Difference between revisions of "RFC1365"

From RFC-Wiki
imported>Admin
(Created page with " Network Working Group K. Siyan Request for Comments: 1365 Siyan Consulting Services ...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
  
  
Line 8: Line 7:
 
Request for Comments: 1365                  Siyan Consulting Services
 
Request for Comments: 1365                  Siyan Consulting Services
 
                                                     September 1992
 
                                                     September 1992
 
  
 
                 An IP Address Extension Proposal
 
                 An IP Address Extension Proposal
 
 
Status of This Memo
 
Status of This Memo
 
 
This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
 
This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
 
not specify an Internet standard.  Distribution of this memo is
 
not specify an Internet standard.  Distribution of this memo is
 
unlimited.
 
unlimited.
 
 
Abstract
 
Abstract
 
 
This RFC suggests an extension to the IP protocol to solve the
 
This RFC suggests an extension to the IP protocol to solve the
 
shortage of IP address problem, and requests discussion and
 
shortage of IP address problem, and requests discussion and
 
suggestions for improvements.
 
suggestions for improvements.
 
 
== Introduction and Background ==
 
== Introduction and Background ==
 
 
The Internet community has a well-developed, mature set of protocols
 
The Internet community has a well-developed, mature set of protocols
 
that have been quite successful in providing network and transport
 
that have been quite successful in providing network and transport
Line 32: Line 24:
 
the Internet, there is a shortage of network numbers that can be
 
the Internet, there is a shortage of network numbers that can be
 
assigned.
 
assigned.
 
 
The current network addressing scheme uses a 32-bit IP address that
 
The current network addressing scheme uses a 32-bit IP address that
 
has a network part and a local address part.  The division between
 
has a network part and a local address part.  The division between
Line 39: Line 30:
 
B, C addresses are assigned to hosts. Class D is used for
 
B, C addresses are assigned to hosts. Class D is used for
 
multicasting and class E is reserved.
 
multicasting and class E is reserved.
 
 
Class A has the highest order bit set to 0, a 7 bit network number
 
Class A has the highest order bit set to 0, a 7 bit network number
 
and a 24 bit host address.
 
and a 24 bit host address.
 
 
Class B has the two higher order bits set to 10, a 14 bit network
 
Class B has the two higher order bits set to 10, a 14 bit network
 
number and a 16 bit host address.
 
number and a 16 bit host address.
 
 
Class C has the three higher order bit set to 110, a 21 bit network
 
Class C has the three higher order bit set to 110, a 21 bit network
 
number and a 8 bit host address.
 
number and a 8 bit host address.
 +
Class D has the four higher order bits set to 1110.
 +
Class E has four higher address bits set to 1111.
  
Class D has the four higher order bits set to 1110.
 
  
Class E has four higher address bits set to 1111.
 
  
  
Line 63: Line 51:
 
implementations. OSI based solutions such as using CLNP have been
 
implementations. OSI based solutions such as using CLNP have been
 
proposed but would take time to implement.
 
proposed but would take time to implement.
 
 
== Proposal for IP extension ==
 
== Proposal for IP extension ==
 
 
The IP header format should not be modified to minimize the changes
 
The IP header format should not be modified to minimize the changes
 
necessary for supporting the address extensions that are proposed in
 
necessary for supporting the address extensions that are proposed in
Line 76: Line 62:
 
a new option type that specifies an extended address. The details of
 
a new option type that specifies an extended address. The details of
 
this mechanism are discussed below.
 
this mechanism are discussed below.
 
 
Class E should be defined with the its five high order bits set to
 
Class E should be defined with the its five high order bits set to
 
11110. Its current definition is that four 1's in the most
 
11110. Its current definition is that four 1's in the most
 
significant bits represent a class E address.
 
significant bits represent a class E address.
 
 
A new class F is proposed with its six high order bits set to 111110.
 
A new class F is proposed with its six high order bits set to 111110.
 
The new class F address would be placed in the same locations that
 
The new class F address would be placed in the same locations that
Line 87: Line 71:
 
options part of the IP header. This is illustrated in the figure
 
options part of the IP header. This is illustrated in the figure
 
below:
 
below:
 
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
| Ver.  | IHL  |  TOS        |  Total Length                |
 
| Ver.  | IHL  |  TOS        |  Total Length                |
Line 105: Line 88:
 
:                            Data                              :
 
:                            Data                              :
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 +
 +
  
  
Line 121: Line 106:
 
the possible length values are 4, 8 octets.  It is proposed that new
 
the possible length values are 4, 8 octets.  It is proposed that new
 
IP option codes be used for the SADDR and DADDR codes respectively.
 
IP option codes be used for the SADDR and DADDR codes respectively.
 
