RFC809

From RFC-Wiki

INDRA Note 1185 INDRA

Feb. 1982 Working

                                                       Paper




RFC 809




                  UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM


                       Tawei Chang








 ABSTRACT:  This note describes the features  of
            the  computerised  facsimile  system
            developed  in  the   Department   of
            Computer  Science at UCL.  First its
            functions  are  considered  and  the
            related    experimental   work   are
            reported. Then the  disciplines  for
            system    design    are   discussed.
            Finally, the implementation  of  the
            system are described, while detailed
            description are given as appendices.



             Department of Computer Science
               University College, London



  NOTE: Figures 5 and 6 may be obtained by sending a request to
  Ann Westine at USC-Information Sciences Institute, 4676 Admiralty
  Way, Marina del Rey, California, 90291 (or WESTINE@ISIF) including
  your name and postal mailing address.  Please mention that you are
  requesting figures 5 and 6 from RFC 809.


  OR: You can obtain these two figures online from the files
      <NETINFO>RFC809a.FAX   and   <NETINFO>RFC809b.FAX
  from the SRI-NIC online library.  These files are in the format
  described in RFC 769.

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

                        Contents
 1. INTRODUCTION...........................................1


 2. SYSTEM FUNCTIONS.......................................2
 2.1 Communication......................................4
 2.2 Interworking with Other Equipment..................8
    2.2.1 Facsimile machines............................8
    2.2.2 Output Devices................................9
 2.3 Image Enhancement..................................11
 2.4 Image Editing......................................15
 2.5 Integration with Other Data Types..................16
 3. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE....................................17
 3.1 System Requirements................................17
 3.2 Hierarchical Model.................................19
 3.3 Clean and Simple Interface.........................20
    3.3.1 Principles....................................21
    3.3.2 Synchronisation and Desynchronisation.........21
    3.3.3 Data Transfer.................................22
 3.4 Control and Organisation of the Tasks..............22
    3.4.1 Command Language..............................23
    3.4.2 Task Controller...............................23
 3.5 Interface Routines.................................26
    3.5.1 Sharable Control Structure....................26
    3.5.2 Buffer Management.............................27
 4. UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM...................................28
 4.1 Multi-Task Structure...............................29
 4.2 The Devices........................................29
 4.3 The Networks.......................................30
 4.4 File System........................................31
 4.5 Data Structure.....................................32
 4.6 Data Conversion....................................34
 4.7 Image Manipulation.................................35
 4.8 Data Transmission..................................39
 5. CONCLUSION.............................................41
 5.1 Summary............................................41
 5.2 Problems...........................................42
 5.3 Future Study.......................................46




UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 Appendix I:   Devices
 Appendix II:  Task Controller and Task Processes
 Appendix III: Utility and Data Formats
 Reference



 1. INTRODUCTION


   The object of a  facsimile  system  is  to  reproduce
 faithfully  a document or image from one piece of paper
 onto another piece of paper  sited  remotely  from  the
 first  one.  Up  to  now,  the main method of facsimile
 communication has been via the telephone network.  Most
 facsimile  machines permit neither the storage of image
 page nor their modification before  transmission.  With
 such  machines,  it is almost impossible to communicate
 between different makes of facsimile machines. In  this
 respect,   facsimile   machines   fall   behind   other
 electronic communication services.
   Integration of  a  facsimile  service  with  computer
 communication  techniques  can bring great improvements
 in service. Not only is the reliability and  efficiency
 improved   but,  more  important,  the  system  can  be
 integrated with  other  forms  of  data  communication.
 Moreover, the computer enables the facsimile machine to
 fit into a complete message and information  processing
 environment.   The  storage  facilities provided by the
 computer system make it possible to store large amounts
 of  facsimile  data  and  retrieve  them  rapidly. Data
 conversion allows facsimile machines of different types
 to   communicate  with  each  other.  Furthermore,  the
 facsimile image is edited and/or  combined  with  other
 forms  of  data,  such  as text, voice and graphics, to
 construct a multi-media message, which  can  be  widely
 distributed over computer networks.
   In the Department  of  Computer  Science  at  UCL,  a
 computerised  facsimile  system  has  been developed in
 order to fully apply  computer  technology,  especially
 communication,  to  the facsimile field.  Some work has
 been done to improve the facsimile service  in  several
 areas.
  (1) Adaptation of the facsimile machine for  use  with
      computer networks.  This permits more reliable and
      accurate  document  transmission,   as   well   as
      improving the normal point-to-point transfers.
  (2) Storage  of  facsimile  pages.  This  permits  the
      queueing  of pages, so saving operator time. Also,
      standard documents can  be  kept  permanently  and
      transmitted at any time.
  (3) Interworking with other facsimile  machines.  This
      permits  different  makes of facsimile machines to


                          - 1 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

      exchange images.
  (4) Compression of the facsimile images.  This  allows
      more   efficient   transmission  to  be  achieved.
      Different compression schemes are investigated.
  (5) Display of images  on  other  devices.   A  colour
      display  is  used  so  that  the  result  of image
      processing can be shown very vividly.
  (6) Improvement of the images. The ability to  'clean'
      the  facsimile  images  not  only  allows for even
      higher  compression  ratio,  but  also  provide  a
      better result at the destination.
  (7) Editing of  facsimile  pages.  This  includes  the
      ability  to  change  pictures,  alter  the size of
      images  and  merge  two  or   more   images,   all
      electronically.
  (8) Integration of the facsimile  service  with  other
      data  types.   For the time being, coded character
      text can be converted into  facsimile  format  and
      mixed  pages  containing  pictures and text can be
      manipulated.
   This  note  first  considers  the  functions  of  the
 facsimile  system,  the related experimental work being
 reported.  Then the discipline for the system design is
 discussed.  Finally,  the  implementation  of  the  UCL
 facsimile system is described. As appendices,  detailed
 description of the system are given, namely
         I.   Devices
         II.  Task controller and task processes
         III. Utility routines and Data format


 2. SYSTEM FUNCTIONS
   The computerised facsimile system we  have  developed
 is composed of an LSI-11 micro-computer running the MOS
 operating system [14] with two AED62 floppy disk drives
 [17], a Grinnell colour display [18], a DACOM facsimile
 machine [16], and a VDU as  the  system  console.  This
 LSI-11  is also attached to several networks, including
 the ARPANET/SATNET [21], [22]  and  the  UCL  Cambridge
 Ring. A schematic of the system is shown in Fig. 1.




                          - 2 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185


          facsimile machine  bit-map display
                 +------+    +------+
                 !      !    !      !
                 +------+    +------+
       +------+        \      /        VDU
       ! disk !      +----------+    +-----+
       +------+ ---- !  LSI-11  ! -- !     !
       ! disk !      +----------+    +-----+
       +------+           |
                       +------+
                       !  NI  !
                       +------+
                   Network Interface
        Fig. 1  Schematic of UCL facsimile system
   In this system, a  page  is  read  on  the  facsimile
 machine  and  the  image data produced is stored on the
 floppy disk. This data can be processed locally in  the
 micro-computer  and  then  sent  to  a  file store of a
 remote computer across the  computer  network.  At  the
 remote  site,  the  image  data  may  be  processed and
 printed on a facsimile machine.
   On the other hand, we can receive image data which is
 sent  by a remote host on the network. This data can be
 manipulated in the same way, including being printed on
 the local machine.
   Section 2.1  dicusses  the  problems  concerned  with
 transmission  of  facsimile  image data over a network,
 while the following sections deal with those  of  local
 manipulation of image data.
   In order to interwork with other  facsimile  machine,
 we   have   to   convert   the   image  data  from  one
 representation format  to  another.  Interworking  with
 other  output devices requires that the image be scaled
 to fit the dimension of the destination  device.  These
 are described in section 2.2.
   Being able to process the image by computer opens the
 door  to  many  possibilities.  First, as considered in
 section 2.3, an image can  be  enhanced,  so  that  the
 quality of the image may be improved and more efficient
 storage and transmission can be achieved.  Secondly,  a
 facsimile  editing  system  can  be supported whereby a
 picture can  be  changed  and/or  combined  with  other



                          - 3 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 pictures. This is described in section 2.4.
   In our system, coded character text can be  converted
 into  its  bit-map representation format so that it can
 be  handled  as  a  facsimile  image  and  merged  with
 pictures. This provides an environment where multi-type
 information can be dealt with.  This  is  discussed  in
 section 2.5.


 2.1 Communication
   The first goal of our computerised  facsimile  system
 is  to  use a computer network to transmit data between
 facsimile machines which are geographically separated.
   Normally, facsimile machines are used in  association
 with  telephone  equipment,  the  data being sent along
 telephone lines.  Placing the facsimile machines  on  a
 computer  network  presents  a problem as the facsimile
 machine does not have the ability  to  use  a  computer
 network  directly.   To  perform  the  network  tasks a
 computer is required, and so the  first  phase  was  to
 attach the facsimile machine to a computer.
   The facsimile machine is not like a standard piece of
 computer  equipment.  We  required  a  special hardware
 interface to enable communication between the facsimile
 machine  and  a small computer. This interface was made
 to appear exactly like  the  telephone  system  to  the
 facsimile   machine.   Furthermore,  the  computer  was
 programmed  to  act  exactly  as  if  it  were  another
 facsimile  machine on the end of a telephone line. Thus
 the local facsimile machine could transmit data to  the
 computer  quite happily, believing that it was actually
 talking to a remote facsimile machine on the other  end
 of  a  telephone  wire.  Because of the property of the
 DACOM 6450 used in the experiment [16],  the  interface
 could  be  identical to one developed for connecting to
 an X25 network. The binary synchronous mode of the chip
 used  (SMC  COM5025) was appropriate to drive the DACOM
 machine.
   At the other side of the computer network there was a
 similar  computer  with an identical facsimile machine.
 The problem of transmitting  a  facsimile  picture  now
 appeared  simple:  data  was  taken  from the facsimile
 machine into the computer, transmitted over the network
 as  if  it was normal computer data, and then sent from
 the computer to the facsimile  machine  at  the  remote
 end.  The  data  being  sent  over  the network appears



                          - 4 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 exactly as any other computer data;  there  is  nothing
 special  about  it  to  signify  that  it  came  from a
 facsimile machine.  The  schematic  of  such  facsimile
 transfer system is shown in Fig. 2.


 facsimile
 machine
  +---+  interface
  !   !    +--+    +-----+
  !   ! == !  ! == !     ! computer
  +---+    +--+    +-----+
                      |
                       - - - - - -    computer
                     /             \  network
                     \             /             facsimile
                       - - - - - -               machine
                                  |    interface  +---+
                               +-----+    +--+    !   !
                      computer !     ! == !  ! == !   !
                               +-----+    +--+    +---+
            Fig. 2  Facsimile transfer system


   The experimental system was used to perform  a  joint
 experiment  between  UCL  and  two groups in the United
 States. Pictures were exchanged via the  ARPANET/SATNET
 [21],  [22]  between UCL in London, ISI in Los Angeles,
 and  COMSAT  in  Washington   D.C.   (Fig.   3).   This
 environment  was chosen because no equivalent group was
 available in the UK.
   One  problem   concerned   with   such   image   data
 transmission  is  the  quantity of data. Even with data
 compression,  a  single  page  of  facsimile  data  can
 produce  as  much  computer  data  as would normally be
 sufficient   for   sending   over   20,000   alphabetic
 characters  -  or  over a dozen typed pages. Thus for a
 given number of pages put into the system,  an  immense
 amount  of  computer  data is produced. This means that
 the transmission will be slower than for sending  text,
 and  that far more storage will be required to hold the
 data.
   Another problem was encountered which became only too
 apparent  when we implemented this system.  The network
 we were using was often unable  to  keep  up  with  the
 speed of the facsimile machine.  When this happened the



                          - 5 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185


                  US               UK
                       satellite
 COMSAT                   __
 +---+    +--+           /  \
 !   ! -- !  !           /  \
 +---+    +--+          /    \
   |          \        /      \
 +---+         \      /        \           UCL
 !fax!          \+--+/          \+--+    +---+
 +---+  ARPANET  !  !   SATNET   !  ! -- !   !
                /+--+            +--+    +---+
               /                           |
 ISI         /                          +---+
 +---+    +--+                           !fax!
 !   ! -- !  !                           +---+
 +---+    +--+
   |
 +---+
 !fax!
 +---+
 Fig. 3. The three participants of the facsimile experiments
 computer tried to slow down the facsimile machine.  The
 facsimile  machine  would  detect  this 'slowness' as a
 communication problem (as a telephone line would  never
 act  in  this  manner),  and would abandon the transfer
 mid-way through the page.
   This is because the the  facsimile  machine  we  were
 using  was never intended for use on a computer; it was
 designed and built for use on telephone lines.  Indeed,
 being  unaware that it was connected to a computer, the
 facsimile machine transmitted data at a constant  rate,
 which exceeded the limit that the network could accept.
 In other words, the computer network we were using  was
 not  designed for the transfer rate that we were trying
 to use over it.
   Both  these  problems  are  surmountable.   Facsimile
 machines are coming on the market that are designed for
 direct communication with a computer. These machines do
 not  mind  the delays on the computer interface and are
 tolerant of the stops and re-starts. On the other hand,
 if  there were a serious use of facsimile machines on a
 computer network, the network could be designed for the
 high  data rate required. Our problem was aggravated by



                          - 6 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 using a network that was never designed  for  the  data
 rates required in our mode of usage.
   Despite the problems we encountered being a result of
 the  experimental  equipment  we  were working with, we
 still had to  improve  the  situation  to  permit  more
 extensive communications to take place. The easiest way
 to do this was to introduce a local storage area in our
 computer   where  the  data  could  be  held  prior  to
 transmission.  The transfer of a page is  now  done  in
 three  stages.   First, the facsimile data is read from
 the facsimile machine and stored on a local disk.  This
 takes  place  at  high  speed  as  this is just a local
 operation.  When this is complete,  the  data  is  sent
 over  the  network  to  a  disk on the remote computer.
 Finally, the data from  that  disk  is  output  to  the
 remote  facsimile  machine.   This  improved  system is
 shown in Fig. 4.


                 computer network
  fax    computer    - - - -     computer   fax
 +---+   +-----+   /         \   +-----+   +---+
 !   ! = !     ! =     ==>     = !     ! = !   !
 +---+   +-----+   \         /   +-----+   +---+
    - - - + |        - - - -        | + - - >
          | | + - - - - - - - - - + | |
          | | |                   | | |
          V | |                   V | |
          +---+                   +---+
          !   !                   !   !
          !   !                   !   !
          +---+                   +---+
          disk                    disk
     Fig. 4.  The improved facsimile transfer system


   The idea  behind  this  method  is  to  decouple  the
 facsimile  machine from the network communications. The
 data is read from the facsimile machine at full  speed,
 without  the  delays  caused  by  the computer network.
 This also has the effect of being  more  acceptable  to
 the human operators: each page is now read in less than
 a minute.  The transmission over the network then takes
 place  at  whatever speed the network can sustain. This
 does not affect the facsimile machines at all; they are
 not involved in the sending or receiving. Only when all
 the data has been received at the remote  disk  is  the
 remote  facsimile  machine told that the data is ready.



                          - 7 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 The facsimile machine is then given the data as fast as
 it will accept it.
   The disadvantage of such a system is that the  person
 sending  the  pages  does  not know how long it will be
 before they are actually printed at the other side.  If
 several  pages  are  input  in  quick succession by the
 operator, they will be stored on disk; it may  then  be
 some time before the last page is actually delivered to
 the destination. This is  not  always  a  disadvantage;
 where  many  operators  are  sending  data  to the same
 destination, it is a definite advantage to be  able  to
 input  the  pages and have the system deliver them when
 the  destination  becomes  free.  Such  a   system   is
 preferable to use of the current telephone system where
 the  operator  has  to  keep  re-dialing   the   remote
 facsimile machine until the call is answered.


