russ Housley for his early feedback on this document.

References

Normative References

[AES] National Institute of Standards and Technology, FIPS Pub

          197: Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), 26 November 2001.

RFC2119 Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate

          Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

RFC3370 Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)

          Algorithms", RFC 3370, August 2002.

RFC3394 Schaad, J. and R. Housley, "Advanced Encryption Standard

          (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm", RFC 3394, September 2002.

RFC3560 Housley, R., "Use of the RSAES-OAEP Key Transport

          Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC
          3560, July 2003.

RFC4056 Schaad, J., "Use of the RSASSA-PSS Signature Algorithm in

          Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 4056, June 2005.

RFC5083 Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)

          Authenticated-Enveloped-Data Content Type", RFC 5083,
          November 2007.

RFC5084 Housley, R., "Using AES-CCM and AES-GCM Authenticated

          Encryption in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC
          5084, November 2007.

RFC5280 Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,

          Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
          Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
          (CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, May 2008.

RFC5652 Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", STD 70,

          RFC 5652, September 2009.

RFC5753 Turner, S. and D. Brown, "Use of Elliptic Curve

          Cryptography (ECC) Algorithms in Cryptographic Message
          Syntax (CMS)", RFC 5753, January 2010.

RFC5754 Turner, S., "Using SHA2 Algorithms with Cryptographic

          Message Syntax", RFC 5754, January 2010.

RFC6090 McGrew, D., Igoe, K., and M. Salter, "Fundamental Elliptic

          Curve Cryptography Algorithms", RFC 6090, February 2011.

RFC7191 Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Key

          Package Receipt and Error Content Types", RFC 7191, April
          2014.

Informative References

RFC5959 Turner, S., "Algorithms for Asymmetric Key Package Content

          Type", RFC 5959, August 2010.

RFC6033 Turner, S., "Algorithms for Cryptographic Message Syntax

          (CMS) Encrypted Key Package Content Type", RFC 6033,
          December 2010.

RFC6160 Turner, S., "Algorithms for Cryptographic Message Syntax

          (CMS) Protection of Symmetric Key Package Content Types",
          RFC 6160, April 2011.

RFC6161 Turner, S., "Elliptic Curve Algorithms for Cryptographic

          Message Syntax (CMS) Encrypted Key Package Content Type",
          RFC 6161, April 2011.

RFC6162 Turner, S., "Elliptic Curve Algorithms for Cryptographic

          Message Syntax (CMS) Asymmetric Key Package Content Type",
          RFC 6162, April 2011.

[SP800-57] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),

          Special Publication 800-57: Recommendation for Key
          Management - Part 1 (Revised), March 2007.

Author's Address

Sean Turner IECA, Inc. 3057 Nutley Street, Suite 106 Fairfax, VA 22031 USA

EMail: [email protected]