RFC2690

From RFC-Wiki

Network Working Group S. Bradner Request for Comments: 2690 Harvard University Category: Informational September 1999

A Proposal for an MOU-Based ICANN Protocol Support Organization

Status of this Memo

This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

This is a copy of the proposal for an MOU-based Protocol Supporting Organization that was submitted to ICANN on April 23, 1999.

Cover Letter

This is a copy of the cover letter that was used to submit the draft to ICANN.

Dear Esther,

       Enclosed please find a description of a proposed Protocol

Support Organization (PSO) for ICANN's consideration. This description is purposefully informal as it is meant to be a basis for discussion and not a final formal legal document.

       This proposal was developed primarily by using the open

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) poisson working group mailing list to discuss successive versions of the proposal. In addition the proposal has benefited from extensive discussion within the IETF's Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) and Internet Architecture Board (IAB). The proposal also benefited from extended discussions with representatives of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).

       I look forward to ICANN's evaluation of this proposal and am

also looking forward to the MOU development meeting noted in section 1.c of the proposal.

Thanks

Scott

Proposal for a MOU-based PSO

                 ICANN Protocol Supporting Organization

1. Definition of the PSO.

  a. Purpose.
     The Protocol Support Organization (PSO) will be a consensus-
     based advisory body within the ICANN framework.
  b. Components.
     The PSO will establish a "Protocol Council" and host an annual
     open meeting (known as the "General Assembly" (described
     below)).
  c. Creation through a Memorandum of Understanding.
     Arrangements regarding the PSO are to be reflected in a
     Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) among ICANN and a group of
     open international Internet related standards development
     organizations (SDOs). SDOs must satisfy a set of objective
     criteria before they can be considered for membership. (see
     Appendix A) After ICANN has accepted a proposal for an ICANN
     PSO, including the SDO criteria, a meeting, open to all SDOs
     that believe they meet the criteria, will be held to develop
     the MOU.
     All existing MOU signatories must agree to the admission of new
     signatories. Rejected applicants can appeal to the ICANN Board
     where a 2/3rds majority can override such a rejection if the
     board finds the SDO meets the criteria.

2. The Protocol Council

  a. Members
     The Protocol Council will have up to [12] individual members
     selected by the SDO signatories of the MOU. (see below)
  b. Term
     The term of Protocol Council members will be 2 years. Removal
     will be pursuant to procedures established through the MOU.
     (Initial terms will be 1 and 2 years to provide initial
     conditions for staggered terms.)
  c. Powers/Duties of the Protocol Council
     i   Appointment of ICANN Directors
         The Protocol Council will nominate 3 Directors to the ICANN
         Board (By-laws, Art. V, Sec. 4(iii)). The initial directors
         would have terms of 1, 2 and 3 years (By-laws, Art. V, Sec.
         9(d)
         The Protocol Council will conduct an open call for
         nominations for any open PSO seats on the ICANN board. Each
         SDO signatory to the MOU is entitled to nominate candidates
         by procedures of its own choosing. Additionally,
         nominations from the public at large should be allowed
         under conditions to be defined by the Protocol Council.
         The Protocol Council will select the PSO nominees to the
         ICANN board from among these nominees by a means of its own
         choosing.
     ii  Qualifications of ICANN Directors
         No more than 2 PSO-nominated Directors may come from the
         same geographic region.
     iii Role of ICANN Directors
         The Directors appointed by the Protocol Council will not
         represent the PSO on the Board, but will function as full
         Directors of ICANN.  (By-laws, Art. V, Sec. 8)
     iv  Advisory Role
         The Protocol Council will advise the Board of ICANN on
         matters referred to the Protocol Council by the ICANN
         Board. As per the ICANN By-laws, only matters relating to
         the assignment of parameters for Internet protocols would
         be so referred.
  d. Policy Development
     In the tradition of the Internet, standards development
     policies and conflict resolution mechanisms should be created
     by those institutions most directly involved, without undue
     interference from centralized bodies.
     The ICANN By-laws vest in the PSO the primary responsibility
     for developing and recommending substantive policies in the
     area of protocol parameter assignment.  The PSO is committed to
     the proposition that policies for parameter assignments for
     particular protocols are the responsibility of the individual
     SDO that developed the protocol. The Protocol Council will be
     available as needed by the SDOs to develop policies and
     procedures for conflict resolution between SDOs. (By-laws, New
     Art. VI, Sec. 2(b)). Any policies must be adopted by consensus
     of all SDOs.  The ICANN Board of Directors will take no
     addition action regarding disputes between SDOs related to
     protocol assignment or registration.