 2.2 Interworking with Other Equipment
 2.2.1 Facsimile machines
   As was mentioned earlier, facsimile machines  produce
 a large amount of data per page due to the way in which
 the pages are encoded.  To reduce the data that has  to
 be  transmitted,  various  compression  techniques  are
 employed.  The manufacturers of facsimile machines have
 developed   proprietary  ways  in  which  the  data  is
 compressed and encoded.  Unfortunately this  has  meant
 that  interworking  of different facsimile machines has
 been impossible.  In the system described in  the  last
 section, exchange of pictures was only possible between
 sites that had identical facsimile  machines.  The  new
 set  of CCITT recommendations will reduce the extent to
 which differences in equipment persist.
   Having  the  data  on  a  computer   gives   us   the
 opportunity  to manipulate data in any way we wish.  In
 particular we could convert the data from the form used
 in  one  facsimile machine to that required by another.
 This means that interworking between different types of
 facsimile machines can be achieved.
   The development of this  system  took  place  in  two
 stages:  the  decompression  of the facsimile data from
 the coded form used in our  machine  into  an  internal
 data  form  and  the  recompression  of the data in the
 internal form into the encoded form  required  for  the
 destination  machine.  Two  programs  were developed to
 perform these two operations.



                          - 8 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

   At the same time we were developing  compression  and
 decompression  programs  for  machines  that  use other
 techniques.  In particular, we  developed  programs  to
 handle  the  recently approved CCITT recommendation for
 facsimile compression [15]. The CCITT came up with  two
 varieties of compression, depending upon the resolution
 being used.
   Unfortunately there were no facsimile machines on the
 network  that  use  the  CCITT  compression  technique.
 However, the programming of the  new  methods  achieved
 two  goals:  it proved that the data could be converted
 inside a small computer, so that machines of  different
 types could be supported on the network, and it enabled
 us  to  compare  the  compression  results.  These  are
 described  in  more detail in [13].  Essentially, these
 show that the DACOM technique  used  by  our  facsimile
 machine  is  comparatively  poor, and that considerably
 less data need be transmitted if some other  method  is
 used.  This  brings  up  another  possibility: we could
 change the compression of the data to reduce the volume
 for transmission and then change the data back again at
 the   destination.   This   may    save    considerable
 transmission  time,  especially  if  fast  computers or
 special hardware was easily available.   This  has  not
 been  tried  yet  in  our  system, as none of the other
 users on the network have the  capability  of  changing
 the  data  format  back  into  that  required  by their
 machines.
   There  are  many  other  more  efficient  compression
 schemes,  e.g.   block  compression  [7] and predictive
 compression [8], but we have not yet incorporated  them
 into our system.


 2.2.2 Output Devices
   One area that we have explored is the use of  devices
 other  than facsimile machines for outputting the data.
 Facsimile  machines  are  both  expensive  to  buy  and
 relatively  slow  to  operate. We have investigated the
 use of a TV-like screen to display the  data,  just  as
 character VDUs are commonly used to display text.  This
 activity requires bit-map displays, with an address  in
 memory  for each postion on the screen. Full colour and
 multiple shades can be used  with  appropriately  large
 bit-map  storage.   Although  simple  in principle, the
 implementation  of   the   relevant   techniques   took
 considerable effort.



                          - 9 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

   The problems arise in  the  way  that  the  facsimile
 image  is encoded. Raw facsimile images consist of rows
 of small dots, each dot recorded as a  black  or  white
 space. When these dots are arranged together they build
 up a picture in a similar manner to the way in which  a
 newspaper  picture is made up. Unfortunately the number
 of dots used in a facsimile page is not the same as the
 number  used  on  most screens. For instance, the DACOM
 facsimile machine uses 1726 dots across each page,  but
 across  a  screen there are usually just 512 dots. Thus
 to show the picture on the screen the 1726 dots must be
 'squeezed' into just 512 dots; stated another way, 1214
 dots must be thrown away without losing the picture!
   It is in reducing the number of picture elements that
 the  problem  arises.  We could just every third dot or
 so from the facsimile  page  and  just  display  those.
 Alternatively,  we  could  take three or more at a time
 and try to convert the group  of  them  into  a  single
 black  or  white  dot.   Unfortunately,  in  both these
 cases, data can get  lost  that  is  necessary  to  the
 picture.   For  instance,  a  facsimile  encoding of an
 architect drawing could easily end up with  a  complete
 line  removed,  radically  changing the presentation of
 the image.
   After much experimentation, we developed a method  of
 reducing  the  number  of  dots  without destroying the
 picture. This is  a  thinning  technique,  whereby  key
 elements  of  the picture are thinned, but not removed.
 Occasionally, when  the  detail  gets  too  fine,  some
 elements  are merged, but under these circumstances the
 eye would not have been able to see the detail  anyway.
 The  details of this technique are described in [3] and
 [4].
   It may also be required that a picture  be  enlarged.
 This enlargement can be done by simply duplicating each
 pixel in the picture.  For a  non-integral  ratio,  the
 picture  can  be expanded up to the nearest integer and
 then shrunk to the correct size.  However, this  method
 may degrade the image quality, e.g. the oblique contour
 may become stepped,  especially  when  the  picture  is
 enlarged  too much. This problem can be solved by using
 an iterative enlargement algorithm. Each time  a  pixel
 is  replaced  with a 2x2 array of pixels, whose pattern
 depends  on  the  original   pixel   and   the   pixels
 surrounding  it.  This  procedure is repeated until the
 requested ratio is reached. If  the  ration  is  not  a
 power  of 2's, the same method as that for non-integral
 ratios is used.



                         - 10 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

   As a side effect of  developing  this  technique,  we
 could  freely  change  the  size and shape of an image.
 The picture can be expanded or shrunk,  or  it  can  be
 distorted.   Distortion,  whereby  the  horizontal  and
 vertical dimensions of the  image  may  be  changed  by
 different amounts, is often useful in image editing.
   The immediate consequence of this ability  to  change
 the image size meant that we could display the image on
 a screen as well as output the  image  on  a  facsimile
 machine.  To  a user of a computerised facsimile system
 this could be a very  useful  feature:  images  can  be
 displayed  on  screen  much  faster than on a facsimile
 machine, and displays are  significantly  cheaper  than
 the  facsimile machines as well. It is possible that an
 installation could have many screen displays where  the
 image  could  be viewed, but perhaps only one facsimile
 machine would be available for hard copy. This would be
 similar to many computer configurations today where the
 number of printers is limited due to  their  cost,  and
 display screens are far more numerous.


 2.3 Image Enhancement
   One aspect of computer processing that we  wanted  to
 investigate  was  that  of image enhancement. Enhancing
 the image is a  very  tricky  operation;  as  the  name
 implies  it  means  that  the image is improved in some
 sense.  Under program  control  this  is  difficult  to
 achieve: what the program thinks is an improvement, the
 human might judge to be distinctly worse.
   Our enhancement attempts were aimed  particularly  at
 printed  documents  and  other forms of typed text. The
 experiment was double pronged: we  hoped  to  make  the
 image  easier  to  read by humans while also making the
 image easier for the computer to handle.
   In our earlier experiments we had  noticed  that  the
 encoding  of  printed  matter was often very poor. This
 was especially noticeable when we  enlarged  an  image.
 Rather  than  each  character having smooth edges as on
 the original  document,  the  edges  were  very  rough,
 unexpected notches and excrescences being caused by the
 facsimile scanner.  They not  only  degrade  the  image
 quality but also decrease the compression efficiency. A
 typical enlargement of several characters is  shown  in
 Fig. 5.




                         - 11 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185






















         Fig 5.  An enlargement of an typed text


   The enhancement method we adopted was first  employed
 at  Loughborough  University  [5].  This method has the
 effect of smoothing the edges of the dark areas on  the
 image.  The  technique consists of considering each dot
 in the image in turn. The dot is either left as  it  is



                         - 12 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 or changed to the opposite colour (white  to  black  or
 black  to  white)  depending  upon  the eight dots that
 surround it. The particular pattern of surrounding dots
 that  are  required to change the inner dot's colour is
 used to control the harshness  of  the  algorithm  [6],
 [8].
   In our  first  set  of  experiments  the  result  was
 definitely  worse  than  the original. Although square-
 like characters such as H, L, and T came out very well,
 anything  with slope (M, V, W, or S) became so bad that
 the oblique  contours  were  stepped.  The  method  was
 subsequently  modified to produce a result that was far
 more acceptable; the image looked a  lot  cleaner  than
 the  original.  Fig.  6  shows the same text as that in
 Fig. 5, but after it has been cleaned.




















                         - 13 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185






















                 Fig. 6  A cleaned text


   The effect of these can be difficult to see  clearly.
 We have used the colour on our Grinnell display to show
 the original picture and the outcome of various picture
 processing  operations superposed in different colours.
 This brings out  the  effect  of  the  operations  very



                         - 14 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 vividly.
   It was mentioned above that the enhancement was  done
 not  only to improve the image for reading but also for
 easier  processing  by  the  computer.   As   described
 earlier,  the  image  from  the  facsimile  machine  is
 compressed in order to reduce the amount of data.   The
 cleaning  allows a higher compression rate so that more
 efficient transmission and/or storage can be achieved.
   We  learned   some   important   lessons   from   the
 enhancement  exercise.   Originally we thought that the
 main attraction in enhancement would be to improve  the
 readability.  In  the  end, we found that improving the
 readability was very difficult, especially because  the
 facsimile  image was so poor. Instead we found that the
 effect of  reducing  the  compressed  output  was  more
 important.  By reducing the data to be transmitted by a
 quarter, significant savings could be made. But  before
 such  a  technique  could be used in a live system, the
 time it  takes  to  produce  the  enhancement  must  be
 weighed  against  the  time  that  would  be  saved  in
 transmission.


 2.4 Image Editing
   By editing we mean that the facsimile picture can  be
 changed,  or  combined with other pictures, while it is
 stored inside the computer.  In  previous  sections  it
 was  mentioned  that we could change the size and shape
 of a facsimile image. This technique was later combined
 with  an  overlaying method that enabled one picture to
 be combined with another [12].
   In order to perform any editing it  is  necessary  to
 have  the picture displayed for the user to see. In our
 case we displayed the picture on  the  bit-map  screen.
 The image took up the left-hand side of the screen, the
 right side being reserved  for  the  picture  that  was
 being  built.   The  user  could  select an area of the
 left-hand screen and move  it  to  a  position  on  the
 right-hand  screen.   Several images could be displayed
 in succession on the left, and areas selected and moved
 to  the right.  Finally, the right-hand screen could be
 printed on the facsimile machine.
   The selection of an area of the picture was  done  by
 the   use   of   a   coloured  rectangular  subsection,
 controlled by a program in the computer, that could  be
 moved  around on the screen. The rectangular subsection



                         - 15 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 was moved with instructions typed in by  the  operator;
 it  could  be  moved  up  or  down,  and  increased  or
 decreased in size. When the  appropriate  area  of  the
 screen  had  been  selected, the program remembered the
 coordinates  and   moved   the   coloured   rectangular
 subsection  to  the  right-hand side of the screen. The
 user then selected an area again, in a similar  manner.
 When the user finished the editing, the program removed
 the part of the picture  selected  from  the  left-hand
 screen  and  converted  it  to  fit  the  shape  of the
 rectangular subsection on the  right-hand  screen.  The
 result was then displayed for the user to see.
   When an image was being edited,  the  editor  had  to
 keep  another  scaled  copy for display. This is due to
 the fact that the screen had a different  dimension  to
 that  of the facsimile machine. The editing operations,
 e.g.  chopping  and  merging,  were  performed  on  the
 original  image  data  files  with  the full resolution
 available on the facsimile machine.


 2.5 Integration with Other Data Types
   The facsimile  machine  can  be  viewed  in  a  wider
 context than merely a facsimile input/output device. It
 can work as a printer  for  other  data  representation
 types,  such  as  coded  character  text  and geometric
 graphics.  At  present,  text  can  be  converted  into
 facsimile  format and printed on the facsimile machine.
 Moreover, mixed pages containing pictures and text  can
 be  manipulated  by  our  system.  The  integration  of
 facsimile images with geometric graphics is a topic  of
 future research.
   In order to  convert  a  character  string  into  its
 facsimile  format,  the  system maintains a translation
 table whereby the patterns of the characters  available
 in  the  system  can  be retrieved. The input character
 string is translated into a set of scan lines, each  of
 which  is  created  by  concatenating the corresponding
 patterns of the characters in the string.
   The translation table is in  fact  a  software  font,
 which  can be edited and modified. Even though only one
 font is available in our system for the time being,  it
 is  quite  easy  to  introduce  other  character fonts.
 Furthermore, it is also  possible  for  a  font  to  be
 remotely  loaded  from a database via the communication
 network.



                         - 16 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

   This allows for more interesting applications of  the
 facsimile  machine.  For  example,  it could serve as a
 Teletex printer, provided that  the  Teletex  character
 font  is included in our system. In this case, the text
 images may be distorted to fit the presentation  format
 requested  by  the Teletex service.  Similarly, Prestel
 viewdata pages  could  be  displayed  on  the  Grinnell
 screen.
   Moreover,  pictures  can  be  mixed  with   text   by
 combining   this   text  conversion  with  the  editing
 described in  the  previous  section.  This  should  be
 regarded   as   a   notable   step  towards  multi-type
 processing.
   Not  only  does  this  support  a  local   multi-type
 environment   but   multi-type   information   can   be
 transmitted over a network. So far  as  this  facsimile
 system  is  concerned, a mixed page containing text and
 pictures can be sent only when it has been  represented
 in  a  bit-map  format.  However,  much  more efficient
 transmission would be achieved if  one  could  transmit
 the text and pictures separately and reproduce the page
 at the destination site. This requires  that  a  multi-
 type  data structure be designed which is understood by
 the two communication sites.


 3. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
   Now let us discuss the general disciplines for design
 and  implementation  of a computerised facsimile system
 which  carries  out  the  functions  described  in  the
 previous  sections.   Having discussed the requirements
 of the system, a hierarchical model  is  introduced  in
 which  the  modules of different layers are implemented
 as separate processes.  The Clean and Simple interface,
 which  is  adopted  for inter-process communication, is
 then  described.   The  task   controller,   which   is
 responsible  for  organising  the  tasks  involved in a
 requested job, is discussed in  detail.   Some  efforts
 have  been  made  in our experimental work to provide a
 more convenient user programming environment and a more
 efficient   data   transfer  method.  This  is  finally
 described.


 3.1 System Requirements
   In a computerised facsimile system,  the  images  are
 represented  in  a  digital  form.  To  carry  out this



                         - 17 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 conversion, a page is scanned by the optical scanner of
 the  facsimile machine, a digital number being produced
 to represent  the  darkness  of  each  pixel.  As  high
 resolution  has to be adopted to keep the detail of the
 image, the facsimile  data  files  are  usually  rather
 large.  In  order  to  achieve  efficient  storage  and
 transmission, the facsimile data must be compressed  as
 much as possible.
   Currently, the facsimile machines made  by  different
 manufacturers   h different  properties,  such  as
 different compression methods and different resolution.
 There   are   also  some  international  standards  for
 facsimile data compression, which are employed for  the
 facsimile  data  to be transferred over the public data
 network. These  require  that  the  facsimile  data  be
 converted  from  one representation form to another, so
 that users who are  separated  geographically  and  use
 different  machines  can  communicate  with each other.
 More sophisticated applications,  e.g.  image  editing,
 request processing facilities of the system as well.
   When being processed, the facsimile image  should  be
 represented   in  a  common  format  or  internal  data
 structure,  which  is  used  to  pass  the  information
 between  different processing routines. For the sake of
 convenience and efficiency, the internal data structure
 should  be fairly well compressed and its format should
 be  easy  for  the  computer  to  manipulate.  In   our
 experimental  work,  the  line  vector  is  chosen as a
 standard unit, a simple  run-length  compression  being
 employed  [3].  Some  processing routines may use other
 data   formats,   e.g.   bit-map,   but   it   is   the
 responsibility   of   such   routines  to  perform  the
 conversion between those formats and the standard one.
   The  system   should   contain   several   processing
 routines,  each  of  which performs one primitive task,
 such  as  chopping,  merging,  and  scale-changing.  An
 immense variety of processing operations can be carried
 out as long as those  task  modules  can  be  organised
 flexibly. The capability for flexible task organisation
 should be thought of  as  one  of  the  most  important
 requirements of the system.
   One  possibility  is  for  the  processing   routines
 involved  to  be  executed  separately, temporary files
 being used as communication media. Though very  simple,
 this method is far too inefficient.




