RFC7903

From RFC-Wiki

Independent Submission S. Leonard Request for Comments: 7903 Penango, Inc. Category: Informational September 2016 ISSN: 2070-1721

                   Windows Image Media Types

Abstract

This document registers media types for certain image formats promulgated in Microsoft Windows, namely image/wmf, image/x-wmf, image/emf, image/x-emf, and image/bmp for use with Windows Metafile, Enhanced Metafile, and Windows Bitmap formats. Originally designed for Microsoft Windows 2.0 and 3.0, these image files are intended to be portable between applications and devices, and they may contain both vector and raster graphics.

Status of This Memo

This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.

This is a contribution to the RFC Series, independently of any other RFC stream. The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at its discretion and makes no statement about its value for implementation or deployment. Documents approved for publication by the RFC Editor are not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841.

Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7903.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.

Introduction

Windows Metafiles

Long before the invention of Scalable Vector Graphics, Microsoft Corporation recognized the value of recording images in a format that its applications and operating systems could easily render irrespective of the output device. With the release of Windows 3.0, Microsoft released its Windows Metafile (WMF) format, which can contain vector and raster graphics in one package. As a binary format that needed to work on 16-bit machines, WMF is comprised of a sequence of record structures. Each record contains drawing commands, object definitions, and configuration settings. When a metafile is processed, the image can be rendered on a display, output to a printer or plotter, stored in memory, or saved to some persistent storage. Reflecting the relationship to the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) API, WMF data is "played" to a playback device context in the same manner that PostScript content is treated as an executable program that results in the output of the original document.

As Microsoft's first 32-bit operating system, Windows NT 3.1 introduced an overhaul to the Windows API ("Win32") and the in-memory formats upon which those APIs relied. The Enhanced Metafile (EMF) format was created at this time, using 32-bit values instead of WMF's 16-bit values. In Windows XP, Microsoft extended EMF with "EMF+", adding support for Windows GDI+.

Many implementations of WMF and EMF were created because of Windows' commercial success in the 1990s. A large body of free and commercially available clip art and other artwork exists in this format. Furthermore, WMF content appears non-normatively in certain

standards (e.g., [OOXML]); the usage is common enough that an implementer would almost certainly need to support it for basic interoperability.

Microsoft publicly documented the WMF format as early as the 1992 Windows 3.1 SDK. Since 2007, Microsoft has released the format specifications [MS-WMF], [MS-EMF], and [MS-EMF+] under its Open Specification Promise [MS-OSP].

Windows Bitmaps

Long before the invention of Portable Network Graphics (PNG), Microsoft Corporation and IBM Corporation needed to record images in a format that their applications and operating systems could easily render on low-end machines (Intel 80286). The resulting "BMP" format contains a single raster graphic with basic header fields that can be easily mapped (or "blitted") to locations in memory. As computing moved from 16-bit to 32-bit, BMP evolved to contain 32-bit structures. As the '90s wore on, the venerable BMP got boosts with support for additional color spaces, color profiles, and compression formats. The same basic format can be used to convey 2-bit black- and-white bitmaps with a 1-bit alpha mask from the '80s, and full- color Ultra HD images on leading-edge displays. BMP is a building block of other formats, including Windows Metafiles, Windows Icons, and Windows Cursors.

Many implementations of BMP were created because of Windows' commercial success in the 1990s. Usage of the format for interchange has declined since the advent of PNG (for lossless raster graphics) and JPEG (for lossy raster graphics); however, a large body of free and commercially available BMP artwork exists. Since Windows Icons are a building block of "favicon.ico" web technology, an implementer would almost certainly need to support this format for basic interoperability.

Microsoft publicly documented the BMP format as early as the 1992 Windows 3.1 SDK (in the Windows Metafile documentation). Since 2007 Microsoft has released the format specification [MS-WMF], which includes most components of the Windows Bitmap format, under its Open Specification Promise [MS-OSP]. See Section 2.2.2.9 of [MS-WMF] (DeviceIndependentBitmap Object). BMP data begins with a BITMAPFILEHEADER and is followed by one of the bitmap headers (BITMAPINFOHEADER, BITMAPV4HEADER, or BITMAPV5HEADER), optional color table data, bitmap data, and optional profile data, in that order [BMPSTOR].

Implementers need to be aware of the [MICE] vulnerability, and to guard against it. Some details are included in the completed registration template.

Windows Metafile Media Type Registration Application

Type name: image

Subtype name: wmf

Required parameters: None.

Optional parameters:

  DEFAULT_CHARSET: The character set intended when the CharacterSet
     enumeration (see the WMF specification) specifies
     DEFAULT_CHARSET.  The value of this parameter is a charset from
     the IANA "Character Sets" registry
     <http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets>.  When this
     parameter is not specified, DEFAULT_CHARSET has the following
     meaning in the WMF specification: "a character set based on the
     current system locale; for example, when the system locale is
     United States English, the default character set is
     ANSI_CHARSET" (which is Windows-1252, more or less).  That is,
     when not specified, the default character set is system
     dependent.  This optional parameter is new to this registration
     and may not enjoy widespread support for some time.  Therefore,
     EMF instead of WMF (or if necessary under the circumstances,
     embedded EMF within WMF) is a more sensible choice when text is
     present.

Encoding considerations: Binary.

Security considerations:

  The Windows Metafile format's security history is punctuated in
  2005-2006 with the disclosure of the Metafile Image Code Execution
  ("MICE") vulnerability.  MICE won the 2007 Pwnie Award for "Mass
  0wnage" and "Breaking the Internet".  The official Microsoft
  security bulletin describes that the flaw occurs because Windows
  Metafiles can set the SETABORTPROC value of the MetafileEscapes
  enumeration (accessible via the META_ESCAPE record), allowing for
  arbitrary code execution, i.e., "active content".
  Windows Metafiles can contain Enhanced Metafiles using the
  META_ESCAPE_ENHANCED_METAFILE record; thus, the security
  considerations of EMF apply to WMF.
  Windows Metafiles are historically very buggy.  As the original
  intent was to replicate Windows GDI calls, flaws in GDI, or in a
  display or printer driver implementing the backend to GDI, could
  be exploitable.  WMF implementations not backed by Windows GDI
  have different risks: namely, while a malicious WMF author may not
  consider the non-Windows GDI implementation as a primary target,
  WMF has many "corner case" records for which an implementation's
  processing may not have received the same level of scrutiny as the
  Windows implementation.  "Fuzzing" the implementation is
  appropriate.
  As a "basic" image format, the image/wmf media type does not
  employ executable content and provides no facilities for privacy
  or integrity.

Interoperability considerations:

  Windows Metafile is the original 16-bit metafile format; it was
  released in 1990 at what some computer historians might consider
  the "zenith" of the desktop publishing revolution.  Accordingly,
  there is a large body of free and commercially available clip art
  that is still in use, either independently or embedded in
  productivity documents (word processing documents, desktop
  publishing documents, slideshows, presentations, spreadsheets, and
  workbooks).  For example, references to WMF content appear (non-
  normatively) in Office Open XML.  To say that support for this
  format is necessary for interoperability would not be an
  understatement.
  Accommodations for comments or arbitrary data storage in Windows
  Metafiles are virtually non-existent.  However, Windows Metafiles
  can contain Enhanced Metafiles using the
  META_ESCAPE_ENHANCED_METAFILE record, so an implementation that
  handles Windows Metafiles is also expected to handle enhanced
  metafile content.  Windows Metafiles can store and output text
  strings (see META_TEXTOUT and META_EXTTEXTOUT records), but the
  encodings of the strings may be ambiguous.  Unicode encodings are
  not possible without the DEFAULT_CHARSET parameter defined in this
  registration.
  The previously unregistered type image/x-wmf is also in wide use.
  Accordingly, it is registered as a deprecated alias.

Published specification:

  WMF: Microsoft Corporation, "[MS-WMF]: Windows Metafile Format",
  v20160714 (Rev 13.1), July 2016,
  <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/cc250370>.

Applications that use this media type:

  Office productivity applications; clip art applications; desktop
  publishing applications; some web browsers (e.g., Internet
  Explorer).

Fragment identifier considerations: None.

Additional information:

  Deprecated alias names for this type: image/x-wmf
  Magic number(s): D7 CD C6 9A (little-endian DWORD 0x9AC6CDD7)
  File extension(s): .wmf
  Macintosh file type code(s):
     None.  A uniform type identifier (UTI) of "com.microsoft.wmf"
     is suggested.

Person & email address to contact for further information:

  Sean Leonard <[email protected]>

Restrictions on usage: None.

Author/Change controller: Sean Leonard <[email protected]>

Intended usage: COMMON

Provisional registration? No

Enhanced Metafile Media Type Registration Application

Type name: image

Subtype name: emf

Required parameters: None.

