Difference between revisions of "RFC1204"

From RFC-Wiki
imported>Admin
(Created page with " Network Working Group S. Yeh Request for Comments: 1204 D. Lee ...")
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Network Working Group                                            S. Yeh
 
Network Working Group                                            S. Yeh
 
Request for Comments: 1204                                        D. Lee
 
Request for Comments: 1204                                        D. Lee
                                          Netix Communications, Inc.
+
                                              Netix Communications, Inc.
                                                        February 1991
+
                                                          February 1991
  
  
                  Message Posting Protocol (MPP)
+
                    Message Posting Protocol (MPP)
  
 
Status of this Memo
 
Status of this Memo
  
This memo describes a protocol for posting messages from workstations
+
  This memo describes a protocol for posting messages from workstations
(e.g., PCs) to a mail service host.  This RFC specifies an
+
  (e.g., PCs) to a mail service host.  This RFC specifies an
Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.  Discussion and
+
  Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.  Discussion and
suggestions for improvement are requested.  Please refer to the
+
  suggestions for improvement are requested.  Please refer to the
current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" for the
+
  current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" for the
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of
+
  standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.
+
  this memo is unlimited.
  
== INTRODUCTION ==
+
1. INTRODUCTION
  
Operating systems for personal computers do not provide a mechanism
+
  Operating systems for personal computers do not provide a mechanism
for user authentication.  However, such a mechanism is crucial for
+
  for user authentication.  However, such a mechanism is crucial for
electronic mail system since authenticating message sender's identity
+
  electronic mail system since authenticating message sender's identity
is important in preventing mail forgery.  Hence, adding personal
+
  is important in preventing mail forgery.  Hence, adding personal
computers to an electronic mail network requires an agent (message
+
  computers to an electronic mail network requires an agent (message
posting server) to authenticate sender's identity and then submit
+
  posting server) to authenticate sender's identity and then submit
mail to the message delivery system (e.g., Sendmail, MMDF) on behalf
+
  mail to the message delivery system (e.g., Sendmail, MMDF) on behalf
of the sender at a PC.  The Netix Message Posting Protocol is
+
  of the sender at a PC.  The Netix Message Posting Protocol is
developed to be the interface between the message posting server and
+
  developed to be the interface between the message posting server and
the PC (client).  The protocol is designed to use TCP and is based on
+
  the PC (client).  The protocol is designed to use TCP and is based on
the command and reply structures defined for Simple Mail Transfer
+
  the command and reply structures defined for Simple Mail Transfer
Protocol ([[RFC821|RFC 821]]) and File Transfer Protocol ([[RFC959|RFC 959]]).
+
  Protocol (RFC 821) and File Transfer Protocol (RFC 959).
  
== SPECIFICATIONS ==
+
2. SPECIFICATIONS
  
=== Command List ===
+
2.1.  Command List
  
  USER <SP> <username> <CRLF>
+
      USER <SP> <username> <CRLF>
  PASS <SP> <password> <CRLF>
+
      PASS <SP> <password> <CRLF>
  DATA <CRLF>
+
      DATA <CRLF>
  NOOP <CRLF>
+
      NOOP <CRLF>
  QUIT <CRLF>
+
      QUIT <CRLF>
  
=== Reply List ===
+
2.2.  Reply List
  
  220 Message Posting Service Ready.
+
      220 Message Posting Service Ready.
  221 Closing Connection.
+
      221 Closing Connection.
  250 Command OK.
+
      250 Command OK.
  
  
  
 +
Yeh & Lee                                                     
  
 +
RFC 1204                          MPP                      February 1991
  
  354 Enter mail, end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
 
  451 Local error encountered.
 
  500 Command unrecognized.
 
  501 Argument syntax error.
 
  503 Illegal command sequence.
 
  530 Authentication Failure.
 
  550 Error.
 
  
=== Command and Reply Descriptions ===
+
      354 Enter mail, end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
 +
      451 Local error encountered.
 +
      500 Command unrecognized.
 +
      501 Argument syntax error.
 +
      503 Illegal command sequence.
 +
      530 Authentication Failure.
 +
      550 Error.
  