                         - 18 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

   As described above,  the  information  unit  for  the
 communication  between  the  processing routines is the
 line vector, so that the routines can be  organised  as
 embedded  loops,  where  a processing routine takes the
 input line from its source routine located in the inner
 loop,  and  passes  the  output line to the destination
 routine located in the outer loop [3].  Obviously  this
 method  is quite efficient. But it is not realistic for
 our system, because it is very difficult  to  build  up
 different  processing  loops  at  run-time and flexible
 task organisation is impossible.
   In a  real-time  operating  system  environment,  the
 primitive   tasks   can   be  implemented  as  separate
 processes. This method, which is discussed in detail in
 the   following   sections,   provides   the   required
 flexibility.


 3.2 Hierarchical Model
   As shown in Fig. 7, the modules in a single  computer
 fall into three layers.


                   +---------+
                   !         ! task controller
                   +---------+
                          tasks
            +---+  +---+  +---+  +---+  +---+
            !   !  ! !   !  !   !  !   !
            +---+  +---+  +---+  +---+  +---+
              |      |                    |
            +---+  +---+                +---+
            !   !  !   ! device drivers !   !
            +---+  +---+                +---+
        - - - | - -  |  - - - - - - - - - | - - - -
            +---+  +---+                +---+
            !   !  !   !    physical    |   !
            !   !  !   !    devices     !   !
            +---+  +---+                +---+
             Fig. 7  The hierarchical model


   These are:
  (1) Device Drivers, which constitute the lowest  layer
      in the model.  The modules in this layer deal with
      I/O activities of the physical  devices,  such  as



                         - 19 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

      facsimile machine, display and floppy  disk.  This
      layer  frees  the task modules of upper layer from
      the burden of I/O programming.
  (2) Tasks, which perform all processing primitives and
      handle different data structures. Above the driver
      of each physical device, there  are  one  or  more
      such  device-independent  modules,  which  work as
      information source or sink in the task chain  (see
      below).  A file system module allows other modules
      to store and retrieve information on the secondary
      storage  device such as floppy disk. Decompression
      and recompression routines convert data structures
      of   facsimile   image  information  so  that  the
      facsimile machines can communicate with  the  rest
      of   the   system.   Processing  primitives,  e.g.
      chopping, merging,  scaling,  are  implemented  as
      task modules in this layer. They are designed such
      that they can be concatenated to  carry  out  more
      complex  jobs.  So far as the system is concerned,
      the protocols for data transmission over  computer
      networks are also regarded as task modules in this
      layer.
  (3)  Task  Controller,  which   organises   the   task
      processes   to   perform  the  specified  job.  It
      provides the users of the application layer with a
      procedure-oriented  language whereby the requested
      job can be defined as a  chain  of  task  modules.
      Literally, the chain is represented by a character
      string:


         <source_task>|{<processing_task>|}<sink_task>


        According to such a command, the task controller
      selects the relevant task modules and concatenates
      them in proper order by means  of  logical  links.
      Then the tasks on the chain are executed under its
      control, so that the data taken  from  the  source
      are processed and the result is put into the sink.


 3.3 Clean and Simple Interface
   It is important, in this application, to develop  the
 software  in  a  modular  way.  It  is desirable to put
 together a set of modules to carry  out  the  different
 image   processing  tasks.  Another  set  of  transport
 modules must be developed for shipping  data  over  the



                         - 20 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 different networks to which the UCL system is attached.
 In   our  computerised  facsimile  system,  these  task
 modules are  implemented  as  separate  processes.  The
 operation  of  the  system  relies on the communication
 between these processes.  The interface which  is  used
 for   such   communication  has  been  designed  to  be
 universal; it is independent of these modules, and  has
 been  termed  the Clean and Simple interface [20]. This
 interface is discussed in this section.


 3.3.1 Principles
   The Clean and Simple interface is concerned with  the
 synchronisation   and   transfer  of  full-duplex  data
 streams between two communicating processes.  Thus  the
 interface   has   three  major  components:  connection
 synchronisation,   data   transfer    and    connection
 desynchronisation.   These   components  are  discussed
 below.
   The connection between two processes is initiated  by
 one  of  them,  which, generally speaking, belongs to a
 higher  layer.  For  example,  the  interface   between
 protocols  of  different  layers is always initiated by
 the higher layer, though, sometimes, the connection  is
 initiated  passively by the primitive 'listen'. It will
 be seen in the next section  that  task  processes  can
 communicate  with each other via the connections to the
 higher  layer  (task  controller)  and  this  makes  it
 possible to achieve flexible task organisation.
   The process initiating the connection is  called  the
 'master' process, while the other is called the 'slave'
 process. The 'master' process is also  responsible  for
 resource   allocation   for   the   two   communicating
 processes. Here 'resource' refers mainly to the  memory
 areas  for  the message structure and data buffer. This
 asymmetric definition of the interface  eliminates  any
 possible confusion in resource allocation.
   The interface is implemented by using the signal-wait
 mechanism  provided  by  the  operating  system. A data
 structure called CSB (Clean and  Simple  Block),  which
 contains  function, data buffer, and other information,
 is sent as the event message, when one process  signals
 another [20].





                         - 21 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 3.3.2 Synchronisation and Desynchronisation
   The  procedure  for  connection  synchronisation   is
 composed   of  two  steps.  First,  the  two  processes
 exchange their identifiers for the specific  connection
 by  means  of a getcid primitive.  Usually, the pointer
 to the task control structure of the process is used as
 the connection identifier.
   Then, the 'master' sends an open CSB with appropriate
 parameter    string    passing    the    initialisation
 information. This information, which can also be called
 open   parameter,   is   process   dependent,  or  more
 accurately, task dependent. For example, the parameters
 for  the  file  system  should be the file name and the
 access mode. Provided the 'slave' accepts the  request,
 the connection is established successfully and data can
 be transferred via the interface.
   In  order  to  desynchronise  the   connection,   the
 'master' initiates a 'close' action. On the other hand,
 an error state or  EOF  (end  of  file)  state  can  be
 reported   by  the  'slave'  to  request  a  connection
 desynchronisation.
   The listen primitive in our system  is  reserved  for
 the  processes  that  receive a request from the remote
 hosts on the networks.


 3.3.3 Data Transfer
   While the Clean and Simple interface is asymmetric in
 relation  to  connection synchronisation, data transfer
 is completely symmetric so long as the  connection  has
 been  established.  Data  flows  in both directions are
 permitted, though the operations are quite different.
   The  interface  provides  two  primitives  for   data
 transfer  --  read  and write. To transfer some data to
 the  'slave',  the  'master'  signals  it  with  a  CSB
 containing  the write function and a buffer filled with
 the data to be transferred.  Having consumed the  data,
 the 'slave' returns the CSB to report the result status
 of the transmission.
   On the other hand, in order to receive some data from
 the 'slave', the 'master' uses a read CSB with an empty
 buffer. Having received the CSB, the 'slave' fills  the
 buffer  with  the data requested and, then, returns the
 CSB.



                         - 22 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 3.4 Control and Organisation of the Tasks
   Another  important  aspect   of   the   multi-process
 architecture  of  the UCL facsimile system, is the need
 to systematise the  control  and  organisation  of  the
 tasks.  This  activity  is  the  function  of  the task
 controller, whose  operations  are  discussed  in  this
 section.


 3.4.1 Command Language
   As mentioned earlier, the task controller supports  a
 procedure-oriented  language by means of which the user
 or the routines of the upper layers can define the jobs
 requested.  A  command  should  contain  the  following
 information:
   1. the names of the task processes which are involved
      in the job.
   2. the open parameters for these task processes.
   3. the order in which the tasks are to be linked.
   The last item is quite  important,  though,  usually,
 the same order as that given in the command is used.
   A command in this language is presented  as  a  zero-
 ended  character  string.  In the task name strings and
 the attribute strings of the open parameters, '|', '"',
 and  ','  must  be  excluded as they will be treated as
 separators. The definition is shown below,  where  '|',
 which  is  the  separator of the command strings in the
 language, does not mean 'OR'.


 <command_string> ::= <task_string>
 <command_string> ::= <task_string>|<command_string>
 <task_string> ::= <task_name>
 <task_string> ::= <task_name>"<open_parameter>
 <open_parameter> ::= <attribute>
 <open_parameter> ::= <attribute>,<open_parameter>


 3.4.2 Task Controller
   In our experimental work, the task controller  module
 is  called  fitter.   This  name which is borrowed from
 UNIX hints how the  module  works.   According  to  the
 command  string,  it  links  the specified tasks into a
 chain, along which the data is processed to fulfil  the



                         - 23 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 job requested (Fig. 8).



                        tasks
            +-----+    +-----+    +-----+
            !  a  ! -> !  b  ! -> !  c  !
            +-----+    +-----+    +-----+
                 Fig. 8  The task chain


   Since  all  modules,  including  fitter  itself,  are
 implemented   as  processes,  the  connections  between
 modules should be via the Clean and Simple  interfaces.
 Upon  receiving  the  command string, the fitter parses
 the string to find each task process involved and opens
 a  connection  to  it. Formally, the task processes are
 chained directly, but, logically, there  is  no  direct
 connection  between  them. All of them are connected to
 the fitter (Fig. 9).



                       fitter
                   +-------------+
               +-- !             ! --+
               |   +-------------+   |
               |          |          |
               V          V          V
            +-----+    +-----+    +-----+
            !  a  !    !  b  !    !  c  !
            +-----+    +-----+    +-----+
      Fig. 9 The connection initiated by the fitter


   For each of the processes  it  connects,  the  fitter
 keeps  a  table called pipe. When the command string is
 parsed, the pipe tables are double-linked to  represent
 the specified order of data flow. So far as one process
 is concerned, its pipe table contains two  pointers:  a
 forward  one pointing to its destination and a backward
 one pointing to its sources. Besides the  pointers,  it
 also  maintains  the  information  to identify the task
 process and the corresponding connection.




                         - 24 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

   Fig. 10 illustrates the chain of the pipe tables  for
 the  job "a|b|c".  Note that the forward (output) chain
 ends at the sink, while the backward (input) chain ends
 at  the  source.  In this sense, the task processes are
 chained in the specified order  via  the  fitter  (Fig.
 11). The data transfer along the chain is initiated and
 controlled by the  fitter,  each  process  getting  the
 input  from  its  source  and putting the output to its
 destination.



           +-----+    +-----+    +-----+
           !  * -+--> !  * -+--> !  0  !
           +-----+    +-----+    +-----+
           !  0  ! <--+- *  ! <--+- *  !
           +-----+    +-----+    +-----+
           !  a  !    !  b  !    !  c  !
           +-----+    +-----+    +-----+
           !     !    !     !    !     !
           !     !    !     !    !     !
           +-----+    +-----+    +-----+
                 Fig. 10  The pipe chain


                       fitter
                   +-------------+
               +-> ! * -> * -> * ! --+
               |   +-------------+   |
               |         | A         |
               |         V |         V
            +-----+    +-----+    +-----+
            !  a  !    !  b  !    !  c  !
            +-----+    +-----+    +-----+
                 Fig. 11  The data flow


   This strategy makes the task organisation so flexible
 that  only the links have to be changed when a new task
 chain is to be built up. In such an  environment,  each
 task process can be implemented independently, provided
 the Clean and Simple interface is supported. This  also
 makes the system extension quite easy.





                         - 25 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

   The fitter manipulates one job at a time. But it must
 maintain  a  command  queue  to cope with the requests,
 which come simultaneously from either the  upper  level
 processes or other hosts on the network.


 3.5 Interface Routines
   In a modular, multi-process system such  as  the  UCL
 facsimile   system,  the  structure  of  the  interface
 routines is very important. The CSI of section  3.3  is
 fundamental  to the modular interface; a common control
 structure is also essential. This  section  gives  some
 details  both  about the sharable control structure and
 the buffer management.


 3.5.1 Sharable Control Structure
   Though the CSI specification is straightforward,  the
 implementation   of   the  inter-process  communication
 interface may be  rather  tedious,  especially  in  our
 system,  where  there  are  many  task  processes to be
 written. Not only does each process have  to  implement
 the  same  control  structure  for signal handling, but
 also the buffer management routines must be included in
 all the processes.
   For the sake of simplicity and efficiency, a  package
 of  standard  interface  routines is provided which are
 shared by the  task  processes  in  the  system.  These
 routines  are re-entrant, so that they can be shared by
 all processes.
   The 'csinit' primitive is called for a  task  process
 to check in.  An information table is allocated and the
 pointer to the table is returned to the caller  as  the
 task  identifier,  which is to be used for each call of
 these interface routines.
   Then,  each  task  process  waits  by  invoking   the
 'csopen'  primitive  which  does  not  return until the
 calling process  is  scheduled.   When  the  connection
 between  the process and the fitter is established, the
 call returns the pointer to the open  parameter  string
 of  the  task,  the corresponding task being started. A
 typical structure of the task process (written in c) is
 shown  below.  After  the task program is executed, the
 process calls the 'csopen' and waits again. It  can  be
 seen  that  the  portability  of  the  task routines is
 improved to a great extent. Only the interface routines



                         - 26 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 should be changed if  the  system  were  to  run  in  a
 different operating environment.


 static int mytid;       /* task identifier */
 task()
 {
         char *op;       /* open parameter */
         mytid = csinit();
         for(;;) {
                 op = csopen(mytid);
                 ...     /* the body of the task */
         }
 }


 3.5.2 Buffer Management
   The package of the interface routines also provides a
 universal buffer management, so that the task processes
 are freed from this burden. The allocation of the  data
 buffers  is  the  responsibility  of  the  higher level
 process, the fitter. If the  task  processes  allocated
 their own buffers, some redundant copying would have to
 be  done.  Thus,  the  primitives  for  data  transfer,
 'csread' and 'cswrite', are designed as:


         char *csread(tid, need);
         char *cswrite(tid, need);


 where 'tid' is the identifier of the task and 'need' is
 the  number  of  data  bytes  to  be  transferred.  The
 primitives return the pointer to  the  area  satisfying
 the  caller's requirement. The 'csread' returns an area
 containing  the  data  required  by  the  caller.   The
 'cswrite'  returns  an  area  into which the caller can
 copy the data to be transferred. The copied  data  will
 be  written to its destination at a proper time without
 the caller's interference.  Obviously  the  unnecessary
 copy  operations can be avoided. It is recommended that
 the data buffer returned  by  the  primitives  be  used
 directly to attain higher performance.





                         - 27 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

   In order to implement  this  strategy,  each  time  a
 piece  of  data  is  required,  the  size of the buffer
 needed is compared with that of the unused buffer  area
 in  the current CSB. If the latter is not less than the
 former,  the  current  buffer  pointer   is   returned.
 Otherwise,  a  temporary buffer has to be employed. The
 data is copied into the buffer until the requested size
 is  reached.  In  this  case,  instead of a part of the
 current buffer, the temporary buffer will be returned.
   A 'cswrite' call with the 'need' field  set  to  zero
 tells  the  interface routine that no more data will be
 sent. It causes  a  'close'  CSB  to  be  sent  to  the
 destination routine.
   If there  is  not  enough  data  available,  'csread'
 returns zero to indicate the end of data.


