RFC4802

From RFC-Wiki

Network Working Group T. Nadeau, Ed. Request for Comment: 4802 Cisco Systems, Inc. Category: Standards Track A. Farrel, Ed.

                                                  Old Dog Consulting
                                                       February 2007
       Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
        Traffic Engineering Management Information Base

Status of This Memo

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

Abstract

This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes managed objects for Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS)-based traffic engineering.

Introduction

This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes managed objects for modeling Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) RFC3945 based traffic engineering (TE). The tables and objects defined in this document extend those defined in the equivalent document for MPLS traffic engineering RFC3812, and management of GMPLS traffic engineering is built on management of MPLS traffic engineering.

The MIB modules in this document should be used in conjunction with the companion document RFC4803 for GMPLS-based traffic engineering configuration and management.

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC2119.

Migration Strategy

MPLS-TE Label Switched paths (LSPs) may be modeled and managed using the MPLS-TE-STD-MIB module RFC3812.

Label Switching Routers (LSRs) may be migrated to model and manage their TE LSPs using the MIB modules in this document in order to migrate the LSRs to GMPLS support, or to take advantage of additional MIB objects defined in these MIB modules that are applicable to MPLS-TE.

The GMPLS TE MIB module (GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB) defined in this document extends the MPLS-TE-STD-MIB module RFC3812 through a series of augmentations and sparse augmentations of the MIB tables. The only additions are for support of GMPLS or to support the increased complexity of MPLS and GMPLS systems.

In order to migrate from MPLS-TE-STD-MIB support to GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB support, an implementation needs only to add support for the additional tables and objects defined in GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB. The gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding may be set to tunnelLspNotGmpls to allow an MPLS-TE LSP tunnel to benefit from the additional objects and tables of GMPLS-LSR-STD-MIB without supporting the GMPLS protocols.

The companion document for modeling and managing GMPLS-based LSRs RFC4803 extends the MPLS-LSR-STD-MIB module RFC3813 with the same intentions.

Textual conventions are defined in RFC3811 and the IANA-GMPLS-TC- MIB module.

Terminology

This document uses terminology from the MPLS architecture document RFC3031, from the GMPLS architecture document RFC3945, and from the MPLS Traffic Engineering MIB RFC3812. Some frequently used terms are described next.

An explicitly routed LSP (ERLSP) is referred to as a GMPLS tunnel. It consists of in-segment(s) and/or out-segment(s) at the egress/ingress LSRs, each segment being associated with one GMPLS- enabled interface. These are also referred to as tunnel segments.

Additionally, at an intermediate LSR, we model a connection as consisting of one or more in-segments and/or one or more out- segments. The binding or interconnection between in-segments and out-segments is performed using a cross-connect.

These segment and cross-connect objects are defined in the MPLS Label Switching Router MIB (MPLS-LSR-STD-MIB) RFC3813, but see also the GMPLS Label Switching Router MIB (GMPLS-LSR-STD-MIB) RFC4803 for the GMPLS-specific extensions to these objects.

The Internet-Standard Management Framework

For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of RFC 3410 RFC3410.

Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58, RFC 2578 RFC2578, STD 58, RFC 2579 RFC2579 and STD 58, RFC 2580 RFC2580.

Outline

Support for GMPLS traffic-engineered tunnels requires the following configuration.

- Setting up tunnels with appropriate MPLS configuration parameters

  using RFC3812.

- Extending the tunnel definitions with GMPLS configuration

  parameters.

- Configuring loose and strict source routed tunnel hops.

These actions may need to be accompanied with corresponding actions using RFC3813 and RFC4803 to establish and configure tunnel segments, if this is done manually. Also, the in-segment and out- segment performance tables, mplsInSegmentPerfTable and mplsOutSegmentPerfTable RFC3813, should be used to determine performance of the tunnels and tunnel segments, although it should be noted that those tables may not be appropriate for measuring performance on some types of GMPLS links.

Summary of GMPLS Traffic Engineering MIB Module

The following tables contain MIB objects for performing the actions listed above when they cannot be performed solely using MIB objects defined in MPLS-TE-STD-MIB RFC3812.

- Tunnel table (gmplsTunnelTable) for providing GMPLS-specific

  tunnel configuration parameters.

- Tunnel hop, actual tunnel hop, and computed tunnel hop tables

  (gmplsTunnelHopTable, gmplsTunnelARHopTable, and
  gmplsTunnelCHopTable) for providing additional configuration of
  strict and loose source routed tunnel hops.

- Performance and error reporting tables

  (gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable and gmplsTunnelErrorTable).

These tables are described in the subsequent sections.

Additionally, the GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB module contains a new notification.

- The GMPLS Tunnel Down Notification (gmplsTunnelDown) should be

  used for all GMPLS tunnels in place of the mplsTunnelDown
  notification defined in RFC3812.  An implementation must not
  issue both the gmplsTunnelDown and the mplsTunnelDown
  notifications for the same event.  As well as indicating that a
  tunnel has transitioned to operational down state, this new
  notification indicates the cause of the failure.

Brief Description of GMPLS TE MIB Objects

The objects described in this section support the functionality described in RFC3473 and RFC3472 for GMPLS tunnels. The tables support both manually configured and signaled tunnels.

gmplsTunnelTable

The gmplsTunnelTable extends the MPLS traffic engineering MIB module (MPLS-TE-STD-MIB RFC3812) to allow GMPLS tunnels to be created between an LSR and a remote endpoint, and existing GMPLS tunnels to be reconfigured or removed.

Note that we only support point-to-point tunnel segments, although multipoint-to-point and point-to-multipoint connections are supported by an LSR acting as a cross-connect.

Each tunnel can thus have one out-segment originating at an LSR and/or one in-segment terminating at that LSR.

Three objects within this table utilize enumerations in order to map to enumerations that are used in GMPLS signaling. In order to protect the GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB module from changes (in particular, extensions) to the range of enumerations supported by the signaling

protocols, these MIB objects use textual conventions with values maintained by IANA. For further details, see the IANA Considerations section of this document.

gmplsTunnelHopTable

The gmplsTunnelHopTable is used to indicate additional parameters for the hops, strict or loose, of a GMPLS tunnel defined in the gmplsTunnelTable, when it is established using signaling. Multiple tunnels may share hops by pointing to the same entry in this table.

gmplsTunnelARHopTable

The gmplsTunnelARHopTable is used to indicate the actual hops traversed by a tunnel as reported by the signaling protocol after the tunnel is set up. The support of this table is optional since not all GMPLS signaling protocols support this feature.

gmplsTunnelCHopTable

The gmplsTunnelCHopTable lists the actual hops computed by a constraint-based routing algorithm based on the gmplsTunnelHopTable. The support of this table is optional since not all implementations support computation of hop lists using a constraint-based routing protocol.

gmplsTunnelErrorTable

The gmplsTunnelErrorTable provides access to information about the last error that occurred on each tunnel known about by the MIB. It indicates the nature of the error and when and how it was reported, and it can give recovery advice through an admin string.

gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable

The gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable provides additional counters to measure the performance of bidirectional GMPLS tunnels in which packets are visible. It supplements the counters in mplsTunnelPerfTable and augments gmplsTunnelTable.

Note that not all counters may be appropriate or available for some types of tunnel.

Use of 32-bit and 64-bit Counters

64-bit counters are provided in the GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB module for high-speed interfaces where the use of 32-bit counters might be impractical. The requirements on the use of 32-bit and 64-bit counters (copied verbatim from RFC2863) are as follows:

  For interfaces that operate at 20,000,000 (20 million) bits per
  second or less, 32-bit byte and packet counters MUST be supported.
  For interfaces that operate faster than 20,000,000 bits/second,
  and slower than 650,000,000 bits/second, 32-bit packet counters
  MUST be supported and 64-bit octet counters MUST be supported.
  For interfaces that operate at 650,000,000 bits/second or faster,
  64-bit packet counters AND 64-bit octet counters MUST be
  supported.

Cross-referencing to the gmplsLabelTable

The gmplsLabelTable is found in the GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB module in RFC4803 and provides a way to model labels in a GMPLS system where labels might not be simple 32-bit integers.

The hop tables in this document (gmplsTunnelHopTable, gmplsTunnelCHopTable, and gmplsTunnelARHopTable) and the segment tables in RFC3813 (mplsInSegmentTable and mplsOutSegmentTable) contain objects with syntax MplsLabel.

MplsLabel (defined in RFC3811) is a 32-bit integer that is capable of representing any MPLS Label and most GMPLS Labels. However, some GMPLS Labels are larger than 32 bits and may be of arbitrary length. Furthermore, some labels that may be safely encoded in 32 bits are constructed from multiple sub-fields. Additionally, some GMPLS technologies support the concatenation of individual labels to represent a data flow carried as multiple sub-flows.

These GMPLS cases require that something other than a simple 32-bit integer be made available to represent the labels. This is achieved through the gmplsLabelTable contained in the GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB RFC4803.

The tables in this document and RFC3813 that include objects with syntax MplsLabel also include companion objects that are row pointers. If the row pointer is set to zeroDotZero (0.0), then an object of syntax MplsLabel contains the label encoded as a 32-bit integer. But otherwise the row pointer indicates a row in another MIB table that includes the label. In these cases, the row pointer may indicate a row in the gmplsLabelTable.

This provides both a good way to support legacy systems that implement MPLS-TE-STD-MIB RFC3812, and a significant simplification in GMPLS systems that are limited to a single, simple label type.

Note that gmplsLabelTable supports concatenated labels through the use of a label sub-index (gmplsLabelSubindex).

Example of GMPLS Tunnel Setup

This section contains an example of which MIB objects should be modified to create a GMPLS tunnel. This example shows a best effort, loosely routed, bidirectional traffic engineered tunnel, which spans two hops of a simple network, uses Generalized Label requests with Lambda encoding, has label recording and shared link layer protection. Note that these objects should be created on the "head- end" LSR.

