RFC1031

From RFC-Wiki

Networking Working Group W. Lazear Request for Comments: 1031 MITRE

                                                       November 1987
                 MILNET NAME DOMAIN TRANSITION

STATUS OF THIS MEMO

This RFC consolidates information necessary for the implementation of domain style names throughout the DDN/MILNET Internet community. Although no official policy has been published, the introduction of domain style names will impact all hosts in the DDN/MILNET Internet. The RFC is designed as an aid to implementors and administrators by providing 1) an overview of the transition process from host tables to domains, 2) a potential timetable for the transition, and 3) references to documentation and software relating to the DDN/ARPANET domain system. Distribution of this RFC is unlimited.

BACKGROUND

All MILNET hosts are expected to have a way of translating the name of any other host into its Internet address. Although the current method of name resolution is to look up the information in a table of all hosts, this method of operation is cumbersome and relies on a central point of information. The Network Information Center (NIC) maintains a table of hosts registered in the MILNET Internet and their addresses. The size of this table and the frequency of updates has reached the limits of manageability. The central host table is FTP'd by a host on a timely basis from the NIC, processed locally (to pare or reformat the table), and used in name resolution.

The domain system uses a distributed database and software to perform the same functions as the host table. In this system, host resolvers query domain servers for name resolution. They may cache answers for performance improvement. The domain servers each maintain a portion of the hierarchical database under separate administrative authority and control. Redundancy is obtained by transferring data between cooperating servers.

The domain system has been operating successfully on the ARPANET for over a year. One indication of success is that the NIC's central host table is no longer a complete list (i.e., ARPANET does not depend primarily on the host table). The domain system is being implemented on the MILNET with DoD military standard protocols. The first step in changing to the domain system has been taken, as required by DDN Management Bulletin #32 (22 Jan 1987). All host

names were converted from a simple, flat namespace to a structured name consistent with domains. In the second step, servers acting as the root of the database hierarchy were put in place. In the next step, hosts are moving away from host table usage.

MIGRATION PATH

All hosts will not change from host table to domain server usage at one time. Accordingly, three stages of conversion to the domain system are envisaged. These stages roughly correspond to 1) continuing to use the host table for all applications, 2) using the domain system for only some applications, and 3) using the domain system for all applications. These stages will exist simultaneously as various hosts convert their application software according to available resources. The following paragraphs discuss these stages in more detail.

Host Table Only

  In the first stage, a host depends entirely on the host table for
  name resolution.  The table is obtained from the NIC's central
  copy and the resolution is done by local table scanning.  Most
  hosts are in this stage.
  Certain hosts may find it infeasible ever to convert to the domain
  system, owing to older architectures, unchangeable software, or
  other considerations.  At the end of the conversion period, the
  NIC will stop maintaining an internet host table.  To continue
  operations, hosts that do not convert will need to obtain an
  equivalent of the host table from some source.  This source may be
  another host with which a bilateral agreement has been negotiated
  offline, a community-of-interest host acting as central repository
  for that community, or a locally-maintained table of host names
  and addresses.  Transfer of the table from the source is a matter
  of local implementation and bilateral agreements.

Domain System and Host Table

  In the second stage, a host will use both the host table and the
  domain system.  A likely scenario is that applications like TELNET
  and FTP will use the domain system and that MAIL will continue to
  use the host table for name resolution.  An alternate scenario is
  that batchstyle applications like MAIL would use the domain system
  and that the interactive applications would convert later.
  This stage is viewed as transitory, as hosts convert over to use
  the domain system exclusively.  It is highlighted as a separate
  stage to emphasize the need during transition for both the host
  table and the domain system.

Domain System Only

  In the third and final stage, a host will have completed
  conversion and will be using the domain system exclusively.  This
  includes correct processing of the mailbox and mail exchanger
  resource records.

MIGRATION TIMETABLE

Table 1 shows the events and dates involved in the MILNET transition from host table to domain system. The operational testing of the root server software has been completed. Voluntary conversion can begin immediately, with mandatory conversion required by October 1989. After this date, hosts not converted need to obtain the host table equivalent by private arrangement (see "Migration Path" above).

                                                  Start     End
    Milestone                                      Date     Date
    ===========================================   ======   ======
    Root server operational testing               Dec 86   Jul 87
    Policy announced in DDN Management Bulletin   Oct 87
    Host conversion                               Oct 87   Oct 89
    Host table discontinued                       Oct 89
                   MILNET Name Domain Timetable
                              Table 1

DOCUMENTATION

The Name Domain system is described in several documents that are maintained and available from the NIC in both online and in hardcopy form. The documents are in "Request For Comments" format (RFC) commonly used in the Internet to document and discuss various networking issues. The documents noted in Table 2 fully describe the concepts, conventions, enhancements, requirements, and operation of the Name Domain system. The following paragraphs give a brief synopsis of each document.