 4. UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM
   Now we discuss the implementation of the computerised
 facsimile   system   developed  in  the  Department  of
 Computer Science at UCL.
   This system has several components. Since  the  total
 system  is  a modular and multi-process one, a specific
 system must be built up for a specific application. The
 way  that this is done is discussed in section 4.1. The
 specific devices and their  drivers  are  described  in
 section  4.2. The system can be attached to a number of
 networks.  In  the  UCL  configuration,   the   network
 interface  can be direct to SATNET [22], SERC NET [23],
 PSS [24], and the Cambridge Ring. The form  of  network
 connection  is  discussed  further  in section 4.3. The
 system must transfer data between the facsimile devices
 and  the disks, and between the networks and the disks.
 For this a filing system is required which is discussed
 in section 4.4.
   A key aspect of the  UCL  system  is  flexibility  of
 devices, networks, and data formats. The flexibility of
 device is achieved by the modular nature of the  device
 drivers  (section  4.2).  The flexibility of network is
 discussed in section 4.8. The additional flexibility of
 data   structure  is  described  in  section  4.5.  The
 flexibility can be utilised by incorporating conversion
 routines  as in section 4.6. An important aspect of the
 UCL system is the ability to provide local manipulation
 facilities  for  the  graphics  files.   The facilities
 implemented for the local manipulation are discussed in



                         - 28 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 section 4.7.  In  order  to  transfer  files  over  the
 different  networks  of  section 4.3. a high level data
 transmission protocol must be defined.  The  procedures
 used in the UCL system are discussed in section 4.8.


 4.1 Multi-Task Structure
   The  task  controller  and   processing   tasks   are
 implemented  as  MOS  processes.  A  number  of utility
 routines are provided  for  users  to  build  new  task
 processes and modules at application level.
   In the environment of MOS, a process is included in a
 system  by  specifying a Process Control Table when the
 system is built up. The macro  'setpcte'  is  used  for
 this  purpose,  the  meaning  of  its  parameters being
 defined in [14].


 #define setpcte(name,entry,pridev,prodev,stklen,
     relpid,relopc)
   {0,name,entry,pridev,prodev,stklen,relpid,relopc}


   A Device Control Table (DCT) has to be specified  for
 each  device  when the system is built up. A DCT can be
 defined anywhere as devices are referenced by  the  DCT
 address.  The  macro  'setdcte'  is designed to declare
 devices, the meanings of its parameters being specified
 in   [14].    This   method   is  used  in  the  device
 descriptions.


 #define setdcte(name,intvec,devcsr,devbuf,devinit,
     ioinit,intrpt,mate)
   {04037,intrpt,0,0,name,mate,intvec,devinit,
     devcsr,devbuf,ioinit}


 4.2 The Devices
   As mentioned in section 2,  apart  from  the  general
 purpose  system console, there are three devices in the
 system to support the facsimile service. These are:
  (1) AED62 Floppy Disk, which is used as the  secondary
      memory storing the facsimile image data. Above its
      driver, a file system is implemented to manage the
      data  stored  on  the disks, so that an image data



                         - 29 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

      file can be accessed through the Clean and  Simple
      interface.  This file system is dicussed in detail
      in the next section. For some processing jobs, the
      image  data  has  to  buffered on a temporary file
      lest time-out occurs on the facsimile machine.
  (2) DACOM Facsimile Machine, which is  used  to  input
      and  output  image  data.  It  reads  an image and
      creates the corresponding data  stream.  On  other
      hand, it accepts the image data and reproduces the
      corresponding image. Above its driver, there is  a
      interface  task  to fit the facsimile machine into
      the system, the Clean and Simple  interface  being
      supported.   The  encoding algorithm for the DACOM
      machine is described in [19].
  (3) Grinnell Colour Display,  which  is  used  as  the
      monitor  of  the  system.  Above  its  driver,  an
      interface task is implemented so  that  the  image
      data  in  standard  format can be accepted through
      the Clean and Simple interface.
   The detailed description  of  these  devices  can  be
 found  in  Appendix  1.  The  interface  task  and  the
 description for each device are listed in the following
 table. The interface tasks can be directly used as data
 source or sink in a task string.


       Device       Interface Task  Description
 AED62 Floppy Disk        fs()      aed62(device)
 DACOM fax Machine       fax()      dacom(device)
 Grinnell Display   grinnell()      grinnell(device)


   Note that the DCTs  for  the  facsimile  machine  and
 Grinnell    display   have   been   included   in   the
 corresponding interface tasks, so that there is no need
 to declare them if these tasks are used.


 4.3 The Networks
   There   are   three   relevant   wide-area   networks
 terminating  in  the  Department of Computer Science at
 the end of 1981. These are:
  (1) A British Telecom X25 network (PSS, [24]).
  (2) A private X25 network (SERC NET, [23])



                         - 30 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

  (3) A Defence network (ARPANET/SATNET, [21], [22])
   In addition there is a  Cambridge  Ring  as  a  local
 network.
   For the time  being,  the  UCL  facsimile  system  is
 directly  attached to the various networks at the point
 NI (Network Interface) of Fig. 1.
   As mentioned earlier, pictures can be  exchanged  via
 the  SATNET/ARPANET,  between UCL in London, ISI in Los
 Angeles, and COMSAT in  Washington  D.C..  The  Network
 Independent File Transfer Protocol (NIFTP, [9]) is used
 to transfer the image data.   This  protocol  has  been
 implemented  on LSI under MOS [10].  In addition, we at
 UCL have put NIFTP on an ARPANET  TOPS-20  host,  which
 can  act  as  an Internet File Forwader (IFF).  In this
 case, TCP/IP ([28], [29]) is employed as the underlying
 transport   service.   Since   TCP   provides  reliable
 communication channels, the  provision  of  checkpoints
 and  error-recovery  procedures are not included in our
 NIFTP implementations.
   In  the  X25  network,  the  transport  procedure  is
 NITS/X25   ([25],   [26]).    Though  pictures  can  be
 transferred to the X25 networks, no  experimental  work
 has been done, because:
  (1) There is at present no  collaborative  partner  on
      these networks.
  (2) The LSI-11, on which our  system  is  implemented,
      has no direct connection to these networks.
   Locally,  image  data  can  be  transmitted  to   the
 PDP11-44s   running  the  UNIX  time-sharing  operating
 system. At present, the SCP ring-driver  software  uses
 permanent   virtual  circuits  (PVCs)  to  connect  the
 various computers on the ring.


 4.4 File System
   A file system has been designed, based on  the  AED62
 double  density  floppy  disk, for use under MOS. It is
 itself implemented as  a  MOS  process  supporting  the
 Clean  and  Simple  interface.  The description of this
 task, fs(fax), can be found in Appendix 2.




                         - 31 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

   In a command string, the file system  task  can  only
 serve  as  either  data  source  or data sink. In other
 words, it can only appear at the first or last position
 on  a  command  string.  In  the  former case, the file
 specified is to be  read,  while  the  file  is  to  be
 written in the latter case.
   Three access modes are allowed which are:


   * Read a file
   * Create a file
   * Append a file


   The file name and access mode are  specified  as  the
 open parameters.
   Let us consider an example.  If a document is  to  be
 read  on  the  facsimile  machine  and  the data stream
 created is to be stored on the file system, the command
 string required is:


         fax"r|fs"c,doc
 where:  fax - interface task for facsimile machine
         r   - read from facsimile machine
         fs  - file system task
         c   - create a new file
         doc - the name of the file to be created.


   In order to dump a  file,  a  task  process  od()  is
 provided  which  works  as  a  data  sink  in a command
 string.


 4.5 Data Structure
   Facsimile  image  data  is  created  using  a   high-
 resolution raster scanner, so that the original picture
 can  be  reproduced  faithfully.  The  facsimile   data
 represents  binary  images,  in  monochrome,  with  two
 levels of intensity, belonging  to  the  data  type  of
 bit-mapped graphics.
   The simplest representation is  the  bit-map  itself.
 The bits, each of which corresponds to a single picture
 element, are arranged in the  same  order  as  that  in
 which  the original picture is scanned, 1s standing for



                         - 32 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 black pixels and 0s for white ones. Operations  on  the
 picture are easily carried out. For example, two images
 represented  in  the  bit-map  format  can  be   merged
 together  by  using  a  simple  logic OR operation. Any
 specific  pixel  can   be   retrieved   by   a   simple
 calculation. However, its size is usually large because
 of  the  high  resolution.   This   makes   it   almost
 unrealistic for storage or transmission.
   Facsimile image data should therefore  be  compressed
 to reduce its redundancy, so that the efficient storage
 and transmission can be achieved.
   Run-length encoding is a useful  compression  scheme.
 Instead of the pattern, the counts of consecutive black
 and white runs are used to represent the image.
   Vector representation, in which the  run-lengths  are
 coded  as  integers  or  bytes,  is  a  useful internal
 representation of images. Not  only  is  it  reasonably
 compressed,  but  it is also quite easy for processing.
 Chopping, scaling and mask-scanning are examples of the
 processing   operations   which   may   be   performed.
 Furthermore, a conversion between different compression
 schemes  may  have to be carried out in such a way that
 the data is first decompressed into the  vector  format
 and  then recompressed. The difficulty in retrieval can
 be overcome by means of line  index,  which  gives  the
 pointers to each lines of the image.
   A higher compression rate leads to a  more  efficient
 transmission.  But  this  is  at the expense of ease of
 processing.  An example of this is the use  of  Huffman
 Code  in  the  CCITT  1-dimensional compression scheme.
 While the data can be compressed more  efficiently,  it
 is rather difficult to manipulate the data direcltly.
   Taking the correlation between  adjacent  lines  into
 account,  2-dimensional compression can achieve an even
 higher   compression    rate.    CCITT    2-dimensional
 compression  and  the  DACOM facsimile machine use this
 method.
   It is desirable to integrate  facsimile  images  with
 other  data types, such as text and geometric graphics;
 the  structure  of  these  other  types  must  then  be
 incorporated  in  the  system.  At  present,  only text
 structure  is  available,  while  the   structure   for
 geometric graphics is a topic for the further study.




                         - 33 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

   In  the  facsimile   system,   the   following   data
 structures    are    supported.    The    corresponding
 descriptions, if any, are listed as well and  they  can
 be found in Appendix 3 (except of dacom(device)).


 type    structure       compression     description
 bit-map  bit-map               -              -
         vector          1D run-length   vector(fax)
         dacom block     2D run-length   dacom(device)
         CCITT T4        1D run-length   t4(fax)
                         2D run-length   t4(fax)
 text    text                  -         text(fax)


   As an  internal  data  structure,  vector  format  is
 widely  used  for data transfer between task processes.
 The set of interface  routines  has  been  extended  by
 introducing  two subroutines, namely getl() and putl(),
 which read and write line vectors directly through  the
 Clean  and  Simple interface. These two routines can be
 found in Appendix 3 (getl(fax) and putl(fax))
   In order to check the validity of a  vector  file,  a
 check task process check() is provided which works as a
 data sink in a command string. It  can  also  dump  the
 vector elements of the specific lines.


 4.6 Data Conversion
   In order to convert one data structure into  another,
 several conversion modules are provided in this system.
 These modules fall into two categories, task  processes
 and  subroutines.  The task processes are MOS processes
 which can only be used in the environment described  in
 this note, while the subroutines which are written in c
 and compatible under UNIX are more generally usable.
   Character strings  or  text  can  be  converted  into
 vector  format,  so  that an integrated image combining
 picture and text can be formed.
   The following table lists these  conversion  modules,
 including  their  functions and descriptions (which can
 be found in Appendix 3).




                         - 34 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 module  type          from          to      description
 decomp  process       dacom         vector   decomp(fax)
 recomp  process       vector        dacom    recomp(fax)
 ccitt   process       vector        t4       ccitt(fax)
                       t4            vector
 bitmap  subroutine    vector        bitmap    bit-map(fax)
 tovec   subroutine    bitmap        vector    tovec(fax)
 ts      subroutine    ASCII string  vector   ts(fax)
 string  process       ASCII string  vector   string(fax)
 tf      process       text          vector   tf(fax)


   Since each DACOM block contains a  Cyclic  Redundancy
 Check  (CRC)  field,  the  system supplies a subroutine
 crc()  to  calculate  or  check  the  CRC  code.   (see
 crc(fax))
   If a vector file  is  to  be  printed  on  the  DACOM
 facsimile   machine,  the  image  data  should  be  re-
 compressed into the DACOM-block  format,  the  required
 command string being shown below.


 fs"e,pic|recomp|fax"w
 where   fs     - file system task
         e      - read an existing file
     ic    - file name
         recomp - re-compression task
         fax    - interface task for facsimile machine
         w      - print an image on facsimile machine


 4.7 Image Manipulation
   Four processing task processes are  provided  in  the
 system.  These are:
  (1) Chop, which applies a defined window to the  input
      image.
  (2) Scale, which enlarges or shrinks the  input  image
      to the defined dimensions.
  (3) Merge, which puts the input image on the specified
      area of a background image.



                         - 35 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

  (4) Clean, which removes the noise on the input image.
   The Clean and  Simple  interfaces  are  supported  in
 these processing tasks so that the tasks can be used in
 command strings.  However, these tasks can  be  neither
 source  nor  sink in a command string.  The data format
 of their input and output is vector.
   For example, a facsimile page can be cleaned and then
 printed  on  the facsimile machine. Note that the image
 data must be recompressed  before  being  sent  to  the
 facsimile  machine. If the original data is the form of
 DACOM  block,  it  has  to  be  decompressed   as   the
 processing   tasks   only  accept  line  vectors.   The
 required command string is shown below.


 fs"e,page|clean|recomp|fax"w
 where   fs     - file system task
         e      - read an existing file
         page   - file name
         clean  - cleaning task
         recomp - re-compression task
         fax    - interface task for facsimile machine
         w      - print an image on facsimile machine


   The descriptions of these  processing  tasks  can  be
 found in Appendix 2 (chop(fax), scale(fax), merge(fax),
 and clean(fax)).
   In tasks 'chop' and  'merge',  a  window  is  set  by
 giving  the coordinates of its vertices. However, it is
 usually rather difficult for a human user to decide the
 exact  coordinates.  The  system  supplies a subroutine
 choice() which specifies a rectangular subsection of an
 image  by  interactive  manipulations  of a rectangular
 subsection  on  the  screen  of  the  Grinnell  display
 displaying the image.  It provides a set of interactive
 commands whereby a user can intuitively choose an  area
 he  is interested in. Note that this subroutine must be
 called by a MOS process and the Grinnell  display  must
 be included in the system.
   By means of these image processing modules, the image
 editing  described  in  section 2.4 can be carried out.
 Let us consider an example. An image abstracted from  a
 picture  'a'  is  to be merged onto a specified area of
 another picture 'b'. First of all, the two pictures 'a'



                         - 36 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 and 'b' should be displayed on the left half and  right
 half  of  the screen, respectively. Assume that the two
 pictures are standard DACOM pages whose dimensions  are
 1726x1200.  They have to be shrunk to fit the dimension
 of the half screen (256x512).  Note that  if  the  data
 format  is not vector, conversion should be carried out
 first.  the required command strings are:


e,a|scale"1726,1200,256,512|grinnell"0,511,255,0,z,g

 fs"e,b|scale"1726,1200,256,512|grinnell"256,511,511,0,z,b
 where   fs            - file system task
         e             - read an existing file
         a             - file name
         b             - file name
         scale         - scale task
         1726,1200     - old dimension
         256,512       - new dimension
         grinnell       - grinnell display interface task
         0,511,255,0   - presentation area (the left half)
         256,511,511,0 - presentation area (the right half)
         z             - zero write mode
         g             - green
         b             - blue


   In an application process, the subroutine choice() is
 called in the following ways for the user to choose the
 areas on both pictures.













                         - 37 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 choice(r, 1726, 1200, 1, 0, 0);
         /* choice the area on 'a' */
         /* r    - red
            1726 - width of the original picture
            1200 - height of the original picture
            1    - left half of the screen
            0    - the subsection can be of any width
            0    - the subsection can be of any height
          */
 choice(r, 1726, 1200, 2, 0, 0);
         /* choice the area on 'b' */
         /* r    - red
            1726 - width of the original picture
            1200 - height of the original picture
            2    - right half of the screen
            0    - the subsection can be of any width
            0    - the subsection can be of any height
          */


   When the user finishes editing,  the  coordinates  of
 the  chosen  rectangular areas are returned. An example
 is given in the table below.  The  widths  and  heights
 listed  in  the  table are actually calculated from the
 coordinates returned and they indicate that the  source
 image has to be enlarged to fit its destination.


