Difference between revisions of "RFC1846"

From RFC-Wiki
imported>Admin
(Created page with " Network Working Group A. DurandRequest For Comments: 1846 IMAGCategory: Experimental ...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Network Working Group                                          A. Durand
 +
Request For Comments: 1846                                          IMAG
 +
Category: Experimental                                        F. Dupont
 +
                                                  INRIA Rocquencourt
 +
                                                      September 1995
  
 +
                      SMTP 521 Reply Code
  
 +
'''Status of this Memo'''
  
 +
This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
 +
community.  This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any
 +
kind.  Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
 +
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
  
 
+
'''Abstract'''
 
 
Network Working Group                                          A. DurandRequest For Comments: 1846                                          IMAGCategory: Experimental                                        F. Dupont                                                  INRIA Rocquencourt                                                      September 1995
 
 
 
                      SMTP 521 Reply Code
 
 
 
Status of this Memo
 
This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internetcommunity.  This memo does not specify an Internet standard of anykind.  Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
 
Abstract
 
  
 
This memo defines a new Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) [1]
 
This memo defines a new Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) [1]
Line 42: Line 45:
  
 
The choice between the two solutions is site dependent.
 
The choice between the two solutions is site dependent.
 
 
 
 
  
 
== The MX relays solution ==
 
== The MX relays solution ==
Line 54: Line 53:
 
During the SMTP dialog, these MX relays MAY bounce any message
 
During the SMTP dialog, these MX relays MAY bounce any message
 
destinated to this particular host with an SMTP 521 reply code.
 
destinated to this particular host with an SMTP 521 reply code.
 
  
 
SMTP dialog example:
 
SMTP dialog example:
Line 74: Line 72:
 
== The SMTP server solution ==
 
== The SMTP server solution ==
  
4.1 521 greeting
+
=== 521 greeting ===
  
 
A host may indicate that it does not accept mail by sending an
 
A host may indicate that it does not accept mail by sending an
Line 83: Line 81:
 
For example: 521 canon.inria.fr does not accept mail
 
For example: 521 canon.inria.fr does not accept mail
  
4.2 SMTP dialog
+
=== SMTP dialog ===
  
 
After issuing the initial 521 reply, the server host MUST do one of
 
After issuing the initial 521 reply, the server host MUST do one of
Line 93: Line 91:
 
   reasonable time, the SMTP server MUST time out and close the
 
   reasonable time, the SMTP server MUST time out and close the
 
   connection.  A suggested time-out value is 5 minutes.
 
   connection.  A suggested time-out value is 5 minutes.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
DISCUSSION:
 
DISCUSSION:
Line 108: Line 100:
 
clients immediately send the QUIT command and return the mail.
 
clients immediately send the QUIT command and return the mail.
  
4.3 MX
+
=== MX ===
  
 
A host which sends a 521 greeting message MUST NOT be listed as an MX
 
A host which sends a 521 greeting message MUST NOT be listed as an MX
 
record for any domain.
 
record for any domain.
  
4.4 Postmaster
+
=== Postmaster ===
  
 
An SMTP server which sends a 521 greeting message IS NOT subject to
 
An SMTP server which sends a 521 greeting message IS NOT subject to
the postmaster requirement of STD 3, [[RFC1123|RFC 1123]] ([2]).
+
the postmaster requirement of [[STD3|STD 3]], [[RFC1123|RFC 1123]] ([2]).
  
 
DISCUSSION:
 
DISCUSSION:
Line 141: Line 133:
 
significantly fewer opportunities for security problems than running
 
significantly fewer opportunities for security problems than running
 
a complete SMTP implementation.
 
a complete SMTP implementation.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
== Authors' Addresses ==
 
== Authors' Addresses ==
Line 162: Line 143:
 
Fax  : +33 76 44 66 75
 
Fax  : +33 76 44 66 75
  
 
  
 
Francis Dupont
 
Francis Dupont
Line 179: Line 159:
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
  
[1] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", STD 10, [[RFC821|RFC 821]],   USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1982.
+
[1] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", [[STD10|STD 10]], [[RFC821|RFC 821]],
[2] Braden, R., Editor, "Requirements for Internet Hosts -    Application and Support", STD 3, [[RFC1123|RFC 1123]], USC/Information    Sciences Institute, October 1989.
+
    USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1982.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 +
[2] Braden, R., Editor, "Requirements for Internet Hosts -
 +
    Application and Support", [[STD3|STD 3]], [[RFC1123|RFC 1123]], USC/Information
 +
    Sciences Institute, October 1989.
  