First in the mplsTunnelTable: {

 mplsTunnelIndex                = 1,
 mplsTunnelInstance             = 1,
 mplsTunnelIngressLSRId         = 192.0.2.1,
 mplsTunnelEgressLSRId          = 192.0.2.2,
 mplsTunnelName                 = "My first tunnel",
 mplsTunnelDescr                = "Here to there and back again",
 mplsTunnelIsIf                 = true(1),
 mplsTunnelXCPointer            = mplsXCIndex.3.0.0.12,
 mplsTunnelSignallingProto      = none(1),
 mplsTunnelSetupPrio            = 0,
 mplsTunnelHoldingPrio          = 0,
 mplsTunnelSessionAttributes    = recordRoute(4),
 mplsTunnelOwner                = snmp(2),
 mplsTunnelLocalProtectInUse    = false(2),
 mplsTunnelResourcePointer      = mplsTunnelResourceIndex.6,
 mplsTunnelInstancePriority     = 1,
 mplsTunnelHopTableIndex        = 1,
 mplsTunnelPrimaryInstance      = 0,
 mplsTunnelIncludeAnyAffinity   = 0,
 mplsTunnelIncludeAllAffinity   = 0,
 mplsTunnelExcludeAnyAffinity   = 0,
 mplsTunnelPathInUse            = 1,
 mplsTunnelRole                 = head(1),
 mplsTunnelRowStatus            = createAndWait(5),

}

In gmplsTunnelTable(1,1,192.0.2.1,192.0.2.2): {

 gmplsTunnelUnnumIf             = true(1),
 gmplsTunnelAttributes          = labelRecordingRequired(1),
 gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding         = tunnelLspLambda,
 gmplsTunnelSwitchingType       = lsc,
 gmplsTunnelLinkProtection      = shared(2),
 gmplsTunnelGPid                = lambda,
 gmplsTunnelSecondary           = false(2),
 gmplsTunnelDirection           = bidirectional(1)
 gmplsTunnelPathComp            = explicit(2),
 gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType = ipv4(1),
 gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipient     = 'C0000201'H,
 gmplsTunnelAdminStatusFlags    = 0,
 gmplsTunnelExtraParamsPtr      = 0.0

}

Entries in the mplsTunnelResourceTable, mplsTunnelHopTable, and gmplsTunnelHopTable are created and activated at this time.

In mplsTunnelResourceTable: {

 mplsTunnelResourceIndex        = 6,
 mplsTunnelResourceMaxRate      = 0,
 mplsTunnelResourceMeanRate     = 0,
 mplsTunnelResourceMaxBurstSize = 0,
 mplsTunnelResourceRowStatus    = createAndGo(4)

}

The next two instances of mplsTunnelHopEntry are used to denote the hops this tunnel will take across the network.

The following denotes the beginning of the network, or the first hop in our example. We have used the fictitious LSR identified by "192.0.2.1" as our head-end router.

In mplsTunnelHopTable: {

 mplsTunnelHopListIndex         = 1,
 mplsTunnelPathOptionIndex      = 1,
 mplsTunnelHopIndex             = 1,
 mplsTunnelHopAddrType          = ipv4(1),
 mplsTunnelHopIpv4Addr          = 192.0.2.1,
 mplsTunnelHopIpv4PrefixLen     = 9,
 mplsTunnelHopType              = strict(1),
 mplsTunnelHopRowStatus         = createAndWait(5),

}

The following denotes the end of the network, or the last hop in our example. We have used the fictitious LSR identified by "192.0.2.2" as our tail-end router.

In mplsTunnelHopTable: {

 mplsTunnelHopListIndex         = 1,
 mplsTunnelPathOptionIndex      = 1,
 mplsTunnelHopIndex             = 2,
 mplsTunnelHopAddrType          = ipv4(1),
 mplsTunnelHopIpv4Addr          = 192.0.2.2,
 mplsTunnelHopIpv4PrefixLen     = 9,
 mplsTunnelHopType              = loose(2),
 mplsTunnelHopRowStatus         = createAndGo(4)

}

Now an associated entry in the gmplsTunnelHopTable is created to provide additional GMPLS hop configuration indicating that the first hop is an unnumbered link using Explicit Forward and Reverse Labels.

An entry in the gmplsLabelTable is created first to include the Explicit Label.

In gmplsLabelTable: {

 gmplsLabelInterface            = 2,
 gmplsLabelIndex                = 1,
 gmplsLabelSubindex             = 0,
 gmplsLabelType                 = gmplsFreeformLabel(3),
 gmplsLabelFreeform             = 0xFEDCBA9876543210
 gmplsLabelRowStatus            = createAndGo(4)

}

In gmplsTunnelHopTable(1,1,1): {

 gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses           = forwardPresent(0)
                                            +reversePresent(1),
 gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr = gmplsLabelTable(2,1,0)
 gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr = gmplsLabelTable(2,1,0)

}

The first hop is now activated:

In mplsTunnelHopTable(1,1,1): {

 mplsTunnelHopRowStatus         = active(1)

}

No gmplsTunnelHopEntry is created for the second hop as it contains no special GMPLS features.

Finally, the mplsTunnelEntry is activated:

In mplsTunnelTable(1,1,192.0.2.1,192.0.2.2) {

 mplsTunnelRowStatus            = active(1)

}

GMPLS Traffic Engineering MIB Module

This MIB module makes reference to the following documents: RFC2205, RFC2578, RFC2579, RFC2580, RFC3209, RFC3411, RFC3471, RFC3473, RFC3477, RFC3812, RFC4001, and RFC4202.

GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

IMPORTS

 MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, NOTIFICATION-TYPE,
 Unsigned32, Counter32, Counter64, zeroDotZero, Gauge32
FROM SNMPv2-SMI                                   -- RFC 2578
 MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP, NOTIFICATION-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF                                  -- RFC 2580
 TruthValue, TimeStamp, RowPointer
FROM SNMPv2-TC                                    -- RFC 2579
 InetAddress, InetAddressType
FROM INET-ADDRESS-MIB                             -- RFC 4001
 SnmpAdminString
FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB                           -- RFC 3411
 mplsTunnelIndex, mplsTunnelInstance, mplsTunnelIngressLSRId,
 mplsTunnelEgressLSRId, mplsTunnelHopListIndex,
 mplsTunnelHopPathOptionIndex, mplsTunnelHopIndex,
 mplsTunnelARHopListIndex, mplsTunnelARHopIndex,
 mplsTunnelCHopListIndex, mplsTunnelCHopIndex,
 mplsTunnelEntry,
 mplsTunnelAdminStatus, mplsTunnelOperStatus,
 mplsTunnelGroup, mplsTunnelScalarGroup
FROM MPLS-TE-STD-MIB                              -- RFC3812
 IANAGmplsLSPEncodingTypeTC, IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC,
 IANAGmplsGeneralizedPidTC, IANAGmplsAdminStatusInformationTC
FROM IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB
 mplsStdMIB
FROM MPLS-TC-STD-MIB                              -- RFC 3811

gmplsTeStdMIB MODULE-IDENTITY

  LAST-UPDATED
     "200702270000Z" -- 27 February 2007 00:00:00 GMT
  ORGANIZATION
    "IETF Common Control and Measurement Plane (CCAMP) Working
     Group"
  CONTACT-INFO
    "       Thomas D. Nadeau
            Cisco Systems, Inc.
     Email: [email protected]
            Adrian Farrel
            Old Dog Consulting
     Email: [email protected]
     Comments about this document should be emailed directly
     to the CCAMP working group mailing list at
     [email protected]."
  DESCRIPTION
    "Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).  This version of
     this MIB module is part of RFC 4802; see the RFC itself for
     full legal notices.
     This MIB module contains managed object definitions
     for GMPLS Traffic Engineering (TE) as defined in:
     1. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
        Signaling Functional Description, Berger, L. (Editor),
        RFC 3471, January 2003.
     2. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, Berger,
        L. (Editor), RFC 3473, January 2003.
     "
  REVISION
    "200702270000Z" -- 27 February 2007 00:00:00 GMT
  DESCRIPTION
    "Initial version issued as part of RFC 4802."
= { mplsStdMIB 13 }

gmplsTeNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { gmplsTeStdMIB 0 } gmplsTeScalars OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { gmplsTeStdMIB 1 } gmplsTeObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { gmplsTeStdMIB 2 } gmplsTeConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { gmplsTeStdMIB 3 }

gmplsTunnelsConfigured OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Gauge32
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"The number of GMPLS tunnels configured on this device.  A GMPLS
 tunnel is considered configured if an entry for the tunnel
 exists in the gmplsTunnelTable and the associated
 mplsTunnelRowStatus is active(1)."
= { gmplsTeScalars 1 }

gmplsTunnelsActive OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Gauge32
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"The number of GMPLS tunnels active on this device.  A GMPLS
 tunnel is considered active if there is an entry in the
 gmplsTunnelTable and the associated mplsTunnelOperStatus for the
 tunnel is up(1)."
= { gmplsTeScalars 2 }

gmplsTunnelTable OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  SEQUENCE OF GmplsTunnelEntry
 MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"The gmplsTunnelTable sparsely extends the mplsTunnelTable of
 MPLS-TE-STD-MIB.  It allows GMPLS tunnels to be created between
 an LSR and a remote endpoint, and existing tunnels to be
 reconfigured or removed.
 Note that only point-to-point tunnel segments are supported,
 although multipoint-to-point and point-to-multipoint
 connections are supported by an LSR acting as a cross-connect.
 Each tunnel can thus have one out-segment originating at this
 LSR and/or one in-segment terminating at this LSR.
 The row status of an entry in this table is controlled by the
 mplsTunnelRowStatus in the corresponding entry in the
 mplsTunnelTable.  When the corresponding mplsTunnelRowStatus has
 value active(1), a row in this table may not be created or
 modified.
 The exception to this rule is the
 gmplsTunnelAdminStatusInformation object, which can be modified
 while the tunnel is active."
 REFERENCE
"1. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
    Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812."
= { gmplsTeObjects 1 }