          (0, 0)
            +-------------------------------> x
            |
            |  (x0, y0)     w
            |     +--------------------+
            |     !                    !
            |     !                    !
            |     !                    ! h
            |     !                    !
            |     !                    !
            |     +--------------------+
            |                       (x1, y1)
            V
            y
 original   x0      y0      x1      y1      w       h
    a       30      40     100     120      70      80
    b      100     100    1100    1100    1000    1000





                         - 38 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

   At this stage, our final  goal  can  be  achieved  by
 performing  a  job  specified below. It is assumed that
 the result image is to be stored as a new file 'c'.


 fs"e,a|chop"30,40,100,120|scale"70,80,1000,1000
     |merge"b,0,100,100,1100,1100|fs"c,c
 where   fs                - file system task
         e                 - read an existing file
         a                 - file name
         chop              - chop task
         30,40,100,120     - the area to be abstracted
         scale             - scale task
         70,80             - old dimension
         1000,1000         - new dimension
         merge             - merge task
         b                 - file name of the background image
         0                 - to be overlaid
         100,100,1100,1100 - the area to be overlaid
         fs                - file system task
         c                 - create a new file
         c                 - the name of the file to be
                             created



 4.8 Data Transmission
   In  order  to  transmit  facsimile  image  data  over
 computer  networks,  using the configuration of Fig. 1,
 the Network Independent File Transfer Protocol  [9]  is
 implemented as a MOS task process, the Clean and Simple
 interface of section 3.3  being  supported  [10].  Thus
 this  module  can be used in a command string directly.
 In this case, the module always works in the  initiator
 mode,  though the server mode is supported as well. Its
 description can be found in Appendix 2 (ftp(fax)).
   As  a  network-independent  protocol,  it  employs  a
 transport  service  to communicate across the networks.
 The Clean and Simple interface is  also  used  for  the
 communication  between the module and transport service
 processes.
   Suppose that an image file stored in  a  remote  file
 system is to be printed on the local facsimile machine.
 Assume that the data is  transmitted  via  the  ARPANET
 [21],  Transport Control Protocol (TCP) [28] being used
 as the underlying transport service. As  was  described



                         - 39 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 before, since the  delay  caused  by  the  network  may
 result  in  a  time-out on the local facsimile machine,
 the job should be divided into two subjobs.
  (1) The remote file  is  transmitted  by  using  NIFTP
      module.   However,  instead  of  being  put on the
      facsimile machine directly, the received  data  is
      store in a temporary file.


      ftp"r,b,ucl,fax,pic;tcp:1234,10,3,3,42,4521|fs"c,tmp
      where   ftp - NIFTP task
              t   - receive
              b   - binary
              ucl - remote user name
              fax - remote password
              pic - remote file name
              tcp - transport service process
              parameters for the transport service:
                  1234      - local channel number
                  10,3,3,42 - remote address
                  4521      - channel reserved for the
                              remote server
              fs  - local file system task
              c   - create a new file
              tmp - the name of the file to be created


  (2) The temporary file is read and the image  is  sent
      to  the facsimile machine for printing. Here it is
      assumed the data received is in the form of  DACOM
      block so that no conversion is needed.


      fs"e,tmp|fax"w
      where   fs     - file system task
              e      - read an existing file
              tmp    - file name
              fax    - interface task for facsimile machine
              w      - print an image on facsimile machine


   We are able to  exchange  image  data  with  ISI  and
 COMSAT.  At present DACOM block is the only format that
 can be used as  all  the  three  participants  in  this
 experiment  possess  DACOM  facsimile  machines  and no



                         - 40 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 other data format is available in both ISI and  COMSAT.
 However,  it  is  the  intention  of the ARPA-Facsimile
 community to adopt the CCITT standard for future  work.
 As mentioned earlier, UCL already has this facility.
   Above NIFTP, a simple protocol was  used  to  control
 the  transmission  of facsimile data. In this protocol,
 the format of a facsimile  data  file  was  defined  as
 follows:  Each  DACOM  block was recorded with a 2-byte
 header at the front. This  header  was  composed  of  a
 length-byte   indicating   the   length  of  the  block
 (including the header) and a code-byte  indicating  the
 type  of  the  block.  This  is  shown in the following
 diagram.


         |<--- header ---->|<------ 74 bytes ------->|
         +--------+--------+-------------------------+
         ! length !  code  !       DACOM block       !
         +--------+--------+-------------------------+


   The Length-byte is 76 (decimal) for all DACOM blocks.
 The  code-byte for a setup block is 071 (octal) and 072
 for a data block. A  special  EOP  block  was  used  to
 indicate  the  end  of  a page. This block had only the
 header with the length-byte set to 2 and the  code-byte
 undefined.  A facsimile data file could contain several
 pages, which were separated by EOP blocks.


 5. CONCLUSION
 5.1 Summary
   Though techniques  for  facsimile  transmission  were
 invented  in  1843,  it  was not until the recent years
 that integration with  computer  communication  systems
 gave rise to "great expectation".  The system described
 in  this  note   incarnates   the   compatibility   and
 flexibility of computerised facsimile systems.
   In this system, facsimile no longer refers simply  to
 the  transmission device, but rather to the function of
 transferring hard copy from one place to another.   Not
 only  does  the  system  allow  for  more  reliable and
 accurate document transmission over  computer  networks
 but  images  can  also  be  manipulated electronically.
 Image is converted from one  representation  format  to
 another,  so that different makes of facsimile machines
 can communicate with each other.  It is possible for  a



                         - 41 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 picture to be presented on different  bit-map  devices,
 e.g.  TV-like  screen,  as it can be scaled to overcome
 the incompatibilities.  Moreover, the  system  provides
 windowing   and   overlaying   facilities   whereby   a
 sophisticated editor can be supported.
   One of the most important aspects of this  system  is
 that   text   can  be  converted  into  its  bit-mapped
 representation format  and  integrated  with  pictures.
 Geometric  graphics  could  also  be  included  in  the
 system. Thus, the facsimile  machine  may  serve  as  a
 printer  for  multi-type  documents.  It  is clear that
 facsimile  will  play  an  important  role  in   future
 information processing system.
   As far  as  the  system  per  se  is  concerned,  the
 following  advantages  can  be  recognised.  Though our
 discussion is concentrated  on  the  facsimile  system,
 many  features  developed  here  apply  equally well to
 other information-processing systems.
  (1)  Flexibility:  The  user  jobs   can   be   easily
      organised.  The  only  thing  to  be done for this
      purpose is to  make  the  logical  links  for  the
      appropriate task processes.
  (2) Simplicity: The interface routines are responsible
      for  the  operations  such  as signal handling and
      buffer management.  By avoiding this  burden,  the
      implementation  of the task processes becomes very
      "clean and simple".
  (3) Portability: The interface routines also makes the
      task   processes   totally   independent   of  the
      operating environment.  Only these routines should
      be modified if the environment were changed.
  (4) Ease of extension: The power of the system can  be
      simply  and infinitely extended by adding new task
      processes.
  (5) Distributed  Environment:  This  approach  can  be
      easily  extended  to  a  distributed  environment,
      where limitless hardware  and  software  resources
      can be provided.


 5.2 Problems
   As discussed earlier, the network we were  using  for
 the  experimental  work was not designed for image data



                         - 42 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 transmission.  The data transfer  is  so  slow  that  a
 time-out may be caused on the facsimile machine. Though
 this problem was solved by means of local buffering and
 pictures  were successfully exchanged over the network,
 the slowness is rather  disappointing  because  of  the
 quantity of image data. The measurement showed that the
 throughput was around 500 bits/sec. In other words,  it
 took  at  least  5 minutes to transfer a page. This was
 caused by the network but not our system. The situation
 has been improved recently. However, It is nevertheless
 required that more  efficient  compression  schemes  be
 developed.
   At present, the system must be directly  attached  to
 the  network to be accessed. However, the network ports
 are much demanded, so that frequent reconfiguration  is
 required.
   The facsimile system can be  connected  only  to  the
 local  network,  the  Cambridge Ring, while the foreign
 networks are connected via gateways to the  ring.  This
 is shown in Fig. 12. Now the X25 network is attached to
 the Ring via an X25 gateway, XG [25], while  SATNET  is
 connected by another gateway, SG [25]. Both network are
 at the transport level; XG and SG support the  relevant
 transport  procedures.  In  the  case  of  XG,  this is
 NITS/X25 ([26], [27]); in the case  of  SATNET,  it  is
 TCP/IP ([28], [29]).


 UCL facsimile
   system          - - - - - - - -
 +--------+      /                 \      +------+
 !        ! ----    Cambridge Ring   ---- !  PE  !
 +--------+      \                 /      +------+
                   - - - - - - - -            |
                     /         \              |
               +------+       +------+        |
               !  XG  !       !  SG  ! --- SATNET
               +------+       +------+
               /       \
             PSS    SERC NET
      Fig. 12  Schematic of UCL network connection


   When the network software runs in the same machine as
 the   application   software,   the  Clean  and  Simple
 interface of section  3.5  was  used  as  an  interface
 between  the  modules.  When  the  gateway software was
 removed to a separate machine, an Inter-Processor Clean



                         - 43 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 and  Simple  [30]  was   required.    The   appropriate
 transport   process  is  transferred  to  the  relevant
 gateway, and appropriate facilities are implemented for
 addressing   the   relevant   gateway.  Otherwise,  the
 software has to be little  altered  to  cater  for  the
 distributed case.
   In our experimental work, the following problems were
 also encountered.
  (1) The primary memory of the LSI-11 is so small  that
      we  cannot  build  up  a system to include all the
      modules we have developed.  In order  to  transfer
      an  edited picture using the NIFTP module, we have
      to first  load  an  editor  system  to  input  and
      process  the  picture, and then an NIFTP system is
      then loaded to transmit it.
  (2) The execution of  an  image  processing  procedure
      becomes  very  slow. For example, it takes several
      minutes to shrink a picture to fit the  screen  of
      the  Grinnell  display.  This  prevents the system
      from being widely used in its present form.
  (3) As secondary storage, floppy disks  are  far  from
      adequate  to keep image data files. At present, we
      have two double-density floppy  disk  drives,  the
      capacity  of  each  disk  being  about 630K bytes.
      However, an image page contains at least 50K bytes
      and,  sometimes,  this number may be doubled for a
      rather complex picture.  Only a limited number  of
      pages can be stored.
   On the other hand, in our  department,  we  have  two
 PDP11-44s   running  UNIX  together  with  large  disks
 supplying abundant file storage. Their processing speed
 is  much  higher  than  that of the LSIs. The UNIX file
 system  supports   a   very   convenient   information-
 management environment. This inspired the idea that the
 UNIX file system could pretend  to  be  a  file  server
 responsible for storing and managing the image data, so
 that all the processing tasks may  be  carried  out  on
 UNIX. Not only does this immediately solve the problems
 listed above, but the following  additional  advantages
 immediately accrue.


  (1) UNIX provides a  far  better  software-development
      environment than LSI MOS ever can or will.
  (2) The facsimile service can be enhanced to  be  able



                         - 44 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

      to support many users at a time.
  (3) The UNIX file system is so sophisticated that more
      complex data entities can be handled.
   In  fact  the  44s  and  the  LSI-11,  to  which  the
 facsimile  machine  and  Grinnell display are attached,
 are  all  connected  to  the  UCL  Cambridge  Ring.   A
 distributed  processing  environment  can  be  built up
 where a job in one computer can be initiated by another
 and  then the job will be carried out by cooperation of
 both computers.
   In such  a  distributed  system,  the  LSI-11  micro-
 computer,   together   with   the   facsimile  machine,
 constitutes  a   totally   passive   facsimile   server
 controlled  by  a  UNIX  user.  A  page  is read on the
 facsimile machine and the image data stream produced is
 transmitted to the UNIX via the ring. The image data is
 stored  as  a  UNIX  file  and  may  be  processed   if
 necessary.  It  can  also  be  sent via the ring to the
 facsimile server where it  will  be  reprinted  on  the
 facsimile machine.
   In order to build up such a distributed  environment,
 IPCS  [30] is far from adequate for this purpose, as it
 does not provide any facility for a remote  job  to  be
 organised.  In  our  system, the task controller can be
 modified so that the command strings  can  be  supplied
 from  a remote host on the network. Having accepted the
 request, the task  controller  organises  the  relevant
 task  chain and the requested job is executed under its
 control.  The execution  of  the  distributed  job  may
 require  synchronisation  between  the  two  computers.
 These problems are discussed in detail in [31].
   Generally speaking, a distributed system based  on  a
 local network, which supplies cheap, fast, and reliable
 communication, could be the ultimate  solution  of  the
 operational problems discussed in this section. In such
 a system, different system operations are  carried  out
 in the most suitable places.
   For the time being, only a  procedure-oriented  task-
 control  language  is  available  in  this system.  The
 command string of the fitter  can  be  typed  from  the
 system  console  directly,  the corresponding job being
 organised and executed.  Theoretically, this  is  quite
 enough   to  cope  with  any  requirement  of  a  user.
 However,  when  the  job  is  complex,  command  typing
 becomes very tedious and prone to error.



                         - 45 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

   Above the task-controller, a job-controller layer  is
 required  which  provides  a  problem-oriented language
 whereby the user can easily put forward his requirement
 to  the  system.  On receipt of such a command, the job
 controller translates it into a command string  of  the
 task  controller  and  passes  the  string  to the task
 controller so  that  operation  request  can  be  done.
 Sometimes,  one  job  has  to  be  divided into several
 subjobs, which are to be dealt  with  separately.   The
 job  controller  should  be  also  responsible for high
 level calculation and management, so that the user need
 not be concerned with system details.
   In the  system  supporting  facsimile  service  under
 UNIX,  a  set  of high-level command is provided, while
 the command  strings  for  the  facsimile  station  are
 arranged automatically and they are totally hidden from
 a UNIX user.


 5.3 Future Study
   At the next stage, our attention should be moved to a
 higher-level,  more sophisticated system which supports
 a multi-type environment. In such a  system,  not  only
 does   the  facsimile  machine  work  as  an  facsimile
 input/output device, but it should also play  the  role
 of  a  printer  for  the  multi-type  document. This is
 because other data types, e.g. coded character text and
 geometric  graphics  can  be easily converted into bit-
 mapped graphics format which the facsimile  machine  is
 able to accept.
   First of all, a data structure should be designed  to
 represent  multi-type  information.  In  a  distributed
 environment, such a structure should be understood  all
 over  the  system,  so  that multi-media message can be
 exchanged.
   In a future  system,  different  services  should  be
 supported,   including  viewdata,  Teletex,  facsimile,
 graphics,  slow-scan  TV  and  speech.  The  techniques
 developed  for facsimile will be generalised for use of
 other bit-mapped image representations, such  as  slow-
 scan TV.
   To improve the performance of the  facsimile  system,
 we  are  investigating  how  we  could use an auxiliary
 special purpose processor to perform some of the  image
 processing   operations.   Such  a  processor  will  be
 essential for the higher data rate  involved  in  slow-



                         - 46 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 scan TV.




























