Difference between revisions of "RFC1141"

From RFC-Wiki
imported>Admin
(Created page with " Network Working Group T. Mallory Request for Comments: 1141 A. Kullberg Obsoletes: [[RFC1071|RF...")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Network Working Group                                        T. Mallory
 
Network Working Group                                        T. Mallory
 
Request for Comments: 1141                                  A. Kullberg
 
Request for Comments: 1141                                  A. Kullberg
 
Obsoletes: [[RFC1071|RFC 1071]]                                  BBN Communications
 
Obsoletes: [[RFC1071|RFC 1071]]                                  BBN Communications
 
                                                         January 1990
 
                                                         January 1990
 
  
 
           Incremental Updating of the Internet Checksum
 
           Incremental Updating of the Internet Checksum
  
Status of this Memo
+
'''Status of this Memo'''
  
 
This memo correctly describes the incremental update procedure for
 
This memo correctly describes the incremental update procedure for
Line 53: Line 46:
  
 
This special case can be optimized in many ways: for instance, you
 
This special case can be optimized in many ways: for instance, you
 
 
 
 
  
 
can bundle updating and checking the ttl.  Compiler mileage may vary.
 
can bundle updating and checking the ttl.  Compiler mileage may vary.
Line 91: Line 80:
  
  
 
  
 
A. Kullberg
 
A. Kullberg

Latest revision as of 20:07, 15 October 2020

Network Working Group T. Mallory Request for Comments: 1141 A. Kullberg Obsoletes: RFC 1071 BBN Communications

                                                        January 1990
         Incremental Updating of the Internet Checksum

Status of this Memo

This memo correctly describes the incremental update procedure for use with the standard Internet checksum. It is intended to replace the description of Incremental Update in RFC 1071. This is not a standard but rather, an implementation technique. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Description

In RFC 1071 on pages 4 and 5, there is a description of a method to update the IP checksum in the IP header without having to completely recompute the checksum. In particular, the RFC recommends the following equation for computing the update checksum C' from the original checksum C, and the old and new values of byte m:

     C' = C + (-m) + m' = C + (m' - m)

While the equation above is correct, it is not very useful for incremental updates since the equation above updates the checksum C, rather than the 1's complement of the checksum, ~C, which is the value stored in the checksum field. In addition, it suffers because the notation does not clearly specify that all arithmetic, including the unary negation, must be performed one's complement, and so is difficult to use to build working code. The useful calculation for 2's complement machines is:

     ~C' = ~(C + (-m) + m') = ~C + (m - m') = ~C + m + ~m'

In the oft-mentioned case of updating the IP TTL field, subtracting one from the TTL means ADDING 1 or 256 as appropriate to the checksum field in the packet, using one's complement addition. One big-endian non-portable implementation in C looks like:

  unsigned long sum;
  ipptr->ttl--;                  /* decrement ttl */
  sum = ipptr->Checksum + 0x100;  /* increment checksum high byte*/
  ipptr->Checksum = (sum + (sum>>16)) /* add carry */

This special case can be optimized in many ways: for instance, you

can bundle updating and checking the ttl. Compiler mileage may vary. Here is a more general and possibly more helpful example which updates the ttl by n seconds:

  UpdateTTL(iph,n)
  struct ip_hdr *ipptr;
  unsigned char n;
  {
      unsigned long sum;
      unsigned short old;
      old = ntohs(*(unsigned short *)&ipptr->ttl);
      ipptr->ttl -= n;
      sum = old + (~ntohs(*(unsigned short *)&ipptr->ttl) & 0xffff);
      sum += ntohs(ipptr->Checksum);
      sum = (sum & 0xffff) + (sum>>16);
      ipptr->Checksum = htons(sum + (sum>>16));
  }

Security Considerations

Security issues are not addressed in this memo.

Authors' Addresses

Tracy Mallory BBN Communications Corporation 50 Moulton Street Cambridge, MA 02238

Phone: (617) 873-3193

EMail: [email protected]

A. Kullberg BBN Communications Corporation 50 Moulton Street Cambridge, MA 02238

Phone: (617) 873-4000

EMail: [email protected]