 
The IP address is the 2 bytes in the fixed IP header part plus the
 
The IP address is the 2 bytes in the fixed IP header part plus the
 
address field defined in the options part.
 
address field defined in the options part.
 
 
If the "Len adr. part" field has a value of 4, the new class is
 
If the "Len adr. part" field has a value of 4, the new class is
 
designated as the F-4 class (Class F with IP address length of 4
 
designated as the F-4 class (Class F with IP address length of 4
 
octets).
 
octets).
 
 
If the "Len adr. part" field has a value of 8, the new class is
 
If the "Len adr. part" field has a value of 8, the new class is
 
designated as the F-8 class (Class F with IP address length of 8
 
designated as the F-8 class (Class F with IP address length of 8
 
octets).
 
octets).
 
 
Each of the F-4 and F-8 IP address class can be further subdivided
 
Each of the F-4 and F-8 IP address class can be further subdivided
 
into a network number and a host number field in a manner that is
 
into a network number and a host number field in a manner that is
 
similar to the current IP addressing scheme.
 
similar to the current IP addressing scheme.
 
 
The sub-class definitions for F-4 class are shown below. Though the 4
 
The sub-class definitions for F-4 class are shown below. Though the 4
 
octets are drawn contiguously, the first 2 octets and the last 2
 
octets are drawn contiguously, the first 2 octets and the last 2
 
octets are not contiguous in the IP header.
 
octets are not contiguous in the IP header.
 
 
Class F-4A has the highest order bit set to 0, a 7 bit network number
 
Class F-4A has the highest order bit set to 0, a 7 bit network number
 
and a 24 bit host address.
 
and a 24 bit host address.
 
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
|0| net number  |  local part                                  |
 
|0| net number  |  local part                                  |
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
 
Class F-4B has the two higher order bits set to 10, a 14 bit network
 
Class F-4B has the two higher order bits set to 10, a 14 bit network
 
number and a 16 bit host address.
 
number and a 16 bit host address.
 
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
|1|0|      net number          |  local part                  |
 
|1|0|      net number          |  local part                  |
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 +
 +
  
  
Line 166: Line 144:
 
Class F-4C has the three higher order bit set to 110, a 21 bit
 
Class F-4C has the three higher order bit set to 110, a 21 bit
 
network number and a 8 bit host address.
 
network number and a 8 bit host address.
 
 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
   |1|1|0|      net number                        | local part    |
 
   |1|1|0|      net number                        | local part    |
 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
 
Class F-4D has the four higher order bits set to 1110. Class F-4D is
 
Class F-4D has the four higher order bits set to 1110. Class F-4D is
 
reserved for multicasting.
 
reserved for multicasting.
 
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
|1|1|1|0|      |      multicast                              |
 
|1|1|1|0|      |      multicast                              |
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
 
The sub-class definitions for F-8 class are shown below. Though the 8
 
The sub-class definitions for F-8 class are shown below. Though the 8
 
octets are drawn contiguously, the first 2 octets and the last 6
 
octets are drawn contiguously, the first 2 octets and the last 6
 
octets are not contiguous in the IP header.
 
octets are not contiguous in the IP header.
 
 
Class F-8A has the highest order bit set to 0, a 7 bit network number
 
Class F-8A has the highest order bit set to 0, a 7 bit network number
 
and a 56 bit host address.
 
and a 56 bit host address.
 
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
|0| net number  |          local part                          |
 
|0| net number  |          local part                          |
Line 190: Line 162:
 
|                          local part                          |
 
|                          local part                          |
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
 
Class F-8B has the two higher order bits set to 10, a 14 bit network
 
Class F-8B has the two higher order bits set to 10, a 14 bit network
 
number and a 48 bit host address.
 
number and a 48 bit host address.
 
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
|1|0|      net number          |  local part                  |
 
|1|0|      net number          |  local part                  |
Line 199: Line 169:
 
|                          local part                          |
 
|                          local part                          |
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
 
Class F-8C has the three higher order bit set to 110, a 21 bit
 
Class F-8C has the three higher order bit set to 110, a 21 bit
 
network number and a 40 bit host address.
 
network number and a 40 bit host address.
 
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
|1|1|0|      net number                        | local part    |
 
|1|1|0|      net number                        | local part    |
Line 208: Line 176:
 
|                          local part                          |
 
|                          local part                          |
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 +
 +
  
  
Line 219: Line 189:
 
Class F-8D has the four higher order bits set to 1110, a 28 bit
 
Class F-8D has the four higher order bits set to 1110, a 28 bit
 
network number and a 32 bit host address.
 
network number and a 32 bit host address.
 
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
|1|1|1|0|                  net number                          |
 
|1|1|1|0|                  net number                          |
Line 225: Line 194:
 
|                          local part                          |
 
|                          local part                          |
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
 
Class F-8E has the five higher order bits set to 11110, a 35 bit
 
Class F-8E has the five higher order bits set to 11110, a 35 bit
 
network number and a 24 bit host address.
 
network number and a 24 bit host address.
 