  USER <SP> <username> <CRLF>
+
2.3.  Command and Reply Descriptions
  
       The USER command informs the message posting server about the
+
       USER <SP> <username> <CRLF>
      username of the user trying to submit mail to the network.  The
 
      required argument for the USER command is a string specifying
 
      the message sender's username.
 
  
      The USER command can only be used under three conditions:
+
        The USER command informs the message posting server about the
 +
        username of the user trying to submit mail to the network.  The
 +
        required argument for the USER command is a string specifying
 +
        the message sender's username.
  
      - when the session with the message posting server has just
+
        The USER command can only be used under three conditions:
        started;
 
  
      - right after a message text (terminated by the "<CRLF>.<CRLF>"
+
        - when the session with the message posting server has just
        sequence) has been successfully submitted to the message
+
          started;
        posting server;
 
  
      - right after a USER command that gets the reply code 501.
+
        - right after a message text (terminated by the "<CRLF>.<CRLF>"
 +
          sequence) has been successfully submitted to the message
 +
          posting server;
  
      List of possible reply codes for the USER command:
+
        - right after a USER command that gets the reply code 501.
  
      - 250  The username of the message sender has been accepted.
+
        List of possible reply codes for the USER command:
  
      - 451   Internal error has occurred in the message posting
+
        - 250   The username of the message sender has been accepted.
              server.
 
  
      - 501   Syntax error detected in the username argument.
+
        - 451   Internal error has occurred in the message posting
 +
                server.
  
      - 503   The USER command has been used under an inappropriate
+
        - 501   Syntax error detected in the username argument.
              condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
 
  
      It is recommended that the message posting server should return
+
        - 503  The USER command has been used under an inappropriate
      250 even if the username is not recognized by the message
+
                condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
      posting server, as long as the username is syntactically
 
      correct.  This is an attempt to prevent the message posting
 
      server from releasing too much information about the user
 
      database.  Client should not be able to test the existence of a
 
      certain username.
 
  
 +
        It is recommended that the message posting server should return
 +
        250 even if the username is not recognized by the message
 +
        posting server, as long as the username is syntactically
 +
        correct.  This is an attempt to prevent the message posting
 +
        server from releasing too much information about the user
 +
        database.  Client should not be able to test the existence of a
 +
        certain username.
  
  
  
  
 +
Yeh & Lee                                                     
  
  PASS <SP> <password> <CRLF>
+
RFC 1204                          MPP                      February 1991
  
      The PASS command is used to inform the message posting server
 
      about the password associated with the username previously
 
      specified.  The required argument for the PASS command is a
 
      string specifying the message sender's password.
 
  
       The PASS command can only be used under two conditions:
+
       PASS <SP> <password> <CRLF>
  
      - right after a USER command that gets the reply code 250;
+
        The PASS command is used to inform the message posting server
 +
        about the password associated with the username previously
 +
        specified.  The required argument for the PASS command is a
 +
        string specifying the message sender's password.
  
      - right after a PASS command that gets the reply code 501.
+
        The PASS command can only be used under two conditions:
  
      List of possible reply codes for the PASS command:
+
        - right after a USER command that gets the reply code 250;
  
      - 250  The password has been accepted and verified to be
+
        - right after a PASS command that gets the reply code 501.
              correctly associated with the username previously
 
              specified.
 
  
      - 451  Internal error has occurred in the message posting
+
        List of possible reply codes for the PASS command:
              server.
 
  
      - 501   Syntax error detected in the password argument.
+
        - 250   The password has been accepted and verified to be
 +
                correctly associated with the username previously
 +
                specified.
  
      - 503   The PASS command has been used under an inappropriate
+
        - 451   Internal error has occurred in the message posting
              condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
+
                server.
  
      - 530   The password provided is not the one associated with the
+
        - 501   Syntax error detected in the password argument.
              username previously specified.
 
  
  DATA <CRLF>
+
        - 503  The PASS command has been used under an inappropriate
 +
                condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
  
      The DATA command is used to inform the message posting server
+
        - 530  The password provided is not the one associated with the
      to get ready to accept a mail message text.  No argument is
+
                username previously specified.
      expected.  (This command has the same meaning as the DATA
 
      command defined in [[RFC821|RFC 821]].)
 