gmplsTunnelEntry OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  GmplsTunnelEntry
 MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table in association with the corresponding
 entry in the mplsTunnelTable represents a GMPLS tunnel.
 An entry can be created by a network administrator via SNMP SET
 commands, or in response to signaling protocol events."
 INDEX {
mplsTunnelIndex,
mplsTunnelInstance,
mplsTunnelIngressLSRId,
mplsTunnelEgressLSRId
 }
= { gmplsTunnelTable 1 }
 GmplsTunnelEntry ::= SEQUENCE {

gmplsTunnelUnnumIf TruthValue, gmplsTunnelAttributes BITS, gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding IANAGmplsLSPEncodingTypeTC, gmplsTunnelSwitchingType IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC, gmplsTunnelLinkProtection BITS, gmplsTunnelGPid IANAGmplsGeneralizedPidTC, gmplsTunnelSecondary TruthValue, gmplsTunnelDirection INTEGER, gmplsTunnelPathComp INTEGER, gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipientType InetAddressType, gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipient InetAddress, gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipientType InetAddressType, gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipient InetAddress, gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipientType InetAddressType, gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipient InetAddress, gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType InetAddressType, gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipient InetAddress, gmplsTunnelAdminStatusFlags IANAGmplsAdminStatusInformationTC, gmplsTunnelExtraParamsPtr RowPointer }

gmplsTunnelUnnumIf OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  TruthValue
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Denotes whether or not this tunnel corresponds to an unnumbered
 interface represented by an entry in the interfaces group table
 (the ifTable) with ifType set to mpls(166).
 This object is only used if mplsTunnelIsIf is set to 'true'.
 If both this object and the mplsTunnelIsIf object are set to
 'true', the originating LSR adds an LSP_TUNNEL_INTERFACE_ID
 object to the outgoing Path message.
 This object contains information that is only used by the
 terminating LSR."
 REFERENCE
"1. Signalling Unnumbered Links in RSVP-TE, RFC 3477."
 DEFVAL  { false }
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 1 }

gmplsTunnelAttributes OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX BITS {
labelRecordingDesired(0)
 }
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"This bitmask indicates optional parameters for this tunnel.
 These bits should be taken in addition to those defined in
 mplsTunnelSessionAttributes in order to determine the full set
 of options to be signaled (for example SESSION_ATTRIBUTES flags
 in RSVP-TE).  The following describes these bitfields:
 labelRecordingDesired
   This flag is set to indicate that label information should be
   included when doing a route record.  This bit is not valid
   unless the recordRoute bit is set."
 REFERENCE
"1. RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels, RFC 3209,
    sections 4.4.3, 4.7.1, and 4.7.2."
 DEFVAL  { { } }
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 2 }

gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  IANAGmplsLSPEncodingTypeTC
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"This object indicates the encoding of the LSP being requested.
 A value of 'tunnelLspNotGmpls' indicates that GMPLS signaling is
 not in use.  Some objects in this MIB module may be of use for
 MPLS signaling extensions that do not use GMPLS signaling.  By
 setting this object to 'tunnelLspNotGmpls', an application may
 indicate that only those objects meaningful in MPLS should be
 examined.
 The values to use are defined in the TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
 IANAGmplsLSPEncodingTypeTC found in the IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB
 module."
 DEFVAL  { tunnelLspNotGmpls }
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 3 }

gmplsTunnelSwitchingType OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Indicates the type of switching that should be performed on
 a particular link.  This field is needed for links that
 advertise more than one type of switching capability.
 The values to use are defined in the TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
 IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC found in the IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB module.
 This object is only meaningful if gmplsTunnelLSPEncodingType
 is not set to 'tunnelLspNotGmpls'."
 DEFVAL  { unknown }
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 4 }

gmplsTunnelLinkProtection OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  BITS {
extraTraffic(0),
unprotected(1),
shared(2),
dedicatedOneToOne(3),
dedicatedOnePlusOne(4),
enhanced(5)
 }
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"This bitmask indicates the level of link protection required.  A
 value of zero (no bits set) indicates that any protection may be
 used.  The following describes these bitfields:
 extraTraffic
   This flag is set to indicate that the LSP should use links
   that are protecting other (primary) traffic.  Such LSPs may be
   preempted when the links carrying the (primary) traffic being
   protected fail.
 unprotected
   This flag is set to indicate that the LSP should not use any
   link layer protection.
 shared
   This flag is set to indicate that a shared link layer
   protection scheme, such as 1:N protection, should be used to
   support the LSP.
 dedicatedOneToOne
   This flag is set to indicate that a dedicated link layer
   protection scheme, i.e., 1:1 protection, should be used to
   support the LSP.
 dedicatedOnePlusOne
   This flag is set to indicate that a dedicated link layer
   protection scheme, i.e., 1+1 protection, should be used to
   support the LSP.
 enhanced
   This flag is set to indicate that a protection scheme that is
   more reliable than Dedicated 1+1 should be used, e.g., 4 fiber
   BLSR/MS-SPRING.
 This object is only meaningful if gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding is
 not set to 'tunnelLspNotGmpls'."
 REFERENCE
 "1. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling
     Functional Description, RFC 3471, section 7.1."
 DEFVAL  { { } }
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 5 }

gmplsTunnelGPid OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  IANAGmplsGeneralizedPidTC
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"This object indicates the payload carried by the LSP.  It is only
 required when GMPLS will be used for this LSP.
 The values to use are defined in the TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
 IANAGmplsGeneralizedPidTC found in the IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB module.
 This object is only meaningful if gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding is not
 set to 'tunnelLspNotGmpls'."
 DEFVAL  { unknown }
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 6 }

gmplsTunnelSecondary OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  TruthValue
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Indicates that the requested LSP is a secondary LSP.
 This object is only meaningful if gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding is not
 set to 'tunnelLspNotGmpls'."
 REFERENCE
"1. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling
    Functional Description, RFC 3471, section 7.1."
 DEFVAL  { false }
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 7 }

gmplsTunnelDirection OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  INTEGER {
forward(0),
bidirectional(1)
 }
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Whether this tunnel carries forward data only (is
 unidirectional) or is bidirectional.
 Values of this object other than 'forward' are meaningful
 only if gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding is not set to
 'tunnelLspNotGmpls'."
 DEFVAL { forward }
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 8 }

gmplsTunnelPathComp OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  INTEGER {
dynamicFull(1),   -- CSPF fully computed
explicit(2),      -- fully specified path
dynamicPartial(3) -- CSPF partially computed
 }
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS current
 DESCRIPTION
"This value instructs the source node on how to perform path
 computation on the explicit route specified by the associated
 entries in the gmplsTunnelHopTable.
 dynamicFull
   The user specifies at least the source and
   destination of the path and expects that the Constrained
   Shortest Path First (CSPF) will calculate the remainder
   of the path.
 explicit
   The user specifies the entire path for the tunnel to
   take.  This path may contain strict or loose hops.
   Evaluation of the explicit route will be performed
   hop by hop through the network.
 dynamicPartial
   The user specifies at least the source and
   destination of the path and expects that the CSPF
   will calculate the remainder of the path.  The path
   computed by CSPF is allowed to be only partially
   computed allowing the remainder of the path to be
   filled in across the network.
 When an entry is present in the gmplsTunnelTable for a
 tunnel, gmplsTunnelPathComp MUST be used and any
 corresponding mplsTunnelHopEntryPathComp object in the
 mplsTunnelHopTable MUST be ignored and SHOULD not be set.
 mplsTunnelHopTable and mplsTunnelHopEntryPathComp are part of
 MPLS-TE-STD-MIB.
 This object should be ignored if the value of
 gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding is 'tunnelLspNotGmpls'."
 REFERENCE
"1. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
    Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812."
 DEFVAL { dynamicFull }
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 9 }

gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipientType OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  InetAddressType
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION

"This object is used to aid in interpretation of

gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipient."
 DEFVAL { unknown }
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 10 }

gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipient OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  InetAddress
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Indicates the address of the upstream recipient for Notify
 messages relating to this tunnel and issued by this LSR.  This
 information is typically received from an upstream LSR in a Path
 message.
 This object is only valid when signaling a tunnel using RSVP.
 It is also not valid at the head end of a tunnel since there are
 no upstream LSRs to which to send a Notify message.
 This object is interpreted in the context of the value of
 gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipientType. If this object is set to
 0, the value of gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipientType MUST be
 set to unknown(0)."
 REFERENCE
"1. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473,
    section 4.2. "
 DEFVAL { '00000000'H } -- 0.0.0.0
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 11 }

gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipientType OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  InetAddressType
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION

"This object is used to aid in interpretation of

gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipient."
 DEFVAL { unknown }
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 12 }

gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipient OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  InetAddress
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Indicates to an upstream LSR the address to which it should send
 downstream Notify messages relating to this tunnel.
 This object is only valid when signaling a tunnel using RSVP.
 It is also not valid at the head end of the tunnel since no Resv
 messages are sent from that LSR for this tunnel.
 If set to 0, no Notify Request object will be included in the
 outgoing Resv messages.
 This object is interpreted in the context of the value of
 gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipientType. If this object is set to
 0, the value of gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipientType MUST be
 set to unknown(0)."
 REFERENCE
"1. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473,
    section 4.2. "
 DEFVAL { '00000000'H } -- 0.0.0.0
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 13 }

gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipientType OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  InetAddressType
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION

"This object is used to aid in interpretation of

gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipient."
 DEFVAL { unknown }
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 14 }

gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipient OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  InetAddress
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Indicates the address of the downstream recipient for Notify
 messages relating to this tunnel and issued by this LSR.  This
 information is typically received from an upstream LSR in a Resv
 message.  This object is only valid when signaling a tunnel using
 RSVP.
 It is also not valid at the tail end of a tunnel since there are
 no downstream LSRs to which to send a Notify message.
 This object is interpreted in the context of the value of
 gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipientType. If this object is set
 to 0, the value of gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipientType MUST
 be set to unknown(0)."
 REFERENCE
"1. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473,
    section 4.2.
"
 DEFVAL { '00000000'H } -- 0.0.0.0
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 15 }

gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  InetAddressType
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION

"This object is used to aid in interpretation of

gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipient."
 DEFVAL { unknown }
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 16 }

gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipient OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  InetAddress
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Indicates to a downstream LSR the address to which it should
 send upstream Notify messages relating to this tunnel.
 This object is only valid when signaling a tunnel using RSVP.
 It is also not valid at the tail end of the tunnel since no Path
 messages are sent from that LSR for this tunnel.
 If set to 0, no Notify Request object will be included in the
 outgoing Path messages.
 This object is interpreted in the context of the value of
 gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType.  If this object is set to
 0, the value of gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType MUST be
 set to unknown(0)."
 REFERENCE
"1. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473,
    section 4.2. "
 DEFVAL { '00000000'H } -- 0.0.0.0
= { gmplsTunnelEntry 17 }

gmplsTunnelAdminStatusFlags OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX IANAGmplsAdminStatusInformationTC MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION

 "Determines the setting of the Admin Status flags in the
  Admin Status object or TLV, as described in RFC 3471.  Setting
  this field to a non-zero value will result in the inclusion of
  the Admin Status object on signaling messages.
  The values to use are defined in the TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
  IANAGmplsAdminStatusInformationTC found in the
  IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB module.
  This value of this object can be modified when the
  corresponding mplsTunnelRowStatus and mplsTunnelAdminStatus
  is active(1).  By doing so, a new signaling message will be
  triggered including the requested Admin Status object or
  TLV."
 REFERENCE
"1. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling
    Functional Description, RFC 3471, section 8."
 DEFVAL  { { } }
 ::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 18 }

gmplsTunnelExtraParamsPtr OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX       RowPointer
 MAX-ACCESS   read-create
 STATUS       current
 DESCRIPTION
"Some tunnels will run over transports that can usefully support
 technology-specific additional parameters (for example,
 Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) resource usage).  Such
 parameters can be supplied in an external table and referenced
 from here.
 A value of zeroDotzero in this attribute indicates that there
 is no such additional information."
 DEFVAL  { zeroDotZero }
 ::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 19 }

gmplsTunnelHopTable OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  SEQUENCE OF GmplsTunnelHopEntry
 MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"The gmplsTunnelHopTable sparsely extends the mplsTunnelHopTable
 of MPLS-TE-STD-MIB.  It is used to indicate the Explicit Labels
 to be used in an explicit path for a GMPLS tunnel defined in the
 mplsTunnelTable and gmplsTunnelTable, when it is established
 using signaling.  It does not insert new hops, but does define
 new values for hops defined in the mplsTunnelHopTable.
 Each row in this table is indexed by the same indexes as in the
 mplsTunnelHopTable.  It is acceptable for some rows in the
 mplsTunnelHopTable to have corresponding entries in this table
 and some to have no corresponding entry in this table.
 The storage type for this entry is given by the value
 of mplsTunnelHopStorageType in the corresponding entry in the
 mplsTunnelHopTable.
 The row status of an entry in this table is controlled by
 mplsTunnelHopRowStatus in the corresponding entry in the
 mplsTunnelHopTable.  That is, it is not permitted to create a row
 in this table, or to modify an existing row, when the
 corresponding mplsTunnelHopRowStatus has the value active(1)."
 REFERENCE
"1. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
    Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812.
 2. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473.
"
= { gmplsTeObjects 2 }

gmplsTunnelHopEntry OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  GmplsTunnelHopEntry
 MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table represents additions to a tunnel hop
 defined in mplsTunnelHopEntry.  At an ingress to a tunnel, an
 entry in this table is created by a network administrator for an
 ERLSP to be set up by a signaling protocol.  At transit and
 egress nodes, an entry in this table may be used to represent the
 explicit path instructions received using the signaling
 protocol."
 INDEX {
mplsTunnelHopListIndex,
mplsTunnelHopPathOptionIndex,
mplsTunnelHopIndex
 }
= { gmplsTunnelHopTable 1 }

GmplsTunnelHopEntry ::= SEQUENCE {

 gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses           BITS,
 gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabel    Unsigned32,
 gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr RowPointer,
 gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabel    Unsigned32,
 gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr RowPointer

}

gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  BITS {
forwardPresent(0),
reversePresent(1)
 }
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"This bitmask indicates the presence of labels indicated by the
 gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabel or
 gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr, and
 gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabel or
 gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr objects.
 For the Present bits, a set bit indicates that a label is
 present for this hop in the route.  This allows zero to be a
 valid label value."
 DEFVAL  { { } }
= { gmplsTunnelHopEntry 1 }

gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabel OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Unsigned32
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"If gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a Forward
 Label is present and gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr
 contains the value zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this
 hop is represented by the value of this object."
= { gmplsTunnelHopEntry 2 }

gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  RowPointer
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Forward Label is present, this object contains a pointer to a
 row in another MIB table (such as the gmplsLabelTable of
 GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB) that contains the label to use on this hop
 in the forward direction.
 If the gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Forward Label is present and this object contains the value
 zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this hop is found in the
 gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabel object."
 DEFVAL  { zeroDotZero }
= { gmplsTunnelHopEntry 3 }

gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabel OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Unsigned32
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Reverse Label is present and
 gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr contains the value
 zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this hop is found in
 this object encoded as a 32-bit integer."
= { gmplsTunnelHopEntry 4 }

gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  RowPointer
 MAX-ACCESS read-create
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Reverse Label is present, this object contains a pointer to a
 row in another MIB table (such as the gmplsLabelTable of
 GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB) that contains the label to use on this hop
 in the reverse direction.
 If the gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Reverse Label is present and this object contains the value
 zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this hop is found in the
 gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabel object."
 DEFVAL  { zeroDotZero }
= { gmplsTunnelHopEntry 5 }

gmplsTunnelARHopTable OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  SEQUENCE OF GmplsTunnelARHopEntry
 MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"The gmplsTunnelARHopTable sparsely extends the
 mplsTunnelARHopTable of MPLS-TE-STD-MIB.  It is used to
 indicate the labels currently in use for a GMPLS tunnel
 defined in the mplsTunnelTable and gmplsTunnelTable, as
 reported by the signaling protocol.  It does not insert
 new hops, but does define new values for hops defined in
 the mplsTunnelARHopTable.
 Each row in this table is indexed by the same indexes as in the
 mplsTunnelARHopTable.  It is acceptable for some rows in the
 mplsTunnelARHopTable to have corresponding entries in this table
 and some to have no corresponding entry in this table.
 Note that since the information necessary to build entries
 within this table is not provided by some signaling protocols
 and might not be returned in all cases of other signaling
 protocols, implementation of this table and the
 mplsTunnelARHopTable is optional.  Furthermore, since the
 information in this table is actually provided by the
 signaling protocol after the path has been set up, the entries
 in this table are provided only for observation, and hence,
 all variables in this table are accessible exclusively as
 read-only."
 REFERENCE
"1. Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels, RFC 3209.
 2. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473.
 3. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
    Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812."
= { gmplsTeObjects 3 }

gmplsTunnelARHopEntry OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  GmplsTunnelARHopEntry
 MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table represents additions to a tunnel hop
 visible in mplsTunnelARHopEntry.  An entry is created by the
 signaling protocol for a signaled ERLSP set up by the signaling
 protocol.
 At any node on the LSP (ingress, transit, or egress), this table
 and the mplsTunnelARHopTable (if the tables are supported and if
 the signaling protocol is recording actual route information)
 contain the actual route of the whole tunnel.  If the signaling
 protocol is not recording the actual route, this table MAY
 report the information from the gmplsTunnelHopTable or the
 gmplsTunnelCHopTable.
 Note that the recording of actual labels is distinct from the
 recording of the actual route in some signaling protocols.  This
 feature is enabled using the gmplsTunnelAttributes object."
 INDEX {
mplsTunnelARHopListIndex,
mplsTunnelARHopIndex
 }
= { gmplsTunnelARHopTable 1 }

GmplsTunnelARHopEntry ::= SEQUENCE {

 gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses           BITS,
 gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabel    Unsigned32,
 gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr RowPointer,
 gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabel    Unsigned32,
 gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr RowPointer,
 gmplsTunnelARHopProtection              BITS

}

gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  BITS {
forwardPresent(0),
reversePresent(1),
forwardGlobal(2),
reverseGlobal(3)
 }
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"This bitmask indicates the presence and status of labels
 indicated by the gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabel or
 gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr, and
 gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabel or
 gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr objects.
 For the Present bits, a set bit indicates that a label is
 present for this hop in the route.
 For the Global bits, a set bit indicates that the label comes
 from the Global Label Space; a clear bit indicates that this is
 a Per-Interface label.  A Global bit only has meaning if the
 corresponding Present bit is set."
= { gmplsTunnelARHopEntry 1 }

gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabel OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Unsigned32
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Forward Label is present and
 gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr contains the value
 zeroDotZero, then the label in use on this hop is found in this
 object encoded as a 32-bit integer."
= { gmplsTunnelARHopEntry 2 }

gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  RowPointer
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Forward Label is present, this object contains a pointer to a
 row in another MIB table (such as the gmplsLabelTable of
 GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB) that contains the label in use on this hop
 in the forward direction.
 If the gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Forward Label is present and this object contains the value
 zeroDotZero, then the label in use on this hop is found in the
 gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabel object."
= { gmplsTunnelARHopEntry 3 }

gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabel OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Unsigned32
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Reverse Label is present and
 gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr contains the value
 zeroDotZero, then the label in use on this hop is found in this
 object encoded as a 32-bit integer."
= { gmplsTunnelARHopEntry 4 }

gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  RowPointer
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Reverse Label is present, this object contains a pointer to a
 row in another MIB table (such as the gmplsLabelTable of
 GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB) that contains the label in use on this hop
 in the reverse direction.
 If the gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Reverse Label is present and this object contains the value
 zeroDotZero, then the label in use on this hop is found in the
 gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabel object."
= { gmplsTunnelARHopEntry 5 }

gmplsTunnelARHopProtection OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  BITS {
localAvailable(0),
localInUse(1)
 }
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Availability and usage of protection on the reported link.
 localAvailable
   This flag is set to indicate that the link downstream of this
   node is protected via a local repair mechanism.
 localInUse
   This flag is set to indicate that a local repair mechanism is
   in use to maintain this tunnel (usually in the face of an
   outage of the link it was previously routed over)."
 REFERENCE
"1. RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels, RFC 3209,
    section 4.4.1."
= { gmplsTunnelARHopEntry 6 }