                         - 47 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

                        Reference


  [1] P. T. Kirstein, "The Role of Facsimile in Business
      Communication", INDRA Note 1047, Jan. 1981.
  [2]  T.  Chang,  "A  Proposed  Configuration  of   the
      Facsimile station", INDRA Note 922, May, 1980.
  [3] T.  Chang,  "Data  Structure  and  Procedures  for
      Facsimile Signal Processing", INDRA Note 923, May,
      1980.
  [4] S. Treadwell,  "On  Distorting  Facsimile  Image",
      INDRA Note No 762, June, 1979.
  [5] M. G. B. Ismail and R.  J.  Clarke,  "A  New  Pre-
      Processing   Techniques   for   Digital  Facsimile
      Transmission", Dept.  of  Electronic  Engineering,
      University of Technology, Loughborough.
  [6]  T.  Chang,  "Mask  Scanning  Algorithm  and   Its
      Application", INDRA Note 924, June, 1980.
  [7] M. Kunt and O. Johnsen, "Block Coding of Graphics:
      A  Tutorial  Review",  Proceedings  of  the  IEEE,
      special issue on  digital  encoding  of  graphics,
      Vol. 68, No 7, July, 1980.
  [8]  T.  Chang,   "Facsimile   Data   Compression   by
      Predictive  Encoding",  INDRA  Note  No  978, May.
      1980.
  [9] High Level Protocol Group, "A Network  Independent
      File  Transfer  Protocol",  HLP/CP(78)1, alos INWG
      Protocol Note 86, Dec. 1978.
 [10] T. Chang, "The Implementation of NIFTP on LSI-11",
      INDRA Note 1056, Mar. 1981.
 [11] T. Chang, "The  Design  and  Implementation  of  a
      Computerised  Facsimile  System",  INDRA  Note No.
      1184, Apr. 1981.
 [12] T. Chang, "The Facsimile Editor", INDRA Note 1085,
      Apr. 1981.
 [13]  K.  Jackson,  "Facsimile   Compression",  Project
      Report,  Dept.  of  Computer  Science,  UCL, June,
      1981.



                         - 48 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

 [14] R. Cole and S. Treadwell, "MOS User Guide",  INDRA
      Note 1042, Jan. 1981.
 [15] CCITT,  "Recommendation  T.4,  Standardisation  of
      Group   3   Facsimile   Apparatus   for   Document
      Transmission", Geneva, 1980.
 [16]  "DACOM  6450  Computerfax  Transceiver   Operator
      Instructions", DACOM, Mar. 1977.
 [17] "AED 6200LP Floppy Disk Storage System", Technical
      Manual,  105499-01A,  Advanced Electronics Design,
      Inc. Feb. 1977.
 [18] "The User Manual for Grinnelll Colour Display".
 [19] D. R. Weber,  "An  Adaptive  Run  Length  Encoding
      Algorithm", ICC-75.
 [20] R. Braden and P. L. Higginson, "Clean  and  Simple
      Interface  under  MOS",  INDRA Note No. 1054, Feb.
      1981.
 [21] L. G. Roberts et al, "The ARPA Computer  Network",
      Computer  Communication  Networks,  Prentice Hall,
      Englewood, pp485-500, 1973.
 [22] I. M. Jacobs et  al:  "General  Purpose  Satellite
      Network",   Proc.   IEEE,   Vol.   66,   No.   11,
      pp1448-1467, 1978.
 [23] J.  W.  Burren  et  al,  "Design  fo  an  SRC/NERC
      Computer   Network",   RL   77-0371A,   Rutherford
      Laboratory, 1977.
 [24] P. T. F.  Kelly,  "Non-Voice  Network  Services  -
      Future     Plans",     Proc.     Conf.    Business
      Telecommunications, Online, pp62-82, 1980.
 [25] P. T. Kirstein, "UK-US  Collaborative  Computing",
      INDRA Note No. 972, Aug. 1980.
 [26] "A Network  Independent  Transport  Service",  PSS
      User   Forum,  Study  Group  3,  British  Telecom,
      London, 1980.
 [27] CCITT, Recommendation X3,  X25,  X28  and  X29  on
      Packet Switched Data Services", Geneva 1978.
 [28]  "DoD  Standard  Transmission  Control  Protocol",
      RFC761,  Information  Sciences  Inst.,  Marina del



                         - 49 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185

      Rey, 1979.
 [29]  "DoD   Standard   Internet   Protocol",   RFC760,
      Information Sciences Inst., Marina del Rey, 1979.
 [30] P. L. Higginson, "The Orgainisation of the Current
      IPCS System", INDRA Note No. 1163, Oct. 1981.
 [31] T. Chang, "Distributed Processing for  LSIs  under
      MOS", INDRA Note No. 1199, Jan. 1982.























                         - 50 -

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185











                 Appendix I: Devices












AED62(DEV) AED62(DEV)



NAME

 aed62 - double density floppy disk

SYNOPSIS

 DCT aed62
 setdct("aed62", 0170, 0170450, 0170450,
         aedini, aedsio, aedint, 0);

DESCRIPTION

 The Double Density disks contain 77 tracks numbered  from  0
 to  76.  There  are 16 sectors (sometimes called blocks) per
 track, for a total of 1232 sectors on each side of the disk.
 These  are  numbered  0  to  1231.  Each sector contains 512
 bytes, for a total of 630,784 bytes  on  each  side  of  the
 floppy.
 Only one side of the floppy can be accessed at a time. There
 is  only one head per drive, and it is located on the under-
 side of the disk. To access the other side, the disk must be
 manually removed and inserted the other way up.
 Each block is actually two blocks on the disk:  an  adddress
 ID  block  and the data block.  The address ID block is used
 by the hardware and contains the  track  number,  the  block
 number and the size of the data block that follows.  When an
 operation is to take place, the seek mechanism first locates
 the  block  by  reading  the address ID blocks and literally
 'hunting' for the correct one. It will  hunt  for  up  to  2
 seconds before reporting a failure.
 Both the address ID and the data blocks are  followed  by  a
 checksum word that is maintained by the hardware and is hid-
 den from the user. On writing, the  checksum  is  calculated
 and  appended  to the block. On reading it is verified (both
 on reading the ID and data blocks) and any error is reported
 as  a  Data Check. No checking on the data block takes place
 on a write, and the hardware has no idea if it  was  written
 correctly. The only way to verify it is to read it.
 Although there are two drives in the unit,  they  cannot  be
 used  simultaneously. If an operation is in progress on one,
 no access can be made to the other until the first operation
 is  complete. The driver will queue requests for both drives
 however, and ensure that are performed in order.
 The MOS driver is called aed62.obj. It operates on the  fol-
 lowing IORB entries:

AED62(DEV) AED62(DEV)


 irfnc
      The operation to be performed, as follows:
                      0 - Read
                      1 - Write
                      2 - Verify
                      3 - Seek
      Read and Write cause data to be transferred to and from
      disk.  Verify does a hardware read without transferring
      the data to memory and is used for verifying  that  the
      data  can be successfully read. The checksum at the end
      of  the  block  of  each  sector  is  verified  by  the
      hardware.  The  seek  command  is used to move the disk
      heads to a specified track.
 irusr1
      The drive number. Only Zero or One is accepted. This is
      matched  against the number dialed on the drive. If the
      number is specified  on  both  drives,  or  neither,  a
      hardware error will be reported.
 irusr2
      The Sector or Block Number. Must be in the range  0  to
      1231 inclusive.  irusr2 specifies the block number that
      the transfer is to begin at for Read and Write, the be-
      ginning  of  the  verified area for the Verify command,
      and the position of the head for the Seek  command.  In
      the  latter  case  the  head  will be positioned to the
      track that contains the block.
 iruva
      This specifies the data  adress,  which  must  be  even
      (word  boundary).   If an odd address is given, the low
      order bit is set to zero to make it even. Not  required
      for the Seek or Verify commands.
 irbr
      Transfer length as a positive number of bytes. Not  re-
      quired for the seek command, bit IS used by Verify com-
      mand so that the correct number of blocks may be  veri-
      fied.  The disk is only capable of transferring an even
      number of bytes. If an odd length is given the low ord-
      er  bit  is made zero to reduce the length to the lower
      even value.  The length is NOT restricted to the sector
      size  of  512 bytes. If the length is greater than 512,
      successive blocks are read/written until  the  required
      transfer



      length has been satisfied. If the length is not an  ex-
      act  multiple  of  512 bytes, only the specified length
      will be read/written. Note  that  the  hardware  always
      reads  and  writes  a  complete sector, so specifying a
      shorter length on a read will cause  the  remainder  of
      the  block to be skipped. On a write, the hardware will
      repeat the last specified  word  until  the  sector  is
      full.
 The driver will attempt to recover  from  all  soft  errors.
 There  is no automatic write/read verify as on mag tapes, so
 that data that is incorrectly written will not  be  detected
 as such until a read is attempted. For this reason, the ver-
 ify feature can be used (see above) to force the checking of
 written  data.  When an error is detected while performing a
 read, the offending block will be re-read up to 16 times and
 disk  resets  will be attempted during this time too. If all
 fails a hardware error indication is returned to  the  user.
 Other errors possible are Protection Error (attempt to write
 to a read-only disk) and User Error,  which  indicates  that
 the  parameters  in  the IORB were incorrect. Errors such as
 there being no disk loaded, or the drive door being open are
 NOT  detectable  by the program. The interface sees these as
 Seek Errors (i.e. soft errors), and thus the driver will re-
 try  several times before returning a Hardware Error indica-
 tion to the user. It should be noted that error recovery can
 take  a  long  time. As mentioned above, there is a 2 second
 delay before a seek error is reported by the  hardware,  for
 instance.












GRINNELL(DEV) GRINNELL(DEV)



NAME

 grinnell - colour display

SYNOPSIS

 DCT grndout
 setdct("grndout", 03000, 0172520, 0172522,
         grnoi, grnot, grnoti, &grndin);
 DCT grndin
 setdct("grndin", 03000, 0172524, 0172526,
         grnoi, grnot, grnoti, &grndout);

DESCRIPTION

 The Grinnell colour display has a screen  of  512x512  pels.
 Three colours (red, green and blue) can be used, but no grey
 scale is supported.  Three  graphics  modes  are  available.
 These are:
  (1) Alphanumeric: The input ASCII characters are  displayed
      at the selected positions on the screen.
  (2) Graphic: Basic geometric elements,  such  as  line  and
      rectangle, are drawn by means of graphics commands.
  (3) Image: The input data is interpreted as  bit  patterns,
      the corresponding images being illustrated.
 The values used to construct commands are described  in  the
 Grinnell User Manual. They are also listed below.
  #define LDC     0100000   /* Load Display Channels */
  #define LSM     0010000   /* Load Subchannel Mask */
  #define   RED   0000010   /* Read Subchannel */
  #define   GREEN 0000020   /* Green subchannel */
  #define   BLUE  0000040   /* Blue subchannel */
  #define WID     0000000   /* Write Image Data */
  #define WGD     0020000   /* Write Graphic Data */
  #define WAC     0022000   /* Write AlphanumCh */
  #define LWM     0024000   /* Load Write Mode */
  #define   REVERSE  0200   /* Reverse Background */
  #define   ADDITIVE 0100   /* Additive (not Replace) */
  #define   ZEROWRITE 040   /* Dark Write */
  #define   VECTOR    020   /* Select Vector Graph */
  #define   DBLEHITE  010   /* Double Height write */
  #define   DBLEWIDTH 004   /* Double Width write */
  #define   CURSORAB  002   /* Cursor (La+Lb,Ea+Eb) */

GRINNELL(DEV) GRINNELL(DEV)


  #define   CURSORON  001   /* Cursor On */
  #define LUM     0026000   /* Load Update Mode */
  #define   Ec        001   /* Load Ea with Ec */
  #define   Ea_Eb     002   /* Load Ea with Ea + Eb */
  #define   Ea_Ec     003   /* load Ea with Ea + Ec */
  #define   Lc        004   /* Load La with Lc */
  #define   La_Lb     010   /* Load La with La + Lb */
  #define   La_Lc     014   /* Load La with La + Lc */
  #define   SRCL_HOME 020   /* Scroll dsiplay to HOME */
  #define   SRCL_DOWN 040   /* Scroll down one line */
  #define   SCRL_UP   060   /* Scroll up one line */
  #define ERS     0030000   /* Erase */
  #define ERL     0032000   /* Erase Line */
  #define SLU     0034000   /* Special Location Update */
  #define   SCRL_ZAP 0100   /* unlimited scroll speed */
  #define EGW     0036000   /* Execute Graphic Write */
  #define LER     0040000   /* Load Ea relative */
  #define LEA     0044000   /* Load Ea */
  #define LEB     0050000   /* Load Eb */
  #define LEC     0054000   /* Load Ec */
  #define LLR     0060000   /* Load La Relative */
  #define LLA     0064000   /* Load La */
  #define LLB     0070000   /* Load Lb */
  #define LLC     0074000   /* Load Lc */
  #define   LGW     02000   /* perform write */
  #define NOP     0110000   /* No-Operation */
  #define SPD     0120000   /* Select Special Device */
  #define LPA     0130000   /* Load Peripheral Address */
  #define LPR     0140000   /* Load Peripheral Register */
  #define LPD     0150000   /* Load Peripheral Data */
  #define RPD     0160000   /* ReadBack Peripheral Data */
  #define MEMRB     00400   /* SPD - Memory Read-Back */
  #define DATA      01000   /* SPD - Byte Unpacking */
  #define   ALPHA   06000   /* LPR - Alphanumeric data */
  #define   GRAPH   04000   /* LPR - Graphic data */
  #define   IMAGE   02000   /* LPR - Image data */
  #define   LTHENH  01000   /* take lo byte then hi byte */
  #define   DROPBYTE 0400   /* drop last byte */
  #define INTERR    02000   /* SPD - Interrupt Enable */
  #define TEST      04000   /* SPD - Diagnostic Test */
 The MOS driver is called grin.obj. It operates on  the  fol-
 lowing IORB entries.
 iruva
      This is a pointer to  the  buffer  where  the  data  is
      stored.

GRINNELL(DEV) GRINNELL(DEV)


      This data must be ready formtatted  for  the  Grinnell,
      since no conversion is performed by the driver.
 irbr
      This transfer length as a positive number of bytes.
 Addressing the grinnell. Rows consist of elments numbered  0
 to 511 running left to right. The lines are number from 0 to
 511 running from bottom to top. It is thus  addressed  as  a
 conventional  X-Y  coordinate system. Note that this coordi-

e system is different the one used for the image.

    X A
      |
      |                                 (511, 511)
  511 +-------------------------------+
      |                               |
      |                               |
      |                               |
      |                               |
      |             (x, y)            |
      |            +                  |
      |                               |
      |                               |
      |                               |
      |                               |
      |                               |
      +-------------------------------+----->
     0                               511    Y

SEE ALSO

 grinnell(fax)










DACOM(DEV) DACOM(DEV)



NAME

 dacom - facsimile machine

SYNOPSIS

 DCT faxinput
 setdct("faxin", 0350, 0174750, 0174740,
         faxii, faxin, faxini, &faxoutput);
 DCT faxoutput
 setdct("faxout", 0354, 0174752, 0174742,
         faxoi, faxot, faxoti, &faxinput);

DESCRIPTION

 The DACOM facsimile machine can read  a  document,  creating
 the  corresponding image data blocks. It can also accept the
 data of relevant format, printing the correponding image.
 Each data block consists of 585 bits, and  is  stored  in  a
 block  of  74 bytes starting on a byte boundary. The final 7
 bits of the last byte are not used and they  are  undefined.
 The  585 bits in each block need to be read as a bit stream:
 the bits in each byte run from the high  orger  end  of  the
 byte  to the low order end. The last 12 bits of the 585 bits
 in each block consistute the CRC field whereby the block can
 be validated.
 There are two kinds of blocks: SETUP blocks and DATA blocks.
 The  first of block of an image data file should be a single
 SETUP block. All following blocks in the file must  be  DATA
 blocks. Note that the second block is a DATA block that con-
 tains ZERO samples, i.e. a dummy data blocks. Form the third
 block, the DATA blocks store the reall image data.
 A standard dacom page contains about 1200 scan  lines,  each
 of which has 1726 pels. One can choose

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185











      Appendix II: Task Controller and Task Processes
















CCITT(FAX) CCITT(FAX)



NAME

 ccitt - conversion between vector and CCITT T4 format

SYNOPSIS

 ccitt() - a MOS task
 command string (task name is defined as ccitt):
 ccitt"<function>

DESCRIPTION

 This routine operates as a MOS pipe task to convert the vec-
 tors to CCITT T4 format or inversely.
 The parameter function specifies what the task is to do.
  value           function
   1c             one-dimensional compression
   1d             one-dimensional decompression
   2c[<k>]        two-dimensional compression
   2d             two-dimensional decompression
 Note k is the maximun number  of  lines  to  be  coded  two-
 dimensionally  before  a one-dimensionally coded line is in-
 serted. If k is omitted, the default value 2 is adopted.

