RFC5857

From RFC-Wiki

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) E. Ertekin Request for Comments: 5857 C. Christou Category: Standards Track R. Jasani ISSN: 2070-1721 Booz Allen Hamilton

                                                          T. Kivinen
                                                     AuthenTec, Inc.
                                                          C. Bormann
                                             Universitaet Bremen TZI
                                                            May 2010
IKEv2 Extensions to Support Robust Header Compression over IPsec

Abstract

In order to integrate Robust Header Compression (ROHC) with IPsec, a mechanism is needed to signal ROHC channel parameters between endpoints. Internet Key Exchange (IKE) is a mechanism that can be leveraged to exchange these parameters. This document specifies extensions to IKEv2 that will allow ROHC and its associated channel parameters to be signaled for IPsec Security Associations (SAs).

Status of This Memo

This is an Internet Standards Track document.

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5857.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English.

Introduction

Increased packet header overhead due to IPsec [IPSEC] can result in the inefficient utilization of bandwidth. Coupling ROHC [ROHC] with IPsec offers an efficient way to transfer protected IP traffic.

ROHCoIPsec [ROHCOIPSEC] requires configuration parameters to be initialized at the compressor and decompressor. Current specifications for hop-by-hop ROHC negotiate these parameters through a link-layer protocol such as the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) (i.e., ROHC over PPP [ROHC-PPP]). Since key exchange protocols (e.g., IKEv2 [IKEV2]) can be used to dynamically establish parameters between IPsec peers, this document defines extensions to IKEv2 to signal ROHC parameters for ROHCoIPsec.

Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [BRA97].

ROHC Channel Initialization for ROHCoIPsec

The following subsections define extensions to IKEv2 that enable an initiator and a responder to signal parameters required to establish a ROHC channel for a ROHCoIPsec session.

ROHC_SUPPORTED Notify Message

ROHC channel parameters MUST be signaled separately for each ROHC- enabled IPsec SA. Specifically, a new Notify message type MUST be included in the IKE_AUTH and CREATE_CHILD_SA exchanges whenever a new ROHC-enabled IPsec SA is created, or an existing one is rekeyed.

The Notify payload sent by the initiator MUST contain the channel parameters for the ROHC session. These parameters indicate the capabilities of the ROHC decompressor at the initiator. Upon receipt of the initiator's request, the responder will either ignore the payload (if it doesn't support ROHC or the proposed parameters) or respond with a Notify payload that contains its own ROHC channel parameters.

Note that only one Notify payload is used to convey ROHC parameters. If multiple Notify payloads containing ROHC parameters are received, all but the first such Notify payload MUST be dropped. If the initiator does not receive a Notify payload with the responder's ROHC channel parameters, ROHC MUST NOT be enabled on the Child SA.

A new Notify Message Type value, denoted ROHC_SUPPORTED, indicates that the Notify payload is conveying ROHC channel parameters (Section 4).

The Notify payload (defined in RFC 4306 [IKEV2]) is illustrated in Figure 1.

                       1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  ! Next Payload  !C!  RESERVED   !         Payload Length        !
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  !  Protocol ID  !   SPI Size    !      Notify Message Type      !
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  !                                                               !
  ~                Security Parameter Index (SPI)                 ~
  !                                                               !
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  !                                                               !
  ~                       Notification Data                       ~
  !                                                               !
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                     Figure 1. Notify Payload Format

The fields of the Notify payload are set as follows:

Next Payload (1 octet)

  Identifier for the payload type of the next payload in the
  message.  Further details can be found in RFC 4306 [IKEV2].

Critical (1 bit)

  Since all IKEv2 implementations support the Notify payload, this
  value MUST be set to zero.

Payload Length (2 octets)

  As defined in RFC 4306 [IKEV2], this field indicates the length of
  the current payload, including the generic payload header.

Protocol ID (1 octet)

  Since this notification message is used during the creation of a
  Child SA, this field MUST be set to zero.

SPI Size (1 octet)

  This value MUST be set to zero, since no SPI is applicable (ROHC
  parameters are set at SA creation; thus, the SPI has not been
  defined).

Notify Message Type (2 octets)

  This field MUST be set to ROHC_SUPPORTED.

Security Parameter Index (SPI)

  Since the SPI Size field is 0, this field MUST NOT be transmitted.

Notification Data (variable)

  This field MUST contain at least three ROHC Attributes (Section
  3.1.1).

ROHC Attributes

The ROHC_SUPPORTED Notify message is used to signal channel parameters between ROHCoIPsec compressor and decompressor. The message contains a list of "ROHC Attributes", which contain the parameters required for the ROHCoIPsec session.

The format for signaling ROHC Attributes takes a similar format to the Transform Attributes described in Section 3.3.5 of RFC 4306 [IKEV2]. The format of the ROHC Attribute is shown in Figure 2.