gmplsTunnelCHopTable OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  SEQUENCE OF GmplsTunnelCHopEntry
 MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"The gmplsTunnelCHopTable sparsely extends the
 mplsTunnelCHopTable of MPLS-TE-STD-MIB.  It is used to indicate
 additional information about the hops of a GMPLS tunnel defined
 in the mplsTunnelTable and gmplsTunnelTable, as computed by a
 constraint-based routing protocol, based on the
 mplsTunnelHopTable and the gmplsTunnelHopTable.
 Each row in this table is indexed by the same indexes as in the
 mplsTunnelCHopTable.  It is acceptable for some rows in the
 mplsTunnelCHopTable to have corresponding entries in this table
 and some to have no corresponding entry in this table.
 Please note that since the information necessary to build
 entries within this table may not be supported by some LSRs,
 implementation of this table is optional.
 Furthermore, since the information in this table is actually
 provided by a path computation component after the path has been
 computed, the entries in this table are provided only for
 observation, and hence, all objects in this table are accessible
 exclusively as read-only."
 REFERENCE
"1. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
    Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812.
 2. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473."
= { gmplsTeObjects 4 }

gmplsTunnelCHopEntry OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  GmplsTunnelCHopEntry
 MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table represents additions to a computed tunnel
 hop visible in mplsTunnelCHopEntry.  An entry is created by a
 path computation component based on the hops specified in the
 corresponding mplsTunnelHopTable and gmplsTunnelHopTable.
 At a transit LSR, this table (if the table is supported) MAY
 contain the path computed by a path computation engine on (or on
 behalf of) the transit LSR."
 INDEX {
mplsTunnelCHopListIndex,
mplsTunnelCHopIndex
 }
= { gmplsTunnelCHopTable 1 }

GmplsTunnelCHopEntry ::= SEQUENCE {

 gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses           BITS,
 gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabel    Unsigned32,
 gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr RowPointer,
 gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabel    Unsigned32,
 gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr RowPointer

}

gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  BITS {
forwardPresent(0),
reversePresent(1)
 }
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"This bitmask indicates the presence of labels indicated by the
 gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabel or
 gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr and
 gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabel or
 gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr objects.
 A set bit indicates that a label is present for this hop in the
 route, thus allowing zero to be a valid label value."
= { gmplsTunnelCHopEntry 1 }

gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabel OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Unsigned32
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Forward Label is present and
 gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr contains the value
 zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this hop is found in this
 object encoded as a 32-bit integer."
= { gmplsTunnelCHopEntry 2 }

gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  RowPointer
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Forward Label is present, this object contains a pointer to a
 row in another MIB table (such as the gmplsLabelTable of
 GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB) that contains the label to use on this hop
 in the forward direction.
 If the gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Forward Label is present and this object contains the value
 zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this hop is found in the
 gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabel object."
= { gmplsTunnelCHopEntry 3 }

gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabel OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Unsigned32
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Reverse Label is present and
 gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr contains the value
 zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this hop is found in this
 object encoded as a 32-bit integer."
= { gmplsTunnelCHopEntry 4 }

gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  RowPointer
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Reverse Label is present, this object contains a pointer to a
 row in another MIB table (such as the gmplsLabelTable of
 GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB) that contains the label to use on this hop
 in the reverse direction.
 If the gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
 Reverse Label is present and this object contains the value
 zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this hop is found in the
 gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabel object."
= { gmplsTunnelCHopEntry 5 }

gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  SEQUENCE OF GmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry
 MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"This table augments the gmplsTunnelTable to provide
 per-tunnel packet performance information for the reverse
 direction of a bidirectional tunnel.  It can be seen as
 supplementing the mplsTunnelPerfTable, which augments the
 mplsTunnelTable.
 For links that do not transport packets, these packet counters
 cannot be maintained.  For such links, attempts to read the
 objects in this table will return noSuchInstance.
 A tunnel can be known to be bidirectional by inspecting the
 gmplsTunnelDirection object."
 REFERENCE
"1. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
    Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812."
= { gmplsTeObjects 5 }

gmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  GmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry
 MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table is created by the LSR for every
 bidirectional GMPLS tunnel where packets are visible to the
 LSR."
 AUGMENTS { gmplsTunnelEntry }
= { gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable 1 }

GmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry ::= SEQUENCE {

 gmplsTunnelReversePerfPackets     Counter32,
 gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCPackets   Counter64,
 gmplsTunnelReversePerfErrors      Counter32,
 gmplsTunnelReversePerfBytes       Counter32,
 gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCBytes     Counter64

}

gmplsTunnelReversePerfPackets OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Counter32
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Number of packets forwarded on the tunnel in the reverse
 direction if it is bidirectional.
 This object represents the 32-bit value of the least
 significant part of the 64-bit value if both
 gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCPackets and this object are returned.
 For links that do not transport packets, this packet counter
 cannot be maintained.  For such links, this value will return
 noSuchInstance."
= { gmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry 1 }

gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCPackets OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Counter64
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"High-capacity counter for number of packets forwarded on the
 tunnel in the reverse direction if it is bidirectional.
 For links that do not transport packets, this packet counter
 cannot be maintained.  For such links, this value will return
 noSuchInstance."
= { gmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry 2 }

gmplsTunnelReversePerfErrors OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Counter32
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Number of errored packets received on the tunnel in the reverse
 direction if it is bidirectional.  For links that do not
 transport packets, this packet counter cannot be maintained.  For
 such links, this value will return noSuchInstance."
= { gmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry 3 }

gmplsTunnelReversePerfBytes OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Counter32
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Number of bytes forwarded on the tunnel in the reverse direction
 if it is bidirectional.
 This object represents the 32-bit value of the least
 significant part of the 64-bit value if both
 gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCBytes and this object are returned.
 For links that do not transport packets, this packet counter
 cannot be maintained.  For such links, this value will return
 noSuchInstance."
= { gmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry 4 }

gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCBytes OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Counter64
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"High-capacity counter for number of bytes forwarded on the
 tunnel in the reverse direction if it is bidirectional.
 For links that do not transport packets, this packet counter
 cannot be maintained.  For such links, this value will return
 noSuchInstance."
= { gmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry 5 }

gmplsTunnelErrorTable OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  SEQUENCE OF GmplsTunnelErrorEntry
 MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"This table augments the mplsTunnelTable.
 This table provides per-tunnel information about errors.  Errors
 may be detected locally or reported through the signaling
 protocol.  Error reporting is not exclusive to GMPLS, and this
 table may be applied in MPLS systems.
 Entries in this table are not persistent over system resets
 or re-initializations of the management system."
 REFERENCE
"1. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
    Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812."
= { gmplsTeObjects 6 }

gmplsTunnelErrorEntry OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  GmplsTunnelErrorEntry
 MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table is created by the LSR for every tunnel
 where error information is visible to the LSR.
 Note that systems that read the objects in this table one at
 a time and do not perform atomic operations to read entire
 instantiated table rows at once, should, for each conceptual
 column with valid data, read gmplsTunnelErrorLastTime
 prior to the other objects in the row and again subsequent to
 reading the last object of the row.  They should verify that
 the value of gmplsTunnelErrorLastTime did not change and
 thereby ensure that all data read belongs to the same error
 event."
 AUGMENTS { mplsTunnelEntry }
= { gmplsTunnelErrorTable 1 }

GmplsTunnelErrorEntry ::= SEQUENCE {

 gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType      INTEGER,
 gmplsTunnelErrorLastTime           TimeStamp,
 gmplsTunnelErrorReporterType       InetAddressType,
 gmplsTunnelErrorReporter           InetAddress,
 gmplsTunnelErrorCode               Unsigned32,
 gmplsTunnelErrorSubcode            Unsigned32,
 gmplsTunnelErrorTLVs               OCTET STRING,
 gmplsTunnelErrorHelpString         SnmpAdminString

}

gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  INTEGER {
noError(0),
unknown(1),
protocol(2),
pathComputation(3),
localConfiguration(4),
localResources(5),
localOther(6)
 }
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"The nature of the last error.  Provides interpretation context
 for gmplsTunnelErrorProtocolCode and
 gmplsTunnelErrorProtocolSubcode.
 A value of noError(0) shows that there is no error associated
 with this tunnel and means that the other objects in this table
 entry (conceptual row) have no meaning.
 A value of unknown(1) shows that there is an error but that no
 additional information about the cause is known.  The error may
 have been received in a signaled message or generated locally.
 A value of protocol(2) or pathComputation(3) indicates the
 cause of an error and identifies an error that has been received
 through signaling or will itself be signaled.
 A value of localConfiguration(4), localResources(5) or
 localOther(6) identifies an error that has been detected
 by the local node but that will not be reported through
 signaling."
= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 1 }

gmplsTunnelErrorLastTime OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  TimeStamp
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"The time at which the last error occurred.  This is presented as
 the value of SysUpTime when the error occurred or was reported
 to this node.
 If gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType has the value noError(0), then
 this object is not valid and should be ignored.
 Note that entries in this table are not persistent over system
 resets or re-initializations of the management system."
= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 2 }

gmplsTunnelErrorReporterType OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddressType MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION

 "The address type of the error reported.
  This object is used to aid in interpretation of
  gmplsTunnelErrorReporter."
= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 3 }

gmplsTunnelErrorReporter OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  InetAddress
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"The address of the node reporting the last error, or the address
 of the resource (such as an interface) associated with the
 error.
 If gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType has the value noError(0), then
 this object is not valid and should be ignored.
 If gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType has the value unknown(1),
 localConfiguration(4), localResources(5), or localOther(6),
 this object MAY contain a zero value.
 This object should be interpreted in the context of the value of
 the object gmplsTunnelErrorReporterType."
 REFERENCE
"1. Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses, RFC 4001,
    section 4, Usage Hints."
= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 4 }

gmplsTunnelErrorCode OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Unsigned32
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"The primary error code associated with the last error.
 The interpretation of this error code depends on the value of
 gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType.  If the value of
 gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType is noError(0), the value of this
 object should be 0 and should be ignored.  If the value of
 gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType is protocol(2), the error should
 be interpreted in the context of the signaling protocol
 identified by the mplsTunnelSignallingProto object."
 REFERENCE
"1. Resource ReserVation Protocol -- Version 1 Functional
    Specification, RFC 2205, section B.
 2. RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels, RFC 3209,
    section 7.3.
 3. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473,
    section 13.1."
= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 5 }

gmplsTunnelErrorSubcode OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  Unsigned32
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"The secondary error code associated with the last error and the
 protocol used to signal this tunnel.  This value is interpreted
 in the context of the value of gmplsTunnelErrorCode.
 If the value of gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType is noError(0), the
 value of this object should be 0 and should be ignored."
 REFERENCE
"1. Resource ReserVation Protocol -- Version 1 Functional
    Specification, RFC 2205, section B.
 2. RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels, RFC 3209,
    section 7.3.
 3. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473,
    section 13.1. "
= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 6 }

gmplsTunnelErrorTLVs OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  OCTET STRING (SIZE(0..65535))
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"The sequence of interface identifier TLVs reported with the
 error by the protocol code.  The interpretation of the TLVs and
 the encoding within the protocol are described in the
 references.  A value of zero in the first octet indicates that no
 TLVs are present."