 RFC    PH   DOCUMENT TITLE
 ===    ==   =======================================================
  799   *    Internet Name Domains
  819        Domain Naming Convention for Internet User Applications
  920        Domain Requirements
  921        Domain Name System Implementation Schedule - Revised
  952   *    Internet Host Table Specification
  953   *    Hostnames Server
  974        Mail Routing and the Domain System
 1032        Domain Administrators Guide
 1033        Domain Administration Operations Guide
 1034        Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities
 1035        Domain Names - Implementation Specification
  • Included in the DDN Protocol Handbook
                       Name Domain Documents
                              Table 2

RFC-799

  This RFC is an early description of the concepts of a name domain
  system. It is exploratory in nature and offers scenarios for name
  resolution and mail forwarding.

RFC-819

  This RFC is a think peice about hierarchical naming conventions
  for internetworking applications.  The conventions proposed are
  aligned along administrative rather than topological boundaries
  and is designed for interoperation among heterogeneous naming
  environments.  Further topics of discussion include mail relaying,
  name service approaches, and naming authorities.

RFC-920

  This RFC contains a policy statement on the requirements of
  establishing a new domain in the ARPA Internet and introduces the
  limited set of top level domains.

RFC-921

  This RFC contains a policy statement on the implementation
  schedule of the ARPA Internet domain system (as of October 1984).
  The discussion describes schedule and future operational
  scenarios, as well as the transition between the two.

RFC-952

  This RFC specifies the format of the host/address table maintained
  by the NIC.

RFC-953

  This RFC contains the official specification of the Hostname
  Server Protocol.  This TCP-based protocol accesses machine-
  readable name/address information in the format described by RFC-
  952 and is used by hosts to obtain all or a portion of the
  centralized host table.

RFC-974

  This RFC presents a description of how mail systems are expected
  to route messages based on domain system information.  In
  particular, it discusses how mailers should interpret mail
  exchanger resource records for message routing to both host and
  domain names.

RFC-1032

  This RFC describes the guidelines for a domain administrator to
  follow to establish a new domain.

RFC-1033

  This RFC provides procedures for domain administrators in
  operating a domain server and maintaining their portion of the
  hierarchical database.

RFC-1034

  This RFC introduces domain style names, their use for ARPA
  Internet mail and host address support, and the protocols and
  servers used to implement domains.  The concepts and facilities of
  the domain system are described.  The RFC also discusses the
  hierarchical database model, resource record usage, query
  formation, query resolution, and domain control.

RFC-1035

  This RFC specifies the format of domain system transactions,
  discusses the implementation of domain servers, and explores the
  use of domain names in the context of mail and other network
  software.

IMPLEMENTATIONS

Several implementations of the domain system exist. The first two paragraphs (JEEVES and BIND) discuss the prominent (and most mature) two implementations and their authors/maintainers. These implementations are available online. The last paragraphs list implementations under development. Points of contact can supply more information.

The intent of listing these implementations is to give vendors the opportunity to inspect working code. These implementations embody experience with the domain system and offer interpretations of the protocols found acceptable in operational environments.

Tops-20 Server and Resolver (JEEVES)

Some domain root servers on the ARPANET are hosted on TOPS-20 systems and run the code called JEEVES. The JEEVES resolver is specific to version 5 of TOPS-20. The code is maintained by Paul Mockapetris (ISI), is available using anonymous FTP from host a.isi.edu, and resides in the files

               <domain.version5>version5.mss
               <domain.version5>version5.doc
               <domain.version5>version5.txt

His mail addresses are:

         ARPANET:  [email protected]
         US MAIL:  USC Information Sciences Institute
                   4676 Admiralty Way
                   Marina del Rey, California 90292-6695

4BSD Unix Resolver and Server (BIND)

Most hosts running lower level domain servers on the ARPANET are hosted on 4BSD systems and run the code called BIND. This code is maintained for periodic releases by Mike Karels (UCB). His mail addresses are:

         ARPANET:  [email protected]
         US MAIL:  Computer Systems Research Group
                   Computer Science Division
                   Department of EE & CS
                   University of California
                   Berkeley, CA  94720

There are two distribution mailing lists that publish information about BIND. General discussions can be received by contacting [email protected] and requesting to join the BIND list. Information relating to testing developmental versions of BIND can be received by contacting [email protected] and requesting to join the BIND-TEST list.