Optional parameters: None.

Encoding considerations: Binary.

Security considerations:

  Enhanced Metafiles are not afflicted with the Metafile Image Code
  Execution ("MICE") vulnerability.  There has been no public
  disclosure of vulnerabilities specific to EMF or EMF+ to date.
  Neither EMF nor EMF+ are designed to contain "active content".
  Nonetheless, Enhanced Metafiles can contain Encapsulated
  PostScript (EPS) data; thus, the security considerations of
  PostScript processing may also apply to EMF.
  As the original intent was to replicate Windows GDI calls, flaws
  in GDI, or in a display or printer driver implementing the backend
  to GDI, could be exploitable with maliciously crafted EMF content.
  EMF implementations not backed by Windows GDI have different
  risks: namely, while a malicious EMF author may not consider the
  non-Windows GDI implementation as a primary target, EMF has many
  "corner case" records for which an implementation's processing may
  not have received the same level of scrutiny as the Windows
  implementation.  "Fuzzing" the implementation is appropriate.  It
  is also possible that EMF+ data is "safe" while EMF data contains
  an exploit (or vice versa); the EMF+-aware implementation (such as
  an application designed for GDI+ on Windows XP or above) would
  skip the "unsafe" data while another implementation would fall
  prey to the exploit.
  As a "basic" image format, the image/emf media type does not
  employ executable content and provides no facilities for privacy
  or integrity.

Interoperability considerations:

  Enhanced Metafile is the 32-bit metafile format; it was released
  in 1992 along with Windows NT 3.1.  There is a large body of free
  and commercially available clip art that is still in use, either
  independently or embedded in productivity documents (word
  processing documents, desktop publishing documents, slideshows,
  presentations, spreadsheets, and workbooks).  To say that support
  for this format is necessary for interoperability would not be an
  understatement.
  Enhanced Metafiles have extensive accommodations for comments and
  arbitrary data storage.  Enhanced Metafiles can store and output
  text strings.  Mercifully, the encodings of these strings are
  well-defined.  Record examples include EMR_EXTTEXTOUTA (US-ASCII),
  EMR_EXTTEXTOUTW (UTF16-LE), EMR_POLYTEXTOUTA (US-ASCII),
  EMR_POLYTEXTOUTW (UTF16-LE), and EMR_SMALLTEXTOUT (UTF16-LE or the
  low-order 8 bits of UTF16-LE -- effectively ISO-8859-1 --
  depending on ETO_SMALL_CHARS).
  Enhanced Metafiles can contain Encapsulated PostScript (EPS) data
  in the EpsData object.  The FormatSignature EPS_SIGNATURE
  (0x46535045, in little-endian) is used instead of
  ENHMETA_SIGNAUTRE (0x464D4520, in little-endian) in such a case.
  Windows XP introduced the GDI+ API, along with EMF+.  EMF+ is
  actually an embedded format in which GDI+ commands are stored as
  EMF comment records (EMR_COMMENT_EMFPLUS record type).  Content
  containing EMF+ data can be identified as "EMF+ Only" (only EMF+;
  the EMF records are not sufficient to reconstitute the drawing) or
  "EMF+ Dual" (both EMF records alone or EMF+ records alone, when
  played back, are sufficient to reconstitute the drawing).  Support
  for EMF+ records may not be as extensive as support for the
  original EMF records.
  The previously unregistered type image/x-emf is also in wide use.
  Accordingly, it is registered as a deprecated alias.

Published specification:

  EMF: Microsoft Corporation, "[MS-EMF]: Enhanced Metafile Format",
  v20160714 (Rev 12.0), July 2016,
  <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/cc230514>.
  EMF+: Microsoft Corporation, "[MS-EMFPLUS]: Enhanced Metafile
  Format Plus Extensions", v20160714 (Rev 14.1), July 2016,
  <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/cc230724>.

Applications that use this media type:

  Office productivity applications; clip art applications; desktop
  publishing applications; some web browsers (e.g., Internet
  Explorer).

Fragment identifier considerations: None.

Additional information:

  Deprecated alias names for this type: image/x-emf
  Magic number(s):
     01 00 00 00 (little-endian DWORD 0x00000001), corresponding to
     the EMR_HEADER Type field.
     The next field (EMR_HEADER Size) should be at least 88 (little-
     endian DWORD 0x00000050).
  File extension(s): .emf (for both EMF and EMF+ content)
  Macintosh file type code(s):
     None.  A uniform type identifier (UTI) of "com.microsoft.emf"
     is suggested.