REFERENCE

"1. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473,
    section 8.2."
= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 7 }

gmplsTunnelErrorHelpString OBJECT-TYPE

 SYNTAX  SnmpAdminString
 MAX-ACCESS read-only
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"A textual string containing information about the last error,
 recovery actions, and support advice.  If there is no help string,
 this object contains a zero length string.
 If the value of gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType is noError(0),
 this object should contain a zero length string, but may contain
 a help string indicating that there is no error."
= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 8 }

-- -- Notifications --

gmplsTunnelDown NOTIFICATION-TYPE OBJECTS {

 mplsTunnelAdminStatus,
 mplsTunnelOperStatus,
 gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType,
 gmplsTunnelErrorReporterType,
 gmplsTunnelErrorReporter,
 gmplsTunnelErrorCode,
 gmplsTunnelErrorSubcode

} STATUS current DESCRIPTION

 "This notification is generated when an mplsTunnelOperStatus
  object for a tunnel in the gmplsTunnelTable is about to enter
  the down state from some other state (but not from the
  notPresent state).  This other state is indicated by the
  included value of mplsTunnelOperStatus.
  The objects in this notification provide additional error
  information that indicates the reason why the tunnel has
  transitioned to down(2).
  Note that an implementation MUST only issue one of
  mplsTunnelDown and gmplsTunnelDown for any single event on a
  single tunnel.  If the tunnel has an entry in the
  gmplsTunnelTable, an implementation SHOULD use gmplsTunnelDown
  for all tunnel-down events and SHOULD NOT use mplsTunnelDown.
  This notification is subject to the control of
  mplsTunnelNotificationEnable.  When that object is set
  to false(2), then the notification must not be issued.
  Further, this notification is also subject to
  mplsTunnelNotificationMaxRate.  That object indicates the
  maximum number of notifications issued per second.  If events
  occur more rapidly, the implementation may simply fail to emit
  some notifications during that period, or may queue them until
  an appropriate time.  The notification rate applies to the sum
  of all notifications in the MPLS-TE-STD-MIB and
  GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB modules applied across the whole of the
  reporting device.
  mplsTunnelOperStatus, mplsTunnelAdminStatus, mplsTunnelDown,
  mplsTunnelNotificationEnable, and mplsTunnelNotificationMaxRate
  objects are found in MPLS-TE-STD-MIB."
REFERENCE
  "1. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering
      (TE) Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812."
= { gmplsTeNotifications 1 }

gmplsTeGroups

 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { gmplsTeConformance 1 }

gmplsTeCompliances

 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { gmplsTeConformance 2 }

-- Compliance requirement for fully compliant implementations.

gmplsTeModuleFullCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS current DESCRIPTION

 "Compliance statement for agents that provide full support for
  GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB.  Such devices can then be monitored and also
  be configured using this MIB module.
  The mandatory group has to be implemented by all LSRs that
  originate, terminate, or act as transit for TE-LSPs/tunnels.
  In addition, depending on the type of tunnels supported, other
  groups become mandatory as explained below."
 MODULE MPLS-TE-STD-MIB -- The MPLS-TE-STD-MIB, RFC 3812
 MANDATORY-GROUPS {
 mplsTunnelGroup,
 mplsTunnelScalarGroup
 }

MODULE -- this module

MANDATORY-GROUPS {

 gmplsTunnelGroup,
 gmplsTunnelScalarGroup

}

GROUP gmplsTunnelSignaledGroup

 DESCRIPTION
"This group is mandatory for devices that support signaled
 tunnel set up, in addition to gmplsTunnelGroup.  The following
 constraints apply:
     mplsTunnelSignallingProto should be at least read-only
     returning a value of ldp(2) or rsvp(3)."

GROUP gmplsTunnelOptionalGroup

 DESCRIPTION
"Objects in this group are optional."

GROUP gmplsTeNotificationGroup

 DESCRIPTION
"This group is mandatory for those implementations that can
 implement the notifications contained in this group."
= { gmplsTeCompliances 1 }

-- Compliance requirement for read-only compliant implementations.

gmplsTeModuleReadOnlyCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE

 STATUS current
 DESCRIPTION
"Compliance requirement for implementations that only provide
 read-only support for GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB.  Such devices can then be
 monitored but cannot be configured using this MIB module."
 MODULE -- this module

-- The mandatory group has to be implemented by all LSRs that -- originate, terminate, or act as transit for TE-LSPs/tunnels.

-- In addition, depending on the type of tunnels supported, other -- groups become mandatory as explained below.

MANDATORY-GROUPS {

 gmplsTunnelGroup,
 gmplsTunnelScalarGroup

}

GROUP gmplsTunnelSignaledGroup

 DESCRIPTION
"This group is mandatory for devices that support signaled
 tunnel set up, in addition to gmplsTunnelGroup.  The following
 constraints apply:
     mplsTunnelSignallingProto should be at least read-only
     returning a value of ldp(2) or rsvp(3)."

GROUP gmplsTunnelOptionalGroup

 DESCRIPTION
"Objects in this group are optional."

GROUP gmplsTeNotificationGroup

 DESCRIPTION
"This group is mandatory for those implementations that can
 implement the notifications contained in this group."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelUnnumIf

 MIN-ACCESS  read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelAttributes

 MIN-ACCESS  read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding

 MIN-ACCESS  read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelSwitchingType

 MIN-ACCESS  read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelLinkProtection

 MIN-ACCESS  read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelGPid

 MIN-ACCESS  read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelSecondary

 MIN-ACCESS  read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelDirection

 MIN-ACCESS  read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Only forward(0) is required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelPathComp

 MIN-ACCESS  read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Only explicit(2) is required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipientType

 SYNTAX       InetAddressType { unknown(0), ipv4(1), ipv6(2) }
 MIN-ACCESS   read-only
 DESCRIPTION  "Only unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) support
             is required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipient

 SYNTAX      InetAddress (SIZE(0|4|16))
 MIN-ACCESS  read-only
 DESCRIPTION "An implementation is only required to support
           unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) sizes."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipientType

 SYNTAX       InetAddressType { unknown(0), ipv4(1), ipv6(2) }
 MIN-ACCESS read-only
 DESCRIPTION "Only unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) support
           is required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipient

 SYNTAX      InetAddress (SIZE(0|4|16))
 MIN-ACCESS read-only
 DESCRIPTION "An implementation is only required to support
           unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) sizes."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipientType

 SYNTAX       InetAddressType { unknown(0), ipv4(1), ipv6(2) }
 MIN-ACCESS read-only
 DESCRIPTION "Only unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) support
           is required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipient

 SYNTAX      InetAddress (SIZE(0|4|16))
 MIN-ACCESS read-only
 DESCRIPTION "An implementation is only required to support
           unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) sizes."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType

 SYNTAX       InetAddressType { unknown(0), ipv4(1), ipv6(2) }
 MIN-ACCESS read-only
 DESCRIPTION "Only unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) support
           is required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipient

 SYNTAX      InetAddress (SIZE(0|4|16))
 MIN-ACCESS read-only
 DESCRIPTION "An implementation is only required to support
           unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) sizes."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelAdminStatusFlags

 MIN-ACCESS read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelExtraParamsPtr

 MIN-ACCESS read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."

-- gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses has max access read-only

OBJECT gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabel

 MIN-ACCESS  read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr

 MIN-ACCESS  read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabel

 MIN-ACCESS  read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr

 MIN-ACCESS  read-only
 DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."

-- gmplsTunnelARHopTable -- all objects have max access read-only

-- gmplsTunnelCHopTable -- all objects have max access read-only

-- gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable -- all objects have max access read-only

-- gmplsTunnelErrorTable -- all objects have max access read-only

OBJECT gmplsTunnelErrorReporterType

 SYNTAX       InetAddressType { unknown(0), ipv4(1), ipv6(2) }
 DESCRIPTION "Only unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) support
           is required."