A commercial version of BIND is distributed with Sun Microsystems' operating system version 3.2. The point of contact is Bill Nowicki. His addresses are:

         ARPANET:  [email protected]
         US MAIL:  Sun Microsystems
                   2550 Garcia Avenue
                   Mountain View, CA 94043

MS-DOS Server and Resolver

FTP Software is working on a port of BIND to their PC/TCP environment under MS/DOS (their PC/TCP package). They already have a resolver that depends on recursive queries. The point of contact is Philip A. Prindeville. His mail addresses are:

         ARPANET:  [email protected]
         US MAIL:  FTP Software Inc
                   P.O. Box 150
                   Kendall Sq. Branch
                   Boston, MA  02142

Tops-20 Resolver

A resolver is being written in C for Tops-20 and ITS by Rob Austein. He encourages contacts from Tops-10, WAITS, and TENEX system programmers. His mail addresses are:

         ARPANET:  [email protected].
         US MAIL:  MIT LCS NE43-503
                   545 Technology Square
                   Cambridge MA 02139

Symbolics Resolver

Symbolics Inc. has an implementation for the 36xx series Lisp Machines. Steven L. Sneddon is the point of contact. His addresses are:

         ARPANET:  [email protected]
         US MAIL:  Manager, Networks and Communications
                   Symbolics, Inc.
                   11 Cambridge Center
                   Cambridge, MA 02142

Xerox Cedar Resolver

Xerox has a resolver running in the Cedar language/environment at Xerox PARC. John Larson is the point of contact. His addresses are:

         ARPANET:  [email protected]
         US MAIL:  Xerox Palo Alto Research Center
                   3333 Coyote Hill Road
                   Palo Alto, CA  94304

Harris Resolver

There is a domain resolver for the Harris H series that handles canonical name, host address, name server, and mail agent (MX) records. Bruce Orchard is the point of contact. His addresses are:

         ARPANET:  orchard/[email protected]
         US MAIL:  549 Waisman Center
                   University of Wisconsin-Madison
                   1500 Highland Avenue
                   Madison, Wisconsin  53705-2280

Fuzzball Server and Resolver

Dave Mills has both server and solver for the so-called PDP11/LSI- 11 Fuzzballs. However, these are not complete implementations and do not support zone transfers and so forth. They have little use outside the fuzzball community, since the code is in assembler and is not for Unix. His addresses are:

         ARPANET:  [email protected]
         US MAIL:  Electrical Engineering Department
                   University of Delaware
                   Newark, DE 19716

Multics Resolver

There is a resolver for Multics that is nearly ready for release. Art Beattie is the point of contact. His addresses are:

         ARPANET:  beattie%[email protected]
         US MAIL:  MS K55
                   Honeywell Bull
                   PO Box 8000
                   Phoenix, AZ, 85066-8000

VAX/VMS Resolver

There is a partial resolver implementation (only supports address queries and IN-ADDR PTR lookups) that is part of the CMU/TEK TCP/IP package for VAX/VMS. It is written in BLISS-32. Vince Fuller is the point of contact. His addresses are:

         ARPANET:  [email protected]
         US MAIL:  Computer Science Department
                   Carnegie-Mellon University
                   Schenley Park
                   Pittsburgh, Pa.  15213

Macintosh Resolver and Server

Tom Unger has ported BIND to the Macintosh. This was done using the Macintosh Programmer's Workshop and CITI's MacIP that currently consists of IP, UDP, and a Berkeley style socket library. His mail addresses are:

         ARPANET:  [email protected]
         US MAIL:  Center for Information and Technology Integration
                   University of Michigan
                   2901 Hubbard
                   Ann Arbor, MI 48105

ORDERING INFORMATION

Documents are available online from the NIC (IP address 10.0.0.51 or 26.0.0.73) by using FTP with the login ANONYMOUS and the password GUEST. RFCs are in files named RFC:RFCnnn.TXT and are simple ASCII files ready for printing. Pages within the documents are separated by a form feed character on a line by itself.

Hardcopy of the documents and software mentioned in the discussions above may be obtained from the NIC or the author. Prices are available on request and are documented in DDN Newsletter #50 (12 Dec 1986). The address and phone numbers of the NIC are listed below.

                    DDN Network Information Center
                    SRI International, Room EJ291
                    333 Ravenswood Avenue
                    Menlo Park, CA 94025
                    (800) 235-3155
                    (415) 859-3695