RFC4603

Network Working Group G. Zorn Request for Comments: 4603 G. Weber Category: Informational R. Foltak

                                                       Cisco Systems
                                                           July 2006

                   Additional Values for the
                    NAS-Port-Type Attribute

Status of This Memo

This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

IESG Note

This RFC is not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard. The IETF disclaims any knowledge of the fitness of this RFC for any purpose and in particular notes that the decision to publish is not based on IETF review for such things as security, congestion control, or inappropriate interaction with deployed protocols. The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at its discretion. Readers of this document should exercise caution in evaluating its value for implementation and deployment. See RFC 3932 for more information.

Abstract

This document defines a set of values for the NAS-Port-Type RADIUS Attribute.

Introduction

This document defines a set of new values for the NAS-Port-Type Attribute RFC2865.

NAS-Port-Type Values

This document defines new values for the NAS-Port-Type Attribute. This specification concerns the following values:

30 PPPoA (PPP over ATM RFC3336)

31 PPPoEoA (PPP over Ethernet RFC2516 over ATM)

32 PPPoEoE (PPP over Ethernet RFC2516 over Ethernet)

33 PPPoEoVLAN (PPP over Ethernet RFC2516 over VLAN)

34 PPPoEoQinQ (PPP over Ethernet RFC2516 over IEEE 802.1QinQ)

IANA Considerations

Attribute Values

This document is intended to act as a request for allocation of the numbers listed by IANA in the appropriate registry [RADTYP], according to the allocation policy given in RFC3575.

The values given have already been implemented by at least one vendor without assignment by IANA.

IANA has registered the numbers listed in Section 2, per this request.

Security Considerations

This specification neither adds to nor detracts from the security of the RADIUS protocol.

References

Normative References

RFC2865 Rigney, C., Willens, S., Rubens, A., and W. Simpson,

          "Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC
          2865, June 2000.

RFC3575 Aboba, B., "IANA Considerations for RADIUS (Remote

          Authentication Dial In User Service)", RFC 3575, July
          2003.

Informative References

[RADTYP] Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, "RADIUS TYPES",

          November 2005, <http://www.iana.org/assignments/radius-
          types>.

RFC2516 Mamakos, L., Lidl, K., Evarts, J., Carrel, D., Simone, D.,

          and R. Wheeler, "A Method for Transmitting PPP Over
          Ethernet (PPPoE)", RFC 2516, February 1999.

RFC3336 Thompson, B., Koren, T., and B. Buffam, "PPP Over

          Asynchronous Transfer Mode Adaptation Layer 2 (AAL2)", RFC
          3336, December 2002.

Authors' Addresses

Glen Zorn Cisco Systems 2901 Third Avenue, Suite 600 SEA1/5/ Seattle, WA 98121 US

Phone: +1 (425) 344 8113 EMail: [email protected]

Greg Weber Cisco Systems 10850 Murdock Road KNV/1/ Knoxville, TN 37932 US

EMail: [email protected]

Rich Foltak Cisco Systems 2200 East President George Bush Turnpike RCDN6/4/2 Richardson, TX 75082 US

Phone: +1 (469) 255-6557 EMail: [email protected]

Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78 and at www.rfc-editor.org/copyright.html, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.

This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at [email protected].

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA).