RFC76

From RFC-Wiki




Network Working Group J. Bouknight Request for Comments: 76 J. Madden NIC 5180 G. Grossman

                                             University of Illinois
                                                    28 October 1970


           Connection-By-Name: User-Oriented Protocol


I. Introduction

Shortly after the first of the year, 1971, the Center for Advanced Computation (CAC) at the University of Illinois will begin to use the facilities of the ARPA network. We are the first of a small class of network nodes whose chief characteristic is that the node is a port to the network only. All computational power for these nodes will be taken from other nodes on the network, ILLIAC IV for example.

An important characteristic of most of the users at our Center is a lack of sophistication about data communication techniques and practices. The user will eventually be in the majority of those using the network from all nodes but the problem is ours, almost from the start.

In our discussions with our prospective users of the network as we designed our port facility, we found that the greatest confusion and consternation arose over having to deal with network protocol at the "nitty-gritty" level of sockets, links, etc. While most of them have been acclimated to computer systems at the file and device-by-name level where the software system handles details, here on the current version of the network, the user handles all details.

Thus, we were compelled to seek a user level interface to network protocol where all user protocol is handled symbolically with system procedures making the translation into host-to-host protocol.

Currently, connections are established by exchange of known socket numbers for the four loose ends of the connection. This requires either that the user or process always know all socket numbers he will use at his or other installations OR that his NCP (and/or related software) remember them for him, allowing him to reference them symbolically.

We propose a more general solution to the "telephone book" approach of obtaining socket numbers for user or processes. Only the host, at each site, knows its socket number space at any given instant in time as well as the status of the user or process to which a socket number



assigned. Additionally, most permanently assigned devices and/or processes are known by standard mnemonic labels such as DSK (disk), LP (line printer), CR (card reader), TECO (PDP-10 text editor), etc. In most systems, all other communications are done through files or pseudo files, known only to the user by their names and not by their internal mechanism. In other words, most intrasystem communication at the user level is by symbolic reference to both devices and process.

We propose facilities, by extension of the current protocol, that will allow users to use the network on a connection-by-name basis as they already do in their host system. In the remainder of this paper we will present the suggested extensions to the current protocol and give an example of its usage in a dialogue between a user at CAC, controlling two processes; one at UTAH, and one at PAOLI (ILLIAC IV construction site).

II. Proposed Extensions to Protocol

Let us define a class of syntax elements for use in our proposed extensions to the protocol. (This syntax is expressed in the metalanguage of the ALGOL-60 report.)

<label> ::= <usercode>/<filename>|<device name>

<devicename> ::= <string>

<usercode> ::= <string>

<filename> ::= <string>|<filename>/<string>

<string> ::= <char>|<char> <string>

<char> ::= A|B|C|D|E|F|G|H|I|J|K|L|M|N|O|P|Q|R|S|T|U|V|W|X|Y|Z|0|1|2|

          3|4|5|6|7|8|9|.|,

A standard set of <devicenames> should be established to reference line printers, card readers, etc. - those hard peripherals with fixed processing tasks. A beginning set of <labels> might be:

  LP            line printer
  CR            card reader
  CP            card punch
  PTR           paper tape recorder
  PTP           paper tape punch
  MT            magnetic tape
  DSK           disk
  TTY           teletype compatible terminal



The format of <usercode> is that of the responding host for the current discussion. Future discussions about foreign-user usage of host facilities may result in a standard format for the entire network.

Most systems can identify files by one <string> plus the <usercode>. Others, such as the Burroughs B6500 use multifile identifiers where many <strings> may be used in the <label>. The set of <char> is that proposed in RFC 66, i.e., ASCII.

The proposed extensions involve a "request" for information and several variants of a "response" to the request.

A. Request for Socket Number for this Label

  <RFSNL> <my socker #> <0> <label>

The RFSNL is sent on the control link to the destination host requesting the socket number of the attached <label>.

B. Acknowledgement of Request

Upon receipt of an <RFSNL>, the destination host returns one of three responses:

  <AORP> <desired socket#> <your socket #>
  <AORN> <desired socket#> <your socket #>
  <AORN> <0> <your socket #>

The first response returns the requested socket number and signifies that the user, device, or process exists. The second response returns the requested socket number but signifies that the user, device, or process is not currently available for connection. The last response signifies that no such user, device, or process exists.