3. Annual Open Meeting (General Assembly)

  a. Hosting an open meeting
     The Protocol Council will periodically host an open meeting
     ("General Assembly") for promoting discussion and receiving
     input regarding the work of the PSO. A General Assembly meeting
     will be held at least once per year, and will permit open
     participation by all interested individuals.
     The annual open meeting will be held in conjunction with a
     major meeting of one of the SDOs that have signed the MOU.
     (with an effort to hold no 2 consecutive meetings in the same
     geographic region.
     It is expected that the major SDOs within the Internet protocol
     standards development community will provide the constituency
     of the General Assembly.
  b. Selection of Protocol Council Members
     Prior to the annual open meeting, the Protocol Council shall
     make an open call for nominations to the upcoming vacancies in
     the Protocol Council. Each SDO signatory to the PSO MOU will be
     entitled to make nominations for some or all of the vacant
     seats by a procedure of its own choosing. In the event that
     there are more nominees than vacancies, an election will be
     held in which each SDO signatory to the PSO MOU has equal votes.
     Protocol Council Members should fairly represent, to the extent
     reasonable, all constituencies within the member SDOs,
     including the major technical areas and geographical regions.

4. Open Proceedings and Documents

  a. Communications between ICANN and the PSO
     All communications between ICANN and the PSO will be made
     public on the PSO web site. In the event that ICANN requests
     that a communication be kept confidential, the PSO will honor
     this request for a fixed period of time not to exceed one year,
     and then make the communication public.
  b. PSO Proceedings
     All discussions of PSO business will be conducted on a
     publicly-archived mailing list accessible through the PSO web
     site. The schedule for the PSO meetings will be posted 90 days
     in advance of the meeting date. The agenda for the Protocol
     Council and annual open meetings will be posted on the PSO web
     site at least 30 days before the meetings.  The minutes from
     all PSO meetings will be publicly posted on the PSO web site
     within 30 days of the meeting.

5. Review of MOU

  The MOU signatories will periodically review the results and
  consequences of their cooperation under the MOU. When appropriate,
  the signatories will consider the need for improvements in the MOU
  and make suitable proposals for modifying and updating the
  arrangements and scope of the MOU.

6. Recognition

  ICANN will officially recognize the PSO described in this memo as
  the PSO under the ICANN By-laws Art. 6, Sec. 3.

Appendix A - requirements for consideration as a PSO-qualified SDO

  SDOs must be open, international, voluntary technical standard and
  technical specification development organizations which:
  1) Develop standards and/or specifications for use over the public
     Internet.
  2) Can demonstrate active membership in the IP-related standards
     and/or specification development process of more than 1000
     individuals, if individual memberships are used by the
     organization, or 100 companies, if corporate memberships are
     used by the organization.
  3) Has been in operation for 3 or more years at the time of their
     application.
  4) Can demonstrate that there is significant deployment of its
     standards on the Internet.
  5) The significant protocols controlled by the organization can be
     implemented without paying a licensing fee to the organization
  Open international voluntary standards bodies are defined as
  international organizations that plan, develop or establish
  voluntary standards.
  An organization shall be considered open and international if its
  standards and/or specifications development process is open to any
  person or organization of any nationality on equitable terms. It
  shall be considered voluntary if it makes no claim to compel use
  of its standards and specifications.
  In either case, to be considered as 'international', the voting
  (or other "full") membership must include individuals or companies
  primarily located in at least three different regions and at least
  two different countries within each of those regions.

Security Considerations

This type of non-protocol document does not directly effect the security of the Internet.

Editor's Address

Scott Bradner Harvard University 1350 Mass Ave, rm 876 Cambridge, MA 02138 USA

Phone: +1 617 495 3864 EMail: [email protected]

Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.