                        1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   !A!     ROHC Attribute Type     !  AF=0  ROHC Attribute Length  !
   !F!                             !  AF=1  ROHC Attribute Value   !
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   !                   AF=0  ROHC Attribute Value                  !
   !                   AF=1  Not Transmitted                       !
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
             Figure 2.  Format of the ROHC Attribute

o Attribute Format (AF) (1 bit) - If the AF bit is a zero (0), then

  the ROHC Attribute is expressed in a Type/Length/Value format.  If
  the AF bit is a one (1), then the ROHC attribute is expressed in a
  Type/Value (TV) format.

o ROHC Attribute Type (15 bits) - Unique identifier for each type of

  ROHC attribute (Section 3.1.2).

o ROHC Attribute Length (2 octets) - Length (in octets) of the

  Attribute Value.  When the AF bit is a one (1), the ROHC Attribute
  Value is 2 octets and the ROHC Attribute Length field is not
  present.

o ROHC Attribute Value (variable length) - Value of the ROHC

  Attribute associated with the ROHC Attribute Type.  If the AF bit
  is a zero (0), this field's length is defined by the ROHC
  Attribute Length field.  If the AF bit is a one (1), the length of
  the ROHC Attribute Value is 2 octets.

ROHC Attribute Types

This section describes five ROHC Attribute Types: MAX_CID, ROHC_PROFILE, ROHC_INTEG, ROHC_ICV_LEN, and MRRU. The value allocated for each ROHC Attribute Type is specified in Section 4.

MAX_CID (Maximum Context Identifier, AF = 1)

  The MAX_CID attribute is a mandatory attribute.  Exactly one
  MAX_CID attribute MUST be sent.  The MAX_CID field indicates the
  maximum value of a context identifier supported by the ROHCoIPsec
  decompressor.  This attribute value is 2 octets in length.  The
  value for MAX_CID MUST be at least 0 and at most 16383.  Since
  CIDs can take values between 0 and MAX_CID, the actual number of
  contexts that can be used are MAX_CID+1.  If MAX_CID is 0, this
  implies having one context.  The recipient of the MAX_CID
  Attribute MUST only use context identifiers up to MAX_CID for
  compression.
  Note that the MAX_CID parameter is a one-way notification (i.e.,
  the sender of the attribute indicates what it can handle to the
  other end); therefore, different values for MAX_CID may be
  announced in each direction.

ROHC_PROFILE (ROHC Profile, AF = 1)

  The ROHC_PROFILE attribute is a mandatory attribute.  Each
  ROHC_PROFILE attribute has a fixed length of 4 octets, and its
  attribute value is a 2-octet long ROHC Profile Identifier
  [ROHCPROF].  There MUST be at least one ROHC_PROFILE attribute
  included in the ROHC_SUPPORTED Notify message.  If multiple
  ROHC_PROFILE attributes are sent, the order is arbitrary.  The
  recipient of a ROHC_PROFILE attribute(s) MUST only use the
  profile(s) proposed for compression.
  Several common profiles are defined in RFCs 3095 [ROHCV1] and 5225
  [ROHCV2].  Note, however, that two versions of the same profile
  MUST NOT be signaled.  For example, if a ROHCoIPsec decompressor
  supports both ROHCv1 UDP (0x0002) and ROHCv2 UDP (0x0102), both
  profiles MUST NOT be signaled.  This restriction is needed, as
  packets compressed by ROHC express only the 8 least-significant
  bits of the profile identifier; since the 8 least-significant bits
  for corresponding profiles in ROHCv1 and ROHCv2 are identical, the
  decompressor is not capable of determining the ROHC version that
  was used to compress the packet.
  Note that the ROHC_PROFILE attribute is a one-way notification;
  therefore, different values for ROHC_PROFILE may be announced in
  each direction.

ROHC_INTEG (Integrity Algorithm for Verification of Decompressed Headers, AF = 1)