 
[[Category:Experimental]]
 
[[Category:Experimental]]

Latest revision as of 10:59, 30 October 2020

Network Working Group A. Durand Request For Comments: 1846 IMAG Category: Experimental F. Dupont

                                                  INRIA Rocquencourt
                                                      September 1995
                      SMTP 521 Reply Code

Status of this Memo

This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

This memo defines a new Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) [1] reply code, 521, which one may use to indicate that an Internet host does not accept incoming mail.

Motivations

Hosts on the Internet have shifted from large, general-purpose hosts to smaller, more specialized hosts. There is an increasing number of hosts which are dedicated to specific tasks, such as serving NTP or DNS. These dedicated hosts frequently do not provide mail service.

Usually, these mailless hosts do not run an SMTP server. Unfortunately, users will occasionally misaddress mail to these hosts. Regular SMTP clients attempting to deliver this misaddressed mail must treat the lack of an SMTP server on the host as a temporary error. They must queue the mail for later delivery, should an SMTP server be started at a later time.

This causes the mail to remain queued for days, until it is returned with what is usually a confusing error message.

Two complementary solutions

Two complementary solutions MAY be implemented to deal with this issue. The first one is to use MX relays to bounce misaddressed mails. The second one is to implement a minimal smtp server on the mailless host to bounce all mails.

The choice between the two solutions is site dependent.

The MX relays solution

MX relays may be used to indicate SMTP clients that an Internet host does not accept mail.

During the SMTP dialog, these MX relays MAY bounce any message destinated to this particular host with an SMTP 521 reply code.

SMTP dialog example:

---> 220 relay.imag.fr ready <--- HELO client.inria.fr ---> 250 relay.imag.fr Hello client.inria.fr <--- MAIL FROM: <[email protected]> ---> 250 <[email protected]>... Sender Ok <--- RCPT TO: <[email protected]> ---> 521 nomail.imag.fr does not accept mail <--- QUIT ---> 221 relay.imag.fr closing connection

If an MX relay of precedence n for a mailless host bounces mails on its behalf, then any other MX relay of precedence lower than n for this mailless host SHOULD do the same.

The SMTP server solution

521 greeting

A host may indicate that it does not accept mail by sending an initial 521 "Host does not accept mail" reply to an incoming SMTP connection. The official name of the server host or its IP address MUST be sent as the first word following the reply code.

For example: 521 canon.inria.fr does not accept mail

SMTP dialog

After issuing the initial 521 reply, the server host MUST do one of the following two options:

a) Close the SMTP connection. b) Read commands, issuing 521 replies to all commands except QUIT.

  If the SMTP client does not issue the QUIT command after a
  reasonable time, the SMTP server MUST time out and close the
  connection.  A suggested time-out value is 5 minutes.

DISCUSSION:

When an SMTP server closes the connection immediatly after issuing the initial 521 reply, some existing SMTP clients treat the condition as a transient error and requeue the mail for later delivery. If the SMTP server leaves the connection open, those clients immediately send the QUIT command and return the mail.

MX

A host which sends a 521 greeting message MUST NOT be listed as an MX record for any domain.

Postmaster

An SMTP server which sends a 521 greeting message IS NOT subject to the postmaster requirement of STD 3, RFC 1123 ([2]).

DISCUSSION:

Postmaster exists so you can report mail errors. A host that doesn't support mail doesn't need a Postmaster.

SMTP client behavior

If an SMTP client encounters a host in an MX record that issues a 521 greeting message, it must do one of the following two options:

a) Attempt to deliver it to a different MX host for that domain. b) Return the mail with an appropriate non-delivery report.

If an SMTP client encounters a 521 reply code in any other part of the SMTP dialog, it MUST return the mail with an appropriate non- delivery report.

Security Considerations

Not running any SMTP server, or running an SMTP server which simply emits fixed strings in response to incoming connection should provide significantly fewer opportunities for security problems than running a complete SMTP implementation.

Authors' Addresses

Alain Durand Institut de Mathematiques Appliquees de Grenoble (IMAG) BP 53 38041 Grenoble CEDEX 9 France

Phone : +33 76 63 57 03 Fax : +33 76 44 66 75 EMail: [email protected]

Francis Dupont Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique B.P. 105 / 78153 Le Chesnay CEDEX France

Phone : +33 1 39 63 52 13 Fax : +33 1 39 63 53 30 EMail: [email protected]

Expericences

People implementing this reply code are suggested to send a message to [email protected] to report their experience.

References

[1] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", STD 10, RFC 821,

   USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1982.

[2] Braden, R., Editor, "Requirements for Internet Hosts -

   Application and Support", STD 3, RFC 1123, USC/Information
   Sciences Institute, October 1989.