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
|1|1|1|1|0|                net number                          |
 
|1|1|1|1|0|                net number                          |
Line 234: Line 201:
 
|  net number  |          local part                          |
 
|  net number  |          local part                          |
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
 
Class F-8F has the six higher order bits set to 111110, a 44 bit
 
Class F-8F has the six higher order bits set to 111110, a 44 bit
 
network number and a 16 bit host address.
 
network number and a 16 bit host address.
 
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
|1|1|1|1|1|0|              net number                          |
 
|1|1|1|1|1|0|              net number                          |
Line 243: Line 208:
 
|          net number          |        local part            |
 
|          net number          |        local part            |
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
 
Class F-8G has the seven higher order bits set to 1111110, a 49 bit
 
Class F-8G has the seven higher order bits set to 1111110, a 49 bit
 
network number and a 8 bit host address.
 
network number and a 8 bit host address.
 
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
|1|1|1|1|1|0|              net number                          |
 
|1|1|1|1|1|0|              net number                          |
Line 252: Line 215:
 
|                net number                    |  local part  |
 
|                net number                    |  local part  |
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
 
== Interoperability Issues ==
 
== Interoperability Issues ==
 
 
If the new class F address is seen by a host that does not support it
 
If the new class F address is seen by a host that does not support it
 
the IP datagram will be ignored. So communication will not be
 
the IP datagram will be ignored. So communication will not be
Line 260: Line 221:
 
existing hosts is much less than implementing an entirely different
 
existing hosts is much less than implementing an entirely different
 
IP header structure or a different protocol.
 
IP header structure or a different protocol.
 
 
The receiving host must be modified to contain the following code
 
The receiving host must be modified to contain the following code
 
sketched below:
 
sketched below:
 +
 +
  
  
Line 272: Line 234:
 
     if (Destination_IP_address & 0xFC000000 == 0xF8000000)
 
     if (Destination_IP_address & 0xFC000000 == 0xF8000000)
 
     {
 
     {
 
 
           /* New extended class F address */
 
           /* New extended class F address */
 
           Class_F_Processing(Destination_IP_address);
 
           Class_F_Processing(Destination_IP_address);
 
 
       }
 
       }
 
 
The Class_F_Processing() procedure can be defined in a separate
 
The Class_F_Processing() procedure can be defined in a separate
 
module. There will be other changes required to communicate the
 
module. There will be other changes required to communicate the
 
results of processing the class F address to the main IP processing
 
results of processing the class F address to the main IP processing
 
module but they should not be so extensive.
 
module but they should not be so extensive.
 
 
Security Considerations
 
Security Considerations
 
 
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
 
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
 
 
Author's Address
 
Author's Address
 
 
Karanjit Siyan
 
Karanjit Siyan
 
Siyan Consulting Services
 
Siyan Consulting Services
Line 294: Line 249:
 
North Glastonbury
 
North Glastonbury
 
Emigrant, Montana 59027
 
Emigrant, Montana 59027
 
 
Phone:  406-333-4491
 
Phone:  406-333-4491
 
  

Revision as of 06:58, 23 September 2020



Network Working Group K. Siyan Request for Comments: 1365 Siyan Consulting Services

                                                    September 1992
                An IP Address Extension Proposal

Status of This Memo This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Abstract This RFC suggests an extension to the IP protocol to solve the shortage of IP address problem, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.

Introduction and Background

The Internet community has a well-developed, mature set of protocols that have been quite successful in providing network and transport services to users. However, because of the spectacular success of the TCP/IP protocols and the number of networks that desire connection to the Internet, there is a shortage of network numbers that can be assigned. The current network addressing scheme uses a 32-bit IP address that has a network part and a local address part. The division between the network part and the local address part has been defined in terms of 5 address classes: class A, B, C, D, E. Of these, only class A, B, C addresses are assigned to hosts. Class D is used for multicasting and class E is reserved. Class A has the highest order bit set to 0, a 7 bit network number and a 24 bit host address. Class B has the two higher order bits set to 10, a 14 bit network number and a 16 bit host address. Class C has the three higher order bit set to 110, a 21 bit network number and a 8 bit host address. Class D has the four higher order bits set to 1110. Class E has four higher address bits set to 1111.





Increasing the size of the IP address field to more than 32 bits would solve the problem, but at the expense of making a new IP header definition that would be incompatible with the existing base of IP implementations. OSI based solutions such as using CLNP have been proposed but would take time to implement.