  The ROHC_INTEG attribute is a mandatory attribute.  There MUST be
  at least one ROHC_INTEG attribute contained within the
  ROHC_SUPPORTED Notify message.  The attribute value contains the
  identifier of an integrity algorithm that is used to ensure the
  integrity of the decompressed packets (i.e., ensure that the
  decompressed packet headers are identical to the original packet
  headers prior to compression).
  Authentication algorithms that MUST be supported are specified in
  the "Authentication Algorithms" table in Section 3.1.1 ("ESP
  Encryption and Authentication Algorithms") of RFC 4835
  [CRYPTO-ALG] (or its successor).
  The integrity algorithm is represented by a 2-octet value that
  corresponds to the value listed in the IKEv2 Parameters registry
  [IKEV2-PARA], "Transform Type 3 - Integrity Algorithm Transform
  IDs" section.  Upon receipt of the ROHC_INTEG attribute(s), the
  responder MUST select exactly one of the proposed algorithms; the
  chosen value is sent back in the ROHC_SUPPORTED Notify message
  returned by the responder to the initiator.  The selected
  integrity algorithm MUST be used in both directions.  If the
  responder does not accept any of the algorithms proposed by the
  initiator, ROHC MUST NOT be enabled on the SA.
  It is noted that:
  1.  The keys (one for each direction) for this integrity algorithm
      are derived from the IKEv2 KEYMAT (see [IKEV2], Section 2.17).
      For the purposes of this key derivation, ROHC is considered to
      be an IPsec protocol.  When a ROHC-enabled CHILD_SA is
      rekeyed, the key associated with this integrity algorithm is
      rekeyed as well.
  2.  A ROHCoIPsec initiator MAY signal a value of zero (0x0000) in
      a ROHC_INTEG attribute.  This corresponds to "NONE" in the
      "IKEv2 Integrity Algorithm Transform IDs" registry.  The
      ROHCoIPsec responder MAY select this value by responding to
      the initiator with a ROHC_INTEG attribute of zero (0x0000).
      In this scenario, no integrity algorithm is applied in either
      direction.
  3.  The ROHC_INTEG attribute is a parameter that is negotiated
      between two ends.  In other words, the initiator indicates
      what it supports, the responder selects one of the ROHC_INTEG
      values proposed and sends the selected value to the initiator.

ROHC_ICV_LEN (Integrity Algorithm Length, AF = 1)

  The ROHC_ICV_LEN attribute is an optional attribute.  There MAY be
  zero or one ROHC_ICV_LEN attribute contained within the
  ROHC_SUPPORTED Notify message.  The attribute specifies the number
  of Integrity Check Value (ICV) octets the sender expects to
  receive on incoming ROHC packets.  The ICV of the negotiated
  ROHC_INTEG algorithms MUST be truncated to ROHC_ICV_LEN bytes by
  taking the first ROHC_ICV_LEN bytes of the output.  Both the
  initiator and responder announce a single value for their own ICV
  length.  The recipient of the ROHC_ICV_LEN attribute MUST truncate
  the ICV to the length contained in the message.  If the value of
  the ROHC_ICV_LEN attribute is zero, then an ICV MUST NOT be sent.
  If no ROHC_ICV_LEN attribute is sent at all or if the ROHC_ICV_LEN
  is larger than the length of the ICV of selected algorithm, then
  the full ICV length as specified by the ROHC_INTEG algorithm MUST
  be sent.
  Note that the ROHC_ICV_LEN attribute is a one-way notification;
  therefore, different values for ROHC_ICV_LEN may be announced in
  each direction.

MRRU (Maximum Reconstructed Reception Unit, AF = 1)

  The MRRU attribute is an optional attribute.  There MAY be zero or
  one MRRU attribute contained within the ROHC_SUPPORTED Notify
  message.  The attribute value is 2 octets in length.  The
  attribute specifies the size of the largest reconstructed unit in
  octets that the ROHCoIPsec decompressor is expected to reassemble
  from ROHC segments (see Section 5.2.5 of [ROHCV1]).  This size
  includes the Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) and the ROHC ICV.  If
  MRRU is 0 or if no MRRU attribute is sent, segment headers MUST
  NOT be transmitted on the ROHCoIPsec channel.
  Note that the MRRU attribute is a one-way notification; therefore,
  different values for MRRU may be announced in each direction.

If an unknown ROHC Attribute Type Value is received, it MUST be silently ignored.

ROHC Channel Parameters That Are Implicitly Set

The following ROHC channel parameters MUST NOT be signaled:

o LARGE_CIDS: This value is implicitly determined by the value of

  MAX_CID (i.e., if MAX_CID is <= 15, LARGE_CIDS is assumed to be
  0).

o FEEDBACK_FOR: When a pair of SAs is created (one in each

  direction), the ROHC channel parameter FEEDBACK_FOR MUST be set
  implicitly to the other SA of the pair (i.e., the SA pointing in
  the reverse direction).

Security Considerations

The ability to negotiate the length of the ROHC ICV may introduce vulnerabilities to the ROHCoIPsec protocol. Specifically, the capability to signal a short ICV length may result in scenarios where erroneous packets are forwarded into the protected domain. This security consideration is documented in further detail in Section 6.1.4 of [ROHCOIPSEC] and Section 5 of [IPSEC-ROHC].

This security consideration can be mitigated by using longer ICVs, but this comes at the cost of additional overhead, which reduces the overall benefits offered by ROHCoIPsec.

IANA Considerations

This document defines a new Notify message (Status Type). Therefore, IANA has allocated one value from the "IKEv2 Notify Message Types" registry to indicate ROHC_SUPPORTED.