OBJECT gmplsTunnelErrorReporter

 SYNTAX      InetAddress (SIZE(0|4|16))
 DESCRIPTION "An implementation is only required to support
           unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2)."
= { gmplsTeCompliances 2 }

gmplsTunnelGroup OBJECT-GROUP

 OBJECTS {
gmplsTunnelDirection,
gmplsTunnelReversePerfPackets,
gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCPackets,
gmplsTunnelReversePerfErrors,
gmplsTunnelReversePerfBytes,
gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCBytes,
gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType,
gmplsTunnelErrorLastTime,
gmplsTunnelErrorReporterType,
gmplsTunnelErrorReporter,
gmplsTunnelErrorCode,
gmplsTunnelErrorSubcode,
gmplsTunnelErrorTLVs,
gmplsTunnelErrorHelpString,
gmplsTunnelUnnumIf
 }
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Necessary, but not sufficient, set of objects to implement
 tunnels.  In addition, depending on the type of the tunnels
 supported (for example, manually configured or signaled,
 persistent or non-persistent, etc.), the
 gmplsTunnelSignaledGroup group is mandatory."
= { gmplsTeGroups 1 }

gmplsTunnelSignaledGroup OBJECT-GROUP

 OBJECTS {
gmplsTunnelAttributes,
gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding,
gmplsTunnelSwitchingType,
gmplsTunnelLinkProtection,
gmplsTunnelGPid,
gmplsTunnelSecondary,
gmplsTunnelPathComp,
gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipientType,
gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipient,
gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipientType,
gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipient,
gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipientType,
gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipient,
gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType,
gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipient,
gmplsTunnelAdminStatusFlags,
gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses,
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabel,
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr,
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabel,
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr
 }
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Objects needed to implement signaled tunnels."
= { gmplsTeGroups 2 }

gmplsTunnelScalarGroup OBJECT-GROUP

 OBJECTS {
gmplsTunnelsConfigured,
gmplsTunnelsActive
 }
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Scalar objects needed to implement MPLS tunnels."
= { gmplsTeGroups 3 }

gmplsTunnelOptionalGroup OBJECT-GROUP

 OBJECTS {
gmplsTunnelExtraParamsPtr,
gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses,
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabel,
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr,
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabel,
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr,
gmplsTunnelARHopProtection,
gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses,
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabel,
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr,
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabel,
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr
 }
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"The objects in this group are optional."
= { gmplsTeGroups 4 }

gmplsTeNotificationGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP

 NOTIFICATIONS {
 gmplsTunnelDown
 }
 STATUS  current
 DESCRIPTION
"Set of notifications implemented in this module.  None is
 mandatory."
= { gmplsTeGroups 5 }

END

Security Considerations

It is clear that the MIB modules described in this document in association with MPLS-TE-STD-MIB RFC3812 are potentially useful for monitoring of MPLS and GMPLS tunnels. These MIB modules can also be used for configuration of certain objects, and anything that can be configured can be incorrectly configured, with potentially disastrous results.

There are a number of management objects defined in these MIB modules with a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create. Such objects may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. The support for SET operations in a non-secure environment without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations. These are the tables and objects and their sensitivity/vulnerability:

o the gmplsTunnelTable and gmplsTunnelHopTable collectively contain

  objects to provision GMPLS tunnels interfaces at their ingress
  LSRs.  Unauthorized write access to objects in these tables could
  result in disruption of traffic on the network.  This is
  especially true if a tunnel has already been established.

Some of the readable objects in these MIB modules (i.e., objects with a MAX-ACCESS other than not-accessible) may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to control even GET and/or NOTIFY access to these objects and possibly to even encrypt the values of these objects when sending them over the network via SNMP. These are the tables and objects and their sensitivity/vulnerability:

o the gmplsTunnelTable, gmplsTunnelHopTable, gmplsTunnelARHopTable,

  gmplsTunnelCHopTable, gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable, and
  gmplsTunnelErrorTable collectively show the tunnel network
  topology and status.  If an administrator does not want to reveal
  this information, then these tables should be considered
  sensitive/vulnerable.

SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security. Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPsec), even then, there is no control as to who on the secure network is allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in these MIB modules.

It is RECOMMENDED that implementers consider the security features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework (see RFC3410, section 8), including full support for the SNMPv3 cryptographic mechanisms (for authentication and privacy).

Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to enable cryptographic security. It is then a customer/operator responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an instance of this MIB module, is properly configured to give access to the objects only to those principals (users) that have legitimate rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.

10. Acknowledgments

This document is a product of the CCAMP Working Group.

This document extends RFC3812. The authors would like to express their gratitude to all those who worked on that earlier MIB document. Thanks also to Tony Zinicola and Jeremy Crossen for their valuable contributions during an early implementation, and to Lars Eggert,

Baktha Muralidharan, Tom Petch, Dan Romascanu, Dave Thaler, and Bert Wijnen for their review comments.

Special thanks to Joan Cucchiara and Len Nieman for their help with compilation issues.

Joan Cucchiara provided a helpful and very thorough MIB Doctor review.

11. IANA Considerations

IANA has rooted MIB objects in the MIB modules contained in this document according to the sections below.

11.1. IANA Considerations for GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB

IANA has rooted MIB objects in the GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB module contained in this document under the mplsStdMIB subtree.

IANA has made the following assignments in the "NETWORK MANAGEMENT PARAMETERS" registry located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/ smi-numbers in table:

...mib-2.transmission.mplsStdMIB (1.3.6.1.2.1.10.166)

Decimal Name References


----- ----------

13 GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB RFC4802

In the future, GMPLS-related standards-track MIB modules should be rooted under the mplsStdMIB (sic) subtree. IANA has been requested to manage that namespace in the SMI Numbers registry RFC3811. New assignments can only be made via a Standards Action as specified in RFC2434.

11.2. Dependence on IANA MIB Modules

Three MIB objects in the GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB module defined in this document (gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding, gmplsTunnelSwitchingType, and gmplsTunnelGPid) use textual conventions imported from the IANA- GMPLS-TC-MIB module. The purpose of defining these textual conventions in a separate MIB module is to allow additional values to be defined without having to issue a new version of this document. The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is responsible for the assignment of all Internet numbers; it will administer the values associated with these textual conventions.

The rules for additions or changes to IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB are outlined in the DESCRIPTION clause associated with its MODULE-IDENTITY statement.

The current version of IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB can be accessed from the IANA home page at: http://www.iana.org/.

11.2.1. IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB Definition

This section provides the base definition of the IANA GMPLS TC MIB module. This MIB module is under the direct control of IANA. Please see the most updated version of this MIB at <http://www.iana.org/assignments/ianagmplstc-mib>.

This MIB makes reference to the following documents: RFC2578, RFC2579, RFC3471, RFC3473, RFC4202, RFC4328, and RFC4783.

IANA assigned an OID to the IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB module specified in this document as { mib-2 152 }.

IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

IMPORTS

   MODULE-IDENTITY, mib-2              FROM SNMPv2-SMI  -- RFC 2578
   TEXTUAL-CONVENTION                  FROM SNMPv2-TC;  -- RFC 2579

ianaGmpls MODULE-IDENTITY

   LAST-UPDATED
              "200702270000Z" -- 27 February 2007 00:00:00 GMT
   ORGANIZATION
              "IANA"
   CONTACT-INFO
              "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
               Postal: 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
                       Marina del Rey, CA 90292
               Tel:    +1 310 823 9358
               E-Mail: [email protected]"
   DESCRIPTION
     "Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).  The initial version
      of this MIB module was published in RFC 4802.  For full legal
      notices see the RFC itself.  Supplementary information
      may be available on:
      http://www.ietf.org/copyrights/ianamib.html"
      REVISION
       "200702270000Z" -- 27 February 2007 00:00:00 GMT
     DESCRIPTION
       "Initial version issued as part of RFC 4802."
   ::= { mib-2 152 }

IANAGmplsLSPEncodingTypeTC ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION

   STATUS       current
   DESCRIPTION
        "This type is used to represent and control
         the LSP encoding type of an LSP signaled by a GMPLS
         signaling protocol.
         This textual convention is strongly tied to the LSP
         Encoding Types sub-registry of the GMPLS Signaling
         Parameters registry managed by IANA.  Values should be
         assigned by IANA in step with the LSP Encoding Types
         sub-registry and using the same registry management rules.
         However, the actual values used in this textual convention
         are solely within the purview of IANA and do not
         necessarily match the values in the LSP Encoding Types
         sub-registry.
         The definition of this textual convention with the
         addition of newly assigned values is published
         periodically by the IANA, in either the Assigned
         Numbers RFC, or some derivative of it specific to
         Internet Network Management number assignments.  (The
         latest arrangements can be obtained by contacting the
         IANA.)
         Requests for new values should be made to IANA via
         email ([email protected])."
   REFERENCE
        "1. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
            Signaling Functional Description, RFC 3471, section
            3.1.1.
         2. Generalized MPLS Signalling Extensions for G.709 Optical
            Transport Networks Control, RFC 4328, section 3.1.1."
   SYNTAX  INTEGER {
              tunnelLspNotGmpls(0),        -- GMPLS is not in use
              tunnelLspPacket(1),          -- Packet
              tunnelLspEthernet(2),        -- Ethernet
              tunnelLspAnsiEtsiPdh(3),     -- PDH
              -- the value 4 is deprecated
              tunnelLspSdhSonet(5),        -- SDH or SONET
              -- the value 6 is deprecated
              tunnelLspDigitalWrapper(7),  -- Digital Wrapper
              tunnelLspLambda(8),          -- Lambda
              tunnelLspFiber(9),           -- Fiber
              -- the value 10 is deprecated
              tunnelLspFiberChannel(11),   -- Fiber Channel
              tunnelDigitalPath(12),       -- Digital Path
              tunnelOpticalChannel(13)     -- Optical Channel
            }

IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION

   STATUS       current
   DESCRIPTION
        "This type is used to represent and
         control the LSP switching type of an LSP signaled by a
         GMPLS signaling protocol.
         This textual convention is strongly tied to the Switching
         Types sub-registry of the GMPLS Signaling Parameters
         registry managed by IANA.  Values should be assigned by
         IANA in step with the Switching Types sub-registry and
         using the same registry management rules.  However, the
         actual values used in this textual convention are solely
         within the purview of IANA and do not necessarily match
         the values in the Switching Types sub-registry.
         The definition of this textual convention with the
         addition of newly assigned values is published
         periodically by the IANA, in either the Assigned
         Numbers RFC, or some derivative of it specific to
         Internet Network Management number assignments.  (The
         latest arrangements can be obtained by contacting the
         IANA.)
         Requests for new values should be made to IANA via
         email ([email protected])."
   REFERENCE
        "1. Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized
            Multi-Protocol Label Switching, RFC 4202, section 2.4.
         2. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
            Signaling Functional Description, RFC 3471, section
            3.1.1."
   SYNTAX  INTEGER {
              unknown(0),   -- none of the following, or not known
              psc1(1),      -- Packet-Switch-Capable 1
              psc2(2),      -- Packet-Switch-Capable 2
              psc3(3),      -- Packet-Switch-Capable 3
              psc4(4),      -- Packet-Switch-Capable 4
              l2sc(51),     -- Layer-2-Switch-Capable
              tdm(100),     -- Time-Division-Multiplex
              lsc(150),     -- Lambda-Switch-Capable
              fsc(200)      -- Fiber-Switch-Capable
            }