C. Discussion

The above extensions to the protocol are intended to enhance user acclimation to network usage. The element of strangeness is subdued and, in fact, for user of the B6500 erased. Attached to this RFC is an appendix containing a preliminary description of the user language of the network port facility being brought up at the CAC. We now present a sample user session on the CAC facility and detail how the protocol is used to establish the proper communication paths.




III. Example of User Dialogue

Assume a user residing at CAC, whose site code is URBANA. His terminal is an alphanumeric CRT terminal and we assume solution of code conversion problems for network communications.

The sample user session will involve the setting up of two processes at two host sites with control from the third host site. All operations can be accomplished with the current protocol plus the proposed extensions.

In addition, we also assume that some form of standard user code is in use for all host sites uniquely identifying every network user when he is present.

Output keyed by systems will be underlined. Comments are offset to the right for legibility. All statements about the UTAH system are purely hypothetical.

User Dialogue                           Comments
                             The user moves to the terminal, applies
                             power and types:

HELLO

                             The CAC system responds for login
                             purposes with:

USER= GROSSMAN


                             for the user's code.


1437 TR7/GROSSMAN LOGGED IN ___________________________ LINE PRINTER DOWN TILL 1600 ___________________________

                             This acknowledges proper usercode and
                             sends any appropriate notes on system
                             status.

! LINK TO ILLIAC

                             The exclamation point (!) is the escape
                             character which flags direct input to
                             the PDP-11 OS:
                             User requests connection to the ILLIAC
                             IV node.  NCP operations establish link
                             from user terminal to B6500 MCP.




1437 TR7/GROSSMAN LINKED ILLIAC


                             Completes response.

? EXECUTE DISK/PRINT; FILE DISK = ALPHA@UTAH REMOTE QUEUE; END

                             1. DISK/PRINT lists text files from
                             disk to B6500 line printer.
                             2. REMOTE files on the B6500 will refer
                             to files going to/coming from the
                             network.
                             3. ALPHA@UTAH specifies that a
                             connection is to be made via the
                             network to a file GROSSMAN/ALPHA from
                             the UTAH node.
                             4. QUEUE specifies periodic attempt to
                             complete the connection.
                             The B6500 will ask for the socket
                             number associated with GROSSMAN/ALPHA
                             until an AORP is received.
                             The language is that of the monitor for
                             the B6500

! FLAG ILLIAC =#

                             All data received or sent on the link
                             to ILLIAC must now be prefaced by the #
                             character.

! LINK TO UTAH

1441 TR7/ GROSSMAN LINKED UTAH


                             User now links into UTAH PDP-10 system.
  1. 1410: DISK/PRINT BOJ 1441

                             System message stating beginning-of-job
                             for DISK/PRINT on B6500.

^C

. R PIP
-
                             User will run PIP on a listing file.





  • NETWKR:ALPHA@ILLIAC <- DSK:FIL.TMP

-

                             NETWRK is network file type for UTAH
                             system.  Mechanism for file control
                             basically same as for B6500 system.
                             Since PIP will be sending to the
                             network, it does not request a socket #
                             from the B6500 NCP but instead
                             instructs its NCP to acknowledge any
                             request for GROSSMAN/ALPHA from ILLIAC
                             with the socket number PIP will send
                             from.  As soon as the B6500 NCP tries
                             again to find GROSSMAN/ALPHA from UTAH,
                             success occurs and the socket numbers
                             are exchanged with subsequent
                             connection establishment.

-

                             PIP completes the task and terminates
                             the connection to the B6500.
  1. 14: DISK/PRINT EOJ 1448
                             B6500 acknowledges completion of task.
  1. ? TO SPO: SAVE LIST GROSSMANHA FOR MAIL(U OF I/GROSSMAN)
                             User sends message to B6500 operator.
                             User logs out of UTAH.

JOB 10, USER GROSSMAN@URBANA TY68 AT 1448 ON 22-NOV-70


FILES DELETED: 0, FILES SAVEDL RUNTIME 0 MIN 12 SEC


                             System logout listing.

! END UTAH

1449 TR7/GROSSMAN DELINKED UTAH


                             Link to UTAH system now dropped.
  1. FROM SPO: LISTING MAILED

                             B6500 operator response.




! LEAVE

                             User desired to log out of CAC system.

1450 TR7/GROSSMAN DELINKED ILLIAC


                             Link to ILLIAC system new dropped.