In addition, IANA has created a new "ROHC Attribute Types" registry in the "Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) Parameters" registry [IKEV2-PARA]. Within the "ROHC Attribute Types" registry, this document allocates the following values:

Registry: Value ROHC Attribute Type Format Reference


-------------------------------------- ------ ---------

0 RESERVED RFC5857 1 Maximum Context Identifier (MAX_CID) TV RFC5857 2 ROHC Profile (ROHC_PROFILE) TV RFC5857 3 ROHC Integrity Algorithm (ROHC_INTEG) TV RFC5857 4 ROHC ICV Length in bytes (ROHC_ICV_LEN) TV RFC5857 5 Maximum Reconstructed Reception Unit (MRRU) TV RFC5857 6-16383 Unassigned 16384-32767 Private use RFC5857

Following the policies outlined in [IANA-CONSIDERATIONS], the IANA policy for assigning new values for the ROHC Attribute Types registry shall be Expert Review.

For registration requests, the responsible IESG Area Director will appoint the Designated Expert. The Designated Expert will post a request to both the ROHC and IPsec mailing lists (or a successor designated by the Area Director) for comment and review. The Designated Expert will either approve or deny the registration request and publish a notice of the decision to both mailing lists (or their successors), as well as informing IANA. A denial notice must be justified by an explanation.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Sean O'Keeffe, James Kohler, and Linda Noone of the Department of Defense, as well as Rich Espy of OPnet for their contributions and support in the development of this document.

The authors would also like to thank Yoav Nir and Robert A Stangarone Jr.: both served as committed document reviewers for this specification.

In addition, the authors would like to thank the following for their numerous reviews and comments to this document:

o Magnus Westerlund

o Stephen Kent

o Lars-Erik Jonsson

o Pasi Eronen

o Jonah Pezeshki

o Carl Knutsson

o Joseph Touch

o David Black

o Glen Zorn

Finally, the authors would also like to thank Tom Conkle, Michele Casey, and Etzel Brower.

References

Normative References

[IPSEC] Kent, S. and K. Seo, "Security Architecture for the

            Internet Protocol", RFC 4301, December 2005.

[ROHC] Sandlund, K., Pelletier, G., and L-E. Jonsson, "The

            RObust Header Compression (ROHC) Framework", RFC 5795,
            March 2010.

[IKEV2] Kaufman, C., "Internet Key Exchange (IKEv2) Protocol",

            RFC 4306, December 2005.

[BRA97] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate

            Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

[ROHCV1] Bormann, C., Burmeister, C., Degermark, M., Fukushima,

            H., Hannu, H., Jonsson, L-E., Hakenberg, R., Koren, T.,
            Le, K., Liu, Z., Martensson, A., Miyazaki, A., Svanbro,
            K., Wiebke, T., Yoshimura, T., and H. Zheng, "RObust
            Header Compression (ROHC): Framework and four profiles:
            RTP, UDP, ESP, and uncompressed", RFC 3095, July 2001.

[ROHCV2] Pelletier, G. and K. Sandlund, "RObust Header

            Compression Version 2 (ROHCv2): Profiles for RTP, UDP,
            IP, ESP and UDP-Lite", RFC 5225, April 2008.

[IPSEC-ROHC] Ertekin, E., Christou, C., and C. Bormann, "IPsec

            Extensions to Support Robust Header Compression over
            IPsec", RFC 5858, May 2010.

[IANA-CONSIDERATIONS]

            Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
            IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
            May 2008.

Informative References

[ROHCOIPSEC] Ertekin, E., Jasani, R., Christou, C., and C. Bormann,

            "Integration of Header Compression over IPsec Security
            Associations", RFC 5856, May 2010.

[ROHC-PPP] Bormann, C., "Robust Header Compression (ROHC) over

            PPP", RFC 3241, April 2002.

[ROHCPROF] IANA, "RObust Header Compression (ROHC) Profile

            Identifiers", <http://www.iana.org>.

[CRYPTO-ALG] Manral, V., "Cryptographic Algorithm Implementation

            Requirements for Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)
            and Authentication Header (AH)", RFC 4835, April 2007.

[IKEV2-PARA] IANA, "Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (KEv2)

            Parameters", <http://www.iana.org>.

Authors' Addresses

Emre Ertekin Booz Allen Hamilton 5220 Pacific Concourse Drive, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90045 US

EMail: [email protected]

Chris Christou Booz Allen Hamilton 13200 Woodland Park Dr. Herndon, VA 20171 US

EMail: [email protected]

Rohan Jasani Booz Allen Hamilton 13200 Woodland Park Dr. Herndon, VA 20171 US

EMail: [email protected]

Tero Kivinen AuthenTec, Inc. Fredrikinkatu 47 HELSINKI FI

EMail: [email protected]

Carsten Bormann Universitaet Bremen TZI Postfach 330440 Bremen D-28334 Germany

EMail: [email protected]