Person & email address to contact for further information:

  Sean Leonard <[email protected]>

Restrictions on usage: None.

Author/Change controller: Sean Leonard <[email protected]>

Intended usage: COMMON

Provisional registration? No

Windows Bitmap Media Type Registration Application

Type name: image

Subtype name: bmp

Required parameters: None.

Optional parameters: None.

Encoding considerations: Binary.

Security considerations:

  Bitmaps have a mostly unremarkable security history.
  Because BMP data can encapsulate JPEG or PNG data (BI_JPEG, BI_PNG
  values of the Compression enumeration in Section 2.1.1.7 of the
  WMF specification), the security considerations of JPEG and PNG
  processing may also apply to BMP.
  As a "basic" image format, the image/bmp media type does not
  employ executable content and provides no facilities for privacy
  or integrity.

Interoperability considerations:

  Uncompressed Windows Bitmaps can be rather large.  If there is a
  need to compress an image, modern applications should consider
  emitting JPEG or PNG data instead of embedding them in BMP
  payloads.

Published specification:

  WMF: Microsoft Corporation, "[MS-WMF]: Windows Metafile Format",
  v20160714 (Rev 13.1), July 2016,
  <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/cc250370>.
  BMP: Microsoft Corporation, "Bitmap Storage", MSDN ID dd183391,
  <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/dd183391>.

Applications that use this media type:

  Office productivity applications; clip art applications; desktop
  publishing applications; web browsers; graphics processing
  applications.

Fragment identifier considerations: None.

Additional information:

  Magic number(s):
     42 4D ("BM"), meaning "bitmap".  The next field
     (BITMAPFILEHEADER bfSize) is a little-endian DWORD indicating
     the size of the bitmap content in bytes.
  File extension(s): .bmp, .dib
  Macintosh file type code(s):
     "BMP ", "BMPf", or "BMPp".  Apple has promulgated a uniform
     type identifier (UTI) of "com.microsoft.bmp".

Person & email address to contact for further information:

  Sean Leonard <[email protected]>

Restrictions on usage: None.

Author/Change controller: Sean Leonard <[email protected]>

Intended usage: COMMON

Provisional registration? No

IANA Considerations

IANA has registered the media types image/wmf, image/x-wmf, image/emf, image/x-emf, and image/bmp in the standards tree using the applications provided in Sections 2, 3, and 4 of this document.

Security Considerations

See the registration templates for their respective security considerations.

The Metafile Image Code Execution (MICE) vulnerability won the 2007 Pwnie Award for "Mass 0wnage" and "Breaking the Internet" [PWNIES07].

References

Normative References

[BMPSTOR] Microsoft Corporation, "Bitmap Storage", MSDN ID dd183391,

          <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/dd183391>.

[MS-EMF] Microsoft Corporation, "[MS-EMF]: Enhanced Metafile

          Format", v20160714 (Rev 12.0), July 2016,
          <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/cc230514>.

[MS-EMF+] Microsoft Corporation, "[MS-EMFPLUS]: Enhanced Metafile

          Format Plus Extensions", v20160714 (Rev 14.1), July 2016,
          <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/cc230724>.

[MS-WMF] Microsoft Corporation, "[MS-WMF]: Windows Metafile

          Format", v20160714 (Rev 13.1), July 2016,
          <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/cc250370>.

Informative References

[MICE] Microsoft Corporation, "Vulnerability in Graphics

          Rendering Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution
          (912919)", MS06-001, V1.0, January 2006,
          <https://technet.microsoft.com/library/security/ms06-001>.

[MS-OSP] Microsoft Corporation, "Open Specification Promise",

          February 2007, <https://msdn.microsoft.com/
          en-us/openspecifications/dn646765>.

[OOXML] Ecma International, "Office Open XML File Formats",

          Standard ECMA-376, Fourth Edition, ISO/IEC 29500, December
          2012, <http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/
          standards/Ecma-376.htm>.

[PWNIES07] Pwnie Awards LLC, "Winners of Pwnie Awards 2007", 2007,

          <http://pwnies.com/archive/2007/winners/>.

Author's Address

Sean Leonard Penango, Inc. 5900 Wilshire Boulevard 21st Floor Los Angeles, CA 90036 United States of America

Email: [email protected] URI: http://www.penango.com/