  
       The DATA command can only be used under two conditions:
+
       DATA <CRLF>
  
      - right after a PASS command that gets the reply code 250;
+
        The DATA command is used to inform the message posting server
 +
        to get ready to accept a mail message text.  No argument is
 +
        expected.  (This command has the same meaning as the DATA
 +
        command defined in RFC 821.)
  
      - right after a mail message text has been successfully
+
        The DATA command can only be used under two conditions:
        accepted from the client.
 
  
      List of possible reply codes for the DATA command:
+
        - right after a PASS command that gets the reply code 250;
  
      - 354  The message posting server is ready to accept the mail
+
        - right after a mail message text has been successfully
              message text.
+
          accepted from the client.
  
 +
        List of possible reply codes for the DATA command:
  
 +
        - 354  The message posting server is ready to accept the mail
 +
                message text.
  
  
  
      - 451  Internal error has occurred in the message posting
+
Yeh & Lee                                                     
              server.
 
  
      - 503  The DATA command has been used under an inappropriate
+
RFC 1204                          MPP                      February 1991
              condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
 
  
      Upon receiving the reply code 354 for the DATA command, the
 
      client should submit the mail message text to message posting
 
      server and terminate the text by the sequence "<CRLF>.<CRLF>"
 
      as defined in [[RFC821|RFC 821]].  If the message text includes the
 
      "<CRLF>.<CRLF>" sequence, then the sequence is replaced by the
 
      "<CRLF>..<CRLF>" sequence as defined in [[RFC821|RFC 821]].  The extra "."
 
      token will not be included in the final copy of the submitted
 
      message.
 
  
      Upon receiving the mail message text terminated by the
+
        - 451  Internal error has occurred in the message posting
      "<CRLF>.<CRLF>" sequence, list of possible reply codes is:
+
                server.
  
      - 250   The mail message text has been successfully queued for
+
        - 503   The DATA command has been used under an inappropriate
              delivery.
+
                condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
  
      - 451  Internal error has occurred in the message posting
+
        Upon receiving the reply code 354 for the DATA command, the
              server and the mail message text has not been queued.
+
        client should submit the mail message text to message posting
 +
        server and terminate the text by the sequence "<CRLF>.<CRLF>"
 +
        as defined in RFC 821.  If the message text includes the
 +
        "<CRLF>.<CRLF>" sequence, then the sequence is replaced by the
 +
        "<CRLF>..<CRLF>" sequence as defined in RFC 821.  The extra "."
 +
        token will not be included in the final copy of the submitted
 +
        message.
  
  NOOP <CRLF>
+
        Upon receiving the mail message text terminated by the
 +
        "<CRLF>.<CRLF>" sequence, list of possible reply codes is:
  
      The NOOP command does not cause any action to be performed by
+
        - 250  The mail message text has been successfully queued for
      the message posting server.  Instead, it tests the status of
+
                delivery.
      the message posting server.  No argument is expected.
 
  
      The NOOP command cannot be used under one condition:
+
        - 451  Internal error has occurred in the message posting
 +
                server and the mail message text has not been queued.
  
       - right after a DATA command that gets the reply code 354
+
       NOOP <CRLF>
        (i.e., when the message posting server is expecting the client
 
        to submit the mail message text).
 
  
      List of possible reply codes for the NOOP command:
+
        The NOOP command does not cause any action to be performed by
 +
        the message posting server.  Instead, it tests the status of
 +
        the message posting server.  No argument is expected.
  
      - 250  The message posting server has not encountered any
+
        The NOOP command cannot be used under one condition:
              internal error.
 
  
      - 451  Internal error has occurred in the message posting
+
        - right after a DATA command that gets the reply code 354
              server during the current session.
+
          (i.e., when the message posting server is expecting the client
 +
          to submit the mail message text).
  
  QUIT <CRLF>
+
        List of possible reply codes for the NOOP command:
  
      The QUIT command is used to terminate the session with the
+
        - 250  The message posting server has not encountered any
      message posting server.  No argument is expected.
+
                internal error.
  
 +
        - 451  Internal error has occurred in the message posting
 +
                server during the current session.
  
 +
      QUIT <CRLF>
  
 +
        The QUIT command is used to terminate the session with the
 +
        message posting server.  No argument is expected.
  