SEE ALSO

 vector(fax), t4(fax), fitter(fax)










CHECK(FAX) CHECK(FAX)



NAME

 check - check the validity of a vector file.

SYNOPSIS

 check() - a MOS task
 command string (the task name is defined as check):
 check"<function>,<width>,<height>,[<from>,<to>]

DESCRIPTION

 This routine operates as a MOS pipe task checking the  vali-
 dity of the input vector file.
 The number of lines to be checked is specified by the param-
 eter  height.   If  the height of the image is less than the
 parameter, the actual height is printed. Thus, one  can  set
 the  parameter  height to a big number in order to count the
 number of lines of the input image.
 The run lengths in each of these lines are  accumulated  and
 the sum is compared with the parameter width.
 These are the basic functions which are  performed  whenever
 the  task is invoked. However, there are several options one
 can choose by setting the one-character parameter function.
  value         function
   'n'          basic function only
   'c'          print the count of each line
   'l'          print all lines
   's'          print the lines in the interval
                specified by parameter from and to

DIAGNOSTICS

 A bad line will be reported and it will cause the job abort-
 ed.

SEE ALSO

 vector(fax), getl(fax), fitter(fax)




CHOP(FAX) CHOP(FAX)



NAME

 chop - extract a designated rectangular area from an image

SYNOPSIS

 chop() - a MOS task
 command string (task name is defined as chop):
 chop"<x0>,<y0>,<x1>,<y1>

DESCRIPTION

 This routine operates as a MOS pipe task extracting a desig-
 nated  rectangular area from an input image.  Input and out-
 put are image data files in the form of vectors.
 The following diagram  shows  the  coordinate  system  being
 used.  Note that the lengths are measured in number of pels.
      (0, 0)                     width  X
         +-------------------------+---->
         |                         |
         |                         |
         |   (x0, y0)              |
         |     +---------+         |
         |     |         |         |
         |     |         |         |
         |     |         |         |
         |     |         |         |
         |     |         |         |
         |     |         |         |
         |     |         |         |
         |     +---------+         |
         |            (x1, y1)     |
         |                         |
         |                         |
         |                         |
         |                         |
  height +-------------------------+
         |
         |
       Y V
 As can be seen in the diagram, the rectangular  area  to  be
 extracted  is  specified  by  the parameters x0, x1, y0, y1,
 which are decimal strings.

BUGS

 One has to make sure that

CHOP(FAX) CHOP(FAX)


         0 < x0 < width
         0 < y0 < height
         0 < x1 < width
         0 < y1 < height

SEE ALSO

 vector(fax), getl(fax), putl(fax), fitter(fax)























CLEAN(FAX) CLEAN(FAX)



NAME

 clean - clean an image.

SYNOPSIS

 clean() - a MOS task
 command string (task name is defined as clean):
 clean"<width>,<height>

DESCRIPTION

 This routine operates as a MOS pipe task cleaning  an  image
 by  means of mask scanning.  Input and output are image data
 files in the form of vectors.
 The width and height should be given as the parameters.

SEE ALSO

 vector(fax), getl(fax), putl(fax), fitter(fax)















DECOMP(FAX) DECOMP(FAX)



NAME

 decomp - decompress DACOM blocks

SYNOPSIS

 decomp() - a MOS task
 command string (task name is defined as decomp):
 decomp

DESCRIPTION

 This task takes DACOM blocks from the Clean and  Simple  in-
 terface,  and  decompresses them into vector format. Then it
 writes the vectors to the Clean and Simple interface.

SEE ALSO

 dacom(dev), vector(fax), fitter(fax)
















FAX(FAX) FAX(FAX)



NAME

 fax - interface process for DACOM facsimile machine

SYNOPSIS

 fax() - a MOS task
 command string (task name is defined as fax):
 fax"<function>

DESCRIPTION

 This task uses the Clean and Simple  interface  to  read  or
 write facsimile image data.
 The one character parameter function specifies  whether  the
 data  is  to be read or written. Character w is for writing.
 In this case, 74 byte DACOM  blocks  contaning  correct  CRC
 fields  are  expected. On the other hand, character r is for
 reading. In this case, a document is read on  the  facsimile
 machine, the DACOM blocks being created.

SEE ALSO

 dacom(dev), fitter(fax)













FITTER(FAX) FITTER(FAX)



NAME

 fitter - fit processes together to form a data pipe

SYNOPSIS

 fitter() - the MOS task controller

DESCRIPTION

 According to the command string typed on the console, fitter
 links the specified processes together to form a task chain.
 The name of the processes is the name given in the PCB.  The
 processes must communicate using the C+S interface. Only one
 C+S interface is opened per process - data is pushed in with
 a cswrite and pulled out with a csread.  The fitter does not
 inspect the data in any way but merely passes  it  from  one
 process to another.
 The format of command string is:
         A | B | C.
 The fitter takes data from the process called A, write it to
 the  process  called  B,  reads  data from the process B and
 write that data to the process  C.   Note  that  all  middle
 processes  are both read and written, while the first one in
 the list is only read from and the last in the list is  only
 written to.
 A double quote is used as the  separator  between  the  task
 name and the open parameter string, e.g.
         A"500 | B"n,xyz | C,
 where the strings '500' and 'n,xyz' are the  open  parameter
 stings  for  tasks  A  and  B,  respectively.  The parameter
 stirng is passed to the corresponding task routine when  the
 csopen call returns.

DIAGNOSTICS

 The command string containing undefined task will be reject-
 ed.

SEE ALSO

 csinit(fax), csopen(fax), csread(fax), cswrite(fax)


FS(FAX) FS(FAX)



NAME

 fs - file system for use under MOS

SYNOPSIS

 fs() - a MOS task
 command string (task name is defined as fs):
 fs"<funciton>,<file_name>

DESCRIPTION

 This is a file system, based on the  Double  Density  floppy
 disk,  for use under MOS. The fs task is used for manipulate
 the files, managed by the file system. This  task  can  only
 appear at the first or last position on a command string. In
 the former case, the file specified is to be read, while the
 file is to be written in the latter case.
 The <function> field contains only one character  indicating
 the function to be performed. The possible values are:
         e - open an existing file (for reading).
         c - open an existing file, and set the length
                   to zero (for rewriting).
         a - append to an existing file.
 If the capitals A, C, and E are used, the functions are  the
 same as described above but the specified file is created if
 it does not exist.

BUGS

 This task is for reading and writing only. As for the  other
 facilities,  e.g.  seek, delete, status and sync, one has to
 use C+S interface directly.
 Note that only 15 files are permitted per disk, only drive 0
 is  supported  at  present, and no hierarchical directory is
 allowed.

SEE ALSO

 aed62(dev), fitter(fax)




FTP(FAX) FTP(FAX)



NAME

 ftp, pftp - NIFTP task processes

SYNOPSIS

 ftp(), pftp() - MOS tasks
 command string (task name is defined as ftp):
 ftp"<function>,,<user_name>,<password>,<file_name>;
     <trasport_service_process>:<transport_service_parameters>

DESCRIPTION

 These tasks are implementation of Network  Independent  File
 Transfer  Protocol (NIFTP) for LSIs under MOS. They employ a
 transport service for communication with a  remote  host  on
 the network, where the same protocol must be supported. They
 communicate with the  user  process  and  transport  service
 processes  thourgh  the  Clean and Simple interface, so that
 they can be used in a fitter command chain directly.
 The code is available in two versions: ftp which  is  a  P+Q
 version supporting both server and intitiator and pftp which
 is a P version working only as an initiator.  Both  of  them
 are capable of sending and receiving.
 This implementation of NIFTP is just a subset of the  proto-
 col  as its main purpose is to provided the facsimile system
 with a data transmission mechanism. For the sake of  simpli-
 city,  only  the  necessary  facilities  are included in the
 module, while more complex facilities, such as data compres-
 sion  and  error recovery are not implemented. The following
 table shows the transfer control parameters being used.
  Attribute       Value Mod. Remarks
  Mode of access  0001  EQ   Creating a new file
                  8002  EQ   Retrieving file
  Codes            -    -    Text file, any parity
                  1002  EQ   Binary file
  Format effector 0000  EQ   No interpretation
  Binary mapping  0008  EQ   Default byte size
  Max record size 00FC  EQ   Default record size
  Transfer size   0400  LE   Default transfer size
  Facilities      0000  EQ   Minimum service
 The meanings of the parameters in  the  command  string  are
 listed below:
 function is the NIFTP function of our site. Any ASCII string
 beginning

FTP(FAX) FTP(FAX)


 beginning with 't' means the file is to  be  transmitted  to
 the remote site.  Otherwise, the file will be retrieved from
 the remote site.
 code specifies the type of the file to be  transferred.  Any
 ASCII  string  beginning with 'b' means it is a binary file,
 while others mean text file.
 user_name is the login name of the server site.
 password is the password of the server site.
 file_name is the name of the file to be transmitted.
 transport_service_process is the process name of  the  tran-
 sport service to be used.
 transport_service_parameters are the  parameter  string  re-
 quired by the transport service.  They are network dependent
 and specified by the corresponding transport service.

SEE ALSO

 fitter(fax)















GRINNELL(FAX) GRINNELL(FAX)



NAME

 grinnell - task to convert and display fax vector data

SYNOPSIS

 grinnell() - a MOS task
 command string (task name is defined as string):
 grinnell"<x0>,<y0>,<x1>,<y1>,<mode>,<colour>

DESCRIPTION

 This task takes the vector data from a Clean and Simple  in-
 terface and displays it on the Grinnell screen. The Grinnell
 screen is viewed as an X-Y plane with (0,0) being the  lower
 left  hand  corner,  (512,  0)  being  the  lower right hand
 corner, etc.
 The parameters x0, y0, x1, y1 are decimal  strings  defining
 the rectangular space on the screen where the image is to be
 displayed. If the image is smaller than this area, it is ar-
 tificially  expanded  to the size of this area. If the image
 is larger than this area it is truncated to the size of  the
 area.
 The colour field consists of any combination of the  charac-
 ters  r,g  or  b  to  define the colours red, green and blue
 respectively. For instance "gb" would  write  the  image  as
 yellow.
 The mode defines how the image is to be displayed. Any  com-
 bination  of  the  characters  r,a and z may be used, to the
 following effect:
         r = reverse image
         a = additive image
         z = zerowrite image.
 There are three bit planes to define the three colours. Nor-
 mally  the  bit planes corresponding to the selected colours
 have either zero bits or one bits written to them  depending
 upon  whether  the image or the background is being written.
 For zerowrite, all non-selected bit planes  (i.e.   colours)
 are  always set to zero, thus erasing any unselected colours
 in the area. Additive mode means that in the selected colour
 planes  the  new bits are ORed in, rather than just written.
 Thus the image is added to. In reverse mode, the image writ-
 ten as one bits is written as zero bits and the bits written
 as zero bits are written as one  bits,  i.e.  the  bits  are
 flipped before being used.

GRINNELL(FAX) GRINNELL(FAX)



SEE ALSO

 grinnell(dev), vector(fax), fitter(fax)

























MERGE(FAX) MERGE(FAX)



NAME

 merge - merge two images together

SYNOPSIS

 merge() - a MOS task
 command string (task name is defined as merge):
 merge"<file_name>,<action>,<x0>,<y0>,<x1>,<y1>

DESCRIPTION

 This routine operates as a MOS pipe task merging two  images
 together to form the result image.  Input and output are im-
 age data files in the form of vectors.
 One of the two input images is called background which is to
 be  copied  directly.  This  is  specified  by the parameter
 file_name.  The image data of the back ground is read via  a
 'tunnel',  maintained  by  this task. Another input image is
 taken form the Clean and Simple  interface  managed  by  the
 fitter.   As  shown  in  the following diagram, the position
 where it is to be put on the background image  is  specified
 by the parameters x0, y0, x1, y1, which are decimal strings.
 This implies that the dimension of the image is x1 - x0  and
 y1 -y0.
      (0, 0)                     width  X
         +-------------------------+---->
         |                         |
         |   (x0, y0)              |
         |     +---------+         |
         |     |         |         |
         |     |         |         |
         |     |         |         |
         |     |         |         |
         |     |         |         |
         |     +---------+         |
         |            (x1, y1)     |
         |                         |
         |                         |
         |       (back ground)     |
  height +-------------------------+
         |
         |
       Y V
 The parameter  action  indicates  how  the  two  images  are
 merged.  If it set to 0, The second image is simply overlaid
 on the back ground image. On the  other  hand  any  non-zero
 value

MERGE(FAX) MERGE(FAX)


 causes the second image to replace the specified area of the
 back ground image.

BUGS

 One has to make sure that
         0 < x0 < width_of_back_ground
         0 < y0 < height_of_back_ground
         0 < x1 < width_of_back_ground
         0 < y1 < height_of_back_ground
 In addition, x0, y0, x1, y1 must be consistent with the  di-
 mension of the image

SEE ALSO

 vector(fax), getl(fax), putl(fax), chop(fax), fitter(fax)


















OD(FAX) OD(FAX)



NAME

 od - dump the input data

SYNOPSIS

 od() - a MOS task
 command string (task name is defined as od):
 od"<format>

DESCRIPTION

 This routine operates as a MOS pipe task dumping  the  input
 data in a selected format.  The input data is taken from the
 Clean and Simple interface.
 The meanings of the one character parameter format are:
        value          format
         'd'           words in decimal
         'o'           words in octal
         'c'           bytes in ASCII
         'b'           bytes in octal


SEE ALSO

 fitter(fax)











RECOMP(FAX) RECOMP(FAX)



NAME

 recomp - compress the vectors to form the DACOM blocks

SYNOPSIS

 recomp() - a MOS task
 command string (task name is defined as recomp):
 recomp

DESCRIPTION

 This task takes vectors from the Clean and Simple interface,
 and  recompresses them into DACOM blocks. Then it writes the
 blocks to the Clean and Simple interface.

SEE ALSO

 dacom(dev), vector(fax), fitter(fax)
















SCALE(FAX) SCALE(FAX)



NAME

 scale - scale an image to a specified dimension

SYNOPSIS

 scale() - a MOS task
 command string (task name is defined as scale):
 scale"<old_width>,<old_height>,<new_width>,<new_height>

DESCRIPTION

 This routine operates as a MOS pipe task scaling  the  input
 image  to the specified dimension.  Input and output are im-
 age data files in the form of vectors.
 The dimension of the input image is given by the  parameters
 old_width  and old_height, while the dimension of the output
 is specified by the parameters new_width and new_height.

SEE ALSO

 vector(fax), getl(fax), putl(fax), fitter(fax)














STRING(FAX) STRING(FAX)



NAME

 string - convert an ASCII string to the vector format

SYNOPSIS

 string() - a MOS task
 command string (task name is defined as string):
 string"

DESCRIPTION

 This routine operates as a  MOS  pipe  task  converting  the
 parameter string s to the corresponding vectors.

SEE ALSO

 vector(fax), ts(fax)

















TF(FAX) TF(FAX)



NAME

 tf - convert a text to the vector format.

SYNOPSIS

 tf() - a MOS task
 command string (task name is defined as tf):
 tf"<width>,<line_sp>,<upper>,<left>

DESCRIPTION

 This routine operates as a MOS pipe task converting the  in-
 put text to the corresponding vectors. The input text, taken
 from the Clean and Simple interface should be in the  format
 defined in text(fax).
         +-------------------------+
         |                         |
         |            upper        |
         |                         |
         |         XXXXXXXXXXXX    |
         |         XXXXXXXXXXXX    |
         |         XXXXXXXXXXXX    |
         |         XXXXXXXXXXXX    |
         |  left   XXXXXXXXXXXX    |
         |         XXXXXXXXXXXX    |
         |         XXXXXXXXXXXX    |
         |         XXXXXXXXXXXX    |
         |         XXXXXXXXXXXX    |
         |            width        |
         |                         |
         +-------------------------+
 As shown in the diagram, the parameters give the information
 for  the formating. The parameter width is the maximum width
 of the text lines.
 Every vector will be padded to fit this  width.  White  pels
 may be padded to the left of each vectors, and the number of
 pel to be padded is specified by the parameter left.
 Empty lines may also be inserted. They are defined by param-
 eters  upper  and  line_sp, the number of pels being used as
 the unit.