Proposal for IP extension

The IP header format should not be modified to minimize the changes necessary for supporting the address extensions that are proposed in this RFC. Instead an "escape" mechanism can be used to specify larger address. The IP header length field is 4 bits and this allows a maximum of fifteen 32-bit words where each word is 4 octets. The minimum size of the IP header without options is 5 words, which leaves 10 words for options. One can reserve 6 words (24 octets) for the normal options and leave the remaining (4 words or 16 octets) for a new option type that specifies an extended address. The details of this mechanism are discussed below. Class E should be defined with the its five high order bits set to 11110. Its current definition is that four 1's in the most significant bits represent a class E address. A new class F is proposed with its six high order bits set to 111110. The new class F address would be placed in the same locations that are used for source and destination IP address in the IP header, but would specify that part of the addressing information is in the options part of the IP header. This is illustrated in the figure below: +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Ver. | IHL | TOS | Total Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Identification |Flags| Fragment Offset | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |1|1|1|1|1|0| Offset| Reserved | Source IP address part 1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |1|1|1|1|1|0| Offset| Reserved | Destination IP address part 1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Options :

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

SADDR Code |Len adr. part 2| Source IP address part 2 :

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

DADDR Code |Len adr. part 2| Destination IP address part 2 :

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Data :

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+





The "Offset" field specifies the offset in words from the beginning of the IP header where the second part of the IP address is located. Its purpose is to avoid searching the options part for addressing information. The address in the options part is in the Type-Length- Value form for consistency with other IP options that are found in this part. The "Len adr. part" indicates the length of the second IP address part in octets. The lengths should be defined so that the second part of the IP address ends on a word boundary. For example, the possible length values are 4, 8 octets. It is proposed that new IP option codes be used for the SADDR and DADDR codes respectively. The IP address is the 2 bytes in the fixed IP header part plus the address field defined in the options part. If the "Len adr. part" field has a value of 4, the new class is designated as the F-4 class (Class F with IP address length of 4 octets). If the "Len adr. part" field has a value of 8, the new class is designated as the F-8 class (Class F with IP address length of 8 octets). Each of the F-4 and F-8 IP address class can be further subdivided into a network number and a host number field in a manner that is similar to the current IP addressing scheme. The sub-class definitions for F-4 class are shown below. Though the 4 octets are drawn contiguously, the first 2 octets and the last 2 octets are not contiguous in the IP header. Class F-4A has the highest order bit set to 0, a 7 bit network number and a 24 bit host address. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |0| net number | local part | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Class F-4B has the two higher order bits set to 10, a 14 bit network number and a 16 bit host address. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |1|0| net number | local part | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+







Class F-4C has the three higher order bit set to 110, a 21 bit network number and a 8 bit host address.

  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |1|1|0|      net number                         | local part    |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Class F-4D has the four higher order bits set to 1110. Class F-4D is reserved for multicasting. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |1|1|1|0| | multicast | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ The sub-class definitions for F-8 class are shown below. Though the 8 octets are drawn contiguously, the first 2 octets and the last 6 octets are not contiguous in the IP header. Class F-8A has the highest order bit set to 0, a 7 bit network number and a 56 bit host address. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |0| net number | local part | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | local part | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Class F-8B has the two higher order bits set to 10, a 14 bit network number and a 48 bit host address. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |1|0| net number | local part | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | local part | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Class F-8C has the three higher order bit set to 110, a 21 bit network number and a 40 bit host address. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |1|1|0| net number | local part | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | local part | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+






Class F-8D has the four higher order bits set to 1110, a 28 bit network number and a 32 bit host address. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |1|1|1|0| net number | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | local part | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Class F-8E has the five higher order bits set to 11110, a 35 bit network number and a 24 bit host address. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |1|1|1|1|0| net number | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | net number | local part | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Class F-8F has the six higher order bits set to 111110, a 44 bit network number and a 16 bit host address. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |1|1|1|1|1|0| net number | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | net number | local part | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Class F-8G has the seven higher order bits set to 1111110, a 49 bit network number and a 8 bit host address. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |1|1|1|1|1|0| net number | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | net number | local part | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Interoperability Issues

If the new class F address is seen by a host that does not support it the IP datagram will be ignored. So communication will not be possible with existing hosts, but the amount of modification for existing hosts is much less than implementing an entirely different IP header structure or a different protocol. The receiving host must be modified to contain the following code sketched below:





    if (Destination_IP_address & 0xFC000000 == 0xF8000000)
    {
         /* New extended class F address */
         Class_F_Processing(Destination_IP_address);
     }

The Class_F_Processing() procedure can be defined in a separate module. There will be other changes required to communicate the results of processing the class F address to the main IP processing module but they should not be so extensive. Security Considerations Security issues are not discussed in this memo. Author's Address Karanjit Siyan Siyan Consulting Services 49 Taurus Road, Box 960 North Glastonbury Emigrant, Montana 59027 Phone: 406-333-4491 EMail: [email protected]