1450 TR7/GROSSMAN LOGGED OUT


                             Session over.






















    Syntax and Semantics for the Terminal User Control Language
       for the Proposed PDP-11 ARPA Network Terminal System
                                by
                          G. R. Grossman


Prefatory Notes

The following document represents a first attempt at providing a control language for the terminal user of the PDP-11 network terminal system. This language is deemed sufficiently powerful to provide the user with a minimal facility for attaching to remote host computers over the ARPA network, initiating processes, and routing data flow to local peripheral devices.

The hardware system as envisioned will comprise a PDP-11/20 with a least 8k of core, a small disk (512 kilobytes of storage), a console teletype, and optional card readers, line printers, DECtapes, User terminals, card punches, storage scopes, etc.

The executive system will consist of a basic driver system which will control autonomous processes and interrupt-driven device service routines. The system will keep tables in core and on the small disk for logging peripheral usage, keeping track of connections on the network, queuing up of tasks that cannot be immediately performed, storing attributes of remote hosts, etc.

Since network hosts handle communications in character-at-a-time or message modes, and may or may not echo characters over the network, the system takes this into account when handling connections to specific hosts. If the connection is in message mode, minimal line- by-line editing facility (character and line deletion) is provided.

A means for the user to change flag and message transmit characters is provided to prevent incompatibilities which may arise between the PDP-11 and other hosts.

This document does not describe control card syntax for card reader usage, nor does it describe the operator's control language. These will be described in later documents.

Character Set

<character> ::= <letter> | <digit> | <special> | <space>

<letter> ::= A | B | ... | Y | Z



<digit> ::= 0 | 1 | ... | 8 | 9

<special> ::= ! | " | # | $ | % | & | ' | ( | ) | * | + | , | - |

               . | / | : | : | < | = | > | ? | @ | [ |  | ] | ^ |
                 |` | { | <bar> | }

Identifiers

<identifiers> ::= <letter> | <identifier> <letter> |

                 <identifier> <digit>
    Semantics:  Identifiers are used to designate peripheral units,
    host computers, etc.  No identifier may exceed 8 characters in
    length.

Numbers

<integer> ::= <digit> | <integer> <digit>

    Semantics:  <integer> are the only form of number allowed in the
    control language.  They must not exceed 2^15-1.

Peripheral Designator

<peripheral designator> ::= <device class> <device number> | OPR

<device number> ::= <digit> | <digit> <digit> |

<device class> ::= CR | CP | LP | DT | TR | SS

    Semantics:  Peripheral designators name specific peripheral
    devices.  Device lasses designate classes of peripherals.
    OPR designates the operator's console teletype.  The classes of
    peripherals corresponding to the device classes are given on the
    following table:
        <device class>                      type of peripheral
            CR                                  card reader
            CP                                  card punch
            LP                                  line printer
            DT                                  DECtape
            TR                                  terminal
            SS                                  storage scope





File Label

<file label> ::= <tape label> | <tape label> / <tape file name>

<tape label> ::= <identifier>

<tape file name> ::= <identifier>

    Semantics: File labels provide the means for designating tape
    files symbolically.  If the <tape label> form is used, the
    designated file is assumed to occupy the entire tape.

Flagged Control Statement

<flagged control statement> ::= <flag> <control statement>

<flag> ::= <special>

    Semantics: <Flagged control statement>s arc the user's names of
    communicating with the PDP-11 system.  The <flag> must be the
    system default flag (!) or a substitute which the user provides
    by means of the <flag statement>.  Input to the system which
    does not begin with a <flag> will be passed on to the process to
    which the user is connected, if any.

Control Statements

<control statement> ::= <link statement> |

                        <copy statement> |
                        <end statement> |
                        <user statement> |
                        <status statement> |
                        <out statement> |
                        <to statement> |
                        <escape statement> |
                        <back statement> |
                        <delete statement> |
                        <transmit statement> |



                        <lock statement> |
                        <unlock statement> |
                        <assign statement> |
                        <label statement> |
                        <create statement> |

Link Statement

<link statement> ::= LINK TO <host>

::= <empty> |

                    QUEUE   |
                    QUEUE    <integer>
    Semantics: The Link statement directs the system to set up a
    connection between the user's unit and a remote host.  The 
    construct allows the user to specify that, if the connection
    cannot be set up immediately, the system is to keep trying.  If
    the QUEUE form is used, the system will keep trying
    indefinitely.  If the QUEUE integer form is used, the system
    will try for integer minutes.