SEE ALSO

 vector(fax), text(fax), ts(fax), fitter(fax)

UCL FACSIMILE SYSTEM INDRA Note 1185











      Appendix III: Utility Routines and Data Formats
















BITMAP(FAX) BITMAP(FAX)



NAME

 bitmap - convert vector format to core bit map

SYNOPSIS

 int  bitmap(ivec, cnt, buff);
 int  *ivec;
 int  cnt;
 char *buff;

DESCRIPTION

 Bitmap converts the fax vector format into a bit map,  using
 each bit of the area pointed to by buff.  The number of ele-
 ments in ivec is given by cnt, and the first element of ivec
 is  taken  as  a  white pel count, the second as a black pel
 count, etc. The resultant bit map  is  placed  in  the  area
 pointed  to by buff. The actual number of bits stored is re-
 turned from the function.  The bits in buff  are  stored  in
 byte  order, with the highest value bit of the byte taken as
 the first bit of the byte.

BUGS

 You have to make sure that buff is big enough  for  all  the
 bits.

SEE ALSO

 vector(fax), tovec(fax)










TOVEC(FAX) TOVEC(FAX)



NAME

 tovec - convert bitmap to vector format

SYNOPSIS

 int  *tovec(buff, nbits);
 char *buff;
 int  nbits;

DESCRIPTION

 The bitmap in the buffer pointed to by buff is converted  to
 vector format. The length of the bitmap in bits is passed in
 nbits.  As the caller would normally not know how many  vec-
 tor elements are going to be needed, the tovec routine allo-
 cates this area for the user.
 Buff is assumed to be  organised  in  byte  order  with  the
 highest  value  bit  of each byte being the first bit of the
 byte. The counts of white and black pels are placed into  an
 integer  vector, the first element of which is the length of
 the rest of the vector. The vector information proper starts
 in  the  second  element which is the count of the number of
 leading white pels.  This is followed by the  count  of  the
 numbr of black pels, etc.
 The routine goes to great lengths to make sure  only  enough
 vector  storage is allocated. Temporary storage is allocated
 in small chunks and then, when the length of the whole  vec-
 tor  is known, the chunks are contacenated into a contiguous
 vector.  The pointer to this vector is returned to the user.

SEE ALSO

 vector(fax), bitmap(fax)








CHOICE(FAX) CHOICE(FAX)



NAME

 choice - specify a rectangular area on Grinnell

SYNOPSIS

 struct  square  {
         int  x0, y0;
         int  x1, y1;
 };
 struct  square  *choice(colour, height, width, area, fw, fh)
 char colour;
 int  height, width, area, fw, fh;

DESCRIPTION

 This subroutine is called by a MOS task.  to specify a  rec-
 tangular  area  of  an image by manipulating a square on the
 Grinnel display being illustrating the image. The  dimension
 of  the  original image is defined as height and width.  The
 area on which the original image is shown  is  specified  by
 the parameter area.
  value       area           dimension    coordinates
    0     the whole screen    512x512     0,511,511,0
    1     the left half       256x512     0,511,255,0
    2     the right half      256x512     256,511,511,0
 The square will be drwan in a colour defined by the  parame-
 ter colour, which can only be:
         value   colour
          'r'     red
          'g'     green
          'b'     blue


 There are two modes being supported:
  (1) Fixed: The square will have a fixed dimension specified
      by the parameters fw and fh.  The operator can move the
      square around as a whole within the predetermined  area
      by  using  following commands, each of which is invoked
      by typing the corresponding characer on the keyboard of
      the system console.


CHOICE(FAX) CHOICE(FAX)



       command         function
         'u'           move the square up one step
         'd'           move the square down one step
         'l'           move the square one step left
         'r'           move the square one step right
         'f'           move fast - set the step to 8 pel
         'o'           move slowly - set the step to 1 pel
         <CR>          ok - the area has been chosen, and
                      return its coordinates


  (2) Arbitrary: This mode is set up when the  subroutine  is
      called  with  the  parameters  fw and fh set to 0.  Any
      edge of the square can be selected to be moved  on  its
      own  by  using  the  same commands described above. The
      following commands are required to select the  relevant
      edge as well as switching the operation mode.
       command         function
         'e'           select the right ('east') edge.
         'w'           select the left ('west') edge.
         'n'           select the upper ('north') edge.
         's'           select the lower ('south') edge.
         'a'           move the square as a whole


 As soon as the user  types  <CR>,  the  coordinates  of  the
 current  square,  which  are accommodated in a square struc-
 ture, are returned. Note these are concerned with the  coor-
 dinate  system  defined  for the image but not for the grin-
 nell.

BUGS

 Currently, only three working areas can be used.

SEE ALSO

 vector(fax), grinnell(dev), grinnell(fax)





CRC(FAX) CRC(FAX)



NAME

 crc - calculate or check the DACOM CRC code

SYNOPSIS

 int  crc(buff, insert);
 char *buff;
 int  insert;

DESCRIPTION

 This routine will check/insert the 12-bit  CRC  code  for  a
 DACOM  block,  pointed  to  by buff.  The block contains 585
 bits, the last 12 bits being the  CRC  code.  The  block  is
 checked  only  when the parameter insert is set to 0, other-
 wise the CRC code is created and inserted  into  the  block.
 When the block is checked, the routine returns the result: 0
 means OK and any non-zero value means the block is  bad.  On
 the  other  hand, when the CRC code is inserted, the routine
 returns the CRC code it has created.
 This routine uses a tabular approach to  determine  the  CRC
 code,  processing  a whole byte at a time and resulting in a
 high throughput.

BUGS

 Do not forget to supply enough space  when  the  12-bit  CRC
 code is to be inserted.

SEE ALSO

 dacom(dev)









CSINIT(FAX) CSINIT(FAX)



NAME

 csinit - initiate the Clean and Simple interface

SYNOPSIS

 int  csinit();

DESCRIPTION

 This routine is called to initiate the Clean and Simple  in-
 terface for the calling process.  Its code is re-entrant, so
 that only one copy is needed for all processes in a system.
 This routine returns the task identifier, which must be used
 on all subsequent interface calls.

SEE ALSO

 csopen(fax), csread(fax), cswrite(fax), fitter(fax)
















CSOPEN(FAX) CSOPEN(FAX)



NAME

 csopen - establish the Clean and Simple connection

SYNOPSIS

 char *csopen(tid);
 int  tid;

DESCRIPTION

 A process calls this routine, waiting to be scheduled.   Its
 code  is re-entrant, so that only one copy is needed for all
 processes in a system.
 The task identifier tid is the word returned from the csinit
 call.  When the fitter process has established the Clean and
 Simple connection for the process, this routine returns  the
 pointer  to  the  parameter string of the corresponding task
 command.

SEE ALSO

 csinit(fax), csread(fax), cswrite(fax), fitter(fax)














CSREAD(FAX) CSREAD(FAX)



NAME

 csread - read data from the Clean and Simple interface

SYNOPSIS

 char *csread(tid, need);
 int  tid, need;

DESCRIPTION

 This routine is called to read data from the Clean and  Sim-
 ple interface. Its code is re-entrant, so that only one copy
 is needed for all processes in a system.
 The task identifier tid is the word returned from the csinit
 call.  The need parameter indicates the number of bytes that
 are required. This routine returns a  pointer  to  a  buffer
 with this much data in it. This is usually more efficient as
 it means that the data does not have to be reblocked.

DIAGNOSTICS

 If the returned value is 0, the end of data is reached.

BUGS

 Funnies happen at the end of data to be read.  The  csread()
 call  has  no  way of saying that the final buffer is partly
 filled.  Thus if you ask for more data,  you  hang  forever.
 But  if  the  data  structures  are  working correctly, this
 should never happen.

SEE ALSO

 csinit(fax), cswrite(fax), fitter(fax)








CSWRITE(FAX) CSWRITE(FAX)



NAME

 cswrite - write data to the Clean and Simple interface

SYNOPSIS

 char *cswrite(tid, need);
 int  tid, need;

DESCRIPTION

 This routine is call to write data to the Clean  and  Simple
 interface.  Its code is re-entrant, so that only one copy is
 needed for all processes in a system.
 The task identifier tid is the word returned from the csinit
 call.  The need parameter indicates the number of bytes that
 are to be written. This routine returns a  write  buffer  of
 the  required  length, to which the user data can be copied.
 The subsequent cswrite()  call  automatically  releases  the
 previous write buffer.
 The cswrite() call with need set to 0 indicates the  end  of
 data, closing the current Clean and Simple connection.

BUGS

 As indicated, the write buffer must be filled up before  the
 next cswrite() call.

SEE ALSO

 csinit(fax), csread(fax), fitter(fax)









GETL(FAX) GETL(FAX)



NAME

 getl - get a line vector from the Clean and Simple interface

SYNOPSIS

 int  *getl(tid);
 int  tid, need;

DESCRIPTION

 This routine is called to read a line vector from the  Clean
 and  Simple  interface. Its code is re-entrant, so that only
 one copy is needed for all processes in a system.
 The task identifier tid is the word returned from the csinit
 call.  The  routine  returns the pointer to the buffer where
 the line vector is stored.

DIAGNOSTICS

 0 will be returned when end of file is reached.

BUGS

 Any memory violation causes  the  whole  task  chain  to  be
 aborted.

SEE ALSO

 vector(fax), putl(fax), fitter(fax)










PUTL(FAX) PUTL(FAX)



NAME

 putl - put a line vector to the Clean and Simple Interface

SYNOPSIS

 putl(tid, buf);
 int  tid, *buf;

DESCRIPTION

 This routine is called to write a line vector to  the  Clean
 and  Simple  interface. Its code is re-entrant, so that only
 one copy is needed for all processes in a system.
 The task identifier tid is the word returned from the csinit
 call. The line vector is stored in a buffer pointed by buf.

SEE ALSO

 vector(fax), getl(fax), fitter(fax)















T4(FAX) T4(FAX)



NAME

 t4 - the data format defined in CCITT recommendation T4

DESCRIPTION

 Dimension and Resolution: In vertical direction the  resolu-
 tion is defined below.
         Standard resolution:            3.85 line/mm
         Optional higher resolution:     7.70 line/mm
 In horizontal direction, the standard resolution is  defined
 as  1728 black and white picture elements along the standard
 line length of 215 mm.  Optionally, there  can  be  2048  or
 2432 picture elements along a scan line length of 255 or 303
 mm, respectively. The input documents up to a minimum of ISO
 A4 size should be accepted.
 One-Dimensional Coding: The one-dimensional run length  data
 compression  is accomplished by the popular modified Huffman
 coding scheme. In this scheme, black and white runs are  re-
 placed  by  a  base  64 codes representation. Compression is
 achieved since the code word lengths are invertly related to
 the  probability  of  the  occurrence of a particular run. A
 special code (000000000001), known as  EOL  (End  of  Line),
 follows  each  line  of data. This code starts the facsimile
 message phase, while the control phase is restored by a com-
 bination  of six contiguous EOLs (RTC). The data format of a
 facsimile message is shown below.
  start of the facsimile data
  |
  v
  +---+------+---+------+-/
  !EOL! DATA !EOL! DATA !
  +---+------+---+------+-/
                end of the facsimile data
                                        |
                                        v
   /-+---+------+---+---+---+---+---+---+
     !EOL! DATA !EOL!EOL!EOL!EOL!EOL!EOL!
   /-+---+------+---+---+---+---+---+---+
                |<------   RTC  ------->|
 Two-Dimensional Coding: The two-dimensional coding scheme is
 labeled  as  the  Modified READ Code. It codes one line with
 reference to the line above,correlation  between  adja-
 cent lines allowing for more efficient compression. In order
 to limit the disturbed area in the event of transmission er-
 rors,

T4(FAX) T4(FAX)


 a one-dimensionally coded line is transmitted after  one  or
 more  two-dimensionally  coded  lines.  A bit, following the
 EOL, indicates whether one-  or  two-dimensional  coding  is
 used for the next line:
         EOL1: one-dimensional coding;
         EOL0: two-dimensional coding.
  start of the facsimile data
  |
  v
  +----+--------+----+--------+-/
  !EOL1!DATA(1D)!EOL0!DATA(2D)!
  +----+--------+----+--------+-/
                         end of the facsimile data
                                                 |
                                                 v
   /-+----+--------+----+----+----+----+----+----+
     !EOL0!DATA(2D)!EOL1!EOL1!EOL1!EOL1!EOL1!EOL1!
   /-+----+--------+----+----+----+----+----+----+
                   |<---------   RTC   --------->|
















TEXT(FAX) TEXT(FAX)



NAME

 text - the text format for use in the facsimile system

DESCRIPTION

 This is the representation  structure  for  coded  character
 text.  It is used in the facsimile system.
 The  text  structure  consists  of  a  series  of  character
 strings,  each  of  which represents a text line. However no
 control characters, e.g. <CR> and  <LF>,  are  used  in  the
 structure. Each text line is proeeded by a count byte, indi-
 cating the number of characters on the line.  The  character
 sting  follows  after the the count byte. A zero count indi-
 cates the end of file.

EXAMPLES

 Here is an example text shown below:
         This is a text.
         This is a picture.
 It can be represented as:
  <017> T  h  i  s <040> i  s <040> a <040> t  e  x  t  .
  <022> T  h  i  s <040> i  s <040> a <040> p  i  c  t  u
  r e  . <0>












TS(FAX) TS(FAX)



NAME

 ts - translate an ASCII string into vector format

SYNOPSIS

 ts(ar_in, left, right, tid)
 char *ar_in;
 int  left, right, tid;

DESCRIPTION

 This routine will convert a zero-ended ASCII string  pointed
 to  by  ar_in  into  the corresponding vecter format. As the
 character font being used is a set of 12x20 matrices,  there
 will  be  20 line vectors created. These vectors are written
 to the Cleans and Simple interface by calling cswrite.   The
 callers task identifier tid has to be provided.
 At the two ends of the text line, blanks can be padded  that
 are  specified  as left and right.  Note that they are meas-
 ured in pels.
 Consequently, the result should be a image, whose  dimension
 is:
         width  = left + 12*length + right;
         height = 20;
 where length is  the  number  of  characters  in  the  input
 string.
 As an intermediate result the bitmap is first created  which
 is then converted into the vector format, by calling tovec.

BUGS

 The input string must be ended with a zero field.


SEE ALSO

 vector(fax),    tovec(fax),    csinit(fax),    cswrite(fax),
 fitter(fax)



VECTOR(FAX) VECTOR(FAX)



NAME

 vector - the internal data structure for a facsimile image

DESCRIPTION

 This is the representation structure for  binary  images,  a
 simple  run length compression algorithm being used. Most of
 the image files are kept in vector format for ease  of  pro-
 cessing.
 The vector format consists of a series of  integer  vectors,
 one vector for each row of pels in the image. Each vector is
 proceeded by a count word which indicates the number of  in-
 teger  words  in the vector.  The next element of the vector
 after the count field is the number of  white  pels  in  the
 first  run  of  the  line.   The  second word then gives the
 number of pels that follow the initial white run, and so  on
 t  the  end of the vector. Note the first run length element
 must refer to a white run. It should be  set  to  0  if  the
 first run is black.

EXAMPLES

 A line consists of 20 pels as follows:
         00011111111011100000
 It can be represented as:
         5, 3, 8, 1, 3, 5
 The inverse of the line:
         11100000000100011111
 should be represented as:
         6, 0, 3, 8, 1, 3, 5