  
      The QUIT command can be used under any condition.  The message
 
      posting server should always return the reply code 221 for the
 
      QUIT command.
 
  
== IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MESSAGE POSTING SERVER ==
+
Yeh & Lee                                                     
  
There are several issues to be considered when implementing the
+
RFC 1204                          MPP                      February 1991
message posting server:
 
  
- secured environment
+
 
- port number assignment
+
        The QUIT command can be used under any condition.  The message
- handling of idle client
+
        posting server should always return the reply code 221 for the
- local/remote password database
+
        QUIT command.
- message queuing
+
 
- handling of message delivery failure
+
3. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MESSAGE POSTING SERVER
 +
 
 +
  There are several issues to be considered when implementing the
 +
  message posting server:
 +
 
 +
  - secured environment
 +
  - port number assignment
 +
  - handling of idle client
 +
  - local/remote password database
 +
  - message queuing
 +
  - handling of message delivery failure
  
 
3.1  Secured Environment
 
3.1  Secured Environment
  
The message posting server is responsible for authenticating message
+
  The message posting server is responsible for authenticating message
senders and submitting mail to the message delivery system.  Hence,
+
  senders and submitting mail to the message delivery system.  Hence,
it should be running in a secured environment, such as running on a
+
  it should be running in a secured environment, such as running on a
system (UNIX, VMS, MS-DOS) with well restricted physical and network
+
  system (UNIX, VMS, MS-DOS) with well restricted physical and network
access.
+
  access.
  
 
3.2  Port Number Assignment
 
3.2  Port Number Assignment
  
Port 218 is assigned for the Netix Message Posting Protocol.
+
  Port 218 is assigned for the Netix Message Posting Protocol.
  
 
3.3  Handling of Idle Client
 
3.3  Handling of Idle Client
  
The message posting server should terminate a session if the client
+
  The message posting server should terminate a session if the client
has been idle for too long, to release the resource allocated for the
+
  has been idle for too long, to release the resource allocated for the
session.
+
  session.
  
 
3.4  Local/Remote Password Database
 
3.4  Local/Remote Password Database
  
To take advantage of existing password databases, such as the passwd
+
  To take advantage of existing password databases, such as the passwd
file in UNIX, the message posting server can use FTP and POP3 to
+
  file in UNIX, the message posting server can use FTP and POP3 to
perform the username and password checking with the appropriate
+
  perform the username and password checking with the appropriate
server.
+
  server.
  
For network that does not have any password database, the message
+
  For network that does not have any password database, the message
posting server should let the system administrator specify a local
+
  posting server should let the system administrator specify a local
password file on the host that the message posting server is running.
+
  password file on the host that the message posting server is running.
  
  
Line 268: Line 280:
  
  
 +
Yeh & Lee                                                     
 +
 +
RFC 1204                          MPP                      February 1991
  
  
 
3.5  Message Queuing
 
3.5  Message Queuing
  
The message posting server should attempt to submit accepted messages
+
  The message posting server should attempt to submit accepted messages
to the message delivery system as soon as possible.
+
  to the message delivery system as soon as possible.
  
 
3.6  Handling of Message Delivery Failure
 
3.6  Handling of Message Delivery Failure
  
Failure in delivering messages should be handled by the message
+
  Failure in delivering messages should be handled by the message
delivery system and the message posting server should not interfere.
+
  delivery system and the message posting server should not interfere.
  
== REFERENCES ==
+
4. REFERENCES
  
[1] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", [[RFC821|RFC 821]],
+
  [1] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 821,
    USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1982.
+
      USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1982.
  
[2] Postel, J., and J. Reynolds, "File Transfer Protocol", [[RFC959|RFC 959]],
+
  [2] Postel, J., and J. Reynolds, "File Transfer Protocol", RFC 959,
    USC/Information Sciences Institute, October 1985.
+
      USC/Information Sciences Institute, October 1985.
  
 
Security Considerations
 
Security Considerations
  
Security issues are discussed in section 3.1.
+
  Security issues are discussed in section 3.1.
  