Copy Statement

<copy statement> ::= COPY <source> TO <dest>

<source> ::= NETWORK |

                      <file label> |
                      <source class> |
                      <source device>

<source class> ::= CR | TR | SS |

<source device> ::= <source class> <device number>

<dest> ::= NETWORK

                      <file label> |




                      <dest class> |
                      <dest device>

<dest class> ::= CP | LP | TR | SS

<dest device> ::= <dest class> <device number>

    Semantics: The <copy statement> directs the system to set up a
    connection between the <source> and <dest> and copy records of
    information between them.  If the <device class> or <device>
    form is used for either <source> or <dest>, the copy process
    cannot begin until a unit is assigned to the user.  If the <file
    label> form is used, the copy process can likewise not proceed
    until the system has access to a properly labeled tape. if the
    NETWORK form is used, a connection to a remote process must be
    pending.
    The  construct has the same meaning as for the <link
    statement>, with the additional provision that the condition
    that caused the process to be incomplete may be the lack of a
    device assignment.

End Statement

<end statement> ::= END

    Semantics: The <end statement> causes the current connection to
    be terminated.

User Statement

<user statement> ::= USER = <identifier>

    Semantics: The <user statement> is used during the log in
    process to allow the user to identify himself.

Status Statement

<status statement> ::= STATUS <device class> |

                      STATUS <peripheral designator>
    Semantics: The <status statement> allows the user to interrogate
    the system as to the status of a device or class of devices.





Out Statement

<out statement> ::= OUT|LEAVE

    Semantics: The <out statement> allows a user to log out of the
    system.  If the OUT form is used, all queued process initiated
    by the user are terminated.  The LEAVE from does not terminate
    such pending queued processes so long as these processes do not
    directly involve the user's terminal.

To Statement

<to statement> ::= TO CON :<text> | TO <user> : <text>

    Semantics: The <to statement> allows the user to send a message
    to the operator or another logged-in user.

Flag Statement

<flag statement> ::= FLAG = <special>

    Semantics: The <flag statement> allows the user to define the
    character which the system recognizes as preceding a control
    statement as distinguished from a message to a remote process to
    which he may be attached.  The default flag character is "|".

Back Statement

<back statement> ::= BACK ? {ascii special or control character}

    Semantics: The <back statement> allows the user to define the
    character which, in control or message mode, causes the system
    to "forget" the previous input character.  The default backspace
    character is RUBOUT (ASCII 1778).

Delete Statement

<delete statement> ::= DELETE = {ASCII special or control character}

    Semantics: The <delete statement> allows the user to define the
    character which, in control or message mode, causes the system
    to "forget" the previous line of input.  The default delete
    character is ASCII VT (control K).






Transmit Statement

<transmit statement> ::= TRANSMIT = {ASCII special or

                                    control character}
    Semantics: The <transmit statement> allows the user to define
    the character which, in control or message mode, causes the
    system to begin interpreting the control statement or to
    transmit the message.  The default transmit character is
    carriage return.

Lock Statement

<lock statement> ::= LOCK

    Semantics: The <lock statement> causes the system to prevent any
    user or process but the process to which the user is currently
    attached from sending messages to the user's terminal.

Unlock Statement

<unlock statement> ::= UNLOCK

    Semantics: The <unlock statement> reverses the action of a
    previous <lock statement>.

Assign Statement

<assign statement> ::= ASSIGN <assign device>

<assign device> ::= LP | DT | CP

    Semantics: The <assign statement> causes the system to attempt
    to assign a device not currently in use to the user.  The 
    construct has the same meaning as for the <link statement>.

Label Statement

<label statement> ::? LABEL DT <device number> <tape label>

    Semantics: The <label statement> causes the system to write a
    new label on the DEC tape specified.






Create Statement

<create statement> ::= CREATE <tape file name> ON <tape label>

    Semantics: The <create statement> causes the system to create a
    new file named <tape file name> on the DEC tape labeled <tape
    label>.

Purge Statement

<purge statement> ::= PURGE <tape label> |

                     PURGE <tape file name> ON <tape label>
    Semantics: The <purge statement> causes the system to delete all
    tape directory information on the DEC tape or tape file
    specified.


       [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
        [ into the online RFC archives by Gottfried Janik 2/98 ]