IANAGmplsGeneralizedPidTC ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION

   STATUS       current
   DESCRIPTION
        "This data type is used to represent and control the LSP
         Generalized Protocol Identifier (G-PID) of an LSP
         signaled by a GMPLS signaling protocol.
         This textual convention is strongly tied to the Generalized
         PIDs (G-PID) sub-registry of the GMPLS Signaling Parameters
         registry managed by IANA.  Values should be assigned by
         IANA in step with the Generalized PIDs (G-PID) sub-registry
         and using the same registry management rules.  However, the
         actual values used in this textual convention are solely
         within the purview of IANA and do not necessarily match the
         values in the Generalized PIDs (G-PID) sub-registry.
         The definition of this textual convention with the
         addition of newly assigned values is published
         periodically by the IANA, in either the Assigned
         Numbers RFC, or some derivative of it specific to
         Internet Network Management number assignments.  (The
         latest arrangements can be obtained by contacting the
         IANA.)
         Requests for new values should be made to IANA via
         email ([email protected])."
    REFERENCE
        "1. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
            Signaling Functional Description, RFC 3471, section
            3.1.1.
         2. Generalized MPLS Signalling Extensions for G.709 Optical
            Transport Networks Control, RFC 4328, section 3.1.3."
    SYNTAX  INTEGER {
              unknown(0),      -- unknown or none of the following
              -- the values 1, 2, 3 and 4 are reserved in RFC 3471
              asynchE4(5),
              asynchDS3T3(6),
              asynchE3(7),
              bitsynchE3(8),
              bytesynchE3(9),
              asynchDS2T2(10),
              bitsynchDS2T2(11),
              reservedByRFC3471first(12),
              asynchE1(13),
              bytesynchE1(14),
              bytesynch31ByDS0(15),
              asynchDS1T1(16),
              bitsynchDS1T1(17),
              bytesynchDS1T1(18),
              vc1vc12(19),
              reservedByRFC3471second(20),
              reservedByRFC3471third(21),
              ds1SFAsynch(22),
              ds1ESFAsynch(23),
              ds3M23Asynch(24),
              ds3CBitParityAsynch(25),
              vtLovc(26),
              stsSpeHovc(27),
              posNoScramble16BitCrc(28),
              posNoScramble32BitCrc(29),
              posScramble16BitCrc(30),
              posScramble32BitCrc(31),
              atm(32),
              ethernet(33),
              sdhSonet(34),
              digitalwrapper(36),
              lambda(37),
              ansiEtsiPdh(38),
              lapsSdh(40),
              fddi(41),
              dqdb(42),
              fiberChannel3(43),
              hdlc(44),
              ethernetV2DixOnly(45),
              ethernet802dot3Only(46),
              g709ODUj(47),
              g709OTUk(48),
              g709CBRorCBRa(49),
              g709CBRb(50),
              g709BSOT(51),
              g709BSNT(52),
              gfpIPorPPP(53),
              gfpEthernetMAC(54),
              gfpEthernetPHY(55),
              g709ESCON(56),
              g709FICON(57),
              g709FiberChannel(58)
            }

IANAGmplsAdminStatusInformationTC ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION

    STATUS current
    DESCRIPTION
        "This data type determines the setting of the
         Admin Status flags in the Admin Status object or TLV, as
         described in RFC 3471.  Setting this object to a non-zero
         value will result in the inclusion of the Admin Status
         object or TLV on signaling messages.
         This textual convention is strongly tied to the
         Administrative Status Information Flags sub-registry of
         the GMPLS Signaling Parameters registry managed by IANA.
         Values should be assigned by IANA in step with the
         Administrative Status Flags sub-registry and using the
         same registry management rules.  However, the actual
         values used in this textual convention are solely
         within the purview of IANA and do not necessarily match
         the values in the Administrative Status Information
         Flags sub-registry.
         The definition of this textual convention with the
         addition of newly assigned values is published
         periodically by the IANA, in either the Assigned
         Numbers RFC, or some derivative of it specific to
         Internet Network Management number assignments.  (The
         latest arrangements can be obtained by contacting the
         IANA.)
         Requests for new values should be made to IANA via
         email ([email protected])."
    REFERENCE
        "1. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
            Signaling Functional Description, RFC 3471, section 8.
         2. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions,
            RFC 3473, section 7.
         3. GMPLS - Communication of Alarm Information,
            RFC 4783, section 3.2.1."
    SYNTAX BITS {
              reflect(0), -- Reflect bit (RFC 3471)
              reserved1(1), -- reserved
              reserved2(2), -- reserved
              reserved3(3), -- reserved
              reserved4(4), -- reserved
              reserved5(5), -- reserved
              reserved6(6), -- reserved
              reserved7(7), -- reserved
              reserved8(8), -- reserved
              reserved9(9), -- reserved
              reserved10(10), -- reserved
              reserved11(11), -- reserved
              reserved12(12), -- reserved
              reserved13(13), -- reserved
              reserved14(14), -- reserved
              reserved15(15), -- reserved
              reserved16(16), -- reserved
              reserved17(17), -- reserved
              reserved18(18), -- reserved
              reserved19(19), -- reserved
              reserved20(20), -- reserved
              reserved21(21), -- reserved
              reserved22(22), -- reserved
              reserved23(23), -- reserved
              reserved24(24), -- reserved
              reserved25(25), -- reserved
              reserved26(26), -- reserved
              reserved27(27), -- Inhibit Alarm bit (RFC 4783)
              reserved28(28), -- reserved
              testing(29), -- Testing bit (RFC 3473)
              administrativelyDown(30), -- Admin down (RFC 3473)
              deleteInProgress(31) -- Delete bit (RFC 3473)
            }

END

12. References

12.1. Normative References

RFC2119 Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate

         Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

RFC2205 Braden, R., Zhang, L., Berson, S., Herzog, S., and S.

         Jamin, "Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) -- Version 1
         Functional Specification", RFC 2205, September 1997.

RFC2434 Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an

         IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434,
         October 1998.

RFC2578 McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder,

         "Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)",
         STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.

RFC2579 McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Textual

         Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.

RFC2580 McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder,

         "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April
         1999.

RFC3031 Rosen, E., Viswanathan, A., and R. Callon, "Multiprotocol

         Label Switching Architecture", RFC 3031, January 2001.

RFC3209 Awduche, D., Berger, L., Gan, D., Li, T., Srinivasan, V.,

         and G. Swallow, "RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP
         Tunnels", RFC 3209, December 2001.

RFC3411 Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, "An

         Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management
         Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks", STD 62, RFC 3411,
         December 2002.

RFC3471 Berger, L., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching

         (GMPLS) Signaling Functional Description", RFC 3471,
         January 2003.

RFC3473 Berger, L., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching

         (GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic
         Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions", RFC 3473, January 2003.

RFC3477 Kompella, K. and Y. Rekhter, "Signalling Unnumbered Links

         in Resource ReSerVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering
         (RSVP-TE)", RFC 3477, January 2003.

RFC3811 Nadeau, T. and J. Cucchiara, "Definitions of Textual

         Conventions (TCs) for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)
         Management", RFC 3811, June 2004.

RFC3812 Srinivasan, C., Viswanathan, A., and T. Nadeau,

         "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering
         (TE) Management Information Base (MIB)", RFC 3812, June
         2004.

RFC3813 Srinivasan, C., Viswanathan, A., and T. Nadeau,

         "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switching
         Router (LSR) Management Information Base (MIB)", RFC 3813,
         June 2004.

RFC3945 Mannie, E., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching

         (GMPLS) Architecture", RFC 3945, October 2004.

RFC4001 Daniele, M., Haberman, B., Routhier, S., and J.

         Schoenwaelder, "Textual Conventions for Internet Network
         Addresses", RFC 4001, February 2005.

RFC4202 Kompella, K. and Y. Rekhter, "Routing Extensions in Support

         of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)", RFC
         4202, October 2005.

RFC4328 Papadimitriou, D., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label

         Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for G.709 Optical
         Transport Networks Control", RFC 4328, January 2006.

RFC4783 Berger, L., "GMPLS - Communication of Alarm Information",

         RFC 4783, December 2006.

RFC4803 Nadeau, T., Ed. and A. Farrel, Ed., "Generalized

         Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Label Switching
         Router (LSR) Management Information Base", RFC 4803,
         February 2007.

12.2. Informative References

RFC2863 McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group

         MIB", RFC 2863, June 2000.

RFC3410 Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart,

         "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-
         Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002.

RFC3472 Ashwood-Smith, P. and L. Berger, "Generalized Multi-

         Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Constraint-based
         Routed Label Distribution Protocol (CR-LDP) Extensions",
         RFC 3472, January 2003.

Contact Information

Thomas D. Nadeau Cisco Systems, Inc. 1414 Massachusetts Ave. Boxborough, MA 01719

EMail: [email protected]

Cheenu Srinivasan Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington Ave. New York, NY 10022

Phone: +1-212-617-3682 EMail: [email protected]

Adrian Farrel Old Dog Consulting

Phone: +44-(0)-1978-860944 EMail: [email protected]

Tim Hall Data Connection Ltd. 100 Church Street Enfield, Middlesex EN2 6BQ, UK

Phone: +44 20 8366 1177 EMail: [email protected]

Ed Harrison Data Connection Ltd. 100 Church Street Enfield, Middlesex EN2 6BQ, UK

Phone: +44 20 8366 1177 EMail: [email protected]

Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.

This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at [email protected].

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.