 
Authors' Addresses
 
Authors' Addresses
  
Shannon Yeh
+
  Shannon Yeh
Netix Communications, Inc.
+
  Netix Communications, Inc.
15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite A-215
+
  15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite A-215
Irvine, CA 92718
+
  Irvine, CA 92718
 +
 
 +
  Phone: (714) 727-9335
 +
 
 +
 +
 
 +
 
 +
  David Lee
 +
  Netix Communications, Inc.
 +
  15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite A-215
 +
  Irvine, CA 92718
 +
 
 +
  Phone: (714) 727-9335
 +
 
 +
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
  
Phone: (714) 727-9335
 
  
 
  
  
David Lee
 
Netix Communications, Inc.
 
15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite A-215
 
Irvine, CA 92718
 
  
Phone: (714) 727-9335
 
  
+
Yeh & Lee

Revision as of 23:47, 22 September 2020




Network Working Group S. Yeh Request for Comments: 1204 D. Lee

                                             Netix Communications, Inc.
                                                          February 1991


                    Message Posting Protocol (MPP)

Status of this Memo

  This memo describes a protocol for posting messages from workstations
  (e.g., PCs) to a mail service host.  This RFC specifies an
  Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.  Discussion and
  suggestions for improvement are requested.  Please refer to the
  current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" for the
  standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of
  this memo is unlimited.

1. INTRODUCTION

  Operating systems for personal computers do not provide a mechanism
  for user authentication.  However, such a mechanism is crucial for
  electronic mail system since authenticating message sender's identity
  is important in preventing mail forgery.  Hence, adding personal
  computers to an electronic mail network requires an agent (message
  posting server) to authenticate sender's identity and then submit
  mail to the message delivery system (e.g., Sendmail, MMDF) on behalf
  of the sender at a PC.  The Netix Message Posting Protocol is
  developed to be the interface between the message posting server and
  the PC (client).  The protocol is designed to use TCP and is based on
  the command and reply structures defined for Simple Mail Transfer
  Protocol (RFC 821) and File Transfer Protocol (RFC 959).

2. SPECIFICATIONS

2.1. Command List

     USER <SP> <username> <CRLF>
     PASS <SP> <password> <CRLF>
     DATA <CRLF>
     NOOP <CRLF>
     QUIT <CRLF>

2.2. Reply List

     220 Message Posting Service Ready.
     221 Closing Connection.
     250 Command OK.


Yeh & Lee

RFC 1204 MPP February 1991


     354 Enter mail, end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
     451 Local error encountered.
     500 Command unrecognized.
     501 Argument syntax error.
     503 Illegal command sequence.
     530 Authentication Failure.
     550 Error.

2.3. Command and Reply Descriptions

     USER <SP> <username> <CRLF>
        The USER command informs the message posting server about the
        username of the user trying to submit mail to the network.  The
        required argument for the USER command is a string specifying
        the message sender's username.
        The USER command can only be used under three conditions:
        - when the session with the message posting server has just
          started;
        - right after a message text (terminated by the "<CRLF>.<CRLF>"
          sequence) has been successfully submitted to the message
          posting server;
        - right after a USER command that gets the reply code 501.
        List of possible reply codes for the USER command:
        - 250   The username of the message sender has been accepted.
        - 451   Internal error has occurred in the message posting
                server.
        - 501   Syntax error detected in the username argument.
        - 503   The USER command has been used under an inappropriate
                condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
        It is recommended that the message posting server should return
        250 even if the username is not recognized by the message
        posting server, as long as the username is syntactically
        correct.  This is an attempt to prevent the message posting
        server from releasing too much information about the user
        database.  Client should not be able to test the existence of a
        certain username.



Yeh & Lee

RFC 1204 MPP February 1991


     PASS <SP> <password> <CRLF>
        The PASS command is used to inform the message posting server
        about the password associated with the username previously
        specified.  The required argument for the PASS command is a
        string specifying the message sender's password.
        The PASS command can only be used under two conditions:
        - right after a USER command that gets the reply code 250;
        - right after a PASS command that gets the reply code 501.
        List of possible reply codes for the PASS command:
        - 250   The password has been accepted and verified to be
                correctly associated with the username previously
                specified.
        - 451   Internal error has occurred in the message posting
                server.
        - 501   Syntax error detected in the password argument.
        - 503   The PASS command has been used under an inappropriate
                condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
        - 530   The password provided is not the one associated with the
                username previously specified.
     DATA <CRLF>
        The DATA command is used to inform the message posting server
        to get ready to accept a mail message text.  No argument is
        expected.  (This command has the same meaning as the DATA
        command defined in RFC 821.)
        The DATA command can only be used under two conditions:
        - right after a PASS command that gets the reply code 250;
        - right after a mail message text has been successfully
          accepted from the client.
        List of possible reply codes for the DATA command:
        - 354   The message posting server is ready to accept the mail
                message text.


Yeh & Lee

RFC 1204 MPP February 1991


        - 451   Internal error has occurred in the message posting
                server.
        - 503   The DATA command has been used under an inappropriate
                condition (i.e., one that is not specified above).
        Upon receiving the reply code 354 for the DATA command, the
        client should submit the mail message text to message posting
        server and terminate the text by the sequence "<CRLF>.<CRLF>"
        as defined in RFC 821.  If the message text includes the
        "<CRLF>.<CRLF>" sequence, then the sequence is replaced by the
        "<CRLF>..<CRLF>" sequence as defined in RFC 821.  The extra "."
        token will not be included in the final copy of the submitted
        message.
        Upon receiving the mail message text terminated by the
        "<CRLF>.<CRLF>" sequence, list of possible reply codes is:
        - 250   The mail message text has been successfully queued for
                delivery.
        - 451   Internal error has occurred in the message posting
                server and the mail message text has not been queued.
     NOOP <CRLF>
        The NOOP command does not cause any action to be performed by
        the message posting server.  Instead, it tests the status of
        the message posting server.  No argument is expected.
        The NOOP command cannot be used under one condition:
        - right after a DATA command that gets the reply code 354
          (i.e., when the message posting server is expecting the client
          to submit the mail message text).
        List of possible reply codes for the NOOP command:
        - 250   The message posting server has not encountered any
                internal error.
        - 451   Internal error has occurred in the message posting
                server during the current session.
     QUIT <CRLF>
        The QUIT command is used to terminate the session with the
        message posting server.  No argument is expected.


Yeh & Lee

RFC 1204 MPP February 1991


        The QUIT command can be used under any condition.  The message
        posting server should always return the reply code 221 for the
        QUIT command.

3. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MESSAGE POSTING SERVER

  There are several issues to be considered when implementing the
  message posting server:
  - secured environment
  - port number assignment
  - handling of idle client
  - local/remote password database
  - message queuing
  - handling of message delivery failure

3.1 Secured Environment

  The message posting server is responsible for authenticating message
  senders and submitting mail to the message delivery system.  Hence,
  it should be running in a secured environment, such as running on a
  system (UNIX, VMS, MS-DOS) with well restricted physical and network
  access.

3.2 Port Number Assignment

  Port 218 is assigned for the Netix Message Posting Protocol.

3.3 Handling of Idle Client

  The message posting server should terminate a session if the client
  has been idle for too long, to release the resource allocated for the
  session.

3.4 Local/Remote Password Database

  To take advantage of existing password databases, such as the passwd
  file in UNIX, the message posting server can use FTP and POP3 to
  perform the username and password checking with the appropriate
  server.
  For network that does not have any password database, the message
  posting server should let the system administrator specify a local
  password file on the host that the message posting server is running.




Yeh & Lee

RFC 1204 MPP February 1991


3.5 Message Queuing

  The message posting server should attempt to submit accepted messages
  to the message delivery system as soon as possible.

3.6 Handling of Message Delivery Failure

  Failure in delivering messages should be handled by the message
  delivery system and the message posting server should not interfere.

4. REFERENCES

  [1] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 821,
      USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1982.
  [2] Postel, J., and J. Reynolds, "File Transfer Protocol", RFC 959,
      USC/Information Sciences Institute, October 1985.

Security Considerations

  Security issues are discussed in section 3.1.

Authors' Addresses

  Shannon Yeh
  Netix Communications, Inc.
  15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite A-215
  Irvine, CA 92718
  Phone: (714) 727-9335
  Email: [email protected]


  David Lee
  Netix Communications, Inc.
  15375 Barranca Parkway, Suite A-215
  Irvine, CA 92718
  Phone: (714) 727-9335
  EMail: [email protected]





Yeh & Lee